3GPP TSG-T2#4 / ETSI SMG4
Miami, US, 14-16 June 1999	TSGT2#4(99)594	

Agenda Item:	

Source:	SWG6

Title:	Report of SWG6#3 (Terminal Features and Performance)

Document for:	Approval	

___________________________________________________________________________

1.	Summary

1.1	SAR requirements

-	SWG6 discussed on T2-99524 which is the revised document of T2-99383 which has already presented at the last T2 and T meetings for information. The requirements of Korea was added to T2-99383 and some editorial correction was done on T2-99383. The need of time stamp on this report was recognised to avoid the confusion by the differences between this report and the latest situation of SAR requirements in each region in the future.

Document delivery
•	Tdoc T2-99587  “ Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 1.2.0) ” 
It was approved as a final draft to be sent to T2 and T for approval.

1.2  General features

-	It was agreed to assign one volunteer for each WG, who would be responsible for investigation of LS answers and prepare LS back if it is needed, or make questionnaires or proposals for more active and effective work on terminal capabilities. T2-99564 shows the assignment of volunteers for each WG, but at least a volunteers for S2 for our near future work is required.

-	The basic structure of “Report of Terminal Capabilities Requirements” was agreed as the table of contents in T2-99520. As the information for T2, SWG6 decided to provide T2-99599 for informing our current status on Terminal Capability work. It was agreed that the first draft report should be sent to other WGs as information after T2’s approval at the next T2 meeting.

-	SWG6 reviewed and investigated LSs from other WGs(T2-99459 from T3, 464 from R1, 465 from R2, 466 from R2, 474 from T2 chairman, 525 from SS adhoc, 533 from N1, 576 from T1).  We decided to prepare the LS back to some LSs, and the base document of the LS to each WGs for the service implementation capabilities. Each volunteer of each WG can use this base document to create LS with the necessary modification for the effective discussion in each WG. T2-99563 is LS to SS adhoc for informing we will create a list of supplementary service for our co-operation and common understanding. T2-99590 is LS to N1 for clarifying our terminology definition ( Baseline , Service Capability) for avoiding their misunderstanding. T2-99589 is LS to R2 for sending the answer on the baseline implementation capability. T2-99596 is the base document for LS to each WG. T2-99597 is LS to R1 for service implementation capabilities including our intention of the priority (default voice codec speech, SMS PP, Circuit switch data service up to 16kbps and at 64kbps) on the investigation in R2. T2-99598 is LS to S2 cc S1 for asking to inform us more detailed information on the defined information transfer and quality attributes. for packet service capabilities because we understand packet service is very important in 3G system. 

-	SWG6 discussed about the effective way for creating LS to each WGs between T2 meetings. SWG6 recognised e-mail approve mechanism is the most potential one.

Document delivery
•	Tdoc T2-99564  “ Assignment of volunteers for each WG on terminal capabilities work” 
       Information for T2
•	Tdoc T2-99599  “Revision to draft Report on Terminal Capability requirements” 
       Information for T2
•	Tdoc T2-99563  LS to SS adhoc
       For approval by T2
•	Tdoc T2-99589  LS to R2
       For approval by T2 
•	Tdoc T2-99590  LS to N1 
       For approval by T2
•	Tdoc T2-99596  “Proposed outline Liaison statement to other WGs on Service Capabilities”
       Information for T2
•	Tdoc T2-99597  LS to R1 (service implementation capabilities)
       For approval by T2
•	Tdoc T2-99598  LS to S2 cc S1 (Request the detail information for packet service capabilities)
       For approval by T2

1.3  Electrical safety requirements

-	SWG6 discussed on T2-99523 “Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations” is a first draft report. It was agreed the followings should be modified.
•	Information of current national standard of Korea should be added in Table 1 “List of national standards and national differences to IEC60950” with remark shows the difference from CB Bulletin.
•	Information of countries which have just the voluntary testing such as USA should be described in the remark of Table 4 “National regulations in each country and region”.
•	The time stamp should be added for avoiding the confusion by the differences of this report and the latest situation in each region in the future

Document delivery 
•	Tdoc T2-99595  “ Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 0.1.0) ” 
It was approved as a final first draft to be sent to T2 and T for information.

