From: Adrian Zoicas
Sent: 17 August 2005 12:33
To: 'Christian Toche'; 'benni.alexander@nokia.com'; 'gerald.goermer@siemens.com'; 'J.Schmidt@MOTOROLA.COM'; 'karl-heinz.nenner@t-mobile.net'; 'liyewen@CHINAMOBILE.COM'; 'Michael.Truss@MOTOROLA.COM'; 'olaf.pollakowski@siemens.com'; 'Thomas. Tovinger@Ericsson. Com'; 'ulf.hubinette@ericsson.com'
Subject: RE: Change of SA5&SWGs Tdoc# allocation for 2006 onwards
Christian,
 
SA1 and SA2 have each more than 5 SWG but still a single Tdoc# range
 
Mike reminded me what the SA chair said about this issue in Montreal.

Regards
Adrian Zoicas


From: Christian Toche [mailto:toche@nortel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:12 AM
To: Adrian Zoicas; 'benni.alexander@nokia.com'; 'gerald.goermer@siemens.com'; 'J.Schmidt@MOTOROLA.COM'; 'karl-heinz.nenner@t-mobile.net'; 'liyewen@CHINAMOBILE.COM'; 'Michael.Truss@MOTOROLA.COM'; 'olaf.pollakowski@siemens.com'; 'Thomas. Tovinger@Ericsson. Com'; 'ulf.hubinette@ericsson.com'
Subject: RE: Change of SA5&SWGs Tdoc# allocation for 2006 onwards

Adrian,
 
Sorry, I do not remember clearly what the SA chair said about this issue. For me, as long as we have two SWGs (C and D), it is better to keep separate Tdoc numbering, especially since we currently have two schedules (one for C and one for D). Having said that, I am open to any changes. We already planned to talk with Thomas about the way to improve the scheduling and we can conisder the numbering issue in this discussion.
 
Let us plan some time during the next leaders meeting to discuss the pros and cons.
 
Best Regards,
 
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Zoicas [mailto:Adrian.Zoicas@etsi.org]
Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 14:59
To: Toche, Christian [SUNP:R900:EXCH]; benni.alexander@nokia.com; gerald.goermer@siemens.com; J.Schmidt@MOTOROLA.COM; karl-heinz.nenner@t-mobile.net; liyewen@CHINAMOBILE.COM; Michael.Truss@MOTOROLA.COM; olaf.pollakowski@siemens.com; Thomas. Tovinger@Ericsson. Com; ulf.hubinette@ericsson.com
Subject: RE: Change of SA5&SWGs Tdoc# allocation for 2006 onwards

Christian,
if you propose the status quo and do not want to go the way proposed by the TSG SA Chair in Montreal,
why not stay just the way we are (i.e. NO change at all) as we are all used now with this.
 
SA5       S5-060000 - S5-061999      
SWGB    S5-064000 - S5-065999      
SWGC    S5-066000 - S5-067999      
SWGD    S5-068000 - S5-069999  

Regards
Adrian Zoicas
Mobile Competence Centre (MCC), ETSI
3GPP CT5 (OSA) & SA5 (OAM&P-Charging) support
Phone: +33 (0)4 92 94 42 21
Mobile: +33 (0)6 74 40 83 72
Fax: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 21
mailto: adrian.zoicas@etsi.org
http://www.etsi.org
http://www.3gpp.org

 

From: Christian Toche [mailto:toche@nortel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:50 AM
To: Adrian Zoicas; 'benni.alexander@nokia.com'; 'gerald.goermer@siemens.com'; 'J.Schmidt@MOTOROLA.COM'; 'karl-heinz.nenner@t-mobile.net'; 'liyewen@CHINAMOBILE.COM'; 'Michael.Truss@MOTOROLA.COM'; 'olaf.pollakowski@siemens.com'; 'Thomas. Tovinger@Ericsson. Com'; 'ulf.hubinette@ericsson.com'
Subject: RE: Change of SA5&SWGs Tdoc# allocation for 2006 onwards

Adrian,
 
Thanks for this proposal. I am personally not in favor of mixing documents from SA5 plenary of various SWGs in the same Tdoc number range. It will make the scheduling of the meeting even more difficult than it is today.
 
According to the current organization, my proposal for 2006 is as follows:
 
SA5       S5-060000 - S5-060999      
SWGB    S5-061000 - S5-063999      
SWGC    S5-064000 - S5-066999      
SWGD    S5-067000 - S5-069999  
 
Any change on the organization might imply to revisit this allocation scheme.
 
Best regards,
 
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Zoicas [mailto:Adrian.Zoicas@etsi.org]
Sent: mardi 16 août 2005 21:39
To: Adrian.Zoicas@etsi.org; benni.alexander@nokia.com; Toche, Christian [SUNP:R900:EXCH]; gerald.goermer@siemens.com; J.Schmidt@MOTOROLA.COM; karl-heinz.nenner@t-mobile.net; liyewen@CHINAMOBILE.COM; Michael.Truss@MOTOROLA.COM; olaf.pollakowski@siemens.com; Thomas. Tovinger@Ericsson. Com; ulf.hubinette@ericsson.com
Subject: Change of SA5&SWGs Tdoc# allocation for 2006 onwards


 Dear All,

An activity for the calmer summer time...

With the closure of SWG-A the actual Tdoc# allocation looks obsolete.
See S5-040216 SA5 administrative issues:

For one calendar year the SA5 plenary and the SWGs have a Tdoc# block allocation under their own administration

        Year 2004       Year 2005       Year 2006      
SA5 plenary     S5-040000 -

S5-041999       S5-05000 -
S5-051999       S5-060000 -
S5-061999      
SWGA    S5-042000 -
S5-043999       S5-052000 -
S5-053999       S5-062000 -
S5-063999      
SWGB    S5-044000 -
S5-045999       S5-054000 -
S5-055999       S5-064000 -
S5-065999      
SWGC    S5-046000 -
S5-047999       S5-056000 -
S5-057999       S5-066000 -
S5-067999      
SWGD    S5-048000 -
S5-049999       S5-058000 -
S5-059999       S5-068000 -
S5-069999      

Proposal 1 (continue with the same formula but loose the 2000-3999 range)

        Year 2006      
SA5 plenary     S5-060000 -

S5-061999      
SWGB    S5-064000 -
S5-065999      
SWGC    S5-066000 -
S5-067999      
SWGD    S5-068000 -
S5-069999      

Proposal 2

        Year 2006      
SA5 plenary + SWGB      S5-060000 - S5-064999  
SWGC + SWGD     S5-065000 -    

Proposal 3

        Year 2006      
SA5 plenary + SWGC + SWGD       S5-060000 -

S5-063999      
SWGB    S5-064000 -    


WDYT ?
Other proposals ?

Regards
Adrian Zoicas
Mobile Competence Centre (MCC), ETSI
3GPP CT5 (OSA) & SA5 (OAM&P-Charging) support
Phone: +33 (0)4 92 94 42 21
Mobile: +33 (0)6 74 40 83 72
Fax: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 21
mailto: adrian.zoicas@etsi.org