IPR call reminder:
|
"I draw your attention to your
obligations under the 3GPP Partner Organizations' IPR policies. Every
Individual Member organization is obliged to declare to the Partner
Organization or Organizations of which it is a member any IPR owned by the
Individual Member or any other organization which is or is likely to become
essential to the work of 3GPP. Delegates are asked to take note that they
are thereby invited:
|
Antitrust policy Reminder:
|
"I
also draw your attention to the fact that 3GPP activities are subject to all
applicable antitrust and competition laws and that compliance with said laws
is therefore required of any participant of this TSG/WG meeting including the
Chairman and Vice Chairman. In case of question I recommend that you contact
your legal counsel. The
leadership shall conduct the present meeting with impartiality and in the
interests of 3GPP. Furthermore,
I would like to remind you that timely submission of work items in advance of
TSG/WG meetings is important to allow for full and fair consideration of such
matters." |
| AI | TD# | Type | Doc For | Subject | Source | Rel | Comments | e-mail_Discussion | Result |
| 0 | - | - | - | All Agenda Items | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 1.1 | - | - | - | Opening of the meeting | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 2 | - | - | - | Agenda | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 2 | S2-2208100 | Agenda | Approval | SA WG2 #153E Meeting Agenda | SA WG2 Chair | - | Approved | ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 2.1 | - | - | - | IPR Call and Antitrust Reminder | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 3 | - | - | - | SA2#152E Meeting report | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 3 | S2-2208101 | Report | Approval | Auto-Generated Report of SA WG2 meeting #152E | SA WG2 Secretary | - | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 4 | - | - | - | General | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 4.1 | - | - | - | Common issues and Incoming LSs | - | - | Docs:=50 | - | |
| 4.1 | - | - | - | LS In for Info or potential action | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208114 | LS In | Information | Reply LS to CT WG3 on Data Reporting API | SA WG4 (S4-221118) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2208095 from S2#152-e. Noted | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia suggests to note this LS since there is no action for SA2. | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2208118 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG4: Reply LS on PLMN ID used in Roaming Scenarios | CT WG4 (C4-224444) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2208099 from S2#152-e. Noted | Noted | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208119 | LS In | Information | LS from GSMA DESS: LS to 3GPP - Hosted SEPP | GSMA DESS (GSMA DESS LS to 3GPP SA3) | Noted | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to note | Noted | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208120 | LS In | Information | LS from : LS reply to 3GPP SA6 on Clarification of Edge Node Sharing | GSMA OPG (OPG_103_Doc_03) | Noted | Magnus O (Ericsson) proposes to Note this LS | Noted | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208149 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG3: LS on NCR Solutions | RAN WG3 (R3-225253) | Rel-18 | Noted | Wanqiang (Huawei): proposes to note this LS as there is no action for SA2. Qian (Ericsson) agrees to NOTE the LS. | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2208166 | LS In | Information | LS from ETSI ISG MEC: LS reply to GSMA OPAG on E/WBI | ETSI ISG MEC (MEC(22)000430r2) | Noted | Magnus O (Ericsson) proposes to Note this LS | Noted | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208169 | LS In | Information | LS from IETF LPWAN WG: Liaison statement from the IETF LPWAN WG to 3GPP | IETF LPWAN WG (LS_from_IETF_1796) | Noted | Hannu (Nokia) proposes to note this LS as there is no action for SA2 right now. | Noted | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208154 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3-LI: Identifier availability for Lawful Interception during Inter-PLMN handover | SA WG3-LI (S3i220485) | Rel-18 | Response drafted in S2-2209207. Final response in S2-2209262 | Laurent (Nokia): Comments Chris (Vodafone) replies to Nokia. Draft LS response will be in S2-2209207. Chris (Vodafone) provides the draft LS response in S2-2209207. | Replied to |
| 4.1 | S2-2209207 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Response LS on Identifier availability for Lawful Interception during Inter-PLMN handover | Vodafone | Rel-18 | Created at CC#1. Response to S2-2208154. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209262. | Chris (Vodafone) provides the draft LS response in S2-2209207. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Leo (Deutsche Telekom) supports to send the LS. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209262 | LS OUT | Approval | Response LS on Identifier availability for Lawful Interception during Inter-PLMN handover | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209207r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208155 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: Reply LS to SA2 on EVEX | SA WG4 (S4-221122) | Rel-17 | Noted | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia suggests to note this LS since there is no action for SA2. | Noted |
| 4.1 | - | - | - | Reply LS or CRs | - | - | Docs:=35 | - | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208123 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG1: LS on handling of PDU sessions for emergency services when registering via both 3GPP and non-3GPP accesses | CT WG1 (C1-225230) | Rel-18 | Response drafted in S2-2208376. Final response in S2-2209263 | Replied to | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208376 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on handling of PDU sessions for emergency services when registering via both 3GPP and non-3GPP Access Type | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208123. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209263. | Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r01 to drafts/revisions. Hannu (Nokia) cannot accept r01 as it is not available '403 forbidden: Access denied'. We need to see any revision that is proposed for the meeting. Fei (OPPO) provides links in revisions. Hannu (Nokia) thanks Fei for the link to r01 but can't agree the contents. Considering discussion on the related CRs (8377 - 8378), the original version is more correct. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fei (OPPO) indicates that the reply LS is linked to status of S2-2208377. ==== Final Deadline ==== Hannu (Nokia) agrees with Fei and Qianghua that the LS must reflect what was agreed in this meeting, so only agreed CRs can be attached. | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209263 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on handling of PDU sessions for emergency services when registering via both 3GPP and non-3GPP accesses | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208376r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208377 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3711 (Rel-17, 'F'): Emergency PDU session transfer | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, MediaTek, Google Inc., Ericsson | Rel-17 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209264. | Jinguo(ZTE) provides r01 Fei (OPPO) comments and the CR is not needed. Hannu (Nokia) comments to Fei (OPPO) that CR on TS 23.501 is needed for sure, as the present SA2 text mandates rejecting completely valid emergency calls! Hannu (Nokia) agrees the comment from Jinguo and provides r02 with editorial change only. Haris(Qualcomm) asks questions for clarification Hannu (Nokia) answers to Haris and asks for clarification on the emergency call back requirements? Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments to Qualcomm question Hannu (Nokia) responds to Shabnam Fei (OPPO) responds to Hannu (Nokia) Kundan (NEC) provides comments. Hannu (Nokia) provides r03 and replies to Fei and Kundan. Can also live with r02 which is also correct. Kundan (NEC) provides response to Hannu (Nokia). Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r04 Hannu (Nokia) answers to Kundan Kundan (NEC) responds to Hannu. Hannu (Nokia) provides r05 with the minimum change. UE impact cannot be avoided due to incorrect condition in the second paragraph. Fei (OPPO) provides comments. Hannu (Nokia) comments that both the general rule in clause 5.16.4.1 and its implementation in clause 5.16.4.9 are needed. Fei (OPPO) provides replies Qianghua (Huawei) comments Shabnam (Ericsson) CT1 is wrong and they are not stage 2 responsible and we must also align with 4G, CT4 etc. I understand you want to consider this for Rel-18, but we cannot accept messing up normal emergency calls being messed up for a corner case CT1 found. Simple soln follow existing principles. Jinguo(ZTE) comment Kundan (NEC) answers to Hannu Kundan (NEC) agrees with Huawei to keep both action. both actions are handling different situations. I explained the reason in my previous mail. Hannu (Nokia) provides r06 and answers the questions. Haris(Qualcomm) indicates that r06 is not acceptable Hannu (Nokia) agrees with Haris and provides hopefully less weird r07. Fei (OPPO) requests to untick the ME box. Kundan(NEC) provides the reference. states the abnormal case is well discussed in CT1 from Rel-9. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) prefers r03, can accept r00 and r07 and objects to other revisions. Fei (OPPO) can only accept r03 and objects to other revisions including r00. Hannu (Nokia) can also accept r03. Fei (OPPO) can only accept r04 and objects to other revisions including r00. Please ignore the previous incorrect version. Hannu (Nokia) asks Fei whether the UE that has got emergency PDU Session in one Access Type is allowed to request another emergency PDU session in the same Access Type. Yes or no? Shabnam (Ericsson) believes that the UE impact from stage 2 specification is unavoidable since we have conflicting text for 5G, which one UE should be compliant with if they are conflicting? Qianghua (Huawei) can live with r07. Prefer to untick the ME impacts. Hannu (Nokia) proposes to take this CR to CC in order to check which revision can be agreed. Fei (OPPO) replies to Hannu and can live with r08 which is based on r04 plus additional changes in the 2nd paragraph. Hannu (Nokia) thanks Fei. Kundan(NEC) can live with r08. Qianghua (Huawei) can also live with r08 if majority can accept Hannu (Nokia) thanks for supports and provides a copy of r08 in 'revisions' folder as suggested in CC #2 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209264 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3711R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Emergency PDU session transfer | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, MediaTek, Google Inc., Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208377r08. Approved | Agreed | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208378 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3561 (Rel-17, 'F'): Emergency PDU session transfer | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, MediaTek, Google Inc. | Rel-17 | Noted | Fei (OPPO) comments Jinguo(ZTE) comments and the CR is not needed. Hannu (Nokia) thanks Fei (OPPO) for good comment and explains to Jinguo why the CR is needed and provides r01. Judy (Ericsson) asks how the CR is relevant to the emergency PDU Session transfer Hannu (Nokia) replies to Judy and provides r02 Qianghua (Huawei) shares the same views and provides more reasons why this CR is not needed Judy (Ericsson) checks if the intention is to align with stage 3 regarding deregistration notify due to duplicated PDU Session detected in UDM Hannu (Nokia) responds to comments and proposes to choose between the original version and r02. Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 to make an alignment with stage 3 Qianghua (Huawei) sustains the view ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) propose to go with r03 which is pure stage 3 alignment not specific to emergency PDU Session, objects to other revisions (r00 included) due to incorrect reason for change. Hannu (Nokia) answers to Qianghua's question even though this discussion becomes irrelevant after r03 that aligns SA2 text with the one in 29.503. Hannu (Nokia) thanks Judy for good compromise and supports r03. Qianghua (Huawei) objects all revs including the original Judy (Ericsson) comments Jinguo(ZTE) comments that r03 has issues and is not agreeable. ask to postpone Hannu (Nokia) supports Judy and points out that all emergency PDU session aspects have been removed in r03 making it pure alignment with the existing stage 3 requirements. Hannu (Nokia) proposes to solve the editorial issues in r03 by re-using CR text from the original r00 and proposes the CR for CC. Late revision r04 shows the changes over r03. Qianghua (Huawei) sustains the objection, sorry to say that concerns are still not addressed Hannu (Nokia) answers to Qianghua and provides r05 to fully align with TS 29.503 hoping that such alignment is acceptable? ==== Final Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) still objects given the reasons explained online and offline, sorry Hannu (Nokia) understand that the discussion with Qianghua is a wording issue and uses the wording from Qianghua in r06 | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2208125 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG1: LS on starting a timer in RRC-inactive state | CT WG1 (C1-225319) | Rel-18 | Responses drafted in S2-2208305, S2-2208838. Final response in S2-2209265 | Replied to | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208305 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on starting a timer in RRC-inactive state | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208125. r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209265, merging S2-2208838 | Hannu (Nokia) has got no strong view on which LS to take as template (8305 or 8838) but suggests to attach CR 8837 and to shorten the LS. Haris(Qualcomm) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hannu (Nokia) supports r01 but points out that this LS still depends on the approval of the CR in S2-2208837 (which is hopefully approved in this meeting) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209265 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on starting a timer in RRC-inactive state | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208305r01, merging S2-2208838. Approved | Approved | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208838 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on starting a timer in RRC-inactive state | Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208125. Merged into S2-2209265 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge into S2-2208305 Hannu (Nokia) has got no strong view on which LS to take as template but shows the way forward in r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 4.1 | S2-2208837 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3733 (Rel-18, 'F'): De-activation timer for eCall only mode UE in RRC_INACTIVE | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Approved | LiMeng (Huawei) has a question on the WID code. Haris(Qualcomm) responds to LiMeng re the WI code Hannu (Nokia) supports the principle but asks about the second change in the CR? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 4.1 | S2-2208134 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG4: LS on service operation used in AMF relocation in Inter PLMN handover procedure | CT WG4 (C4-224408) | Rel-17 | Noted | Hannu (Nokia) proposes to note the LS, assuming the CR related CR in S2-2208896 that carries out the SA2 action can be agreed. Qian (Ericsson) agrees to NOTE the LS. | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2208253 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3554 (Rel-17, 'F'): N2 HO service operation update | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Merged into S2-2209266 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this paper to 8896. Qian (Ericsson) is ok to merge. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 4.1 | S2-2208896 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3587 (Rel-17, 'F'): Update service operation used in AMF relocation in Inter PLMN handover procedure | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209266, merging S2-2208253 | Fenqin (Huawei) provides r01. Qian (Ericsson) provides r02. Jinguo(ZTE) provides r03. Hannu (Nokia) provides r04 to clean up the cover page. Fenqin (Huawei) provides r06 and ask ignore r05. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qian (Ericsson) is ok with r06. Hannu (Nokia) supports r06. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209266 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3587R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Update service operation used in AMF relocation in Inter PLMN handover procedure | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson, ZTE | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208896r06, merging S2-2208253. Approved | Agreed | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208130 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG3: Reply LS on Traffic Identification within 5G Media Streaming | CT WG3 (C3-224556) | Rel-17 | Response drafted in S2-2208353. Postponed | Postponed | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208353 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Traffic Identification within 5G Media Streaming | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208130. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209258. Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mirko (Huawei) proposes to postpone the LS response. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 4.1 | S2-2209258 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Traffic Identification within 5G Media Streaming | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208353r00. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208354 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3431R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Traffic Identification using ToS/TC for 5G Media Streaming | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2203843 from S2#151E. r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209267. Postponed | Judy (Ericsson) responds to Dan(China Mobile) Dan(China Mobile) provide suggestion for updating the NOTE Dan(China Mobile) reply suggestion Mirko (Huawei) comments. Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 and responds Dan (China Mobile) ok for r01 NOTE update Pallab (Nokia) shares the view with Mirko (Huawei) and questions whether we need to duplicate the information in TS 23.502 Judy (Ericsson) responds to Pallab (Nokia) and Mirko (Huawei). Mirko (Huawei) responds. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Mirko (Huawei) and provide r02 Pallab (Nokia) NOT OK with r02 Dario (Qualcomm) is not OK with r02 and provides r03. Judy (Ericsson) is fine with r03 and responds ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mirko (Huawei) objects to the original version and all revisions and suggests to instead clarify those issues in 23.503 clause 6.1.3.6. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 4.1 | S2-2209267 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3431R3 (Rel-17, 'F'): Traffic Identification using ToS/TC for 5G Media Streaming | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208354r03. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208133 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG4: Reply to LS on VoLTE Roaming GBR Handling | CT WG4 (C4-224401) | Rel-17 | This LS was postponed | Postponed | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208158 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: DRAFT Reply LS to 3GPP SA2 on VoLTE Roaming GBR Handling | SA WG4 (S4-221192) | Rel-17 | This LS was postponed | Postponed | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208504 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Handling of HPLMN request for GBR greater than VPLMN value for IMS voice service in home routed roaming . | Vivo | Rel-17 | Noted | Judy (Ericsson) proposes to have the discussion in 9115 thread ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2208606 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion paper for VoLTE GBR handling in roaming case | OPPO | Rel-17 | Noted | Judy (Ericsson) proposes to have the discussion in 9115 thread ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2209115 | DISCUSSION | Decision | Avoiding a HPLMN request for a GBR greater than the VPLMN s value for IMS voice in home routed roaming. | Vodafone | Rel-17 | Noted | Judy (Ericsson) proposes to use this paper for further discussion for 9115, 8502, 8504 and 8606. Haris(Qualcomm) provides comments to the indicated papers Yang (OPPO) provides comments Rainer (Nokia) comments. Judy (Ericsson) comment Xiaobo (vivo) asks questions for clarification Chris (Vodafone) replies Xiaobo (vivo) asks further questions for clarification Chris (Vodafone) responds to Vivo's questions Xiaobo (vivo) provides some clarification and share understanding Chris (Vodafone) responds and suggests an outline for an LS to GSMA Leo (Deutsche Telekom) agrees with the proposal and the LS to be sent to GSMA Xiaobo (vivo) agrees with proposal from Chris (Vodafone) and supports to send LS to GSMA. Rainer (Nokia) is ok with a LS to GSMA. Yang (OPPO) is supportive of sending the LS to GSMA. And suggest to ask GSMA if they can define a recommended GBR value for the roaming case Chris (Vodafone) replies an comments EPS fallback and on the difficulty of a common value for TN and NTN Judy (Ericsson) is OK with LS to GSMA Haris(Qualcomm) is ok to send LS to GSMA but asks one question Rainer (Nokia) replies to Haris (Qualcomm). Haris(Qualcomm) responds ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tao(VC) check the status of the proposed LS out to GSMA Chris (Vodafone) provides the draft LS in the drafts folder. Judy (Ericsson) provides an update to the draft LS in the drafts folder Rainer (Nokia) provides an update. Chris (Vodafone) replies. Chris (Vodafone) provides an updated draft. Chris (Vodafone) uploads that draft into inbox/revisions as S2-2210158. ==== Final Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) provides r01 Chris (Vodafone) is OK with r01 | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2210158 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Response to 'LS to 3GPP SA WG2 on VoLTE Roaming GBR Handling' | Vodafone | CC#4: r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209969. | Chris (Vodafone) is OK with r01 Judy (Ericsson) provides r02 Rainer (Nokia) comments. Chris (Vodafone) does not agree with r02. Chris (Vodafone) puts a copy of 10158r01 into the CC#4 folder. | Revised | |
| 4.1 | S2-2209969 | LS OUT | Approval | Response to LS to SA WG2 on VoLTE Roaming GBR Handling | SA WG2 | - | Revision of S2-2210158r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208502 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3718 (Rel-17, 'F'): Handling of HPLMN request for GBR greater than VPLMN value for IMS voice service in home routed roaming | Vivo | Rel-17 | Noted | Judy (Ericsson) proposes to have the discussion in 9115 thread Rainer (Nokia) proposes to note 8502 at this meeting. Xiaobo (vivo) replies to questions from Rainer (Nokia) and propose to postpone this. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to NOTE the CR. Xiaobo (vivo) is ok to note the CR. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2209140 | CR | Approval | 23.228 CR1257 (Rel-18, 'F'): IMS cross border mobility with Home routed IMS calls | Vodafone (S2-2205903 was Ericsson, Vodafone?, AT&T) | Rel-18 | Confirm Sources!. Affected clauses under revision history! r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209268. | Rainer (Nokia) provides r01. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r02 Rainer (Nokia) provides r03. Chris (Vodafone) provides r04. Rainer (Nokia) replies. Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) comments. Haris(Qualcomm) comments Chris (Vodafone) replies to Qualcomm Rainer (Nokia) comments. Rainer (Nokia) provides r05. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that I don't believe this is Category F CR but rather Category C. So I propose to change to a Cat C please. Rainer (Nokia) provides r06. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Antoine (Orange) comments that the WI code should be 'V8, TEI18', and asks why the 2 new procedures are specific to voice whereas the LS from SA3-LI did not mention voice. Chris (Vodafone) replies to Orange and Ericsson. To help MCC, he will change the WID name from S8HR to V8 during the CR clean up (3GU did not allow a search for 2 letter WID codes). ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209268 | CR | Approval | 23.228 CR1257R1 (Rel-18, 'F'): IMS cross border mobility with Home routed IMS calls | Vodafone, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209140r06. Approved | Agreed | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208159 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG5: LS on Reference point allocation to support charging services | SA WG5 (S5-225775) | Rel-18 | Response drafted in S2-2209199. Final response in S2-2209259 | Replied to | |
| 4.1 | S2-2209199 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS reply on Reference point allocation to support charging services | MATRIXX Software | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208159. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209259. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209259 | LS OUT | Approval | LS reply on Reference point allocation to support charging services | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209199r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 4.1 | S2-2209200 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3752 (Rel-18, 'B'): Reference point numbers for charging | MATRIXX Software | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209347. | Antoine (Orange) comments that the WI code should be MMS_CH_SBI, and wonders whether it's worth spending efforts allocating RP numbers... Gerald (MATRIXX Software) followed the given guidance and provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 4.1 | S2-2209347 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3752R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Reference point numbers for charging | MATRIXX Software | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209200r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 4.1 | - | - | - | Common issue CRs | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 4.1 | S2-2208396 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3562 (Rel-17, 'F'): Release of emergency PDU Session without data transfer for a period | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 4.1 | S2-2209065 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3748 (Rel-17, 'F'): Support for 5QI Priority Level in QoS constraints | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-17 | Noted | Antoine (Orange) comments that the WI code should be 'TEI17, 5GS_Ph1' like the CR that introduced this clause (CR#3507). Judy (Ericsson) questions FASMO aspect Laurent (Nokia): would a way forward be that this CR (and its companion) are agreed as R18 CR(s) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tao(VC) I see change proposal and way forward by Laurent. Any update/view from the author or co-source company on the way forward? ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2209067 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0757 (Rel-17, 'F'): Support for 5QI Priority Level in QoS constraints | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-17 | Noted | Antoine (Orange) comments on WI code and wording. Judy (Ericsson) proposes to discuss in 9065 thread Laurent (Nokia): would a way forward be that this CR (and its companion) are agreed as R18 CR(s) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tao(VC) I see change proposal and way forward by Laurent. Any update from the author or co-source company on the way forward view? Laurent (Nokia): ok for me for R18 Judy (Ericsson) objects to this paper, and any enhancement in Rel-18 needs to be justified as commented previously in 9065 thread. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 4.1 | S2-2209191 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3601 (Rel-17, 'F'): Support for 5QI Priority Level in QoS constraints | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-17 | Noted | Antoine (Orange) comments that the WI code should be 'TEI17, 5GS_Ph1'. Judy (Ericsson) proposes to discuss in 9065 thread Jinguo(ZTE) fixes the title and provides comment Mirko (Huawei) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) objects to this paper, and any enhancement in Rel-18 needs to be justified as commented previously in 9065 thread. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 4.2 | - | - | - | P-CRs/CRs related to use of inclusive language in 3GPP | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 5 | - | - | - | Pre-Rel-17 Maintenance (excluding all 5G topics) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 5.1 | - | - | - | 3GPP Packet Access Maintenance | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 5.2 | - | - | - | QoS and PCC Maintenance | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 5.3 | - | - | - | Non-3GPP Access Maintenance | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 5.4 | - | - | - | IMS and IMS-Related Maintenance | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 6 | - | - | - | Rel-15/Rel-16 Maintenance for 5G (only related to 5GS_Ph1 Work Item) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 6.1 | - | - | - | General aspects, concepts and reference models | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 6.1 | S2-2208408 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3583R3 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on Mapped NSSAI | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Revision of (agreed, but noted by TSG SA) S2-2202047 from S2#150E. Should be a revision of (Postponed) S2-2205700. r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209558. | Josep (DT) asks for clarification why roaming mention in normative text is removed. Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Josep (DT). Genadi (Lenovo) provides question for clarification. Haris(Qualcomm) provides r01 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 Alessio(Nokia) comments Alessio(Nokia) provides r03 Krisztian (Apple) provides r05. Genadi (Lenovo) provides r04. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Alessio(Nokia) is ok with r05. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r06 Alessio(Nokia) prefers r05 but can live with r06 Haiyang (Huawei) is ok with r06. Genadi (Lenovo) is fine with r06, but we prefer r05 to avoid repetition of Requested NSSAI. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r06 and r05 as they have at the end the same meaning ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.1 | S2-2209558 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3583R4 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on Mapped NSSAI | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Apple | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208408r06. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.1 | S2-2208762 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3729 (Rel-17, 'F'): Mapped NSSAI when UE is roaming | Ericsson, Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Postponed | Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply alessio(Nokia) provides r02 Krisztian (Apple) provides r03. Jinguo(ZTE) provides r04 Myungjune (LGE) provides r05. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and r06 alessio(Nokia) is ok with r03. alessio(Nokia) objects to r05 and r04 alessio(Nokia) objects to r06 Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) supports r06 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and suggests to postpne the CR due to one company objection Alessio(nokia) rather suggests to approve r03 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that r03 is not agreeble before CT1 provided feedback alessio(nokia) so really the reason why this is not approved is Ericsson objection to r03 technical content. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) indicates that r03 is useless to solve the issue in reason for change Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to approve r06 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r06 or to postpone Alessio(Nokia) comments that r03 is the only version that we accept in line with existing CT1 text (so it does align with CT1 text). Nokia objects to changing existing clear specification unless there is a FSMO reason DUE to the specifications. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.1 | S2-2208763 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Alignments related to usage of mapped S-NSSAi | Ericsson | Rel-17 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209559. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 adding a statement about possibly doing CRs from Rel-15 at the next meeting. Alessio(Nokia) does not agree we need to state a speculative statement as in r02... if we agree to go to rel-15 at this meeting we just say so. if not we say there was no agreement to go back to rel-15 in which case it is inconsistent spec set (really? do we want that?). we shall take the decision at this meeting. in fact we should ask a number on Thursday to get the job done really...(not sure there is value to postpone?) Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comment that time passed for getting new tdoc numbers, as explained by chair att CC-1 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r03 Alessio(Nokia) believes there is nothing preventing the allocation of new tdoc numbers if this is needed and there is consensus. I missed the statement new tdoc numbers are forbidden even if they are needed. asks Ericsson if they would object to allocation of tdoc numbers if we all agree to that. Haris(Qualcomm) comment that CR numbers need to be completed in the LS Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r04 alessi(Nokia) provides r05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to approve r05 as r06 simply tries to hide the debate. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) sorry, r05 hides the mapping issue for roaming i.e. we really prefer to be clear and instead approve r04. If Nokia objects to r04 as they want to hide it, we are ok with r05. alessio(Nokia) can only accept r05 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.1 | S2-2209559 | LS OUT | Approval | Alignments related to usage of mapped S-NSSAI | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208763r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 6.1 | S2-2208834 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3673R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Mapped NSSAI alignment with stage-3 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2205753 from S2#152E. r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209560. | Alessio(Nokia) comments on the release of this CR and asks why it is not rel-15 if this is aligning with stage 3 sing rel-15 Haris(Qualcomm) responds that we are ok to bring the same CR to rel.15/16 at next meeting Krisztian (Apple) provides r01. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 Alessio(Nokia) ok with r01. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) agrees with r01 (and certainly r02) alessio(nokia) Provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.1 | S2-2209560 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3673R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Mapped NSSAI alignment with stage-3 | Qualcomm Incorporated, Apple, MediaTek Inc | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208834r03. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.2 | - | - | - | Common Access Control, RM and CM functions and procedure flows | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 6.3 | - | - | - | Session management and continuity functions and flows | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 6.3 | S2-2208351 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3559 (Rel-16, 'F'): 3GPP PS Data Off status in PDU Session Establishment | Ericsson | Rel-16 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209561. | Laurent (Nokia): Comments and suggests to only consider this for R17 Judy (Ericsson) responds to Laurent (Nokia) and prefer to have the correction in Rel-16 as well. Mirko (Huawei) comments. Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.3 | S2-2209561 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3559R1 (Rel-16, 'F'): 3GPP PS Data Off status in PDU Session Establishment | Ericsson | Rel-16 | Revision of S2-2208351r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.3 | S2-2208352 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3560 (Rel-17, 'F'): 3GPP PS Data Off status in PDU Session Establishment | Ericsson | Rel-17 | r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209562. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.3 | S2-2209562 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3560R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): 3GPP PS Data Off status in PDU Session Establishment | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208352r00. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.4 | - | - | - | Security related functions and flows | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 6.5 | - | - | - | QoS concept and functionality | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 6.5 | S2-2209058 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3747 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction on conditions for using SPI for UE derived QoS rules | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209563. | Stefan (Ericsson) provides r01 Mirko (Huawei) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.5 | S2-2209563 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3747R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction on conditions for using SPI for UE derived QoS rules | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2209058r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.6 | - | - | - | Policy and charging control | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 6.6 | S2-2208132 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG3: UE Policy Control with PCF re-selection during AMF relocation | CT WG3 (C3-224697) | Rel-17 | Responses drafted in S2-2208348, S2-2208859, S2-2209089. Postponed | Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to use this thread to discuss the LS 8132 Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Jinguo(ZTE) provides comments Belen (Ericsson) asks ZTE DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Uri(Oracle) provides comments Haiyang (Huawei) comments Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Belen (Ericsson) Huazhang (vivo) have some observation and join the discussion Yue (China Telecom) provides comment. Belen (Ericsson) replies to the discussion on the PCF needs to know if it is an initial registration or a mobility case Pallab (Nokia) provides views Uri (Oracle) responds to Haiyang Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Uri (Oracle), Ok to postpone the LS discussion Belen (Ericsson) is okay to postpone the LS. DongYeon (Samsung) agrees to postpone this LS. | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2208348 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on UE Policy Control with PCF re-selection during AMF relocation | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208132. Postponed | Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) agrees to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2208859 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on UE Policy Control with PCF re-selection during AMF relocation | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208132. Postponed | Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) agrees to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2209089 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on UE Policy Control with PCF re-selection during AMF relocation | Samsung Electronics Romania | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208132. Postponed | Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) agrees to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2209091 | DISCUSSION | Decision | UE Policy Association Establishment when AMF relocation with PCF change. | Samsung | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) suggests to note this discussion paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 6.6 | S2-2209093 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3597 (Rel-17, 'F'): UE Policy Association Establishment when AMF relocation with PCF change | Samsung | Rel-17 | Postponed | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to use 8132 as thread for discussion, and update the CR accordingly. Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) agrees to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2209095 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0758 (Rel-17, 'F'): UE Policy Association Establishment when AMF relocation with PCF change | Samsung | Rel-17 | Postponed | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to use 8132 as thread for discussion, and update the CR accordingly. Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) agrees to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2208349 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3558 (Rel-17, 'F'): UE Policy determination at AMF relocation with PCF change | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Postponed | DongYeon (Samsung) asks a question. Belen (Ericsson) asks if questions below are replied in S2-2208132 Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to use 8132 as thread for discussion, and update the CR accordingly. Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) proposes to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.6 | S2-2208350 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0742 (Rel-17, 'F'): UE Policy determination at AMF relocation with PCF change | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Postponed | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to use 8132 as thread for discussion, and update the CR accordingly. Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to postpone the paper as per discussion in 8132. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) proposes to postpone this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 6.7 | - | - | - | 3GPP access specific functionality and flows | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 6.7 | S2-2208252 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3703 (Rel-17, 'F'): PScell handling in 5GS | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Noted | Hannu (Nokia) proposes to note this CR as it is attempting to extend the agreed scope of Rel-17 feature. Qian (Ericsson) provides comments. Wanqiang (Huawei) has concern and proposes to note this CR. Qian (Ericsson) responds. Hannu (Nokia) replies to Qian. Chris (Vodafone) thinks that the Ericsson CR is logical. Hannu (Nokia) comments that this CR is not what we agreed when introducing this feature and that the justification for this 5GS change is derived from EPS. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qian (Ericsson) responds to Hannu(Nokia) and propose to approve original revision. Wanqiang (Huawei) is not Ok with original revision as it is not a correction CR. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 6.7 | S2-2209002 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3742 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction of reference for RedCap indication from UE | Qualcomm Inc. | Rel-17 | Bad WI code. CR Number incorrect XXX! Should be 3742 (in revision number cell). r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209564. | Hannu (Nokia) provides r01. Miguel (Qualcomm) ok with r01. Steve (Huawei) comments on the record rev number and CR number. Miguel (Qualcomm) provides r02 correcting CR number and Rev number ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qian (Ericsson) is ok with r02 Steve (Huawei) is ok with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.7 | S2-2209564 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3742R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction of reference for RedCap indication from UE | Qualcomm Inc. | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2209002r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.8 | - | - | - | Specific services support | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 6.9 | - | - | - | Interworking and Migration | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 6.9 | S2-2208382 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3712 (Rel-17, 'F'): Monitoring event in 5GS to EPS mobility | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209565. | Fenqin (Huawei): Comments and provides r01 Qian (Ericsson) asks questions Hannu (Nokia) asks questions and comments that some changes in r01 are not correct. Fenqin (Huawei) provides a feedback to Hannu Qian (Ericsson) provides comments. Hannu (Nokia) answers to Fenqin. Hannu (Nokia) asks follow-up questions Fenqin (Huawei) answers to Hannu. Hannu (Nokia) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) is fine with r02 Fenqin (Huawei) provides response to Qian Qian (Ericsson) provides further comments. Hannu (Nokia) proposes to agree r02. Fenqin (Huawei) we are fine to go with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 6.9 | S2-2209565 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3712R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Monitoring event in 5GS to EPS mobility | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208382r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 6.10 | - | - | - | Non-3GPP access specific functionality and flows | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 6.11 | - | - | - | Framework functions | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7 | - | - | - | Rel-16 Maintenance for 5G (excluding 5GS_Ph1) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.1 | - | - | - | Architecture enhancements for 3GPP support of advanced V2X services (eV2XARC) | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 7.1 | S2-2208174 | CR | Approval | 23.287 CR0184 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of V2X policy request during registration procedure | LG Electronics, Ericsson, CATT, Huawei, ZTE | Rel-17 | Postponed | LaeYoung (LGE) thinks that result for this CR should be same to result of S2-2208356/8357 in AI#8.8 for consistent handling of same topic (i.e. approved or postponed). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to get this CR POSTPONED as well because the result of S2-2208356/8357 in AI#8.8 covering same topic is Postponed. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 7.1 | S2-2208175 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0738 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of V2X policy request during registration procedure | LG Electronics, Ericsson, CATT, Huawei, ZTE | Rel-17 | Postponed | LaeYoung (LGE) thinks that result for this CR should be same to result of S2-2208356/8357 in AI#8.8 for consistent handling of same topic (i.e. approved or postponed). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to get this CR POSTPONED as well because the result of S2-2208356/8357 in AI#8.8 covering same topic is Postponed. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 7.2 | - | - | - | Wireless and Wireline Convergence for the 5G system architecture (5WWC) | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 7.2 | S2-2208180 | CR | Approval | 23.316 CR2072 (Rel-17, 'F'): Change the direction of the arrow in figure | IPLOOK | Rel-17 | Spec version incorrect - V17.3.0! r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209670. | Laurent (Nokia): Comments, shall provide revision marks Weizhi Wu(IPLOOK) provides r01 Weizhi Wu(IPLOOK) provides r02 Stefan (Ericsson) comments on the revision marks ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Weizhi Wu(IPLOOK) provides r03 Stefan (Ericsson) suggest to agree r03 Laurent (Nokia): suggests to agree R03 for the same reason than Stefan Marco (Huawei) ok with r03 since agrees with Stefan (Ericsson) and Laurent (Nokia) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 7.2 | S2-2209670 | CR | Approval | 23.316 CR2072R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Change the direction of the arrow in figure | IPLOOK | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208180r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 7.2 | S2-2208323 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3708 (Rel-16, 'F'): R16 Correction on TNGF functionality | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-16 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 7.2 | S2-2208324 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3709 (Rel-17, 'A'): R17 Correction on TNGF functionality | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 7.3 | - | - | - | Access Traffic Steering, Switch and Splitting support in the 5G system architecture (ATSSS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.4 | - | - | - | Cellular IoT support and evolution for the 5G System (5G_CIoT) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.5 | - | - | - | Enablers for Network Automation for 5G (eNA) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.6 | - | - | - | Enhancement to the 5GC Location Services (5G_eLCS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.7 | - | - | - | 5GS Enhanced support of Vertical and LAN Services (Vertical_LAN) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.8 | - | - | - | Enhancements to the Service-Based 5G System Architecture (5G_eSBA) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.9 | - | - | - | Architecture enhancements for the support of Integrated access and backhaul (IABARC) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.10 | - | - | - | Enhancement of URLLC supporting in 5GC (5G_URLLC) | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 7.10 | S2-2208138 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG4: LS on Packet Delay Failure Threshold | CT WG4 (C4-224636) | Rel-17 | Postponed | Postponed | |
| 7.10 | S2-2208572 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0750 (Rel-16, 'F'): Clarifications for QoS monitoring control | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-16 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides detailed comments and objects to the CR as not FASMO and adds new functions not in scope. Mirko (Huawei) replies to Shabnam's comments. Devaki (Nokia) comments. We also believe the CR changes must be limited to FASMO changes and new enhancements must be removed. Mirko (Huawei) responds to Devaki's questions. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) proposes to note the CR and work offline towards a resolution at the next meeting. Devaki (Nokia) proposes to postpone the paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 7.10 | S2-2208573 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0751 (Rel-17, 'A'): Clarifications for QoS monitoring control | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 7.10 | S2-2208574 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3721 (Rel-16, 'F'): Clarifications for QoS monitoring control | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-16 | Noted | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides technical comments and objects to the CR as this is not FASMO and changing functions that are stable since Rel-16. Genadi (Lenovo) provides a question for clarification. Mirko (Huawei) responds to Genadi's question. Mirko (Huawei) replies to Shabnam's comments. Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Mirko (Huawei). Mirko (Huawei) comments. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments in line and notes that Lenovo has created a separate thread after Ericsson email thread was established... Mirko (Huawei) responds. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that since we have not created any revision but good discussion, propose to note now and work offline until next meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 7.10 | S2-2208575 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3722 (Rel-17, 'A'): Clarifications for QoS monitoring control | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 7.11 | - | - | - | Enhancement of Network Slicing (eNS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.12 | - | - | - | Optimisations on UE radio capability signalling (RACS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.13 | - | - | - | Enhanced IMS to 5GC Integration (eIMS5G_SBA) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.14 | - | - | - | User Data Interworking and Coexistence (UDICoM) | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 7.14 | S2-2208186 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3551 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment of TS 23.502 with SBI-based SMS | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 7.15 | - | - | - | Enhancing Topology of SMF and UPF in 5G Networks (ETSUN) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.16 | - | - | - | 5GS Transfer of Policies for Background Data Transfer (xBDT) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 7.17 | - | - | - | Single radio voice continuity from 5GS to 3G (5G_SRVCC) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8 | - | - | - | Rel-17 WIDs | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.1 | - | - | - | Enablers for Network Automation for 5G - phase 2 (eNA_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 8.1 | - | - | - | 5GS information exposure | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 8.1 | S2-2208167 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG3: LS on Issues on exposing 5GS information to an untrusted AF | CT WG3 (C3-224688) | Rel-17 | Responses drafted in S2-2208705, S2-2208992. Final response in S2-2209566 | Replied to | |
| 8.1 | S2-2208705 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS reply on Issues on exposing 5GS information to an untrusted AF | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208167. Merged into S2-2209566 | Josep (DT) would like to point out that A1 is not an answer to Q1. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Belen (Ericsson) and Josep(DT), and provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yannick (Nokia): Nokia suggests to merge this into S2-2208992. r01 for this draft LS out is not aligned with further changes made to related CR in S2-2208991. Wang Yuan (Huawei) is OK to merge this into S2-2208992. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.1 | S2-2208992 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Issues on exposing 5GS information to an untrusted AF | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208167. r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209566, merging S2-2208705 | Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r01 which aligns with S2-2208991r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Leo (Deutsche Telekom) supports r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.1 | S2-2209566 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on Issues on exposing 5GS information to an untrusted AF | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208992r01, merging S2-2208705. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.1 | S2-2208704 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0549 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on exposing 5GS information to an untrusted AF | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Merged into S2-2209671 | Antoine (Orange) asks a fundamental question. Wang Yuan (Huawei) propose to merge this CR into S2-2208991. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.1 | S2-2208991 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0553 (Rel-17, 'F'): Corrections on exposing 5GS information to untrusted AF | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209671, merging S2-2208704 | Antoine (Orange) asks a fundamental question. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r01. Wang Yuan (Huawei) thanks r01 for merging the 'NSI ID' proposal from 8704 and asks question on r01. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia replies to Huawei. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided r02. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia requests clarification to Malla (NTT DOCOMO). Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Yannick (Nokia). Belen (Ericsson) cannot agree with the proposed updates in this CR Yannick (Nokia): Nokia asks if comment from Ericsson applies to all revisions that have been provided so far. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r03 and asks if this could be a way forward. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) asks for clarification. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia answers that this revision should be read together with the LS out draft reply in S2-2208992r01. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r04, with same text proposal as r03, but with cover page changes. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) supports r04 and would like to co-sign. Belen (Ericsson) asks to remove in r04 NOTE 1: Dispersion analytics bound by slice are not provided to untrusted AF. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia agrees with proposal from Ericsson. We suggest to go with 'r04 + removal of NOTE 1 in 6.10.1'. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.1 | S2-2209671 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0553R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Corrections on exposing 5GS information to untrusted AF | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Huawei | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208991r04, merging S2-2208704. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.1 | S2-2208990 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on eNA_Ph2 issues | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2205413 (Replied to at S2#151E). r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209567 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.1 | S2-2209567 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on eNA_Ph2 issues | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208990r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.1 | - | - | - | Other | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 8.1 | S2-2208824 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0550 (Rel-17, 'F'): Formatting and Processing Instructions related correction to Nadrf_DataManagement service | ZTE | Rel-17 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209672. | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia cannot accept initial version of the CR for Rel-17. Formatting and processing instructions have not been discussed in the context of ADRF, adding this at this stage of Rel-17 is not appropriate. Provides r01. Jinguo(ZTE) provides r02 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia replies to ZTE and provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments that if r03 is acceptable some changes to coversheet would be needed. Jinguo(ZTE) is ok with r03 + coversheet change, and thanks Yannick for good suggestion ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.1 | S2-2209672 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0550R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Formatting and Processing Instructions related correction to Nadrf_DataManagement service | ZTE, Nokia | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208824r03. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.1 | S2-2208989 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0552 (Rel-17, 'F'): Corrections for time window in ADRF Nadrf_DataManagement service | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.1 | S2-2208247 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0545 (Rel-17, 'F'): Granularity of time and location for NWDAF analytics results | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Postponed | Wang Yuan (Huawei) raises concerns on r00. Belen (Ericsson) replies to Huawei concerns and asks if those are resolved ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Belen (Ericsson) asks Huawei if their comments were addressed, no response was received. Wang Yuan (Huawei) thanks for the clarification and in principle ok with this idea but still suggests to postpones the CR for next meeting since the changes still needs some further considerations. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.1 | S2-2208591 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0547 (Rel-17, 'F'): Remove the Editor s Note related to EVEX in SA WG4 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.1 | S2-2208173 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0544 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction on SMCCE Analytics | LG Electronics, Ericsson | Rel-17 | Postponed | LaeYoung (LGE) comments that the change in this CR conflicts with the change in 8247 (clause 6.12.3). Belen (Ericsson) agrees that this one is not needed if we go with the change in 8247 (clause 6.12.3). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) thinks that this CR can be Approved because 8247 is expected to be Noted. Belen (Ericsson) asks to check S2-2208247 first, given that Huawei did not reply. LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to POSTPONE this CR as 8247 is expected to be postponed for further discussion. Belen (Ericsson) is okay to POSTPONE ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.1 | S2-2208248 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0546 (Rel-17, 'F'): Corrections to Slice Load level Analytics ID | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.2 | - | - | - | Enhanced support of Non-Public Networks (eNPN) | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 8.2 | S2-2208139 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG6: Reply LS on Facilitating roaming adoption across 3GPP NPN deployments | CT WG6 (C6-220475) | Rel-17 | Noted | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and propose to note the LS | Noted |
| 8.2 | S2-2208766 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0753 (Rel-17, 'F'): The list of PSIs associated to an SNPN | Ericsson | Rel-17 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209568. | Josep (DT) comments, provides r01. Mirko (Huawei) comments. Josep (DT) tries, provides r03, please disregard r02. Requets to pelase re-check r03. Josep (DT) provides r04. Belen (Ericsson) is okay with r04. Josep (DT) is happy to co-sign. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.2 | S2-2209568 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0753R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): The list of PSIs associated to an SNPN | Ericsson, Deutsche Telekom | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208766r04. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.2 | S2-2208768 | DISCUSSION | Decision | Differentiation of subscribed/non-subscribed SNPN in CH architecture. | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.2 | S2-2208769 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3731 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification when access SNPN using CH with AAA-S | Ericsson | Rel-17 | r03 agreed. CC#3: r03 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209673. | Josep (DT) is not sure whether introducing new terminology (subscribed/non-subscribed) improves clarity. Rainer (Nokia) agrees with Josep (DT). Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply Haris(Qualcomm) comments that the CR is not FASMO but if the majority prefer to do this clarification only option 2 is acceptable without the sentence: 'This is, the AUSF, UDM and NSSAAF in Figure 5.30.2.9.2-1 belong to the subscribed SNPN of the UE.' In NOTE 2 Josep (DT) is OK to add as many clarification NOTEs but not to change normative text. Qianghua (Huawei) comments that the introduction of non-subscribed/subscribed SNPN in CH AAA-S case makes it hard to understand the architecture and doesn't see any benefits or necessities to do so Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides the comments and considers this is not a FASMO CR Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r01 Saso (Intel) provides r02 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r02 Qianghua (Huawei) the terms 'subscribed/non-subscribed' still confuse me and doesn't match with the network selection logic, miss one case in the NOTE Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) asks further clarification. Haris(Qualcomm) proposes changes on top of r03 to add next to SUPI privacy settings 'SUPI privacy settings (when using privacy protection scheme other than the 'null-scheme' to generate the SUCI as defined in TS 33.501 [29])' Qianghua (Huawei) replies and can not live the NOTE as it is Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides replies and ok with QC suggestion i.e. r03 + '(when using privacy protection scheme other than the 'null-scheme' to generate the SUCI as defined in TS 33.501 [29])' Qianghua (Huawei) that normative text applies for both 'subscribed SNPN' and 'non-subscribed SNPN' case. ==== Final Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) proposes to make additional changes on the NOTE after offline discussion with Peter, i.e. r03 + '(when using privacy protection scheme other than the 'null-scheme' to generate the SUCI as defined in TS 33.501 [29])' + 'same as corresponding NFs in the subscribed SNPN' Antoine (Orange): The green addition is not clear. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Antoine | Revised |