1.4	AOB

-	SWG6 discussed on T2-99457,458 (Location Service technology). But SWG6 has no comment and opinion on these documents. But these documents will be brought to home for the detail investigation.
-	SWG6 discussed on T2-99534 (Security Integration Guideline). But SWG6 has no comment and opinion on these documents. But these documents will be brought to home for the detail investigation.
-	SWG6 discussed on T2-99468 (USIM issue on hanover between 3G and GSM). SWG6 recognised this issue should be treated in SWG5.

2.	Meeting Information

2.1  This meeting

-	14:00 on 15th – 12:00 on 16th June 1999 in Miami
-	Chairman; Kiyohito NAGATA (NTT DoCoMo)
-	Meeting reporter; Chie NODA (DoCoMo Europe)
-	The number of participants : 20 approximately

-	Annex 1; Approved agenda
-	Annex 2; Participants list (about 20 delegates on average)
-	Annex 3; Input document list
-	Annex 4; Output document list

2.2  Next meeting

-	Next meeting schedule : 6 – 10 September 1999 in Finland

3.	Presentations and Discussions

3.1  SAR requirements

3.1.1  Input from rapporteur

•	Tdoc T2-99524  “ Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 1.1.0) ”  [ERICSSON]
T2-99383 which has already presented at the last T2 and T meetings is revised including the requirements of Korea. The section 5.7 is added. SAR testing is not yet mandatory in Korea.
Comments
-	According to FCC regulation, SAR is important in USA.
Conclusions
-	The time stamp should be added in general section for avoiding the misunderstanding of readers in future.

•	Tdoc T2-99587  “ Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 1.2.0) ”  [ERICSSON]
The time stamp is added.
Conclusions
-	It was approved to be sent to T2 and T plenary for approval.

3.2  General features (Terminal capabilities)

3.2.1	Assignment of volunteers

•	Tdoc T2-99527  “ Assignment of volunteers for each WG on terminal capabilities work ”  [SWG6 chairman]
On this document, for proceeding SWG6 activity effectively SWG6 chairman proposes assignments of some volunteers for each WG, who would be responsible for investigation of LS answers and prepare LS back if it is needed, or make questionnaires or proposals for more active work on terminal capabilities. The candidates as co-ordinators between T2-SWG6 and each WG are shown.
Conclusions
-	Assignment of volunteers for each WG was agreed and the volunteers listed on this document was accepted.
-	Someone from Ericsson, Mr. Harma from Nokia and Mr Shimizu from Matsushita were accepted as volunteers for N3, T2 and CN SS adhoc respectively.
-	We need a volunteer for S2.  So the chairman need to ask not only inside T2 but also S2.
-	T2-99564 is updated document including three volunteers.

3.2.2  Presentation of inputs

•	Tdoc T2-99520  “ Report of Terminal Capabilities Requirements v0.0.3 ”  [Rapporteur]
It is a proposed revision to the draft report on Terminal Capability requirements, submitted to the last TSG T WG2 meeting as document T2-99334. This latest version seeks to refine the description of the required terminal baseline capabilities, in line with discussion in the last SWG6 meeting. In addition an overall structure for the document is proposed incorporating information received from other WGs into the annexes. The description of service capabilities are added.
Comments
-	Some capabilities such as Mexe and SAT which are used to realise OSA (Open System Architecture) might be added by S1 in section 4.
-	Handover is identified as service implementation capability.
-	The document number of VHE stage 1 is TS 22.22.
Conclusions
-	Each volunteers for each WG should investigate what terminal capabilities are baseline.
-	It was approved to create the basement of proposed draft for asking other WGs to identify service implementation capabilities. Because of the lack of the answer from S1, this document will contains some generic description and some priority made by us. The contents of the liaison statement should be selected appropriately from this basement draft document for each WG by each volunteer if it will be possible.
-	The table content was agreed. We decided our work on this outline.
-	It was agreed that SWG6 would send this TR to T2 for information as T2-99599.
-	The meeting acknowledged the hard work put in by Mr Bishop to produce this draft.

