Automatic email summary, 2026-01-22 18:53:35.539680
52 messages processed
==================

S3-260002
email summary
[Nokia]: Is triggering the email discussion on the Template discussion and the Threat Reference to TR 33.926; is providing initial info and feedback;

[Ericsson]: Few editorial changes. Revision r2<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG3_Security/TSGS3_125AdHoc-e/Inbox/Drafts/draft_S3-260002-r2%20Update%20to%20AMF%20SCAS%20living%20doc%20according%20to%20NESASG%20feedback.docx> is uploaded to drafts folder.

[Ericsson]: Revision r4 is uploaded to drafts folder.

[Nokia]: we have agreed to keep this bullet with text ‘procedure and execution steps’; basically, we agreed to be here a bit flexible;



S3-260003
email summary
[Nokia]: is triggering the discussion on the applicability of Release; is providing information and feedback;

[Ericsson]: r1 looks ok.



S3-260008
email summary
problems finding <Minutes> or </Minutes> in message from Markus Hanhisalo <000001fda333f410-dmarc-request@LIST.ETSI.ORG>

[BSI (DE)] : 4.2.2.3 baseline format missing
4.2.2.3 “Requirement Reference” may produce changes on changes
4.2.2.3 “Requirement Reference” we prefer TS 33.501, clause 13.2.2.4.3 
4.2.2.5, 4.2.2.9, 4.2.2.10 see no changes 

[Nokia]: comments accepted, basically, except the last one which says there is no modification; modifications are not shown by cb

[Nokia]: is providing details on the missing cb

[BSI (DE)]: Provided r3, editorial/formatting of 1st change



S3-260011
email summary
[Ericsson]: Uploaded r2<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG3_Security/TSGS3_125AdHoc-e/Inbox/Drafts/draft_S3-260011-r2%20Corrections%20to%20TR%2033926.docx>.



S3-260012
email summary
[NTT DOCOMO]: clarification required before acceptance

[ZTE]: Provide clarifications and r1

[BSI (DE)] : Agreeing with NTT Docomo, prohibition of autostart shall be minimum requirement

[BSI (DE)] : Providing r2 as minimum agreeable baseline

[NTT DOCOMO]: still not ok

[NTT DOCOMO]: r2 not ok, revision required: if the test case is split, 
we should do this in one document.

[MITRE]: not fine and provides comments

[BSI (DE)]: Provided r3 following suggestions from MITRE and DOCOMO

[ZTE]: Propose to note



S3-260013
email summary
[BSI (DE)] : 6th (6.2.2.1.6) and 7th (6.2.2.1.7) change contain no changes

[Ericsson]: Few editorial comments. Revision r2<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG3_Security/TSGS3_125AdHoc-e/Inbox/Drafts/draft_S3-260013-r2%20-%20NESAS%20based%20changes%20to%20TS%2033.523.doc> is uploaded to drafts folder.

[Huawei]: Reply.



S3-260014
email summary
[Ericsson]: Information how “Procedure and execution steps” clause is used in SCAS’s.

problems finding <Minutes> or </Minutes> in message from "Parsel, Mike" <00000813c1830b31-dmarc-request@LIST.ETSI.ORG>

[Ericsson]: Revision r1<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG3_Security/TSGS3_125AdHoc-e/Inbox/Drafts/draft_S3-260014-r1%20Correction%20to%2033916.docx> is uploaded to drafts folder.

[NTT DOCOMO]: suggests wording update

[Ericsson]: wording updated and r2<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG3_Security/TSGS3_125AdHoc-e/Inbox/Drafts/draft_S3-260014-r2%20Correction%20to%2033916.docx> is uploaded to drafts folder.