| 8.2 | S2-2209673 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3731R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification when access SNPN using CH with AAA-S | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208769r03 + changes. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.2 | S2-2208839 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3675R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment with SA WG3 agreement on usage of SUCI when CH is legacy AAA | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2205756 from S2#152E. CC#3: r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209947. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Fei (OPPO) comments Haris(Qualcomm) provides r01 Haris(Qualcomm) responds Genadi (Lenovo) comments to r01. Genadi (Lenovo) responds to Haris (Qualcomm). Qianghua (Huawei) comments on the same point with Genadi Genadi (Lenovo) agrees with the proposal by Qianghua (Huawei). Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides the comments on r01 and suggest to remove the change from clause 5.30.2.4.2 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 Haris(Qualcomm) asks questions on r02 Haris(Qualcomm) provides r03 Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r04. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides r05 Haris(Qualcomm) indicates that r05 is not acceptable Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply and r05 is ok Haris(Qualcomm) responds to Peter ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) can only accept r04, r03. Objects to r05, r02. R00 and R01 contain incorrect text Chia-Lin (MediaTek) can only accept r05 and object all other versions including the original one Fei (OPPO) can accept r04, r02, r05 and objects other revisions including r00. Haris(Qualcomm) asks Chia-Lin (Mediatek) to clarify the objection to r04 Qianghua (Huawei) OK with r01, r02, r03, r04, r05. But not the original Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply that the note in 08769 clarifies that UDM handles the privacy as well i.e. the note is not needed in this CR Chia-Lin (MediaTek) responds to Haris (Qualcomm) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.2 | S2-2209947 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3675R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment with SA WG3 agreement on usage of SUCI when CH is legacy AAA | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208839r05. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.2 | S2-2208935 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3738 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification of SUPI for SNPN | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208839 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that changes looks ok, but we can only agree this or 08839. Haris(Qualcomm) suggests to focus the discussion on S2-2208839 Qianghua (Huawei) OK to merge this into S2-2208839 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.3 | - | - | - | Enhancement of support for Edge Computing in 5GC (eEDGE_5GC) | - | - | Docs:=18 | - | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208102 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG3: LS on handling of FQDN ranges in AF influence on traffic routing procedures | CT WG3 (C3-222419) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205396 from S2#152-e. Response drafted in S2-2208372. Final response in S2-2209269 | Replied to | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208372 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply to CT WG3 LS on handling of FQDN ranges in AF influence on traffic routing procedures | Ericsson [to be SA2] | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208102. r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209269. | Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Yuan Tao (CATT). Yuan Tao (CATT) asks Xinpeng(Huawei) for clarification on r01. Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r01. Yuan Tao (CATT) replies to Xinpeng(Huawei). Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Jari (NTT DOCOMO). Jari (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Xinpeng Jari (NTT DOCOMO) responds to Xinpeng Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds Jari (NTT DOCOMO) prefers r01 Jari (NTT DOCOMO) responds to Magnus H Shubhranshu (Nokia) proposes to agree r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.3 | S2-2209269 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply to CT WG3 LS on handling of FQDN ranges in AF influence on traffic routing procedures | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208372r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208160 | LS In | Information | LS from SA WG6: Reply LS to OPAG_34_Doc_07_OPAG_LS ETSI-3GPP-Network integration | SA WG6 (S6-222337) | Rel-18 | Noted | Magnus O (Ericsson) proposes to Note this LS | Noted |
| 8.3 | S2-2208162 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG6: Forward on S6-222332, LS on Network federation interface for Telco edge consideration | SA WG6 (S6-222543) | Rel-18 | Postponed | Magnus O (Ericsson) proposes to postpone this LS to the November meeting | Postponed |
| 8.3 | S2-2208163 | LS In | Information | LS from SA WG6: Reply LS on user’s consent for EDGEAPP | SA WG6 (S6-222555) | Rel-17 | Response drafted in S2-2208373. Final response in S2-2209270 | Replied to | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208373 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Response LS on Clarifications for AF specific UE ID retrieval | Ericsson [to be SA2] | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208163. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209270. | Jinsook (DISH) Question for clarification Magnus (Ericsson) Provides answers ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jinsook (DISH) Thanks for the clarification, further comment ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.3 | S2-2209270 | LS OUT | Approval | Response LS on Clarifications for AF specific UE ID retrieval | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208373r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208164 | LS In | Information | LS from SA WG6: Reply LS to Network federation interface for Telco edge consideration | SA WG6 (S6-222557) | Rel-18 | Noted | Noted | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208368 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3663R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction related to traffic correlation in PCC rule | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2205633 from S2#152E. r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209271. | Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r01. Magnus H (Ericsson) comments and provides r02 Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r03. Shubhranshu (Nokia) asks for clarification Magnus H (Ericsson) this document should be under AI#6.6, could we please move. Sorry for the inconvenience. Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Jari (NT DOCOMO) provides r04 Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.3 | S2-2209271 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3663R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction related to traffic correlation in PCC rule | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208368r04. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208369 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0732R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction related to traffic correlation in PCC rule | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2205635 from S2#152E. r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209272. | Xinpeng(Huawei) comments. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r01. Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Magnus H (Ericsson) this document should be under AI#6.6, could we please move. Sorry for the inconvenience. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.3 | S2-2209272 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0732R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction related to traffic correlation in PCC rule | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208369r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.3 | S2-2208370 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3634R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to clarify role of PCC in authorization of EAS Discovery procedure with EASDF | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2205629 from S2#152E. Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.3 | S2-2208371 | DISCUSSION | Decision | DP on role of PCC in authorization of EAS Discovery procedure with EASDF. | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Noted | Xinpeng(Huawei) proposes to note this DP paper. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.3 | S2-2208576 | CR | Approval | 23.548 CR0063 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarifications for local event notification control | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.3 | S2-2209171 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3751 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to clarify uses of FQDN Range in the AF request | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Postponed | Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) comments and provides r01. Jari (NTT DOCOMO) provides r02. Xinpeng(Huawei) proposes merge 9171 into 8370. Magnus H (Ericsson) agrees with Xinpeng that we should merge 9171 into 8370 Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds Shubhranshu (Nokia) proposes NOT to merge Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Shubhranshu (Nokia). Xinpeng(Huawei) responds to Shubhranshu (Nokia). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xinpeng(Huawei) proposes to note this paper. Shubhranshu (Nokia) proposes to postpone this paper Xinpeng(Huawei) is fine to postpone. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.3 | S2-2209172 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0759 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to clarify uses of FQDN Range in the AF request | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Postponed | Xinpeng(Huawei): the result of 9172 depends on the discussion of 9171. Jari (NTT DOCOMO) proposes to postpone Shubhranshu (Nokia) OK to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.4 | - | - | - | Enhancement of Network Slicing Phase 2 (eNS_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=25 | - | |
| 8.4 | S2-2208116 | LS In | Information | Reply LS on Support for managing slice for trusted third-party owned application | SA WG1 (S1-222262) | Rel-18 | Revision of Postponed S2-2208097 from S2#152-e. Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) proposes to note this LS in since there is no action for SA2 | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2208151 | LS In | Information | LS from SA WG1: Reply LS on Support for managing slice for trusted third-party owned application | SA WG1 (S1-222267) | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) proposes to note this LS in since there is no action for SA2 | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2208161 | LS In | Information | LS from SA WG6: Reply LS on Reply LS on Support for managing slice for trusted third-party owned application | SA WG6 (S6-222340) | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) proposes to note this LS in since there is no action for SA2 | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2208107 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3: LS on EAC Mode for NSAC | SA WG3 (S3-221164) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205437 from S2#152-e. Response drafted in S2-2208415. Final response in S2-2209260 | Replied to | |
| 8.4 | S2-2208415 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on EAC Mode for NSAC | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208107. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209260. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.4 | S2-2209260 | LS OUT | Approval | LS Reply on EAC Mode for NSAC | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208415r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.4 | S2-2208416 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3563 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on EAC Mode for NSAC | Huawei, HiSilicon, ZTE | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209273. | Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01 George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) provides comments Haiyang (Huawei) provides clarification Dongeun (Samsung) comments Haiyang (Huawei) provides clarification to Dongeun (Samsung) alessio(Nokia) supports the comment(s) by Stefano. proposes to note this CR also at this meeting as it is not helping to address a FASMO issue so we cannot agree to it. SA3 can put a note in their specs if they see a need and can find consensus in SA3 on a logic to set a proper value that is secure. Haiyang (Huawei) provides comments to Alessio (Nokia) Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.4 | S2-2209273 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3563R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on EAC Mode for NSAC | Huawei, HiSilicon, ZTE | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208416r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.4 | S2-2209003 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3592 (Rel-17, 'F'): Update in EAC mode procedure | Samsung | Rel-17 | Noted | Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the CR. Please see comments below. Ashok (Samsung) responds to George (Ericsson) and Fenqin (Huawei) George (Ericsson) provides answer. EAC follow the quota. This case is for 3GPP, then that's what it is applied for. Ashok (Samsung) comments Fenqin (Huawei) provides response Ashok (Samsung) provides comments Iskren (NEC) this CR should be noted as the quota is per UE, not per AT Ashok (Samsung) responds to Iskren (NEC) Fenqin (Huawei) reply to Ashok Ashok (Samsung) clarifies to Fenqin Jinguo(ZTE) comments Fenqin (Huawei) provides a further comments Ashok (Samsung) responds to Fenqin , Jinguo alessio(Nokia) also agrees there is no FASMO. the worst case EAC is not activated for both access types. Ashok (Samsung) ask a question to Alessio(Nokia) Iskren (NEC) comments. Ashok (Samsung) explains to Iskren Alessio(Nokia) replies Ashok (Samsung) responds to Alessio(Nokia) George (Ericsson) provides response George (Ericsson) The issue is understood and no action is required. Ashok (Samsung) replies to Iskren Ashok (Samsung) seeks a clarification from George Ashok (Samsung) provides response to George (Ericsson) Ashok (Samsung) comments to George Iskren (NEC) answers Ashok (Samsung) replies to Iskren Ashok (Samsung) replies to Iskren (NEC) Iskren (NEC) replies to Ashok (Samsung) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to note this paper. Ashok (Samsung) agrees to NOTE the paper ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2208103 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG1: LS on NSSRG restriction on pending NSSAI | CT WG1 (C1-224073) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205406 from S2#152-e. This LS was postponed | Postponed | |
| 8.4 | S2-2209037 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on NSSRG restriction on pending NSSAI | NEC | Rel-17 | CC#3: r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209944. | Alessio(Nokia) provides r01 so it can be used in association with Nokia CRs. Alessio(Nokia) provides r01 so it can be used in association with Nokia CRs. (sending zip file) Alessio(Nokia) provides r01 clarifying that when NSSRG Info applies the Pending NSSAI cannot be blindly added to the Requested as (you may imagine) the requested and pending need not be compatible a priory. Kundan (NEC) objects to r01. Nokia has wrong understanding of pending NSSAI. Pending NSSAI is implicit requested NSSAI according to CT1. If the UE is interested in the pending NSSAI but can't send it as a part of requested NSSAI due to CT1 design doesn't mean it is not requested NSSAI. Ashok (Samsung) provides r02 Kundan(NEC) : r02 is very confusing and contradictory alessio(nokia) comments CT1 has not a common understanding that is why they asked the question. even if they had the understanding the pending is always part of requested this is not correct as it violates the NSSRG feature when there is incompatibility with pending. it would be like mandating the allowed or rejected is always part of requested... (given that a pending S-NSSAI can be ultimately allowed or rejected). Alessio(Nokia) also prefers to postpone to next meeting and have a call to discuss this important topi. r02 is to us going in the right direction logically but we need to create the right CR backing it so CT1 eventually does the right thing. And also we need to tell CT1 they have to remove in NSSRG context (i.e. for UEs for which NSSRG applies) the assumption that the pending is virtually part of requested as obviously when the Ue requests incompatible slices with a pending S-NSSAI this cannot be part of the requested. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kundan(NEC) provides r03 which is very much aligned with stage 2 and stage3. Xiaowen(vivo) is ok to r03 and propose to go with r03, can live with r02. Tao(VC) remind r03 is provided after revision deadline. Further check whether any version agreeable. r03 is uploaded on the server within the time period. this is before 10/12 16:00 UTC. alessio(nokia) suggest to note the LS as we will postpone the issue nokia is not happy to send any LS till we have a stable state in SA2. this will not be till next meeting. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to send LS as delaying to next meeting means we probably delay the resolution in stage 3 to Q1 2023 Alessio(Nokia) LSs are sent when there is a clear way forward. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.4 | S2-2209944 | LS OUT | Approval | LS out on NSSRG restriction on pending NSSAI | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2209037r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.4 | S2-2209038 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on NSSRG Restrictions on Pending NSSAI | vivo | Rel-17 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209037 | Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to discuss in 9037 thread Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to merge this LS to 9037 Xiaowen (vivo) agrees to merge into 9037. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.4 | S2-2209039 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3744 (Rel-17, 'F'): NSSRG restriction on Pending NSSAI | Vivo | Rel-17 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) think this CR is not needed Genadi (Lenovo) has concerns with the proposal. Alessio(Nokia) also believes this is not the way forward to resolve the issue. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that a way forward without need for any indication is preferred Xiaowen (vivo) provides responses. Jinguo(ZTE) agree with others view ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stefano (Qualcomm) assumes that based on the previous comments, this CR will be noted. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) agree that CR should be noted vivo confirm this CR can be noted. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2209040 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3594 (Rel-17, 'F'): NSSRG restriction on Pending NSSAI | Vivo | Rel-17 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) think this CR is not needed Alessio(Nokia) believes this is not the way forward to resolve the issue. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stefano (Qualcomm) assumes that based on the previous comments, this CR will be noted. we should note this CR. as we don't need a separate indicator. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) agree that CR should be noted vivo confirm this CR can be noted. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2209201 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3684R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on Interaction between NSSAA and NSSRG | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2206152 from S2#152E. LATE DOC: Rx 03/10, 10:50. Postponed | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question if the late CR is part of the meeting? Kundan (NEC) has same response as Peter. After the document submission deadline it was not in the tdoc list. Kundan(NEC) also proposes to note this paper. alessio(nokia) ... we believe that our CRs are consistent with current UE behaviour in NSSRG handling which is the same as if the S-NSSAI was allowed instead of pending. if we can request one S-NSSAI set incompatible with allowed NSSAI, we surely can request one S-NSSAI incompatible with a pending NSSAI. it is the network then that needs to check the compatibility of the pending with the allowed at time of NSSAA completion. Kundan (NEC) pending NSSAI is considered as part of the requested NSSAI. so Nokia CR is against the current NSSRG principle. Kundan(NEC): Nokia CR has a big drawback, it is always rejecting the pending NSSAI. what is the logic? Alessio(Nokia) clarifies Kundan's doubt alessio(Nokia) clarifies this was a network side behaviour predating the NSSRG introduction. this is no longer valid thereafter. Kundan(NEC) further clarifies Alessio. According to stage 3, receiving incompatible slices at the network side is abnormal case. Alessio(Nokia)replies that consistently with that the requested NSSAI is always made of compatible S-NSSAIs as we say. Haiyang (Huawei) comments. Kundan (NEC) has same understanding as Huawei that pending NSSAI is part of requested NSSAI should be compatible. we have reiterated earlier this also. Kundan(NEC) indicates that the UE can still be interested in the pending NSSAI and an additional slice then the pending slice and new additional must be compatible. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and propose we move forward with CR in 09004 Ashok (Samsung) suggests a way forward This CR suffers same issue Genadi raised. AMF will deny the service of most preferred slice for the UE. Alessio(Nokia) comments alessio(nokia) clarifies we are addressing the case here where the UE is no more interested in the pending NSSAI (as the whole discussion is what to do when the Pending s-NSSAI is incompatible with requested) alessio(Nokia) is not in tune with the way forward proposed by Ashok(Samsung) as this is exactly the issue this CR wants to avoid (any blocking factor to requesting service) alessio(Nokia) cannot see any relationship with the access type issue. Kundan (NEC) commented that Nokia CR does not have statement that the UE is no more interested then ignore the pending NSSAI and send the new requested NSSAI. it has very generic statement to send the incompatible requested NSSAI even though the UE is interested. can you show me where it is mentioned that the UE is not interested pending NSSAI statement?? Stefano (Qualcomm) believes the original question has not been answered: this is a LATE CR and as such should not be discussed. If we allow it, then anyone under any WID will start injecting late CRs. This is not acceptable, sorry. Alessio(Nokia) replies to Stefano (Qualcomm) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kundan (NEC) CR won't work when the UE is pending over one AMF and UE tries to register on another AMF and ignoring the pending NSSAI and sends the incompatible slices. how the two AMF can co-operate after NSSAA procedure is finished on one AMF? This solution doesn't work in many cases in addition to the case when the UE is registering over two AMFs. I agree with Stefano this this CR shouldn't be treated at all due to late submission. Kundan (NEC) indicates this CR won't work when the UE is pending over one AMF and UE tries to register on another AMF and ignoring the pending NSSAI and sends the incompatible slices. how the two AMF can co-operate after NSSAA procedure is finished on one AMF? This solution doesn't work in many cases in addition to the case when the UE is registering over two AMFs. I agree with Stefano this this CR shouldn't be treated at all due to late submission. alessio(Nokia) the statements below need to be discussed further in a DP as they are not clear. if the UE requests compatible slices set on both accesses both AMFs will react to pending consistently. so the issue is not clear and needs to be discussed but I see ultimately the only argument left is the procedural one so let's postpone the issue Peter Hedman (Ericsson) agree that CR should be noted and we can focus on NEC CR Kundan (NEC) provides list of drawbacks of this solution. alessio (Nokia) the issue is postponed then. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.4 | S2-2209202 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3529R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on Interaction between NSSAA and NSSRG | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2206159 from S2#152E. LATE DOC: Rx 03/10, 10:50. Noted | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that we should move forward with CR in 9004 i.e. this CR can be noted. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kundan(NEC): this document should be noted. reasons are provided in 09201 thread. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.4 | S2-2209004 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3693R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Pending NSSAI and NSSRG | NEC, Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, ZTE | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2206644 from S2#152E. CC#3: r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209943. Agree r02? | Genadi (Lenovo) asks a question for clarification. Alessio(Nokia) comments and asks this paper to be noted Ashok (Samsung) comments Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Kundan(NEC) responds to Genadi. Kundan (NEC) comments Kundan(NEC) asks question to Genadi. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01 Genadi (Lenovo) comments to Kundan(NEC). Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Kundan(NEC) that the NSSRG applies to Allowed NSSAI and the UE may have one Allowed NSSAI for AT1 and another Allowed NSSAI for AT2. Kundan (NEC) the current specification 23.501 and 24.501 don't allow what you are saying. Please below in details. Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Kundan (NEC). Jinguo(ZTE) provides comment Kundan (NEC) responds to Ashok. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and propose we move forward with this CR Ashok (Samsung) suggests a way forward Myungjune comments on way forward proposed by Ashok (Samsung) Ashok (Samsung) responds to Myungjune Alessio(Nokia) cannot accept any revision of this document where there is a concept the Ue needs to wait for NSSAA completion before requesting a new set of slices. we can only accept 9201 approach that is consistent with the behavior when the same S-NSSAI is allowed rather than pending... alessio(Nokia) objects to the approach in this CR as it causes blocking obtaining service. Alessio(Nokia) has problems with this paper being the basis as it is against established 3GPP principle to not delay or potentially block service as already stated, cannot live with this approach. Alessio(Nokia) suggests to keep the discussion focused and not introduce AT distractions... the requested NSSAI is what matters and this is to be irrespective of the Pending NSSAI or allowed NSSAI. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) provides comments Jinguo(ZTE) propose a compromise for R17 alessio(nokia) agrees with Ulises(Interdigital) that the only restriction is to ensure the requested NSSAI is made of mutually compatible S-NSSAIs ad we will object to this cR. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Nokia that we should maintain a consistent logic for NSSRG Kundan (NEC) nothing against the 3GPP principle this is following 3GPP specification and GSMA requirement of NSSRG. aligned with stage 3 specification. Mutually exclusive services cannot be attained at the same time. one needs to be dropped. Alessio(Nokia) UE requests compatible slices between themselves at all times. the AMF can allow a pending if compatible with allowed when NSSAA successfully completed, else it will remove from pending the S-NSSAI (if NSSAA does not fails otherwise it rejects the S-NSSAI). there is nothing to add. we have the CR that does this. I stop commenting on this subject as w already said the same thing too many times. Nokia CRs has many issues already highlighted in that thread. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) provides reply ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xiaowen (vivo) provides comments. Kundan(NEC) provides r02. In this revision we have added a condition that UE shall apply the NSSRG rules with respect to pending NSSAI if the UE is interested which is very much aligned with CT1 specification. Kundan(NEC) ask questions to Ulises to understand his comment further. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) provides answers to Kundan Kundan (NEC) responds to Xiaowen. Xiaowen (vivo) responds to Kundan. Alessio(Nokia) comment: the fact stage 3 forgot to update this quoted text by kundan on Pnding NSSAI when NSSRG was introduced is undeniable. like we did forget to update our specs. so not sure we can refer to not updated text of CT1 after NSSRG was introduced to resolve this. SA2 anc TCT1 need to resolve the NSSAA and NSSRG feature interaction. we want to do it In a way that des NOT block the Ue to request new services like when the same S-NSSAI is allowed. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.4 | S2-2209943 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3693R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Pending NSSAI and NSSRG | NEC, Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, ZTE | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2209004r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.4 | S2-2209022 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3694R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Pending NSSAI and AMF Relocation in Connected mode 23.501. | NEC, Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2206652 from S2#152E. Approved. CC#3: This was postponed. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.4 | S2-2208545 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3682R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): UE-Slice-MBR exemption for priority services | Samsung | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2206034 from S2#152E. CC#3: Postponed | Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 Jinguo(ZTE) provides comment Dongeun (Samsung) replies to Jinguo (ZTE) Dongeun (Samsung) replies to Belen (Ericsson) Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to note this paper Dongeun (Samsung) disagrees to Haiyang (Huawei) Haiyang (Huawei) provides feedback Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Dongeun Dongeun (Samsung) replies to Haiyang (Huawei) and Jinguo (ZTE) Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Dongeun (Samsung) provides r02 alessio(Nokia) comments Belen (Ericsson) provides comments, replies to Samsung as well. Dongeun (Samsung) replies to Belen (Ericsson) and provide r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.4 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 8.4 | S2-2208470 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3717 (Rel-17, 'F'): AMF provides Target NSSAIs for all TAI in the Registration Area | NEC | Rel-17 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 8.4 | S2-2208471 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3568 (Rel-17, 'F'): AMF provides Target NSSAIs for all TAI in the Registration Area | NEC | Rel-17 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 8.4 | S2-2208521 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0748 (Rel-17, 'F'): AMF provides Target NSSAIs for all TAI in the Registration Area | NEC | Rel-17 | Not Handled | Mirko (Huawei) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 8.4 | S2-2208969 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3741 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to the Target NSSAI feature in RRC redirection | NEC | Rel-17 | Not Handled | Jinguo(ZTE) comments this CR is not handled. Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) has questions for clarification and concerns ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 8.5 | - | - | - | Enhanced support of Industrial IoT - TSC/URLLC enhancements (IIoT) | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 8.5 | S2-2208553 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3573 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on time synchronization error budget provisioning and ASTI management | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209569. | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments regarding if this is FASMO, if we are to proceed the following comments apply Devaki (Nokia) provides r01 - believes it is a FASMO as current stage 2 has some inconsistencies resulting in ambiguity for stage 3 and implementation. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments to remove RAN impacts on cover sheet as there is none, if others don't have any issue on FASMO, I can live with the CR ?? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) comments that we will remove the RAN impacts from cover page of the final uploaded version of the CR. Thanks! ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.5 | S2-2209569 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3573R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on time synchronization error budget provisioning and ASTI management | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208553r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.5 | S2-2208578 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3527R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment of IIoT related parameter description | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2206052 from S2#152E. r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209570, merging S2-2208947 | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments Mirko (Huawei) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.5 | S2-2209570 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3527R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment of IIoT related parameter description | Huawei, HiSilicon, ZTE, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208578r01, merging S2-2208947. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.5 | S2-2208936 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3589 (Rel-17, 'F'): Adding SUPI in BSF-DISCOVER output | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Approved | Saso (Intel) provides r01 and cosigns. Devaki (Nokia) comments on r01 (moving all Mandatory parameters to be optional would have backward compatibility issues?) Qianghua (Huawei) provides comments Qianghua (Huawei) provides r02 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments isn't this approach too drastic and contradictory to what we usually do? Qianghua (Huawei) agrees with Shabnam and prefers the original. Saso (Intel) withdraws r01; ok with r00. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.5 | S2-2208522 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3570 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to BSF service description | Samsung | Rel-17 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208936 | Shabnam (Ericsson) proposes to take 8936 as the basis and consider this merged. Sang-Jun (Samsung) confirms 8522 is merged into 8936. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.5 | S2-2208947 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3590 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the AF request Qos procedure. | ZTE | Rel-17 | Merged into S2-2209570 | Mirko (Huawei) suggests to merge this CR into S2-2208578r01. zhendong (ZTE) confirm the merge proposal ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.6 | - | - | - | Access Traffic Steering, Switch and Splitting support in the 5G system architecture Phase 2 (ATSSS_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.7 | - | - | - | Support of Aerial Systems Connectivity, Identification, and Tracking (ID_UAS) | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 8.7 | S2-2208104 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG4: LS on UAV authorization container | CT WG4 (C4-223513) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205417 from S2#152-e. Response drafted in S2-2208295. Final response in S2-2209274 | Replied to | |