•	Tdoc T2-99521  “ Proposed revision to WI on Terminal capabilities ”  [Samsung]
It is the proposed revision of WI on terminal capabilities submitted to the last meeting, as T2-99385. The proposed schedule for definition of terminal capabilities is updated according to the discussion in the last SWG6 meeting
Comments 
-	We need to consider whether we need to change the schedule in WI because of the delay of getting the answer of Service definition from S1, or not.
Conclusions
SWG6 decided to keep WI and the schedule as it is in T2-99521 because of the time limitation until the end of this work.
-	

3.2.3  Liaison statements from other WGs

•	Tdoc T2-99459  “ LS from T3 on Principles for the continued work with Terminal Capabilities ”  [TSG-T3]
It is a first LS answer from T3 on terminal capabilities. Transmission protocols T=0 and T=1 are identified as terminal capabilities except support of CHV1. 
Conclusions
-	We need to confirm if transmission protocols are baseline capabilities and if both of transmission protocols T=0 and T=1 are mandatory.
-	Mr Iimori will prepare LS to be sent to T3 for confirmation.
-	We believe there are more baseline capabilities such as user identity number.  So we need to make T3 understand better our requests.

•	Tdoc T2-99464  “ LS from RAN1 on Physical Layer Baseline Implementation Capabilities ”  [TSG-R1]
It indicates physical layer baseline capabilities identified by R1. R1 considers that all the baseline implementation capabilities are mandatory, but dependent on the operational mode (FDD/TDD). A particular baseline implementation capability is only applicable to one mode (TDD or FDD) then that capability could be considered optional because the mode as a whole is optional.
Conclusions
-	It is appropriate at this moment, but it should be updated if the situation of R1’s investigation will be changed.

•	Tdoc T2-99465  “ LS from RAN2 on terminal capabilities ”  [TSG-R2]
It explains that all the baseline implementation capabilities identified on T2-99397 are mandatory. a particular baseline implementation capability is only applicable to one mode (TDD or FDD) then that capability could be considered optional because the mode as a whole is optional. SCCH logical channel and the SCH transport are only applicable to the TDD mode.
T2 is requested to show a basic set of service capabilities to help in making the specifications more exact in terms of the implementation capabilities required for different types of services. Also T2 is asked to show the guidance in how to handle a terminal to simultaneously support a combination of services.
Comments
-	We can’t answer to section 3 where R2 asks T2 to show a basic set of service capabilities at this moment
-	From the test conformance perspective, required capabilities to support a combination of services are important.
Conclusions
- To prepare LS back was agreed, but T2 should apologise not to response a set of service capabilities.

•	Tdoc T2-99466  “ LS from RAN2 on FACH rates ”  [TSG-R2]
This LS explains that R2 sees the need for FACH rates in the same range as for DCH to support requirements from signalling and packet data, and also the need to support multiple FACH in a cell.
R2 are still investigating the minimum required FACH rate for the baseline terminal capabilities.
Conclusions
-	It is an information to let us know R2 investigates FACH rate.

•	Tdoc T2-99474  “ Mandatory or Optional Terminal Capabilities”  [T2 Chairman]
This shows the contents sent to S1_SMS reflector by T2 Chairman. To define a number of categories of "normal" mobile is proposed. For these categories, various minimum capabilities will be identified.
Comments
-	It was presented by T2 Chairman at the last S1 meeting. S1 rejected the concept to categorise terminal types.
Conclusions
-	
-	SWG6’s opinion is there is no need to category terminals.
-	This is an information discussed at the last S1 meeting.

•	Tdoc T2-99525  “ Email from CN SS ad hoc on terminal capabilities ”  [Chairman SWG3 WPB (CC adhoc)]
This is an e-mail sent to T2 reflector by the chairman of CN SS ad hoc group, which will continue the work of SMG3-WPB in 3GPP. As an answer to T2’s question about terminal capabilities required for supporting standardised supplementary services, a list of specifications is given.
Conclusions
-	It should be investigated by CN SS adhoc volunteer, Mr Shimizu.

•	Tdoc T2-99533  “ LS from CN1 on terminal capabilities ”  [TSG-CN1]
This is the first answer on terminal capabilities from CN1. It is described that MM protocol is mandatory for all mobiles. CC protocol is optional but if terminals support speech calls, CC is mandatory.
Comments
-	CN1 misunderstood the meaning of baseline implementation capabilities.
-	The baseline implementation capabilities are up to network registration, but location registration may not be baseline as terminals which implements only mobile originated packet service.
-	LS to clarify T2’s intention and the definition of baseline implementation capabilities should be sent.
Conclusions
-	We need to make N1 understand better our definition of the terminology Baseline and Service Capability for effective co-operation with N1.

•	Tdoc T2-99576  “ Part 2: Implementation Conformance Statement (ICS) proforma specification (3G TS 11.110-2 version 0.0.4) ”  [TSG-T1]
The present document provides the Implementation Conformance Statement (ICS) proforma for 3rd Generation Mobile Station (MS), in compliance with the relevant requirements, and in accordance with the relevant guidance given in ISO/IEC 9646-7 and ETS 300 406. Most contents of Annex A.4 are refereed “Report of Terminal Capabilities Requirements”.
Comments
-	This TS refers to the our TR of terminal capabilities.
Conclusions
-	Dr. Sood will inform our current activity as a liaison person.

3.2.4	Preparation for LS

•	Tdoc T2-99528  “ Proposed LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities ” [NTT DoCoMo]
On this LS, T2 asks R2 to investigate terminals which are dual mode (FDD / TDD) and / or dual system (2G / 3G). Also it is confirmed if MAC, RLC, RRC, and Measurement requirements are baseline implementation capabilities.

•	Tdoc T2-99529  “ Proposed LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities ” [NTT DoCoMo]
This is a revised document of T2-99528 adding an apology that T2 can not response on a set of service capabilities.
Conclusions
-	The minor mistake of document number should be revised. It was approved as T2-99589

•	Tdoc T2-99561  “ Proposed outline Liaison statement to other WGs on Service Capabilities ” [Samsung Electronics Research Institute]
This document contains proposed text to be used as a basis for liaison statements to be sent to other working groups, requesting details of the service implementation capabilities required for release 99, to support service capabilities as agreed in S1.
Comments
-	We should give a priority for investigation of service implementation capabilities.
-	The sets of service capabilities are described on S1’s document although T2 has not received S1’s response. The values of data rates are added by T2 ourselves.
Conclusions
-	The certain values of data rates should be changed to ”up to 64kbps” for circuit switched data services and “up to 2048kbps” for packet switched data services.
-	Preparation of LS to S2 cc S1 to ask QoS of packet switched data services was agreed.
-	Each volunteer for each WG should report the progress of WG by SWG6 reflector. Because the next meeting is Spetember 3 months far away from now.
-	T2-99596 is the final approved document including above mentioned points.

•	Tdoc T2-99562  “ Proposed outline Liaison statement to TSG RAN WG1 on Service Capabilities ” [Samsung Electronics Research Institute]
This is a proposed LS to ask R1 to identify service implementation capabilities according to service capabilities given in T2-99561.
Conclusions
-	The same description of data rates on revised T2-99561 should be used.
-	The priority of this work is to identify service implementation capabilities for default codec speech, SMS-PP, circuited switched data services of at 64kbps as well as up to 16kbps. At this moment we have little information on the detail on QoS of packet switched data services. So this situation should be included in LS for avoiding the misunderstand that T2 thinks packet service is not important.
-	T2-99597 is the final approved document including above mentioned points.

•	Tdoc T2-99593  “ Proposed Liaison statement to TSG SA WG2 on Information attributes for bearer services ” [Samsung]
TSG T WG2 need more detailed information on the defined information transfer and quality attributes. TSG SA WG2 is therefore requested to forward to TSG T WG2, details of those attributes, to enable T2 SWG6 to progress with its work.
Conclusions
-	T2-99598 was final version approved.

•	Tdoc T2-99563  “ Reply draft for LS from SS Adhoc ” [SWG6]
This is the draft reply for LS titled “Review of terminal capabilities” sent from SS Adhoc group. SWG6 informs we will create a list of SS for our co-operation and common understanding.
Conclusions
-	It was approved.