| 8.7 | S2-2208295 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on UAV authorization container | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208104. r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209274. | Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) expresses concerns and proposes R01 Pallab (Nokia) comments on R01 Ashok (Samsung) comments Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) disagrees Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) comments Guanglei (Huawei) provides comments and r02 based on r01 Ashok (Samsung) seeks clarification Pallab (Nokia) comments and provides R03 Guanzhou (InterDigital) can't accept r03. Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) provides R04 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments on the wording see below Pallab (Nokia) responds to Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) Pallab (Nokia) responds to Shabnam (Ericsson) Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r05 Stefano (Qualcomm) agrees and provides R06 to improve readability. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that maybe there is misunderstanding I understood that payload availability is NOT up to stage 3 since it will be part of the function of the USS/UAS NF and will be forwarded, the only aspect left is payload type is needed or not and that we leave to stage 3. Did I misunderstand that? Stefano (Qualcomm) agrees and provides R07. Pallab (Nokia) is OK with r07 Ashok (Samsung) also fine with r07 Guanzhou (InterDigital) is OK with r07. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanglei (Huawei) is Ok with r07 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.7 | S2-2209274 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on UAV authorization container | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208295r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.7 | S2-2208137 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG4: LS on Indication of Network Assisted Positioning method | CT WG4 (C4-224626) | Rel-17 | Postponed | Guanglei (Huawei) comments the corresponding Ls reply is 8744, discussed in 8.14 | Postponed |
| 8.7 | S2-2208296 | CR | Approval | 23.256 CR0068 (Rel-17, 'F'): Corrections to functionality and procedure at UAS NF for C2 authorization | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-17 | Postponed | Guanglei (Huawei) comments. Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments and provides r01 Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) expresses concerns Pallab (Nokia) comments and provide r02 Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Pallab (Nokia) and can't accept r02. Pallab (Nokia) comments and provide r03 and r04. Prefers r04 Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides r05. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that we can not accept r05 and comments on proposal Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Shabnam (Ericsson). Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the case we are trying to address and CT1 spec in our view needs to be updated and aligned with stage 2 and CT4 discussion. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Guanzhou (InterDigital) Stefano (Qualcomm) asks for clarification on what revision might be acceptable. We see technical concerns with all. Pallab (Nokia) is OK to postpone the CR if there is no agreeable revision Guanzhou (InterDigital) also thinks the CR should be postponed. Shabnam (Ericsson) ok to postpone but we need to come back to this and correct stage 2 consistency, we don't want Rel-18 to be built on misleading text. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.7 | S2-2208843 | CR | Approval | 23.256 CR0070 (Rel-17, 'F'): Aerial Subscription Update | Samsung | Rel-17 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209275. | Guanglei (Huawei) comments. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments regarding potential alternative solns and Objects to current approach in these CRs as not suitable for the subscription handling. Ashok (Samsung) comments. Ashok (Samsung) provides r01. Dimitris (Lenovo) has a question for clarification Ashok (Samsung) responds to Dimitris (Lenovo) Stefano (Qualcomm) responds to Ashok (Samsung) Stefano (Qualcomm) asks question for clarification. Ashok (Samsung) agrees to Stefano (Qualcomm) comment and removed the NOTE and provides r02 Ashok (Samsung) provides r03 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments , thanks we would be ok and please also update 23.502 and correct one UCU left ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.7 | S2-2209275 | CR | Approval | 23.256 CR0070R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Aerial Subscription Update | Samsung | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208843r03. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.7 | S2-2208866 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3586 (Rel-17, 'F'): Aerial Subscription Update | Samsung | Rel-17 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209276. | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments to follow potential soln option as indicated in the thread of document 8843 and objects to the soln in this CR Ashok (Samsung) provides r01 which is inline with 8843 paper discussion ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.7 | S2-2209276 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3586R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Aerial Subscription Update | Samsung | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208866r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | System enhancement for Proximity based Services in 5GS (5G_ProSe) | - | - | Docs:=27 | - | |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | Discovery message cast type | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208106 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG2: LS on Cast Type for Discovery message | RAN WG2 (R2-2206391) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205424 from S2#152-e. Responses drafted in S2-2208515, S2-2209064. Final response in S2-2209277 | Replied to | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208515 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Cast Type for Discovery message | OPPO | Rel-17 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2205994 from S2#152E. Response to S2-2208106. Noted | Hannu (Nokia) proposes to note this LS and to proceed as suggested in S2-2209064 which is better aligned with the existing SA2 specifications. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.8 | S2-2209064 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Cast Type for Discovery message | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208106. r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209277. | Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r01. Hannu (Nokia) provides r02. Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hannu (Nokia) thanks Fei for the update and supports r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.8 | S2-2209277 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on Cast Type for Discovery message | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2209064r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208513 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Cast type for direct discovery. | OPPO | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.8 | S2-2208514 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0108R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Cast Type for Discovery message | OPPO | Rel-17 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2205993 from S2#152E. Noted | Hannu (Nokia) proposes to note the document as there is neither requirement nor criteria for the upper layers to determine the cast type. Fei (OPPO) responds to Hannu (Nokia) Hong (Qualcomm) proposes to NOTE the CR. Hannu (Nokia) shares the view of Hong that SA2 hasn't got any requirement but only a question from RAN2 in their LS and we need to reply based on our specifications. Sudeep (Apple) agrees with Hannu (Nokia) and Hong (Qualcomm) and proposes to NOTE this CR. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | 5G DDNMF discovery | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208122 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG1: LS on 5G DDNMF discovery | CT WG1 (C1-225229) | Rel-17 | Response drafted in S2-2208600. Final response in S2-2209261 | Replied to | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208600 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on 5G DDNMF Discovery | ZTE | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208122. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209261. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.8 | S2-2209261 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on 5G DDNMF Discovery | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208600r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208599 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0119 (Rel-17, 'F'): Add 5G DDNMF Address in Parameter Provisioning for 5G ProSe Direct Discovery | ZTE, Ericsson | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | Policy request during registration procedure | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208128 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG1: LS on V2X policy or ProSe policy request during registration procedure | CT WG1 (C1-225451) | Rel-17 | Responses drafted in S2-2208355, S2-2208700. Postponed | Postponed | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208355 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on V2X policy or ProSe policy request during registration procedure | LG Electronics | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208128. Noted | Susan (Huawei) proposes to either merge this draft LS to S2-2208700 or note this paper . Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Susan. Susan (Huawei) replies to Hong (Qualcomm). Hannu (Nokia) asks whether we are discussing the removal of the Rel-17 requirement or including it in Rel-18? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.8 | S2-2208700 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on V2X policy or ProSe policy request during registration procedure | Huawei, HiSilicon | Response to S2-2208128. Noted | LaeYoung (LGE) thinks that this LS may be not needed depending on the discussion outcome for 8356/8357. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208356 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0743 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of ProSe policy request during registration procedure | Ericsson, LG Electronics, CATT, Huawei, ZTE | Rel-17 | Postponed | Susan (Huawei) provides r01. Hannu (Nokia) supports r01. The cover page update is needed as in the absence of any Rel-18 TS version, we can only decide on Rel-17 in this meeting. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Hannu (Nokia) and Susan (Huawei) and provides r02. Hong (Qualcomm) objects r01. Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 (please ignore r02) Sherry (Xiaomi) comments. Hannu (Nokia) asks whether we can postpone this Rel-17 proposal until Rel-18 TS version exists? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to get this CR POSTPONED because 8357 covering same topic (so coupled together) is postponed. Judy (Ericsson) agrees to postpone this CR until TS spec for Rel-18 is available Hannu (Nokia) adds the comment for the minutes that SA2 did not challenge the applicability of this CR to Rel-17. The CR is postponed to allow us apply it only on Rel-17 without impacting Rel-18. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.8 | S2-2208357 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0115 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of ProSe policy request during registration procedure | Ericsson, LG Electronics, CATT, Huawei, ZTE | Rel-17 | Postponed | Susan (Huawei) provides r01. Hannu (Nokia) supports r01 as in the absence of any Rel-18 TS, we can't decide on Rel-18 yet. Hong (Qualcomm) objects to r01. Judy (Ericsson) provides r02 to allow the work to be continued in Rel-18 Hong (Qualcomm) is fine with r02. Hannu (Nokia) proposes to postpone the CR on the grounds explained in S2-2208356 discussion thread. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Hannu (Nokia) and OK to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hannu (Nokia) adds the comment for the minutes that SA2 did not challenge the applicability of this CR to Rel-17. The CR is postponed to allow us apply it only on Rel-17 without impacting Rel-18. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.8 | S2-2208482 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0116 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of ProSe policy request during registration procedure | CATT | Rel-17 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208357 | Deng Qiang (CATT) this paper can be merged into S2-2208357. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.8 | S2-2208483 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0747 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of V2X/ProSe policy request during registration procedure | CATT | Rel-17 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208356 | Deng Qiang (CATT) this paper can be merged into S2-2208356. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | RRC estbl cause | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208129 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG1: LS on setting RRC establishment cause value when relay UE has its own service | CT WG1 (C1-225453) | Rel-17 | Noted | Deng Qiang (CATT) this LS In is for information and can be noted. | Noted |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | Secondary authentication | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208153 | LS In | Information | LS from SA WG3: LS Reply on Reply LS on 5G ProSe security open items | SA WG3 (S3-222434) | Rel-17 | Response drafted in S2-2208359. Postponed | Postponed | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208359 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply to 5G ProSe security open items | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208153. Noted | Hannu (Nokia) has got concerns on SA2 telling SA3 what kind of security work they can do. Asking technical questions is of course fine. Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 Steve (Huawei) comments Jungje (Interdigital) comments Judy (Ericsson) responds to Steve (Huawei) and Jungje (Interdigital) Jungje(Interdigital) comments Judy (Ericsson) Hannu (Nokia) is concerned that the LS is not asking SA3 guidance on SA2 specifications but micro-managing SA3 work from SA2. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Jungje(Interdigital) that SA2 is in To but not CCed, and responds to Hannu (Nokia) that inclusion of the draft CR in SA3 LS is for feedback if any and as such no micro managing other WGs work Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Judy (Ericsson) Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r02. Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 with wording update Jungje(Interdigital) responds Judy(Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungje (Interdigital) responds to Judy(Ericsson) and propose to note. Oppose to original and any version. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Jungje (Interdigital) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.8 | S2-2208358 | DISCUSSION | Decision | Discussion of 5G ProSe security open item for L3 Remote UE's secondary AA. | Ericsson | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted | |
| 8.8 | - | - | - | Corrections | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208516 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0117 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on DCR message for DRX | OPPO | Rel-17 | Merged into S2-2209279 | LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Fei (OPPO). Fei (OPPO) responds to LaeYoung (LGE) LaeYoung (LGE) comments and proposes to MERGE this CR to S2-2208581. Hong (Qualcomm) comments and also thinks separate TX Profile for DCR is not needed. Hannu (Nokia) supports the proposed merging of this document to S2-2208581. Fei (OPPO) responds and fine to NOTE/merge this CR. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Fei (OPPO), Hannu (Nokia) and Hong (Qualcomm). Wen (vivo) replies. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.8 | S2-2208581 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0118 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarifications on PC5 DRX operations | Vivo, LG Electronics | Rel-17 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209279, merging S2-2208516 | Fei (OPPO) provides r01 LaeYoung (LGE) is OK with r01. Hannu (Nokia) supports r01 and considers it reasonable to call the other paper as merged to this one. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wen (vivo) is OK with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.8 | S2-2209279 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0118R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarifications on PC5 DRX operations | Vivo, LG Electronics | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208581r01, merging S2-2208516. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.8 | S2-2208908 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0120 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction on PC5 link release indication | Huawei, HiSilicon, vivo | Rel-17 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209280. | Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.8 | S2-2209280 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0120R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction on PC5 link release indication | Huawei, HiSilicon, vivo | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208908r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.8 | S2-2209138 | CR | Approval | 23.304 CR0121 (Rel-18, 'F'): Updates to Control Plane based security procedures for 5G ProSe UE-to-Network Relay | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CR Number missing! Noted | Judy (Ericsson) comments Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 Fei (OPPO) comments. Steve (Huawei) Some small hiccup, the comment from Judy is not about S2-2209138. Steve (Huawei) comments Judy (Ericsson) thanks Steve (Huawei) and corrects that no revison is provided to 9138. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies, and proposes to send a LS to SA3 to confirm whether both user plane based solution and control based solution are supported for 5G ProSe discovery. Sherry (Xiaomi) proposes to send a LS to SA3 to confirm whether 5G ProSe relay discovery security have two options of user plane based solution and control based solution. Deng Qiang (CATT) comments. Fei (OPPO) provides comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Deng Qiang (CATT) think this CR should be NOTED. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | Architectural enhancements for 5G multicast-broadcast services (5MBS) | - | - | Docs:=40 | - | |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | 5MBS User Services | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208108 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: Reply LS on 5MBS User Services | SA WG4 (S4-220828) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205450 from S2#152-e. Responses drafted in S2-2208329, S2-2208720. Final response in S2-2209281 | Replied to | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208329 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on 5MBS User Services | Ericsson, ZTE, Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208108. r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209281, merging S2-2208720 | Robbie (Ericsson) clarifies to LiMeng (Huawei). LiMeng (Huawei) comments and provides r01 Miguel (Qualcomm) comments Robbie (Ericsson) provides r02. Peng Tan (TELUS) request clarification and put further comments on r02 Robbie (Ericsson) replies to Peng Tan (TELUS). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peng Tan (TELUS) provides further comments Peng (TELUS) replies to Robbie (Ericsson) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209281 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on 5MBS User Services | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208329r02, merging S2-2208720. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208951 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0129R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the traffic handling in MBSTF for interworking | ZTE, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, Qualcomm | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2206206 from S2#152E. CR Revision incorrect: -1! r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209282. | LiMeng (Huawei) provides r01 Miguel (Qualcomm) responds to LiMeng (Huawei) finds no merit for r01, supports r00 Thomas(Nokia) raises concerns against r01 zhendong (ZTE) share the similar view with qualcomm and nokia Robbie (Ericsson) prefers r00. LiMeng (Huawei) responds and provides r02. zhendong (ZTE) provides r03 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r04. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209282 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0129R2 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the traffic handling in MBSTF for interworking | ZTE, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, Qualcomm | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208951r04. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208720 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on MBS user service | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208108. Merged into S2-2209281 | LiMeng (Huawei) is fine use the email thread of S2-2208329 for discussions Thomas (Nokia) suggest to use S2-2208329 as basis for discussions Robbie (Ericsson) suggests marking it as merged into S2-2208329 LiMeng (Huawei) agrees to merge this document into S2-2208329 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.9 | S2-2208718 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion on MBS user service. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208115 | LS In | Information | LS on modifications to MBS User Services architecture | SA WG4 (S4-221119) | Rel-17 | Revision of Postponed S2-2208096 from S2#152-e. Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) suggests marking it as NOTED | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208131 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG3: Reply LS on 5MBS User Services | CT WG3 (C3-224655) | Rel-17 | Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) suggests marking it as NOTED | Noted |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208136 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG4: LS on Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | CT WG4 (C4-224417) | Rel-17 | Responses drafted in S2-2208201, S2-2208328, S2-2208897. Final response in S2-2209283 | Robbie (Ericsson) provides comments Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Thomas (Nokia) suggest this thread as basis for discussions Thomas (Nokia) replies to Fenqin Fenqin (Huawei) provides feedback Thomas(Nokia) replies to Fenqin Fenqin (Huawei) replies to Thomas Fenqin (Huawei) further replies to Thomas Thomas(Nokia) replies to Robbie Robbie (Ericsson) replies to Thomas(Nokia) Fenqin (Huawei) replies to Thomas(Nokia) | Replied to |
| 8.9 | S2-2208201 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208136. Merged into S2-2209283 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this LS to 8897 and take 8897 as base line. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.9 | S2-2208328 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208136. Merged into S2-2209283 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this LS to 8897 and take 8897 as base line. Robbie (Ericsson) confirms it is merged into 8897. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.9 | S2-2208897 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208136. r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209283, merging S2-2208201 and S2-2208328 | Fenqin (Huawei) provides r01 Thomas (Nokia) provides r02 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r03 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r04 Fenqin (Huawei) is fine with r04 Thomas (Nokia) is fine with r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209283 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208897r04, merging S2-2208201 and S2-2208328. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208200 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0134 (Rel-17, 'F'): Handling of tunnel between UPF and MB_UPF for Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-17 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209284, merging S2-2208331 | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 to capture results of offline discussions Robbie (Ericsson) provides r02, merge in S2-2208331 Thomas (Nokia) provides r03 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r04 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r05 Thomas (Nokia) is fine with r04 zhendong (ZTE) is fine with r04 Fenqin (Huawei) is not ok with r05 and provide r06. Youngkyo(Samsung) provides a comment. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r07, including the comments from Youngkyo(Samsung). Fenqin (Huawei) provide response to Youngkyo. Robbie (Ericsson) replies to Fenqin (Huawei). Thomas (Nokia) can accept r07 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) we are fine with r07 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209284 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0134R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Handling of tunnel between UPF and MB_UPF for Multicast MBS session Deactivation and Reactivation | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, Ericsson, Huawei | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208200r07, merging S2-2208331. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208331 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0136 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on MBS session activation and deactivation | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Merged into S2-2209284 | Thomas (Nokia) suggest to consider this CR as merged into S2-2208200 Robbie (Ericsson) confirms this CR is merged into S2-2208200 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | shared NG-U Termination among gNBs | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208148 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG3: LS on shared NG-U Termination among gNBs | RAN WG3 (R3-225247) | Rel-17 | Responses drafted in S2-2208722, S2-2208950. Final response in S2-2209285 | Replied to | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208722 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Common CU-UP | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208148. Merged into S2-2209285 | Thomas (Nokia) suggest to merge into S2-2208950 LiMeng (Huawei) is fine with the merging proposal. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.9 | S2-2208950 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on shared NG-U Termination among gNBs | ZTE | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208148. r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209285, merging S2-2208722 | Fenqin (Huawei) provides the r01 zhendong (ZTE) provides r02 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r03 zhendong (ZTE) provides the response ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209285 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on shared NG-U Termination among gNBs | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208950r03, merging S2-2208722. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208721 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion on the issue of shared NG-U Termination among gNBs. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208948 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion on the common UP issue raised by RAN WG3 for shared delivery establishment management. | ZTE | Rel-17 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208949 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0141 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the shared delivery tunnel management for common gNB UP case | ZTE | Rel-17 | r10 agreed. Revised to S2-2209286. | zhendong (ZTE) provides the response zhendong (ZTE) comments Robbie (Ericsson) provides r02 Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Fenqin (Huawei) provides the comment and r03 Thomas (Nokia) provides r04 and raises concerns against r03 Thomas (Nokia) provides r05 as alternative to r04 Prefers r04 but can also accept r05 Fenqin(Huawei) provides r06 zhendong (ZTE) provides r07 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r08. Fenqin(Huawei) is fine with r08 zhendong (ZTE) reply to robbie(Ericsson) Robbie (Ericsson) replies to zhendong (ZTE) Thomas (Nokia) provides r09, raises concerns about r08 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r10 Thomas (Nokia) is fine with r10 Fenqin(Huawei) is fine with r10 zhendong (ZTE) is fine with r10 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209286 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0141R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the shared delivery tunnel management for common gNB UP case | ZTE, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, Ericsson, Huawei | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208949r10. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | Other LSs | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208152 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3: Reply LS on the impact of MSK update on MBS multicast session update procedure | SA WG3 (S3-222391) | Rel-17 | Response drafted in S2-2208327. Final response in S2-2209287 | Replied to | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208327 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on the impact of MSK update on MBS multicast session update procedure | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Response to S2-2208152. r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209287. | Fenqin (Huawei) provides r01 Robbie (Ericsson) is fine with r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209287 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on the impact of MSK update on MBS multicast session update procedure | SA WG2 | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208327r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208124 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG1: Reply LS on AS-NAS layer interactions for MBS | CT WG1 (C1-225249) | Rel-17 | Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) suggests marking it as NOTED | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208141 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG2: Reply LS on the MBS broadcast service continuity and MBS session identification | RAN WG2 (R2-2208885) | Rel-17 | Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) suggests marking it as NOTED | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208146 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG3: Response LS on Support of Broadcast and Multicast MBS sessions with AMF Set | RAN WG3 (R3-225165) | Rel-17 | Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) suggests marking it as NOTED | Noted |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | CRs | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208330 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0135 (Rel-17, 'F'): Missing NID in output parameters to AF for SNPN | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.9 | S2-2208577 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0137 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clean-up of PCC procedures for 5MBS | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209288. | Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 Thomas(Nokia) comments Judy (Ericsson) responds to Thomas(Nokia) Thomas(Nokia) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) is fine with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209288 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0137R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clean-up of PCC procedures for 5MBS | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208577r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208723 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0139 (Rel-17, 'F'): CR on MTK or MSK processing | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209289. | Robbie (Ericsson) asks for clarification LiMeng (Huawei) thanks for r01, but it seems that the link is broken. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Thomas(Nokia) replies that link now works. Thomas (Nokia) replies to Robbie LiMeng (Huawei) replies to Thomas and Robbie. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r02 and replies to LiMeng (Huawei) and Thomas (Nokia) LiMeng (Huawei) asks questions Robbie (Ericsson) replies to LiMeng (Huawei) Thomas (Nokia) is fine with r02 and replies to LiMeng and Robbie ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.9 | S2-2209289 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0139R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): CR on MTK or MSK processing | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, Ericsson | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208723r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208170 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0133R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment with SA WG4 work on MBS service announcements | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of (postponed) S2-2207689 from S2-152E. CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: No consensus. Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) comments that S2-2208170 and S2-2208840 are competing, and we need to find a way forward. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) proposes to NOTE S2-2208170 and move ahead with S2-2208840 Youngkyo(Samsung) shares the view with Haris(Qualcomm). Robbie (Ericsson) supports Haris(Qualcomm) to note this CR and move ahead with S2-2208840 Thomas(Nokia) suggest bringing both S2-2208170 and S2-2208840 to CC2 as they are competing proposals ==== Final Deadline ==== Thomas(Nokia) provides late r01 | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2208840 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0140 (Rel-17, 'F'): Alignment with stage-3 for USD and service announcement | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-17 | CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: No consensus. Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) supports this CR, and adds Ericsson as co-source in r01. LiMeng (Huawei) objects to the proposal. Youngkyo(Samsung) supports wayforward of this CR and provide r02. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to NOTE this LS, and use S2-2208812 Haris(Qualcomm) responds to LiMeng (Huawei) Haris(Qualcomm) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wanqiang(Huawei) objects the proposal (any revision). Kaixin (CBN) objects to the proposal. Zhendong (ZTE) agrees with Wanqiang (Huawei), proposes to Note this CR. Haris(Qualcomm) suggests to discuss in CC#2 Antoine (Orange) supports r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.9 | S2-2209198 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0142 (Rel-17, 'F'): Update on service announcement/pre-configuration description | Samsung | Rel-17 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208840 | Robbie (Ericsson) suggests merging it to S2-2208840 Thomas (Nokia) suggest to consider this CR covered by S2-2208840or S2-2208170 Youngkyo(Samsung) is okay to handle this issue S2-2208840 instead of me to be continued from the previous meeting. Youngkyo(Samsung) is okay with merging it to S2-2208840 Thomas (Nokia) suggest to consider this CR covered by S2-2208840 or S2-2208170 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 8.9 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 8.9 | S2-2208719 | CR | Approval | 23.247 CR0138 (Rel-17, 'F'): CR on MBS user service | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 8.10 | - | - | - | System enablers for multi-USIM devices (MUSIM) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.11 | - | - | - | Architecture aspects for using satellite access in 5G (5GSAT_ARCH) | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 8.11 | S2-2208121 | LS In | Action | LS from CT WG1: LS on UE selecting a non-allowed TAI in satellite access broadcasting multiple TACs per cell | CT WG1 (C1-225160) | Rel-17 | Noted | Steve (Huawei) comments Jean Yves (Thales) comments Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Hannu (Nokia) proposes to note the LS and agrees the interpretation suggested by Jean Yves and Stefan. Yuxin (Xiaomi) supports to note the LS and provides comments. Chris (Vodafone) is also Ok to note the LS. The example looks like network misconfiguration. | Noted |