•	Tdoc T2-99565  “ LS on terminal capabilities ” [Fujitsu]
The purpose of this LS is to ask N1 to study and find a minimum set of terminal baseline capability defined in our previous LS and draft of TR on Terminal Capability.
Conclusions
-	It was approved. The revised number for editorial changes is T2-99590.

3.3  Electrical safety requirements

3.3.1  Input from rapporteur

•	Tdoc T2-99523  “ Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 0.0.2) ” [Rapporteur]
T2-99336 (version 0.0.1) is formatted to Technical Report including the information in T2-99330 and T2-99331. Most information written in this report is quoted from IEC’s publications. Table 4 is added 
Comments
-	There is no description of the situation of USA in Table 4. In USA there is a voluntary testing. 
-	Table 1 shows there is no national standard in Korea, but it has been created since 1998.
Conclusions
-	Information of the national standard of Korea should be added in Table 1 with remark shows the difference from CB Bulletin.
-	Information of countries which have just the voluntary testing such as USA should be described in the remark of Table 4.
-	In its scope or introduction, the time stamp should be added for avoiding the confusion by the differences of this report and the latest situation in each region in the future
  
•	Tdoc T2-99588  “ Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 1.0.0) ” [Rapporteur]
Time stamp in Scope, the information of Korean national standard in Table 1 and USA’s voluntary testing in Table 4 are added to T2-99523.
Conclusions
-	The number of version is not appropriate. Version 1.0.0 will be assigned by MCC after T’s approval. The final approved document is T2-99595.

3.4  Any other business

3.4.1  Input from other groups in 3GPP

•	Tdoc T2-99453  “ TSG-T2 work program ” [MCC]
It shows all work program of T2. Page 11, 12 and 19 are related with SWG6.
Comments
-	The document number was considered. Version number 1.0.0, 2.0.0 and 3.0.0 are used if 50 %, 80%, and 100% of its content respectively are stable.
Conclusions
-	The schedule should be revised.

•	Tdoc T2-99457  “ LS from RAN2 on Measurement Requirements for LCS ” [TSG-R2]
This is a draft preliminary review of the techniques and operation for a Location Service (LCS) feature in UTRAN. TSG RAN WG2 asks that the requirements for the LCS be considered in the development of radio systems and terminal capabilities.
Conclusions
-	It is an information and we have no comment at this moment. We need to bring home for investigation of the details.

•	Tdoc T2-99458  “ Report on Location Services (LCS) ” [TSG-R2]
This is a Technical Report on LCS.

•	Tdoc T2-99468  “ LS from T3 on Implications of GSM-UTRAN handover and GSM access on the USIM ” [TSG-T3]
T2, S1 and S2 are asked to response which identities, parameters and algorithms are to be used to access the GSM BSS or GSM network with dual-mode terminals. 
Conclusions
-	This should be handled by SWG5.

•	Tdoc T2-99534  “ 3G Security; Integration Guidelines ” [TSG-S3]
This is a Draft Technical Specification of 3G security created be S3. 
Conclusions
-	It is an information and we have no comment at this moment. We need to bring home for investigation of the details.
-	

Annex 1 : Participants list

NAME	COMPANY	E-MAIL	
AFCHAR Ramin	MANNESMANN MOBILFUNK	ramin.afchar@d2privat.de	
GRONQVIST Annette	Sonera Ltd	annette.gronqvist@sonera.fi	
BISHOP Craig	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS RESERCH INSTITUTE	ckbishop@aol.com	
BRATT Gunilla	ERICSSON LM	gunilla.bratt@ecs.ericsson.se	
HARMA Esa	NOKIA MOBILE PHONES	esa.harma@nmp.nokia.com	
HASHIMOTO Kazuya	NEC TECHNOLOGIES UK	kazuya.hashimoto@nectech.co.uk	
IIMORI Eiji	TOSHIBA	iimori@msrd.hino.toshiba.co.jp	
IWANE Yasushi	MITSUBISHI	iwane@cew.melco.co.jp	
KANNO Hiroshi	FUJITSU LIMITED	kanno@mcws.ts.fujitsu.co.jp	
MURASE Atsushi	NTT DOCOMO	murase@cet.yrp.nttdocomo.co.jp	
NAGATA Kiyohito	NTT DOCOMO	nagata@rdplan.nttdocomo.co.jp	
NISHIMURA Norio	MITSUBISHI	n.nishi@cew.melco.co.jp	
NODA Chie	DOCOMO EUROPE	noda@docomo.fr	
PERSSON Sofi	Telia AB	sofi.a.persson@telia.se	
RYU Joon	SAMSUNG	joonryu@khgw.info.samsung.co.kr	
SHIMIZU Toshihiro	Matsushita Communication Ind.	toshi.shimizu@mci.co.uk	
SOOD Prem	SHARP	pls.@sharplabs.com	
URIYA Susumu	NEC	uriya@ccmail.mcd.yh.nec.co.jp	
VOSKAR Paul	NOKIA	paul.voskar@nmp.nokia.com	
HOLLEY Kevin	BT	Kevin.holley@bt.com	
PARK Sang-keun	SAMSUNG	skpark@khgw.info.samsung.co.kr	
NOVAK Lars	ERICSSON	Lars.Novak@ecs.ericsson.se	
NEUMANN Peter	SIEMENS	Peter.neumann@mch.siemens.de	

Annex 2 : Approved agenda

Tuesday 15th June (14:00~15:30)
1.	Opening of the meeting
2.	Approval of the agenda ------------------------------------------------------ 526
3.	Registration and allocation of input documents -----------------------
4.	SAR requirements
4.1.	    Presentation of inputs -------------------------------------------- 524 
4.2.	    Completion of the report on SAR requirements -----------
4.3.	    Discussion for future work ---------------------------------------

Tuesday 15th June (16:00~18:00)
5.	General features
5.1.	    Assignment of volunteers --------------------------------------- 527,564
5.2.	    Presentation of inputs -------------------------------------------- 520,521,599
5.3.	    Liaison statements from other WGs ------------------------- 459,464,465,466,
                                                         474,525,533,576
5.4.	    Preparation for LS ------------------------------------------------ 528,529,561,562
5.5.	    Discussion for future work --------------------------------------

Wednesday 16th June (09:00~10:30)
6.	Electrical safety requirements
6.1.	    Presentation inputs ---------------------------------------------- 523 
6.2.	    Completion of the report on electrical safety --------------
6.3.	    Discussion for future work -------------------------------------

Wednesday 16th June (11:00~12:30)
7.	Approval of outputs
7.1.	    Documents delivery
Report on SAR requirements for approval of TSG-T2 --------- 587
First complete draft on electrical safety requirements --------- 588,595
    Liaison statements ---------------------------------------------------- 563,565,589,590, 591,
                                                         592,593,596,597,598
7.2.	    Meeting report for TSG-T2 ------------------------------------- 594
8.	Any other business ---------------------------------------------------------- 453,457,458,468,534
9.	Future meetings
10.	Closing the meeting

Annex 3 : Input documents list

STC_DOC	Subject	Source	SWG	Status	
T2-99453	TSG-T2 work program	MCC	OP, all SWGs	Revised	
T2-99457	LS from RAN2 on Measurement Requirements for LCS	RAN2	SWG6	Information	
T2-99458	Report on Location Services (LCS)	RAN2	SWG6	Information	
T2-99459	LS from T3 on Principles for the continued work with Terminal Capabilities	T3	SWG6	Agreed to prepare LS back for confirmation and clarification	
T2-99464	LS from RAN1 on Physical Layer Baseline Implementation Capabilities	RAN1	SWG6	Appropriate answer	
T2-99465	LS from RAN2 on terminal capabilities	RAN2	SWG6	Agreed to prepare LS back for confirmation and further study	
T2-99466	LS from RAN2 on FACH rates	RAN2	SWG6	Information	
T2-99468	LS from T3 on Implications of GSM-UTRAN handover and GSM access on the USIM	T3	SWG5/6	Information	
T2-99474	Mandatory or Optional Terminal Capabilities	T2 chairman	OP/SWG6	Information	
T2-99520	Report on Terminal Capability Requirements v0.0.3	Rapporteur	SWG6		
T2-99521	Proposed revision to WI on Terminal capabilities	Samsung	SWG6	Agreed table content	
T2-99523	Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (34.907 V0.0.2)	TOSHIBA	SWG6	Revised (523  588)	
T2-99524	Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 1.1.0)	Rapporteur	SWG6	Revised (524  587)	
T2-99525	Email from CN SS ad hoc on terminal capabilities	Chairman SWG3 WPB (CC adhoc)	SWG6	Information	
T2-99526	Draft agenda of SWG6#3	SWG6 Charmin	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99527	Assignment of volunteers for each WG on terminal capabilities work	SWG6 Chairman	SWG6	Revised (527  564)	
T2-99528	Proposed LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities	NTT DoCoMo	SWG6	Revised (528  529)	
T2-99529	Proposed LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities	NTT DoCoMo	SWG6	Revised (529  592)	
T2-99533	LS from CN1 on terminal capabilities	CN1	SWG6	Agreed to prepare LS back for clarification	
T2-99534	3G Security; Integration Guidelines		all SWGs	Information	
T2-99561	Proposed outline Liaison statement to other WGs on Service Capabilities	Samsung	SWG6	Revised (561  591)	
T2-99562	Proposed outline Liaison statement to TSG RAN WG1 on Service Capabilities	Samsung	SWG6	Revised (562  597)	
T2-99563	Reply draft for LS from SS Adhoc	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99564	Assignment of volunteers for each WG on terminal capabilities work	SWG6	SWG6	Information	
T2-99565	LS on terminal capabilities	Fujitus	SWG6	Revised (565  590)	
T2-99576	Part 2: Implementation Conformance Statement (ICS) proforma specification (3G TS 11.110-2 version 0.0.4)	T1	SWG6	Information	
T2-99587	Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations in different regions
(3G TR 34.925 version 1.2.0)	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99588	Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (34.907 V1.0.0)	TOSHIBA	SWG6	Revised (588  595)	
T2-99589	LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99590	LS on terminal capabilities	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99591	Proposed outline Liaison statement to other WGs on Service Capabilities	Samsung	SWG6	Revised (591  596)	
T2-99592	Proposed LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities	NTT DoCoMo	SWG6	Revised (592  589)	
T2-99593	Proposed Liaison statement to TSG SA WG2 on Information attributes for bearer services	Samsung	SWG6	Revised (593  598)	
T2-99594	Report of SWG6#3 (Terminal Features and Performance)	SWG6	SWG6	Report to T2	
T2-99595	Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (34.907 V0.1.0)	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99596	Proposed outline Liaison statement to other WGs on Service Capabilities	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99597	Proposed Liaison statement to TSG RAN WG1 on Service Capabilities	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99598	Proposed Liaison statement to TSG SA WG2 on Information attributes for packet switched bearer services	SWG6	SWG6	Approved	
T2-99599	Revision to draft Report on Terminal capability requirements	SWG6	SWG6	Information	

Annex 4 : Output documents list

STC_DOC	Subject	To	Purpose	
T2-99587	Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations (3G TR 34.925 version 1.2.0)	T2 and T	for approval as TR	
T2-99595	Report on electrical safety requirements and regulations (34.907 V0.1.0)	T2 and T	Information	
T2-99564	Assignment of volunteers for each WG on terminal capabilities work	T2	Information	
T2-99589	LS back to TSG-R2 on terminal capabilities	R2	for approval to send LS	
T2-99590	LS on terminal capabilities	N1	for approval to send LS	
T2-99563	Reply draft for LS from SS Adhoc	CN SS	for approval to send LS	
T2-99596	Proposed outline Liaison statement to other WGs on Service Capabilities	T2	for approval to send LS	
T2-99597	Proposed Liaison statement to TSG RAN WG1 on Service Capabilities	R1	for approval to send LS	
T2-99598	Proposed Liaison statement to TSG SA WG2 on Information attributes for packet switched bearer services	S2
CC: S1	for approval to send LS	
T2-99599	Revision to draft Report on Terminal capability requirements	T2	Information	
T2-99594	Report of SWG6#3 (Terminal Features and Performance)	T2	Report