| 8.11 | S2-2208135 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG4: Reply LS on Nudm_UEContextManagement service for satellite NG-RAN | CT WG4 (C4-224409) | Rel-17 | Noted | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note this LS which is for information Steve (Huawei) agrees about noting. We can note it. | Noted |
| 8.12 | - | - | - | Architecture enhancements for 3GPP support of advanced V2X services - Phase 2 (eV2XARC_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 8.12 | S2-2208165 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG2: LS on TX profile | RAN WG2 (R2-2208853) | Rel-17 | Noted | LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to NOTE this LS because this LS is for Information thus no action is needed in SA2. | Noted |
| 8.12 | S2-2208306 | CR | Approval | 23.287 CR0185 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the PC5 DRX operation for Groupcast | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209571. | LaeYoung (LGE) provides r02. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r01, and replies to Wen (vivo) and Fei (OPPO). Fei (OPPO) comments on r01. Wen(vivo) comments. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r01. LiMeng (Huawei) is fine with r02. LaeYoung (LGE) thanks to LiMeng (Huawei) for checking and confirming r02. :) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fei (OPPO) is fine with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.12 | S2-2209571 | CR | Approval | 23.287 CR0185R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Clarification on the PC5 DRX operation for Groupcast | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208306r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.12 | S2-2208481 | CR | Approval | 23.287 CR0186 (Rel-17, 'F'): Removal of V2X policy request during registration procedure | CATT | Rel-17 | Postponed | LaeYoung (LGE) thanks to Deng Qiang (CATT) and let's merge this CR to S2-2208174. Deng Qiang (CATT) is fine to discuss this issue under AI#7.1, and this paper can be merged into S2-2208174. LaeYoung (LGE) suggests to discuss this issue under AI#7.1 (with S2-2208174). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.13 | - | - | - | 5G System Enhancement for Advanced Interactive Services (5G_AIS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.14 | - | - | - | Enhancement to the 5GC LoCation Services-Phase 2 (5G_eLCS_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 8.14 | S2-2208743 | CR | Approval | 23.273 CR0234 (Rel-17, 'F'): Support an indication of reliable UE location information requirement | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Bad WI Code! Noted | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r02 to correct WI code. Stephen (Qualcomm) flags the r01 with the correct agenda item in the subject line Ming (CATT) comments and provides r03. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments and an r04 Guanglei (Huawei) can live with r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree r01, r02 or r04 but not r00 or r03 Ming (CATT) comments, can only accept r03 for this meeting. Suggests that SA2 checks SA3 on whether the measurement from UE is trusted or not, and align SA2 spec accordingly in future meeting, if necessary. Guanglei (Huawei) understand the concern from Ming(CATT), supports r03 for the sake of future proof. If the discussion on NTN has conclusion that the UE-based measurement is also trusted, we can further revise SA2/SA3 UAS/LCS specifications. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) supports r03 and considers UE provided information as not reliable. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.14 | S2-2208742 | CR | Approval | 23.256 CR0069 (Rel-17, 'F'): Indication of Network Assisted Positioning method for UAV positioning | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Bad WI Code! r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209572. | Guanglei (Huawei) provides r01 to correct WI code. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.14 | S2-2209572 | CR | Approval | 23.256 CR0069R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Indication of Network Assisted Positioning method for UAV positioning | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208742r01. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.14 | S2-2208744 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS reply on Indication of Network Assisted Positioning method | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209573. CC#3: This LS was postponed and S2-2209573 was withdrawn | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides r01 and comments that incoming LS S2-2208137 is in AI#8.7 Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides link to r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanglei (Huawei) is fine with r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.14 | S2-2209573 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS reply on Indication of Network Assisted Positioning method | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208744r01. CC#3: WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 8.14 | S2-2209074 | CR | Approval | 23.273 CR0235 (Rel-17, 'F'): Update of GNSS integrity requirement provisioing | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-17 | Postponed | Cai Simon (Nokia) provides comments Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Runze (Huawei) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm). Runze (Huawei) replies to Simon (Nokia). Cai Simon (Nokia) replies to Runze (Huawei) Runze (Huawei) agrees with Cai Simon (Nokia) and provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) proposes to postpone the CR and agrees with Runze (Huawei) to consult RAN2 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 8.14 | S2-2210162 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on GNSS integrity requirement provisioning | Huawei | CC#4: r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209966. | Runze (Huawei) provides r00 of S2-2210162 in the revision folder. | Revised | |
| 8.14 | S2-2209966 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on GNSS integrity requirement provisioning | SA WG2 | - | Revision of S2-2210162r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 8.15 | - | - | - | Multimedia Priority Service (MPS) Phase 2 (MPS2) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.16 | - | - | - | Dynamic management of group-based event monitoring (TEI17_GEM) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.17 | - | - | - | N7/N40 Interfaces Enhancements to Support GERAN and UTRAN (TEI17_NIESGU) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.18 | - | - | - | System enhancement for Redundant PDU Session (TEI17_SE_RPS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.19 | - | - | - | IMS Optimization for HSS Group ID in an SBA environment (TEI17_IMSGID) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.20 | - | - | - | Support for Signed Attestation for Priority and Emergency Sessions (TEI17_SAPES) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.21 | - | - | - | Dynamically Changing AM Policies in the 5GC (TEI17_DCAMP) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.22 | - | - | - | IP address pool information from UDM (TEI17_IPU) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.23 | - | - | - | Same PCF selection for AMF and SMF (TEI17-SPSFAS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.24 | - | - | - | Support of different slices over different Non-3GPP access (TEI17_N3SLICE) | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 8.24 | S2-2208254 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3704 (Rel-17, 'F'): ULI with TAI for non-3GPP access | Ericsson | Rel-17 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209290. | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Stefan (Ericsson) replies Stefan (Ericsson) provides r02 Marco (Huawei) provide r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00 and R02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.24 | S2-2209290 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3704R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): ULI with TAI for non-3GPP access | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208254r03. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.24 | S2-2208255 | CR | Approval | 23.316 CR2073 (Rel-17, 'F'): ULI with TAI for wireline access | Ericsson | Rel-17 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 8.25 | - | - | - | Minimization of Service Interruption (MINT) | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 8.25 | S2-2208126 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG1: Reply LS on system information extensions for minimization of service interruption (MINT) | CT WG1 (C1-225386) | Rel-17 | Noted | Hyunsook (LGE) proposes to note the LS. | Noted |
| 8.25 | S2-2209166 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3600 (Rel-17, 'F'): PLMN with disaster condition | Samsung | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209291. | Hyunsook (LGE) provides a comment and r01. Haiyang (Huawei) provides a question. Lalith(Samsung) replies Haiyang (Huawei) further provides a question. Lalith(Samsung) replies to Haiyang (Huawei) Haris(Qualcomm) provides r02 Lalith(Samsung) is OK with r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haiyang (Huawei) is OK with r02. Hyunsook (LGE) is OK with r02. Qian (Ericsson) is OK with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.25 | S2-2209291 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3600R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): PLMN with disaster condition | Samsung | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2209166r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.26 | - | - | - | Architecture Enhancement for NR Reduced Capability Devices (ARCH_NR_REDCAP) | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 8.26 | S2-2208127 | LS In | Information | LS from CT WG1: Reply LS on the maximum PTW length of IDLE eDRX | CT WG1 (C1-225450) | Rel-17 | Noted | Steve (Huawei) proposes to note Chris (Vodafone) comments that when using eDRX, DRX should be short and hence large PTW is not needed. It might be good to inform R2 and C1 about that. | Noted |
| 8.27 | - | - | - | Architecture support for NB-IoT/eMTC Non-Terrestrial Networks in EPS (IoT_SAT_ARCH_EPS) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 8.28 | - | - | - | Rel-17 CAT B/C alignment CR(s) due to the work led by other 3GPP Working Groups | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 8.28 | S2-2208188 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3552 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to Nnef_UEId_Get and Nbsf_Management_Discovery definition | Intel | Rel-17 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209574. | Saso (Intel) provides r01 by removing the second change (which is merged in 8936). Dario (Qualcomm) provides r02 Saso(Intel) is ok with r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00, R01; Supports R02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 8.28 | S2-2209574 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3552R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Correction to Nnef_UEId_Get | Intel | Rel-17 | Revision of S2-2208188r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 8.28 | S2-2208469 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3668R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): NSAG for TA(s) just outside of the RA has a specific association to those TA(s) | NEC | Rel-17 | Revision of (Postponed) S2-2205672 from S2#152E. Noted | Genadi (Lenovo) asks a question for clarification. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that current text is good enough i.e. propose to note the CR Tamura (NEC) responds to Genadi. Genadi (Lenovo) is fine with the clarification by Tamura (NEC). Jinguo(ZTE) shares the same view as Peter Hedman (Ericsson) Tamura (NEC) provides r01. Tamura (NEC) replies to Jinguo (ZTE). Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and still do not see the need for the CR Alessio(Nokia) shares the view of Ericsson. the operator can configure NSAGs for TAs outside RA already so there is no FASMO. FASMO does not apply to configuration related issues that can be set in a way that does not cause the misoperation. Jinguo(ZTE) is fine with Tamura (NEC) response Haiyang (Huawei) comments Tamura (NEC) provides r02 reflecting given comments from Jinguo (ZTE) and Sunhaiyang (Huawei) but not seeking approval any more in this meeting. As two companies don't qualify it as FASMO, no point to propose it as release 17. As Peter (Ericsson) proposed in his Email, we are happy to work on it as Release 18. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Andy is right. r02 can be noted. I was not clear. Sorry about it. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 8.28 | S2-2209204 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3: LS reply on 5G NSWO roaming aspects | SA WG3 (S3-222397) | Rel-17 | Noted | Laurent (Nokia): Proposes to NOTE the LS Stefan (Ericsson) agrees to NOTE | Noted |
| 9 | - | - | - | Rel-18 SIDs | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.1.1 | - | - | - | Study on System Enabler for Service Function Chaining (FS_SFC) | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.1.1 | S2-2208268 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-18: KI#1, Basic conclusions . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209858 | Megha(Intel) comments - can this pCR be marked as merged with S2-2209113? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments -this pCR is to be marked as merged with S2-2209113 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.1.1 | S2-2208685 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-18: Conclusions for FS_SFC. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209858 | Dongjoo(Nokia) responds to Megha Megha(Intel) comments - can this pCR be marked as merged with S2-2209113? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dongjoo(Nokia) confirms this document can be marked as merged into S2-2209113. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.1.1 | S2-2208898 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-18: KI#1, Conclusion for KI#1. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209858 | Megha(Intel) comments - can this pCR be marked as merged with S2-2209113? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments - this pCR is to be marked merged with S2-2209113. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.1.1 | S2-2209113 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-18: KI#1: Conclusion. | Intel, AT&T, Interdigital, Microsoft, Sandvine, Deutsche Telekom, DISH network, Charter Communications | Rel-18 | CC#4: r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209858, merging S2-2208268, S2-2208685 and S2-2208898 | Jinguo(ZTE) shares the same view as others Dongjoo(Nokia) responds to Megha Fenqin (Huawei) proposes comments. Megha(Intel) proposes to use this pCR as baseline for all discussions related to KI#1 conclusion. Stefan (Ericsson) also shares the same views Megha(Intel) provides r01 and comments Megha (Intel) provides response to Jinguo (ZTE) Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Megha (Intel) Fenqin (Huawei) provides further comments. Dongjoo(Nokia) asks questions to Jinguo(ZTE) Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Megha Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Dongjoo(Nokia) Megha (Intel) replies to Stefan and provides r02 Dongjoo(Nokia) replies and asks a further question to Jinguo(ZTE) Fenqin (Huawei) provides r03 Dongjoo(Nokia) asks a clarification question to Fenqin(Huawei) Fenqin (Huawei) provides response to Dongjoo. Dongjoo(Nokia) replies to Fenqin(Huawei) and provides r04 Stefan (Ericsson) provides r06 Jinguo(ZTE) provides r07, and points that that Stefan(Ericsson) provides r05 instead of r06, Megha(Intel) provides r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha (Intel) provides comments Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Dongjoo (Nokia) provides feedback to Fenqin (Huawei) Megha (Intel) provides reply to Fenqin(Huawei) Dongjoo (Nokia) supports the response from Megha (Intel) Megha (Intel) provides comment that based on the result of the SoH r05 will be used for KI#1 agreement. Megha (Intel) is ok with r05 with the added underlined text to bullet point 2 - PCF checks whether the indicated SFC policy IDs and Metadata correspond to an authorized SFC policy for the AF. ==== Final Deadline ==== Megha (Intel) proposes to check this pCR in CC#4 to update the approved r05 with the addition of text 'and Metadata' and remove text 'for the AF' in bullet point 2. | Revised |
| 9.1.1 | S2-2209858 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-18: KI#1: Conclusion. | Intel, AT&T, Interdigital, Microsoft, Sandvine, Deutsche Telekom, DISH network, Charter Communications, KPN | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209113r09, merging S2-2208268, S2-2208685 and S2-2208898. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.1.2 | - | - | - | System Enabler for Service Function Chaining (SFC) | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208269 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3706 (Rel-18, 'C'): Basic description of Service Function Chaining | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Postponed | Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments proposes to postpone the CR. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208455 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3716 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support for Service Function Chaining in 5GS | Intel | Rel-18 | Noted | Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments that based on the outcome of SoH , this CR is to be NOTED. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208525 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3719 (Rel-18, 'C'): SMF/UPF functionalities for SFC support (based on option 1 for KI#1 Conclusion) | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Postponed | Dongjoo(Nokia) ask a question Hyunsook (LGE) clarifies. Dongjoo(Nokia) replies to Hyunsook(LGE) Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments to postpone the CR to next meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208526 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3571 (Rel-18, 'B'): Enabling AF to request predefined SFC | ETRI | Rel-18 | Postponed | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Yoohwa (ETRI) responds to Stefan (Ericsson). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) ask to postpone this paper Megha(Intel) comments - For CC#4 as this CR needs to be marked as postponed. | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208689 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3727 (Rel-18, 'B'): Adding a clause for the description of SFC | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Postponed | Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments to postpone the CR to next meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208701 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3728 (Rel-18, 'B'): Supporting traffic influence to service functions | Lenovo, | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209859. Postponed | Megha(Intel) provides r01 and comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) ask to postpone this paper Dimitris (Lenovo) is ok to postpone Megha(Intel) comments - For CC#4 this CR needs to be marked as postponed. | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2209859 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3728R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Supporting traffic influence to service functions | Lenovo, | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208701r01. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208712 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3580 (Rel-18, 'B'): Supporting traffic influence to service functions | Lenovo, | Rel-18 | Postponed | Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Dimitris (Lenovo) responds ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208899 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3736 (Rel-18, 'B'): Application Function influence SFC support | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments to postpone the CR to next meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208456 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3567 (Rel-18, 'B'): Procedure update to support Service Function Chaining in 5GS | Intel | Rel-18 | Noted | Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments that based on the outcome of SoH , this CR is to be NOTED. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208691 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3579 (Rel-18, 'B'): Procedure update for SFC support | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | CR Number missing! Postponed | Dongjoo(Nokia) provides r02 Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Dongjoo (Nokia) provides r03 accepting the comments from Stefan (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments to postpone this CR for next meeting ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208900 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3588 (Rel-18, 'B'): Application Function influence SFC support | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Megha(Intel) comments the decision to endorse/postpone this CR depends on the KI#1 conclusion in AI 9.1.1. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) comments to postpone this CR for next meeting ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.1.2 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208270 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0740 (Rel-18, 'C'): Basic description of Service Function Chaining | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208457 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0746 (Rel-18, 'B'): Policy update to support Service Function Chaining in 5GS | Intel | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208702 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0752 (Rel-18, 'B'): SFC Support | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.1.2 | S2-2208901 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0756 (Rel-18, 'B'): Application Function influence SFC support | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | Study on Generic group management, exposure and communication enhancements (FS_GMEC) | - | - | Docs:=28 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | KI#1 - group service area, group MBR, group QoS | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208524 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1: Conclusion update on service area enforcement. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209575. | Qianghua (Huawei) provides r01 to capture the assumption to use LADN-based approach Sang-Jun (Samsung) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hyunsook (LGE) is OK with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2209575 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1: Conclusion update on service area enforcement. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208524r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208607 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Conclusion update for KI#1 for SMF service area control. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the pCR Dan (China Mobile) reply Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Qianghua (Huawei) provides comments and suggests a way forward Qianghua (Huawei) provides r01, this is an attempt to make a way forward as proposed below ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Shubhranshu (Nokia) concerns to r01 Stefan (Ericsson) shares same concern as Shubhranshu Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects also to r01 for the reasons given by Shubhranshu and Stefan ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208594 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1: Update for Group-MBR conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209576. | Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2209576 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1: Update for Group-MBR conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208594r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208714 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1_Conclusion update for QoS provision for KI#5 muticast group. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | CC#3: r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209948. | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Qianghua (Huawei) also suggests to consider this as part of KI#3, but with different views on how to use such QoS Heng (China Telecom) reply Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments Stefan (Ericsson) comments Sang-Jun (Samsung) comments. Heng (China Telecom) provide r01. Heng (China Telecm) provides r02 Shubhranshu (Nokia) asks for clarification Heng (China Telecom) reply to Shubhranshu and provide r03 to correct the mistake. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Heng (China Telecom) reply to Shubhranshu (Nokia) Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the PCR (all versions) Heng (China Telecom) reply to Sebastian (Qualcomm) Sang-Jun (Samsung) proposes to go with r03. Qianghua (Huawei) proposes to go with r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2209948 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#3_Conclusion update for QoS provision for KI#5 muticast group. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208714r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | KI#3 - conclusion updates | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208280 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#3: Conclusion updates . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209674. | Qianghua (Huawei) provides comments Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r01 Qianghua (Huawei) provides r02 Stefan (Ericsson) provides r03 Qianghua (Huawei) provides r04 Stefan (Ericsson) provides r05 Shubhranshu (Nokia) objects r04 Qianghua (Huawei) replies and also asks Sebastian to reconsider again ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r01; objects to other versions; can be ok with r05 if this text ('The following example or NOTE may however be added to e.g. TS 23.501 or 23.502) to clarify how the AF does this.') and the two sub-bullets are removed and replaced by 'How the AF does this is not to be standardized (An example or NOTE may however be added to e.g. TS 23.501 or 23.502).' Stefan (Ericsson) OK with r00, r01, r03, r05. Objects to r02, r04 Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies to Stefan Qianghua (Huawei) OK to go with r05+ removal of ('The following example or NOTE may however be added to e.g. TS 23.501 or 23.502) to clarify how the AF does this.') and the two sub-bullets, + addition of 'How the AF does this is not to be standardized in SA2 specifications (A NOTE may however be added to e.g. TS 23.501 or 23.502' + removal of the EN about CSR/CSA Qianghua (Huawei) cannot accept R0, R01, r03, for records ==== Final Deadline ==== Shubhranshu (Nokia) agrees and proposes to capture this in Chair's Note: 'Revision of S2-2208280r05 + changes proposed by Huawei', instead of current Chair's Note which says: 'Revision of S2-2208280r05 + changes proposed by Qualcomm' Antoine (Orange): I don't understand 'removal of the EN about CSR/CSA' because there's no EN and nothing about CSR/CSA in r05. Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with the proposal by Shubhranshu (Nokia) | Revised |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2209674 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#3: Conclusion updates . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208280r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208503 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Update to conclusion of KI#3. | Siemens | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | KI#4- Rapp Blank Conclusion | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208646 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Merged Conclusion for FS_GMEC KI#4. | Samsung (Rapp), Huawei (Rapp) | Rel-18 | CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: Noted | Qianghua (Huawei) provides r01 Laurent (Nokia): provides r02 Qianghua (Huawei) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stefan (Ericsson) objects to r01-r03 (r00 is empty) Qianghua (Huawei), based on offline discussion, proposes to go with r03 + the following changes: Move sentence 'Implementation dependent signaling ... is based on implementation choice.' to the NOTE, and change 'signaling' to 'mechanism' Add 'except a NOTE such as' after 'No standard impacts are expected for this purpose' Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00-R03 Sang-Jun (Samsung) also supports going with r03 + the following changes: Move sentence 'Implementation dependent signaling ... is based on implementation choice.' to the NOTE, and change 'signaling' to 'mechanism' Add 'except a NOTE such as' after 'No standard impacts are expected for this purpose' Zhendong (ZTE) is fine with qianghua proposal Stefan (Ericsson) cannot accept Qianghua proposal Qianghua (Huawei), based on offline discussion, proposes to go with r03 + the following changes: Move sentence 'Implementation dependent signaling ... is based on implementation choice.' to the NOTE, and change 'signaling' to 'mechanism' Add 'except a NOTE such as' after 'No standard impacts are expected for this purpose' + confirm whether to keep the Ens at CC#3 ==== Final Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): my request is to have a written text in front of me at the CC3. Especially I require to SEE where such NOTE would be 'No standard impacts are expected for this purpose' Qianghua (Huawei) provides r04 at CC#3, need to check whether to keep the ENs or not at CC#3, besides the following changes over r03 seem agreeable: - Move sentence 'Implementation dependent signaling ... is based on implementation choice.' to the NOTE, and change 'signaling' to 'mechanism' - Add 'except a NOTE such as' after 'No standard impacts are expected for this purpose' | Noted |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | KI#4-contributions from company | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208283 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#4: Conclusion proposal. | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Noted | Qianghua (Huawei) disagrees some observations and thus cannot agree the conclusions pointing to specific solutions. Sang-Jun (Samsung) shares the same veiws as Qianghua. Stefan (Ericsson) provides replies Laurent (Nokia): answers Qianghua (Huawei) provides responses to the comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) agrees to note or merge, discussion already under 08646. Otherwise object for record. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208939 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#4, evaluations and conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Stefan (Ericsson) cannotagree to the conclusions Laurent (Nokia): We cannot also agree to the conclusions, support Stefan's view as we expressed also in 8283 thread Qianghua (Huawei) provides responses to the comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version (anyhow we are discussing 8646 now) Qianghua (Huawei) OK to note ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208954 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#4, adding the evaluation and conclusion for KI#4. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Noted | Stefan (Ericsson) has similar concerns ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version (anyhow we are discussing 8646 now) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | KI#5-conclusion updates | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208615 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Conclusion for FS_GMEC KI#5. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Approved | Sebastian (Qualcomm) suggests to note the paper Sang-Jun (Samsung) repiles to Sebastian (Qualcomm). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sang-Jun (Samsung) proposes to go with r00 as the NOTEs should be added even before the conclusion for KI1/2/3 are being undated. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.2.1 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=13 | - | |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208279 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1: Update to conclusions . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208592 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Update of Solution #12: Support 5G VN service area restriction with SMF service area. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208953 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1, update the solution 18. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208952 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1, conclusion update. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208937 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#1: Update conclusions to address Editor's notes. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208394 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Update of Solution #21 for FS_GMEC KI#1. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208281 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#3, Sol#22: Solution updates to address ENs and clarify solution. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208938 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#3: Update conclusions to address the ENs. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2209162 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI# 3 Conclusion updates. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai bell | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208223 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Update to solution 16 ( 6.16.2.5). | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208282 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: KI#4, Sol#16: Updates to resolve editor s notes . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208613 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Conclusion for FS_GMEC KI#4. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): Objects to any version (rapporteur said not handled anyhow) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.1 | S2-2208618 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-74: Evaluation for FS_GMEC KI#4. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): Objects to any version (rapporteur said not handled anyhow) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.2 | - | - | - | Generic group management, exposure and communication enhancements (GMEC) | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.2.2 | - | - | - | KI#2- CRs | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208428 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3715 (Rel-18, 'B'): TS 23.501 Enhancing External Exposure of Network Capability | NTT DOCOMO, Huawei | Rel-18 | CR Number missing! r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209577, merging S2-2208941 | Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) provides r01. Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) responds. Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Qianghua (Huawei) comments Stefan (Ericsson) comments Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Tugce Qianghua (Huawei) provides r02, merging 2208941 Stefan (Ericsson) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) OK with r03, prefer r02 Stefan (Ericsson) proposes to go with r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2209577 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3715R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): TS 23.501 Enhancing External Exposure of Network Capability | NTT DOCOMO, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208428r03, merging S2-2208941. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208432 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3566 (Rel-18, 'B'): TS 23.502 Enhancing parameter provisioning services | NTT DOCOMO, Huawei | Rel-18 | CR Number missing! Merged into S2-2209578 | Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) provides r01. Qianghua (Huawei) proposes to mark this CR postponed or merged into 08595 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208595 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3575 (Rel-18, 'B'): Enhance group status event reporting | CATT | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209578, merging S2-2208432 | Stefan (Ericsson) comments and provides r01 and r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2209578 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3575R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Enhance group status event reporting | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208595r02, merging S2-2208432. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208941 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3739 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support the enhance group status event reporting | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209577 | Qianghua (Huawei) agrees to merge this in S2-2208428 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.2.2 | - | - | - | KI#5- CRs | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208643 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3725 (Rel-18, 'C'): Allowing UE to simultaneously send data to different groups with different QoS policy | Samsung, Huawei, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Postponed | Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to r00 and in general suggests to postpone the CR Sang-Jun (Samsung) replies to Sebastian (Qualcomm). This is regarding the principle agreed for KI#5 and need to be captured even before the conclusion for KI1/2/3 are being undated. Qianghua (Huawei) provides r01 and asks for clarification from Sebastian Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies and proposes to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sang-Jun (Samsung) replies to Sebastian (Qualcomm) and propses to go with r01. Sebastian (Qualcomm) prefers to postpone; (objects to r00 and r01) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.2.2 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208596 | DRAFTCR | Information | Update for 5G VN group data | CATT | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208597 | DRAFTCR | Information | Update paramaters for 5G VN group data | CATT | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208940 | DRAFTCR | Information | KI#1: Support the enhancement of group attribute management | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.2.2 | S2-2208942 | DRAFTCR | Information | KI#3: provisioning of traffic characteristics and monitoring of performance characteristics | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | Study on Access Traffic Steering, Switching and Splitting support in the 5GS; Phase 3 (FS_ATSSS_Ph3) | - | - | Docs:=32 | - | |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | Liaisons | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208111 | LS In | Action | LS from BBF: BBF 5G-RG requirements for 3GPP Rel.18/ATSSS (Enhanced Hybrid Access) | BBF (LIAISE-542-5G-RG-Hybrid-Access-Requirements-00) | Revision of Postponed S2-2205467 from S2#152-e. This LS was postponed | Postponed | ||
| 9.3 | - | - | - | KI#2 - Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209195 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#2: Sol.2.1 Update. | Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209278. | Apostolis (Lenovo) provides comments and questions. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) provides r01. Tao(VC) still check r00 since r01 is provided after revision deadline and no explict objection to r00 for see. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209278 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#2: Sol.2.1 Update. | Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209195r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209087 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to solution #2.2: MPQUIC steering functionality using UDP proxying over HTTP. | Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Broadcom, Tencent, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ZTE, CableLabs, LG Electronics, Tejas Networks, Meta USA, Google, Charter Communications | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209292. | Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) provides comments, questions and suggestions to the solution update. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209292 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to solution #2.2: MPQUIC steering functionality using UDP proxying over HTTP. | Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Broadcom, Tencent, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ZTE, CableLabs, LG Electronics, Tejas Networks, Meta USA, Google, Charter Communications | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209087r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209090 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to solution #2.3: MPQUIC steering functionality using IP proxying over HTTP. | Lenovo, Broadcom | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | KI#3 - Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208801 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | DP on the effectiveness of asynchronous redundant steering mode | Alibaba Group | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Rainer (Nokia) proposes to note the DP in 8801. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.3 | S2-2208796 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: New solution on asynchronous redundant traffic steering mode. | Alibaba Group | Rel-18 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2205560 from S2#152E. Noted | Dario (Qualcomm) comments Rainer (Nokia) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) assumes that no new solution is allowed at this meeting and this should be Noted. Rainer (Nokia) agrees to note the paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.3 | S2-2209032 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to solution #3.7: Suspending the Redundancy Steering Mode. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209293. | Rainer (Nokia) provides r01. Yubing (China Telecom) is ok with r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209293 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to solution #3.7: Suspending the Redundancy Steering Mode. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209032r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209034 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to solution #3.1: Deactivate the RSM during the redundant transmission. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | KI#5 - Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208326 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#5, update Sol#5.6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | KI#2 - Evaluation and Conclusions | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209092 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Evaluation for KI#2. | Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Broadcom, Tencent | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209294. | Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) comments and provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209294 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Evaluation for KI#2. | Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Broadcom, Tencent | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209092r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209094 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusions for KI#2. | Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Broadcom, Tencent, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ZTE, CableLabs, LG Electronics, Tejas Networks, Meta USA, Google, US Cellular, China Mobile, Qualcomm Incorporated, Charter Communications, AT&T, Samsung, Cisco, HP | Rel-18 | CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: r06 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209955. | Apostolis (Lenovo) provides r01. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Apostolis (Lenovo) responds to Susan (Huawei) and requests this document to be discussed in CC#3. | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209955 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusions for KI#2. | Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Broadcom, Tencent, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ZTE, CableLabs, LG Electronics, Tejas Networks, Meta USA, Google, US Cellular, China Mobile, Qualcomm Incorporated, Charter Communications, AT&T, Samsung, Cisco, HPE, NICT, KPN, F5, DISH Network, Intel, Tessares, Microsoft, CATT, ETRI | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209094r06 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209196 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Evaluation and Conclusions for KI#2. | Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | Noted | Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) provides r01. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) comments that we could try to merge the evaluation part with 9092 and the conclusion part with 9094. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | KI#3 - Evaluation and Conclusions | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208278 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#3: Updates to conclusion . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: r10 agreed. Revised to S2-2209956. | Dario (Qualcomm) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stefan (Ericsson) comments on slides ==== Final Deadline ==== Apostolis (Lenovo) provides r02 as a possible compromise to be discussed in CC#3. | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209956 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#3: Updates to conclusion . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208278r10. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208439 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#3: Evaluation/conclusions update on suspending the redundant steering mode. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209295. | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Rainer (Nokia) replies. Myungjune (LGE) comments Myungjune (LGE) replies to Rainer (Nokia) Myungjune (LGE) replies to Rainer (Nokia). Rainer (Nokia) provides r01. Stefan (Ericsson) provides r02 Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) is ok with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209295 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#3: Evaluation/conclusions update on suspending the redundant steering mode. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208439r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208987 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#3: Conclusion update for KI#3 . | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209296 | Dario (Qualcomm) asks questions for clarifications. Rainer (Nokia) proposes to merge 8987 into 9096. Guanzhou (InterDigital) agrees to merge this with S2-2209096 and responds to Dario (Qualcomm)'s questions. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.3 | S2-2209035 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Updates to the Conclusion for KI #3. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.3 | S2-2209096 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusions for KI#3: RTT Thresholds. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209296, merging S2-2208987 | Dario (Qualcomm) asks questions for clarification. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209296 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusions for KI#3: RTT Thresholds. | Lenovo, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, InterDigital | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209096r06, merging S2-2208987. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.3 | S2-2209098 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusions for KI#3: RSM with ATSSS-LL. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Jinguo(ZTE) asks questions for clarification. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 9.3 | S2-2209152 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#3: Removal of EN on duplication factor in evaluation and conclusions. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Charter Communications, Broadcom | Rel-18 | Noted | Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Stefan (Ericsson) have similar comments as LGE Rainer (Nokia) replies. Jinguo(ZTE) shares same concerns as Ericsson and LGE Susan (Huawei) shares the similar view as Ericsson, LGE, ZTE. Dario (Qualcomm) replies and provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) comments. Susan (Huawei) objects to all versions of the paper, i.e. r00 and r01. Susan (Huawei) replies to Rainer (Nokia). Stefan (Ericsson) also objects to all versions of the paper, i.e. r00 and r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.3 | - | - | - | KI#5 - Evaluation and Conclusions | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.3 | S2-2208276 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#5: Updates to conclusions to resolve Editor s note 1. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209297 | Myungjune (LGE) proposes to merge this pCR into S2-2208460 / S2-2208500. Rainer (Nokia) agrees to merge and asks for clarification. Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Rainer Stefan (Ericsson) OK to consider it merged into S2-2208500 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.3 | S2-2208277 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#5: Updates to conclusions to resolve Editor s note 2. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209297 | Myungjune (LGE) proposes to merge this pCR into S2-2208460 / S2-2208500. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stefan (Ericsson) OK to consider it merged into S2-2208500 Marco (Huawei) as per Stefan's comment. Yes consider merged into 8500. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.3 | S2-2208460 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: KI#5 Conclusion (clause 8.3), addressing the 1st EN in clause 8.3. | Charter Communications, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Broadcom, Apple, CableLabs | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209297 | Myungjune (LGE) provides r01. Marco (Huawei) comments Paul R (Charter) comments Marco (Huawei) consider merged into 8500 as per 8500r06 Paul R (Charter) confirms that S2-2208460r01 has been merged into S2-2208500 during the meeting ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.3 | S2-2208500 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusion for KI#5. | LG Electronics, Lenovo, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r11 agreed. Revised to S2-2209297, merging S2-2208276, S2-2208277 and S2-2208460 | Myungjune (LGE) replies to Jinguo (ZTE) Jinguo(ZTE) asks questions for clarification. Myungjune (LGE) provides r01. Jinguo(ZTE) asks one question Myungjune (LGE) replies Jinguo (ZTE). Marco (Huawei) ask clarification and comments Stefan (Ericsson) comments and provides r02 Paul R. (Charter) comments and provides r03 Myungjune (LGE) provides r04. Myungjune (LGE) replies to Marco (Huawei) Marco (Huawei) agrees with Paul (charter) to remove of Wireline support . Support R02 NOT r03 & r04 Myungjune (LGE) clarifies that r04 is aligned with r02. Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Paul and Myungjune Myungjune (LGE) replies to Stefan (Ericsson). Paul R. (Charter) provides r06 which merges S2-2208460r01 pCR, because S2-2208500r05 addresses the 1st EN in step 6. Myungjune (LGE) replies to Paul R. (Charter) Stefan (Ericsson) replies and provides r08 DongYeon (Samsung) provides r09. Marco (Huawei) provide r10 without option 'without interruption' Paul R (Charter) agrees to r09 but not r10 Myungjune (LGE) replies to Marco (Huawei) . Stefan (Ericsson) comments to Myungjune and provides r11 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Paul R (Charter) supports r11 as it improves r09 Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r11. Stefan (Ericsson) responds to Myungjune Marco (Huawei) can live with r11 and object any version from 00 to 09 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.3 | S2-2209297 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-53: Conclusion for KI#5. | LG Electronics, Lenovo, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Charter Communications | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208500r11, merging S2-2208276, S2-2208277 and S2-2208460. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | Study on enhanced support of Non-Public Networks phase 2 (FS_eNPN_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=56 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | General | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208776 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Progress and open issues for NPN enhancements in Rel-18 | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209860. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r01 Guanzhou (InterDigital) has some suggestion on Q1 Rainer (Nokia) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r01 but also ok to add the proposals suggested and that is done in r02, i.e. r01+ Add 'and whether it is necessary that the UE needs to use any of these modes to select an SNPN over non-3GPP access' to question 4. Add ', and does it depend on whose credentials the UE uses to access the hosting network' to question 1 Remove ' Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r01 or r02. Saso (Intel) prefers r01 wording for Q4. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) asks if we then can agree r01 or r01+ Add ', and does it depend on whose credentials the UE uses to access the hosting network' to question 1 Remove ' Rainer (Nokia) is ok to remove yellow text. Guanzhou (InterDigital) is OK with r02 and is also OK with r01+changes Peter(Ericsson) mentioned below ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209860 | LS OUT | Approval | Progress and open issues for NPN enhancements in Rel-18 | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208776r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208770 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: Correction of Mapping Solutions to Key Issues. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | KI#2 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208438 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#2 on Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN: Conclusion update. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Intel, Qualcomm Incorporated, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | Huan (vivo) asks questions for clarifications Rainer (Nokia) replies. Huan (vivo) comments Saso (Intel) replies to Huan. Marco (Huawei) comments Rainer (Nokia) comments. Huan(vivo) comments. Saso (Intel) replies to Huan(vivo). Yishan (Huawei) provides comments Saso (Intel) replies to Yishan (Huawei) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208945 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#2 Conclusions update to resolve the EN on NSWO enhancements. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209861. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Saso (Intel) provides comments Rainer (Nokia) comments. Marco (Huawei) shares previous emails' views and concerns Genadi (Lenovo) provides r01 and replies to Peter (Ericsson), Saso (Intel), Rainer (Nokia) and Marco (Huawei). Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Saso (Intel). Marco (Huawei) further comments Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Marco (Huawei). Saso (Intel) comments. Marco (Huawei) can accept Saso's (Intel) proposal to consider for a note in future normative work. Saso (Intel) provides r02 to keep the discussion ongoing. Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r02 Marco (Huawei) ok with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209861 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#2 Conclusions update to resolve the EN on NSWO enhancements. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208945r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | KI#3 | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208313 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3, Update evaluation on KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209862, merging S2-2208734 | Marco (Huawei) provide r01 as merging of S2-228734/8775 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209862 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3, Update evaluation on KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208313r01, merging S2-2208734. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208316 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3, Update conclusion on KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209863. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and questions Yishan (Huawei) answers to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) and provides r01 accordingly Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02, and ok to keep the content of agreement in this paper ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yishan (Huawei) is ok with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209863 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3, Update conclusion on KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208316r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208734 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3: Update evaluation of solutions for KI#3. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209862 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments, and suggests to mark the paper as merged into 08313. Liping Wu (CATT) agrees to mark the paper as merged into 08313. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208775 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3: Evaluation and conclusion for Key Issue #3. | Ericsson, Qualcomm | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209864. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r01 and suggests to merge in evaluation into 08313, tbd what tdoc to use for conclusions Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209864 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#3: Evaluation and conclusion for Key Issue #3. | Ericsson, Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208775r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209173 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: Update evaluation and solution#22 for key issue#3/4. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Noted | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Peter (Ericsson) Marco (Huawei) provide r01 and comment Josep (DT) agrees with Peter (Ericsson) does not find unsecured connection to the hosting network acceptable. Ashok (Samsung) comments Huan (vivo) comments Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Josep (DT) Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Huan(vivo) Josep (DT) replies to Jianning (Xiaomi) and expresses big security concerns with this pCR. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) objects to this pCR. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | KI#4 | - | - | Docs:=17 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208291 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Conclusion of Key Issue #4 PNI-NPN. | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | Antoine (Orange) assumes this will be considered merged into S2-2208774. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Huan (vivo) confirms this contribution is considered merged into S2-2208774. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208293 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Conclusion of Key Issue #4 SNPN - content of the hosting network selection information. | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209865 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) I assume this has been merged into other tdocs? Josep (DT) objects to this pCR because it did not merge a suggested. The discussion is clearly on 8774 Huan (vivo) confirms this contribution can be considered the evaluation part is merged into 2208444 and conclusion part into S2-2208774. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208294 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Conclusion of Key Issue #4 SNPN - where and how a UE obtains hosting network selection information. | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | Antoine (Orange) assumes this will be considered merged into S2-2208774. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Huan (vivo) confirms this contribution can be considered as merged into S2-2208774. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208297 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: 23.700-08: Conclusions for KI#4. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | Antoine (Orange) provides an initial bunch of comments and questions. Josep (DT) additionally comments. Finds the conclusion too inconclusive Pallab (Nokia) responds to Josep (DT) Pallab (Nokia) responds to Antoine (Orange) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) proposes to merge this to S2-2208774. Josep (DT) objects to this pCR because it did not merge a suggested. The discussion is clearly on 8774 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and suggests to mark 'Merged into S2-2208774' Pallab (Nokia) confirms Merging into S2-2208774 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208317 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4, Update conclusion on KI#4. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | Antoine (Orange) raises an ambiguous sentence. Yishan (Huawei) answers to Antoine (Orange) and provides r01. Guanzhou (InterDigital) points out revisions of S2-2208774 try to merge 8317 and other KI#4 conclusion proposals. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) considers this is merged in 8774. Otherwise we object to all versions of this. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208444 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4: Evaluation and interim conclusions on automatic Hosting network selection. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209865, merging S2-2208293, S2-2208541 and S2-2208773 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r03 based on r01, now I need to re-implement based on r02. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) objects to r00. Huan (vivo) is OK to r04 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209865 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4: Evaluation and interim conclusions on automatic Hosting network selection. | MediaTek Inc., Futurewei, vivo, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208444r04, merging S2-2208293, S2-2208541 and S2-2208773. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208541 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4, evaluation update on 7.4.2. | Futurewei | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209865 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to mark it as 'merged into the revision of S2-2208444' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208737 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4, #5, Sol#13: Update to add one precondition for procedure 6.13.3.1. | CATT | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) I assume this has been merged? ==== Final Deadline ==== Liping Wu (CATT) provides comments and ask for approval for this pCR. | Approved |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208773 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Update evaluation of Key Issue #4. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209865 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) been merged to 08444 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208774 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Conclusion of Key Issue #4. | Ericsson, LG Electronics | Rel-18 | CC#4: r25 agreed. Revised to S2-2209976. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r01 Saso (Intel) comments on localized service information advertised via SIB Josep (DT) comments, comments that only S2-2209005 captured automatic/manual selection aspects. Yishan (Huawei) provides comments and agree with comments from Josep (DT) and Saso (Intel) Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments and provides r02. Yishan (Huawei) comments and provides r03. Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Yishan (Huawei). Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r04 Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides comments and r04 Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides r05 on top of Ericsson's r04 Antoine (Orange) comments on r05. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides the comments on r05 Josep (DT) comments on r05. Yishan (Huawei) provides the comments on r05 Pallab (Nokia) provides comments on r05 and has concerns with many conclusions Huan (vivo) provides comments on r05 Saso (Intel) provides r06 removing the SIB option Gerald (MATRIXX Software) with comment. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and question on the business relationships possible Pallab (Nokia) provides r07 based on comments provided earlier Antoine (Orange) asks Peter why he is discussing roaming interfaces; this is not in the scope of this Study. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Antoine Josep (DT) agrees to Peter (Ericsson's proposal) to clearly separate SNPN and PLMN cases. Huan (vivo) comments Antoine (Orange) Replies to Huan. Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides responses some questions on r05 and provides r08 Genadi (Lenovo) provides comments and r09. Antoine (Orange) replies to Amanda. Antoine (Orange) agrees with Genadi. Guanzhou (InterDigital) can't accept 7c. Yishan (Huawei) has concerns about 7c and 7d and provides r10. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides r11 based on r10 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r12 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides some replies Antoine (Orange) provides r13. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides r14 based on r13 Huan(vivo) provides r15 Josep (DT) comments on r15, cannot accept point 4 in 8.4.3. Yishan (Huawei) provides r16 to capture comments from Josep (DT) Genadi (Lenovo) comments to Chia-Lin (MediaTek) and provides r17. Miguel (Qualcomm) provides r18 Pallab (Nokia) provides r19 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Josep Josep (DT) replies to Peter (Ericsson). Guanzhou (InterDigital) asks Peter (Ericsson) a question Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides r20 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r21 Josep (DT) comments. Naman (Samsung) provides r22 on top of r21 Yishan (Huawei) provides r23 Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides r24 based on r23 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) asks Rapporteur what the proposed way forward regarding revisions is. Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) prefer to approve r23 as we don't agree with the deletion of some text in r24. Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides comments on revisions Josep (DT) is OK to go forward with >=r20, provides some overview of changes in the last five revisions. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments, and suggests to approve r24 and only do changes on top if really necessary Chia-Lin (MediaTek) also suggests to go with r24 Yishan (Huawei) also suggests to go with r24 or r23 Huan (vivo) is OK to r24 Pallab (Nokia) is OK to agree r24 with below changes. Can also accept r19, objects to all other revisions. 1. Change 'via new UE policy' to 'e.g. via new UE policy' in clause 8.4.3 2. add this in clause 8.4.3 --> '7c. The serving network may broadcast in a SIB an indication that localised service(s) are available in the geographic locality of the cell that is broadcasting.' Pallab (Nokia) is OK to agree r24 with below changes. Can also accept r19, objects to all other revisions. 1. Change 'via new UE policy' to 'e.g. via new UE policy' in clause 8.4.3 2. add this in clause 8.4.3 --> '7c. The serving network may broadcast in a SIB an indication that localised service(s) are available in the geographic locality of the cell that is broadcasting.' Pallab (Nokia) is OK to agree r24 with below changes. Can also accept r19, objects to all other revisions. 1. Change 'via new UE policy' to 'e.g. via new UE policy' in clause 8.4.3 2. add this in clause 8.4.3 --> '7c. The serving network may broadcast in a SIB an indication that localised service(s) are available in the geographic locality of the cell that is broadcasting.' Genadi (Lenovo) can only accept r22. Alternatively, we are OK to r24 + reverting 7d with the accompanying EN. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) suggests r24, or r24 + 'EN: It is FFS whether, e.g. home network, may broadcast in a SIB an indication that localised service(s) are available in the geographic locality of the cell that is broadcasting ' + 'EN: (Complementary to Alt.1 in clause 8.4.2 also) It is FFS whether , in case of SNPN as hosting network, the hosting network may broadcast the supported localized service information (e.g. service identifiers and/or human readable service information, such as name, cost, service description) to help UEs discover the service and the hosting network. The localized service identifier may be pre-configured in the UE as per clause 8.4.2. The human readable service information is used for manual hosting network selection. UE may acquire this information from hosting network also via on-demand SIB while UE is RRC_IDLE or RRC_INACTIVE state in serving network. ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) is OK to agree r24 with below changes. Can also accept r19, objects to all other revisions. 1. Change 'via new UE policy' to 'e.g. via new UE policy' in clause 8.4.3 2. add this in clause 8.4.3 --> '7c. The serving network may broadcast in a SIB an indication that localised service(s) are available in the geographic locality of the cell that is broadcasting.' Pallab (Nokia) is not OK with updates and requests to have conclusion text as proposed earlier. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments with proposal to go for r24 or r24 + changes Antoine (Orange) comments. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides updated proposal as per comments | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209976 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Conclusion of Key Issue #4. | Ericsson, LG Electronics, Futurewei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208774r25. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208973 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4: Conclusion for KI#4. | InterDigital | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) I assume this has been merged? Josep (DT) objects to this pCR because it did not merge a suggested. The discussion is clearly on 8774 Guanzhou (InterDigital) confirms this is merged into 8774. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209005 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Conclusion of Key Issue #4. | Qualcomm Inc | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | Antoine (Orange) assumes this will be considered merged into S2-2208774. Miguel (Qualcomm) author confirms this is can be considered merged into S2-2208774 as suggested ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209167 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #4: Evaluation and Conclusions update. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) I assume this has been merged? Josep (DT) objects to this pCR because it did not merge a suggested. The discussion is clearly on 8774 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209168 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4: Update Sol#41 and remove ENs. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) I assume this has been merged? Naman (Samsung) proposes to approve r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) agree to approve r00. | Approved |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209175 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: Conclusion for key issue#4. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208774 | Antoine (Orange) assumes this will be considered merged into S2-2208774. Jianning (Xiaomi) is ok to merge this paper into 8774 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | KI#5 | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208292 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #5: Update of Evaluation and Conclusion of Key Issue #5 PNI-NPN. | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209867 and S2-2209866 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and suggests to merge in evaluation into 08735 and conclusion to 08298 Huan (vivo) agrees to be merged as suggested and is OK with the revision proposal from Peter ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208298 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: 23.700-08: Updates to conclusions for KI#5. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r10 agreed. Revised to S2-2209866, merging S2-2208318, S2-2208445 and S2-2209006 | Antoine (Orange) asks (1) what are the use cases and service requirements for accessing localized services via another network used as underlay and (2) which solution of the TR details how home network services can be accessed using a hosting network as overlay. Guanzhou (InterDigital) can't accept removing validity info from SoR. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Pallab (Nokia) responds to Antoine (Orange). Pallab (Nokia) responds to Guanzhou (InterDigital). Pallab (Nokia) responds to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) Pallab(Nokia) provides r01 merging S2-2208318, S2-2208445, S2-2208772, to be taken as the basis for further discussion Yishan (Huawei) provides r02 to polish the conclusion Huan (vivo) comments Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r03 Josep (DT) comments. Antoine (Orange) provides r05. Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments and provides r04. Pallab (Nokia) provides r06 Antoine (Orange) provides r07. Myungjune (LGE) provides r08. Pallab (Nokia) is OK with r08. Josep (DT) does not agree r08 is correct. Provides r09 Miguel (Qualcomm) provides r10 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) is ok with r09, r010 Josep (DT) objects to r05-r08. Is OK with 09, r10 Huan (vivo) is ok with r10 Yishan (Huawei) is ok with r10 Pallab (Nokia) proposes to approve r10 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r10 Chia-Lin (MediaTek) can only accept r10 Guanzhou (InterDigital) is OK with r09/r10. Miguel (Qualcomm) can only accept r10 Amanda (Futurewei) prefer to approve r10, but can live with r09 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209866 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: 23.700-08: Updates to conclusions for KI#5. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208298r10, merging S2-2208318, S2-2208445 and S2-2209006. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208318 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5, Update conclusion on KI#5. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209866 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and suggests we merge in conclusion to 08298 Pallab (Nokia) comments that a revision r01 has been provided in 08298 merging the conclusion content from 08318 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208445 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5: Evaluation and interim conclusions on UE for accessing the localized services in a registered Hosting network. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209866 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and suggests to merge in evaluation to 08735 and conclusion to 08298 Pallab (Nokia) comments that a revision r01 has been provided in 08298 merging the conclusion content from 8445 Chia-Lin (MediaTek) is ok to merge the pCR to S2-2208298 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208542 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5, evaluation and conclusion update . | Futurewei | Rel-18 | Noted | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) comments that the subject of this discussion is wrong (8542): it is commenting on 8452 instead . Guanzhou (InterDigital) asks questions. Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) replies to InterDigital Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Josep (DT) comments on adding 'if UE is in good coverage of the hosting network' as condition Pallab (Nokia) provides comments and concurs with concerns raised by other companies Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides responses to Nokia, DT and LGE and provide r02 Josep (DT) comments that the issue of coverage is a bit different to that of QoS/QoE. Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) response to DT's comment and provides r03 Myungjune (LGE) comments. Josep (DT) comments. Pallab (Nokia) objects to r00-r02 Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) is fine with r04. Pallab (Nokia) objects to all revisions and proposes to NOTE Guanzhou (InterDigital) objects to all versions. Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) responses to Nokia and InterDigital Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Amanda (Futurewei). ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208735 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5: Update evaluation of solutions for KI#5. | CATT | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209867, merging S2-2208292 and S2-2208772 | Liping Wu (CATT) provides r01 Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides r02 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) looks ok and happy to support Liping Wu (CATT ) provides comments and ask Amanda to align the content between evaluation and conclusion paper. Amanda Xiang ( Futurewei ) provides r03 to align with the conclusion and evaluation. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209867 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5: Update evaluation of solutions for KI#5. | CATT, Futurewei, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208735r04, merging S2-2208292 and S2-2208772. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208772 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5: Evaluation and conclusion for Key Issue #5. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209867 and S2-2209866 | Pallab (Nokia) proposes to merge the conclusions into 08298 and provides r01 removing the conclusions part. A revision of S2-2208298r01 is provided including the conclusions from this paper. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to mark the P-CR as merged into 08735 (evaluation) and 08298 (conclusion) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209006 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI #5: Conclusion of Key Issue #5. | Qualcomm Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209866 | Pallab (Nokia) comments and thinks that some of the conclusions are not clear Josep (DT) comments on hosting network ID. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Josep (DT) finds Peter's proposal regarding network identifiers OK. Guanzhou (InterDigital) asks can we assume this is merged in 8298 Pallab (Nokia) proposes to consider this as merged to 8298 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) objects to this pCR. Guanzhou (InterDigital) considers this is merged in 8298. Otherwise we object to this tdoc. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | KI#6 | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208314 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6, Update evaluation on KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209868 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) proposes to merge this into 09073. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208315 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6, Update conclusion on KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question Pallab (Nokia) shares the same view as Ericsson Chia-Lin (MediaTek) shares the same view as Nokia and Ericsson ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) objects to this pCR. Overlapping with main discussion thread in 8771. Pallab (Nokia) also proposes to NOTE the pCR ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208446 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Evaluation and interim conclusion on the existing mechanism reused for UE returning from Hosting network. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208771 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and propose to mark P-CR as merged into other tdocs Chia-Lin (MediaTek) is ok to merge to S2-2208771 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208520 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: Conclusion on KI#6. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208771 | Guanzhou (InterDigital) assumes this is merged in S2-2208771?. Myungjune (LGE) is ok to merge this into S2-2208871. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208736 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Update evaluation for KI#6. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208771 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) I assume this has been merged? Josep (DT) objects to this pCR because it did not merge a suggested. The discussion is clearly on 8771 ==== Final Deadline ==== Liping Wu (CATT) provides comments and ask for marking the pCR 'merged into 2208771'. | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208771 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion of Key Issue #6. | Ericsson, Qualcomm | Rel-18 | CC#3: r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209936. | Myungjune (LGE) provides r01. Pallab (Nokia) provides comments on r01. Myungjune (LGE) replies to Pallab (Nokia). Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 Huan (vivo) comments Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides r03. Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides r04. And please ignore r03. Prabhu (NEC) responds to Huan (vivo) and Peter (Ericsson), and provides r05. Pallab (Nokia) objects to all revisions from r00-r05. Provides r06 Miguel (Qualcomm) responds to Pallab (Nokia), believes informative annex may be overkill Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question why Nokia objects to r00, and provides r07 Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides r08. Miguel (Qualcomm) still prefers r00 over r06 and r07. Prabhu (NEC) clarifies a need for new mechanism to address the requirements of KI #6 and provides r09. Ashok (Samsung) is fine with r08. Not Ok with r09 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) suggests to go with r08. Myungjune (LGE) support objects r09 and ok with r06 r07, r08. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Peter Hedman (Ericsson). OK with r06, r07. Objects to all other revisions Huan (vivo) prefers r08, is ok to r07. Prabhu (NEC) responds to Ashok (Samsung). Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r08, r07, r06, r02, r00 Prabhu (NEC) responds to Myungjune (LGE). Ashok (Samsung) clarifies to Prabhu (NEC) Chia-Lin (MediaTek) is ok with r07 or r08. Guanzhou (InterDigital) only accepts r08 and points out other versions have evaluation text which is supposed to be merged with 9073 Miguel (Qualcomm) prefers r00, but can live with r08 Genadi (Lenovo) prefers r08 or r07. ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) OK with r08. | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209936 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion of Key Issue #6. | Ericsson, Qualcomm, LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208771r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208971 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Update of the evaluation. | InterDigital | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209868 | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question if we can mark the paper as merged into 09073? ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) confirms this is merged into 9073. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209073 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#6. | NEC | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209868, merging S2-2208314 and S2-2208971 | Guanzhou (InterDigital) propose r01 that merges S2-2208971. (resent to correct the wrong meeting number in the subject line) Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) is OK with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209868 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#6. | NEC, InterDigital | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209073r02, merging S2-2208314 and S2-2208971. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209139 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#6: Update of the conclusions. | InterDigital | Rel-18 | Noted | Prabhu (NEC) provides r01. Pallab (Nokia) provides comments and raises concerns with the proposal. Proposes to NOTE. Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) shares the same view as LGE and Nokia Ashok (Samsung ) comments Josep (DT) also agrees with others, comments that the approach in this pCR would be difficult to deploy. Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments. Prabhu (NEC) responds Josep (DT) and Ashok (Samsung). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Josep (DT) objects to this pCR. Content is already included in discussion 8771, where the bulk of the discussion happened (e.g. r09 can be considered a merger as it includes avoidance-based) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.4.1 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208312 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#5, Update evaluation on KI#5. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208311 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4, Update evaluation on KI#4. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2208459 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#2: Additional conclusion on SNPN access mode. | Intel | Rel-18 | Not Handled | Rainer (Nokia) asks for clarification. Saso (Intel) replies to Rainer (Nokia). Rainer (Nokia) replies and is ok with 8459 as is.. Yishan (Huawei) comments Rainer (Nokia) replies. Saso (Intel) replies to Yishan. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yishan (Huawei) replies. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.4.1 | S2-2209174 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: Conclusion for key issue#3. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.4.2 | - | - | - | Enhanced support of Non-Public Networks phase 2 (eNPN_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2208426 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3714 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN | Intel, Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209869. | Omkar (CableLabs) provides r01 and comments Saso (Intel) provides r02 and comments Ashok (Samsung) comments Omkar (CableLabs) provides r03 and comments Saso (Intel) replies to Ashok Ashok (Samsung) responds to Saso Saso (Intel) comments on r03 and proposes to focus on r02 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments/questions Saso (Intel) replies to Peter Yishan (Huawei) provides r04 Saso (Intel) provides r05 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yishan (Huawei) is ok with r05 and object to r00~r04 Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r05. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that some content is dependent on feedback from CT1 Saso (Intel) proposes to agree the CRs with a note in the official meeting report. Omkar (CableLabs) is ok with r05, objects to r00. ==== Final Deadline ==== Saso (Intel) checks with the Rapporteur whether this CR (currently marked as approved) needs to be reopened. | Revised |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2209869 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3714R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN | Intel, Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208426r05. Approved (Some content is dependent on feedback from CT WG1) | Agreed | |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2208427 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3565 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN | Intel, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2208512 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3569 (Rel-18, 'B'): Equivalent SNPN support | OPPO, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Mediatek Inc., LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Approved | Marco (Huawei) comments that the CR to 23.502 needs to be aligned to 23.501 on UE capability ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) proposes to approve r00. Fei (OPPO) replies. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) agree that it make sense to agree r00 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) agree to approve r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2208767 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3730 (Rel-18, 'B'): Equivalent SNPN support | Ericsson, OPPO, LG Electronics, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Approved | Yishan (Huawei) asks for clarification Fei (OPPO) responds to Yishan (Huawei). Yishan (Huawei) responds to Fei (OPPO) and provides r01. Myungjune (LGE) replies to Yishan (Huawei) Fei (OPPO) agree with Myungjune Yishan (Huawei) asks questions Fei (OPPO) provided response to Yishan Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply Yishan (Huawei) replies to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) and Fei (OPPO) and agree to send the LS to CT1 Myungjune (LGE) replies to Yishan (Huawei). Yishan (Huawei) answers. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question Yishan (Huawei) answers to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) objects r01 and proposes to approve r00. Rainer (Nokia) supports r00. Fei (OPPO) supports r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2208429 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0745 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN | Intel, Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209870. | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides questions Saso (Intel) replies to Peter; provides r01 Marco (Huawei) provide r02 Saso (Intel) is OK with r02 Josep (DT) comments, provides r03. Saso (Intel) is OK with r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments, and CR depends on CT1 feedback Saso (Intel) replies to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) that there is no intent to introduce SNPN access mode to EPS/EPC. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2209870 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0745R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN | Intel, Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208429r03. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.4.2 | S2-2208434 | CR | Approval | 23.402 CR2997 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of Non-3GPP access for SNPN | Intel, Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comment that usage of SNPN access mode depends on CT1 feedback, and assume we do not propose to introduce SNPN access mode to EPS/EPC. Saso (Intel) replies to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) that there is no intent to introduce SNPN access mode to EPS/EPC. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 9.5 | - | - | - | Study on Phase 2 for UAS, UAV and UAM (FS_UAS_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 9.5 | - | - | - | LS’s in | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.5 | S2-2208168 | LS In | Action | LS from MITRE Engenuity Open Generation 5G Consortium: | MITRE Engenuity Open Generation 5G Consortium (S2-2208168) | Postponed | Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) proposes to postpone answering to this LS | Postponed | |
| 9.5 | - | - | - | KI#1 | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.5 | S2-2208983 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: KI#1: Solution #4 update. | InterDigital | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.5 | S2-2208975 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: KI#1: Update to evaluation. | InterDigital | Rel-18 | Approved | Pallab (Nokia) comments and requests for clarification Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Pallab (Nokia). Pallab (Nokia) responds to Guanzhou (InterDigital) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.5 | S2-2208301 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: 23.700-58: Updates to conclusions for KI#1. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209579. | Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments and provides r01 Pallab (Nokia) responds to Guanzhou (InterDigital) Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Pallab (Nokia). Ashok (Samsung) need clarification Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments Ashok (Samsung) responds to Shabnam (Ericsson) Guanzhou (InterDigital) responds to Shabnam(Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) thanks for the clarification, I wonder do you plan to address this with soln in future or should we change the EN to a NOTE stating restricted discovery is not supported? Do you believe existing ProSe mechanism can't be reused, I thought that can be reused in cases as described when under MNO. Guanzhou (InterDigital) accepts only r01 and objects to other versions. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.5 | S2-2209579 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: 23.700-58: Updates to conclusions for KI#1. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208301r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.5 | - | - | - | KI#2 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.5 | S2-2209122 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: TR 23.700-58 Conclusions Key Issue #2. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209580, merging S2-2209079 | Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides r01. Antoine (Orange) comments on the 1st bullet. Stefano (Qualcomm) provides R02. Runze (Huawei) provides R03. Runze (Huawei) provides URL of R03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) supports R03 only, but no other versions. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.5 | S2-2209580 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: TR 23.700-58 Conclusions Key Issue #2. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209122r03, merging S2-2209079. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.5 | S2-2209079 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: Conclusion of Key Issue 2. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209580 | Guanzhou (InterDigital) suggests this is merged in 9122. Runze (Huawei) is fine to merge this paper into 2209122 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.5 | - | - | - | KI#3 | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.5 | S2-2208780 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: KI#3, Sol#7 Clarifications & address eNs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments and asks for clarifications. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments sorry I seems I have missed a few emails including this one ?? bad macros ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.5 | S2-2208299 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: 23.700-58: Updates to evaluation for KI#3. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, InterDigital | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.5 | S2-2209082 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: KI#3: Evaluation update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209581. | Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments and provides r01. Runze (Huawei) accepts r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.5 | S2-2209581 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: KI#3: Evaluation update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209082r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.5 | S2-2209083 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: KI#3: interim Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209582 | Pallab (Nokia) proposes to NOTE this paper. As discussed in the evaluation paper S2-2208299, we believe the network based DAA mechanism does not work in practical cases. So we do not agree to take Sol#2 into normative phase. Runze (Huawei) proposed to merge the paper into 2209129. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.5 | S2-2208300 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: 23.700-58: Conclusion for KI#3. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, InterDigital | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209582 | Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into 9129 Pallab (Nokia) agrees to merge into 9129 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.5 | S2-2209129 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: TR 23.700-58 Conclusions Key Issue #3. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209582, merging S2-2208300 and S2-2209083 | Guanzhou (InterDigital) propose r01. Guanzhou (InterDigital) propose r01. (resent to correct the wrong meeting number in the subject line) Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and r02 to include area specific DAA Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r03 adding Ericsson as supporting company and clarify soln# which was missed. Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) comments and is supportive Runze (Huawei) provides r04. Guanzhou (InterDigital) provides r05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanzhou (InterDigital) accepts r05 and r01 and objects to other versions. Runze (Huawei) supports r04 and r05, objects to other versions. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.5 | S2-2209582 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-58: TR 23.700-58 Conclusions Key Issue #3. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Ericsson, InterDigital | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209129r05, merging S2-2208300 and S2-2209083. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.6 | - | - | - | Study on Extensions to the TSC Framework to support DetNet (FS_DetNet) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Study on 5G Timing Resiliency and TSC & URLLC enhancements (FS_5TRS_URLLC) | - | - | Docs:=48 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Key Issue #1 | - | - | Docs:=19 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208398 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI #1, Sol #14: Update to address ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the PCR Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments with r01, as noted we may not choose taking this on board in Rel-18, we would like to update the solution to correct and answer questions for completeness. The EN is still there. Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies Shabnam (Ericsson) and we are providing updates to soln already in the TR to address your comments right and we have not removed the EN which says whether it is in scope is FFS, so no contradiction here other than cleanup of the TR. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208399 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on 5G Timing Resiliency | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r01 as discussed in offline call Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the LS for the same reasons as given for S2-2208398 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208400 | DISCUSSION | Decision | FS_5TRS_URLLC, KI #1: 5GS network timing synchronization status and reporting | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208403 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI #1, Annex A: An alternative to report a time synchronization status to UEs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209871. Rapporteur: Handle independently | Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and r02, please ignore r01 as I missed one comment from Qualcomm in that revision. Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) is fine with r03, objects to other versions. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209871 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI #1, Annex A: An alternative to report a time synchronization status to UEs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208403r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208554 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for key issue 1. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209875 Rapporteur: Merge into S2-2209101 | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that we would not like to include any conclusion on SIB without RAN consultation. Issues we see are described in 8400, will take the discussion under 9101 as proposed by rapporteur. Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 9103. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208555 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Annex to capture methods to notify UE regarding RAN time sync for KI#1 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209872. Rapporteur: Handle independently | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments ok with the proposal but we also added a general EN on our Annex submission for RAN dependency, additional question Devaki (Nokia) replies to Shabnam. Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments zhendong (ZTE) comments Devaki (Nokia) provides r01. Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) is fine with r02 if the figure is aligned with the text (remove step 2; replace steps 8-10 by one step 'UE enters RRC_Connected', renumber figure and text); objects to other versions Devaki (Nokia) uploaded r03 before the deadline (with fix for the figure) but the email was not sent to the reflector by mistake. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209872 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Annex to capture methods to notify UE regarding RAN time sync for KI#1 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208555r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208609 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for FS_5TRS_URLLC KI#1. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209875 Rapporteur: Merge into S2-2209101 | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 9103. Sang-Jun (Samsung) agrees that this is merged with 9103. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208626 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#1: Conclusion proposal. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209875 Rapporteur: Merge into S2-2209101 | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 9103. Runze (Huawei) agrees to merge this paper into 9103. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208955 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#1 adding the notifying UE time sync status method to Annex. | ZTE | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209873. Rapporteur: Handle independently | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the proposal is similar to Ericsson one in 8403, whether ZTE sees opportunity to merge? zhendong (ZTE) provides the response Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments zhendong (ZTE) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) comments on r01 Zhendong (ZTE) provides the response to runze (huawei) Sebastian (Qualcomm) supports Zhendong ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209873 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#1 adding the notifying UE time sync status method to Annex. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208955r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209101 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#1: Update solution 1 to clarify SIB aspects and add details in annex on ciphering of time synchronization status in SIB. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209874. Rapporteur: Handle independently (solution update not needed) | Josep (DT) supports this approach, would like to co-sign. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments as depending on responses and potential merger revision may be provided later. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments for additional update as per offline discussion Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r01 Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies to Josep ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209874 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#1: Update solution 1 to clarify SIB aspects and add details in annex on ciphering of time synchronization status in SIB. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209101r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209103 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for key issue 1. | Qualcomm | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209875, merging S2-2208554, S2-2208609 and S2-2208626 Rapporteur: Handle independently. (isolated issue on information reported) | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments Devaki (Nokia) provides r01 and comments. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and r02, clarifying some aspects and adding EN on RAN dependency and co-signs Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies to Jari Jari (NTT DOCOMO) responds to Sebastian Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r03 Runze (Huawei) provides r04. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and r05 Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r06 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the updated text is not making sense see below, provides r07 Runze (Huawei) replies to Sebastian (Qualcomm). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) supports r04, r06, r07, and objects to other versions. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209875 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for key issue 1. | Qualcomm, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ZTE, Samsung, AT&T, Verizon, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209103r07, merging S2-2208554, S2-2208609 and S2-2208626. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209118 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusions based on the reply from ITU-T SG15 Q13/Q15 on monitoring of time synchronization and relevant parameters. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and r01 on Ericsson view and analysis for the LS response, though it is not yet available for 3GPP. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) comments that to be fair since 3GPP/SA2 has not yet officially received any response and we are creating Annex to capture different options, we should note this paper. though I would encourage companies to review the r01 and consider their responses so we have a common view to work from next meeting. Devaki (Nokia) proposes to postpone this paper as we are waiting for the LS response officially (we cannot accept r01 however). Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to r01; disagrees with most of the observations in r01 as they go beyond what is contained in the ITU-T LS; r01 also mistakenly assumes that the network would need to calculate the end-to-end accuracy and provide it to the UE but that has not been proposed; Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok to postpone the paper; suggests to have an offline call soon after this meeting to try to converge on the open points (see email for details) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209169 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Time Synchronization Status notification towards UE(s) | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209876. Rapporteur: Use this as the baseline for time sync status notification | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r01 Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r02 Devaki (Nokia) provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r03 and r02; objects to other versions. Runze (Huawei) prefers rev03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209876 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on Time Synchronization Status notification towards UE(s) | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209169r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Key Issue #2 | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208401 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#2, Sol#7: Evaluation of the deferred 5GC-MT-LR-based approach. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Scott (Inspur) objects the paper. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208477 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: TR 23.700-25-040: Updates to the solutions of Key Issue #2 . | Inspur | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209877 Rapporteur: 5GC-MT-LR-based approach – variant #2 | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that no budget for soln update as per workplan, Objects proposal to change/revise the solution at this point. Devaki (Nokia) proposes to merge (and discuss) the conclusion aspects (not related to MT-LR) under 8556. Scott(Inspur) replies. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208478 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: TR 23.700-25-040: Updates to the conclusion of Key Issue #2 . | Inspur | Rel-18 | Noted | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments as explained in 8401 and as we see no need to have multiple solns for the same issue & as we are only focusing on TA level and homogeneous TA status across RA as Qualcomm is proposing no need for additional complexity of this mechanism, we Object inclusion of this approach. Sebastian (Qualcomm) supports the comments provided by Ericsson and objects to the pCR ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208556 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for key issue 2 update to address the EN. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209877, merging S2-2208477, S2-2208791, S2-2209116 and S2-2208627 Rapporteur: Can we this as the baseline for conclusion to capture the way forward regarding cell level granularity for coverage? Variant #1 | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments Devaki (Nokia) comments Devaki (Nokia) provides r01. Jari (NTT DOCOMO) provides r02 Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r03 Devaki (Nokia) provides r04 for consideration. Jari (NTT DOCOMO) responds to Devaki ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) comments. Sebastian (Qualcomm) can only accept r03; objects to other versions Runze (Huawei) proposes to agree r03, but keep the last EN (Editor's note: How ASTI service activation/deactivation is impacted by TA or Cell level Requested Coverage Area is FFS.) in r03. Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to proposal by Runze to keep the last EN in r03; we can only accept r03 as-is and object to other versions. Shabnam (Ericsson) proposes to go with r03, we concluded we will only use TA level for this release and if any Interactions with ASTI arises for TA then we will need to address that as part of the process? ==== Final Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) can live with r03 as is. | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209877 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for key issue 2 update to address the EN. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208556r03, merging S2-2208477, S2-2208791, S2-2209116 and S2-2208627. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208627 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#2: Update of conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209877 Merged into S2-2208556? | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8556. Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the PCR ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208791 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#2: Update conclusion for time synchronization service enhancements. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209877 Rapporteur: Handle independently | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8556. Yuan Tao (CATT) confirms this paper is merged with 8556. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208956 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#2, update the conclusion for the kI#2. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Noted | Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the PCR ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209116 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Removing Editor's note on cell level granularity for coverage area. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209877 Rapporteur: Cell level coverage area - Variant #2 | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8556. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Key Issue #3 | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208557 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusions for KI#3 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, NTT DOCOMO, Ericsson, ZTE | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209878. Rapporteur: Use this as the baseline. | Devaki (Nokia) provides r01 as per offline discussion to allow the option to restrict coverage area and/or allow any coverage area in the subscription. Sang-Jun (Samsung) provides r02 with a small editorial change and adding Samsung as co-signer. Runze (Huawei) provides r03. Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r04 Runze (Huawei) replies to Sebastian (Qualcomm), and provides r05. Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) replied to Sebastian (Qualcomm). Devaki (Nokia) comments. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and supports Nokia analysis but prefers to go with r04, can also accept r00. Revisions r01, r02, r03, r05 not acceptable as they either introduces wrong concept or ambiguity. Devaki (Nokia) proposes that we go with original version and work on the newly added bullet for next meeting. R04 is fine as well; r04+ '(optionally) an indication to allow AF requested Uu time synchronization error budget, start/stop time and/or Coverage Area always accepted' is also fine. Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r00 and r04; objects to other versions; proposes to go for r04 with additional EN: 'Editor's note: How to enable an AF to request ASTI service if there is also an ASTI subscription in the Access and Mobility Subscription data is FFS' Runze (Huawei) agrees with Sebastian (Qualcomm)'s proposal that go for r04 with additional EN: 'Editor's note: How to enable an AF to request ASTI service if there is also an ASTI subscription in the Access and Mobility Subscription data is FFS'. Runze (Huawei) objects to r00-r04 (without the EN) Devaki (Nokia) comments that r04 + proposed EN is fine. Shabnam (Ericsson) can accept r04 + proposed EN but wonders if the EN should start with 'Whether and then how...' . Sebastian (Qualcomm) supports Shabnam's (Ericsson) proposal. Also ok to start with 'Whether and then how...' Runze (Huawei) don't agree the EN start with 'Whether and then how...', insist the previous wording. ==== Final Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) comments that we should stick with 'Editor's note: How to enable an AF to request ASTI service if there is also an ASTI subscription in the Access and Mobility Subscription data is FFS'. Devaki (Nokia) proposes to go with r03 with 'enabling an AF to request ASTI service if there is also an ASTI subscription in the Access and Mobility Subscription data is FFS' as discussed. Runze (Huawei)agrees with Devaki (Nokia)'s proposal to go with r03 with 'enabling an AF to request ASTI service if there is also an ASTI subscription in the Access and Mobility Subscription data is FFS'. Runze (Huawei) provides r06 in the revision and CC#4 folder as final revision, per chair's guidance. Devaki (Nokia) agrees with r06, reflects the proposal also from QCOM and E///. | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209878 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusions for KI#3 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, NTT DOCOMO, Ericsson, ZTE, Samsung, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208557r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Key Issue #5 | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208957 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#5, update the conclusion for the KI#5. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208187 | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8187. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208187 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Update on conclusions for KI#5. | NTT DOCOMO, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Huawei, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Key Issue #6 | - | - | Docs:=12 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208424 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS OUT on UL scenario of reactive RAN feedback for burst sending time adjustment | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209879. Rapporteur: Merge this into S2-2208612? | György (Ericsson) provides r01. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02. György (Ericsson) comments. Haiyang (Huawei) provides reply to György (Ericsson). zhendong (ZTE) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) can only accept r00; objects to other versions; can accept r03 with the following changes: remove 'The mechanism allows the RAN to provide feedback to the AF to change the burst sending time based on the RAN TDD pattern.', remove '. SA2 kindly asks RAN2 to provide feedback on the proposal'; replace 'SA2 asks RAN2 group to kindly provide the feedback' by 'SA2 asks RAN2 group to inform SA2 if RAN2 considers it feasible to extend the reactive adaptation mechanism also to the UL case based on UE feedback to RAN using RRC signalling.' Haiyang (Huawei) provides r04 as an Alt: which is r03+ removing 'The mechanism allows the RAN to provide feedback to the AF to change the burst sending time based on the RAN TDD pattern.' and '. SA2 kindly asks RAN2 to provide feedback on the proposal'+ Replacing 'SA2 asks RAN2 group to kindly provide the feedback' by 'SA2 asks RAN2 group to inform SA2 if RAN2 considers it feasible to extend the reactive adaptation mechanism also to the UL case based on UE feedback to RAN using RRC signalling.' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209879 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on UL scenario of reactive RAN feedback for burst sending time adjustment | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208424r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208142 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG2: Reply LS on RAN feedback for low latency | RAN WG2 (R2-2208913) | Rel-18 | Noted | Sebastian (Qualcomm) proposes to note the LS | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2210161 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on low latency communication applications to use RAN feedback on periodicity for scheduling | Samsung | Rel-18 | CC#4: r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209964. | Sang-Jun (Samsung) provides r00 of S2-2210161 in the revision folder. | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209964 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on low latency communication applications to use RAN feedback on periodicity for scheduling | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2210161r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208425 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Discussion on periodicity provisioning and update conclusion of KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209880 Rapporteur: Merge this into S2-2208612? | György (Ericsson) comments. Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8612 as discussed. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208562 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for key issue 6 update to address the ENs and some clarifications. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209880 Rapporteur: Merge this into S2-2208612? | György (Ericsson) comments. Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8612 as discussed. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208612 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for FS_5TRS_URLLC KI#6. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209880, merging S2-2208425 and S2-2208562 Rapporteur: Can we use this as a baseline for KI#6 conclusion updates? | György (Ericsson) comments. Devaki (Nokia) comments. Sang-Jun (Samsung) provides r01. Sang-Jun (Samsung) replies to György (Ericsson). Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments. Sang-Jun (Samsung) provides r02. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r03. Sang-Jun (Samsung) provides r04. György (Ericsson) provides r05. Sang-Jun (Samsung) replies to György (Ericsson) and proposes to go with r04 as discussed offline. Devaki (Nokia) comments that the newly proposed EN in r04 is strange (states the obvious that SA1 has to provide requirements which they do already. Sang-Jun (Samsung) provides r06 based on Devaki (Nokia)'s comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) objects to r05, ok with other versions. Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to r05; proposes to go with r04 but replace 'EN: The above industrial applications behaviours regarding periodicity need to be confirmed by SA1.' by 'EN: Whether periodicity values are provided will be determined in a future meeting based on SA1 feedback' Sang-Jun (Samsung) proposes to go with r06 which is the same as Sebastian (Qualcomm)proposed. That is r04 but replace 'EN: The above industrial applications behaviours regarding periodicity need to be confirmed by SA1.' by 'EN: Whether periodicity values are provided will be determined in a future meeting based on SA1 feedback' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209880 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for FS_5TRS_URLLC KI#6. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208612r06, merging S2-2208425 and S2-2208562. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208860 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#6: Conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209881. Rapporteur: Merge this into S2-2208612? | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8612 as discussed. Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to keep this paper separately. Devaki (Nokia) comments that it is fine to treat this paper independently. György (Ericsson) comments. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02. Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments Haiyang (Huawei) provides reply to Jari (NTT DOCOMO). Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r03, objects to other versions ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2209881 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#6: Conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208860r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208958 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#6, update the conclusion for the KI#6. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Noted | Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r01 Haiyang(Huawei) checks whether this paper has been merged already Zhendong (ZTE) provides the response ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) objects to r01, ok with the original version. Jari (NTTT DOCOMO) objects original and all revisions Zhendong (ZTE) explains the change, and asks Jari to reconsider Jari (NTTT DOCOMO) responds to zhendong ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.7.1 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208610 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: Conclusion for FS_5TRS_URLLC KI#3. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled Rapporteur: Merge this with S2-2208557 | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8557. Sang-Jun (Samsung) agrees that this is merged with 8557. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208628 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#3: Update of conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled Rapporteur: Merge this with S2-2208557 | Devaki (Nokia) proposes that this is merged with 8557. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208402 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI #2, Conclusion: Update to address the EN. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled Rapporteur: Merge this into S2-2208556 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.7.1 | S2-2208976 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-25: KI#5, Update of Solution #9. | NTT DOCOMO | Rel-18 | Not Handled Rapporteur: | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.7.2 | - | - | - | 5G Timing Resiliency and TSC & URLLC enhancements (TRS_URLLC) | - | - | Docs:=19 | - | |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208171 | DRAFTCR | Approval | Interworking with TSN network deployed in the transport network | NTT DOCOMO | Rel-18 | Postponed | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208558 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3574 (Rel-18, 'B'): AF provides PER to NEF/PCF (as concluded for 23.700-25, KI#4) | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209882, merging S2-2208794 | György (Ericsson) comments. Mirko (Huawei) provides r01. Devaki (Nokia) comments. Yuan Tao (CATT) comments. Mirko (Huawei) responds. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2209882 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3574R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): AF provides PER to NEF/PCF (as concluded for 23.700-25, KI#4) | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208558r01, merging S2-2208794. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208559 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0749 (Rel-18, 'B'): AF provides PER to NEF/PCF (as concluded for 23.700-25, KI#4) | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209883 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) comments that this CR should be unapproved as it was merged with 8795r02 (which must be approved). Sorry, we forgot to mention in this thread earlier. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208560 | DRAFTCR | Information | TSN support in TN | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208561 | DRAFTCR | Information | RAN_BATFeedback_For_ AF_Adaptation | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208792 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3732 (Rel-18, 'B'): Exposure time synchronization services for requested coverage area | CATT | Rel-18 | Postponed | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) comments Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r01. zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the CR (conclusions are not table yet) Yuan Tao (CATT) is ok to postpone the CR as offline discussion ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208793 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3581 (Rel-18, 'B'): Exposure time synchronization services for requested coverage area | CATT | Rel-18 | Postponed | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the CR (conclusions are not table yet) Yuan Tao (CATT) is ok to postpone the CR as offline discussion ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208794 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3582 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support AF Request of PER for QoS and Alt-QoS | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209882 | Yuan Tao (CATT) confirms this paper is merged into 2208558. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208795 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0754 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support AF Request of PER for QoS and Alt-QoS | CATT | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209883, merging S2-2208559 | Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r01, which merges with 2208559. Devaki (Nokia) comments that r01 is not accessible (seems to have been uploaded to a wrong revisions folder - DRAFT/REVISIONS. Yuan Tao (CATT) updates link for r01. Mirko (Huawei) provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yuan Tao (CATT) is ok with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2209883 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0754R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support AF Request of PER for QoS and Alt-QoS | CATT, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208795r02, merging S2-2208559. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208861 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3734 (Rel-18, 'B'): RAN feedback for burst sending time adjustment | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the CR (conclusions are not stable yet) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208862 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0755 (Rel-18, 'B'): Pro-active RAN feedback for burst sending time adjustment | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the CR (conclusions are not stable yet) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208863 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3584 (Rel-18, 'B'): CR 23.502 RAN feedback for adaption | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to postpone Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to the CR (conclusions are not stable yet) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208864 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3735 (Rel-18, 'B'): Interaction with TSN TN | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) proposes to merge with S2-2208171 Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208865 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3585 (Rel-18, 'B'): Interaction with TSN TN | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Jari (NTT DOCOMO) proposes to merge with S2-2208972 Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208959 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3740 (Rel-18, 'B'): Adding time synchronization service area restriction | ZTE | Rel-18 | Postponed | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208960 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3591 (Rel-18, 'B'): Adding time synchronization service area restriction | ZTE | Rel-18 | Postponed | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.7.2 | S2-2208972 | DRAFTCR | Approval | Interworking with TSN network deployed in the transport network | NTT DOCOMO | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.8.1 | - | - | - | Study on RedCap Phase 2 (FS_RedCAP_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.8.2 | - | - | - | RedCap Phase 2 (NR_RedCAP_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=14 | - | |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208117 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG3: Reply LS on FS_REDCAP_Ph2 option feasibility | RAN WG3 (R3-225119) | Rel-18 | Revision of Postponed S2-2208098 from S2#152-e. Response drafted in S2-2208655. Noted | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to NOTE the LS | Noted |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208145 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG2: Reply LS on FS_REDCAP_Ph2 option feasibility | RAN WG2 (S2-2204989) | Rel-18 | Noted | Steve (Huawei) can be noted | Noted |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208655 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on conclusion of FS_REDCAP_Ph2 | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208117. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208258 | Steve (Huawei) can be merged to S2-2208258 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208258 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on long eDRX support for RRC_INACTIVE | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#4: r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209958. | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to use this paper as baseline paper for 23.502 CR. Steve (Huawei) comments, I guess you meant 8527 for the 502 CR? Qian (Ericsson) withdraw the previous comment since it's meant for 8257. Qian (Ericsson) provides r01 to merge in the content from 8655 Lars (Sony) we should add RAN2. Qian (Ericsson) provides r02. Steve (Huawei) comments on 2 LSs out. Hannu (Nokia) provides r03. Steve (Huawei) comments and provides r04 Lars (Sony) should the new paging msg from AMF be included in the list? Qian (Ericsson) provides comments Steve (Huawei) comments on still discussing ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jinguo(ZTE) prefers r03, but we can also live with r02 or r04 Qian (Ericsson) proposes to go with r02, though can live with r03/r04 as well Qian (Ericsson) comments and provides r06 Lars (Sony) comments Lars (Sony) is ok with r06 Steve (Huawei) Just the polite indication is all that is required. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r06 Qian (Ericsson) indicates that r06 is agreeable on top of r02 with updating the 2rd/3rd bullets to below text(highlighted ones are updated): - The gNB sends an indication to the CN to handle MT communication while the UE is in RRC_INACTIVE state and provides unreachability information (e.g., eDRX values negotiated between UE and gNB for RRC_INACTIVE state). This allows the CN to apply the HLcom functionality (e.g. data buffering, notifications to other network and application functions etc) based on the unreachability information the gNB provided (as described in CR3705 and CR3555). - If the gNB has indicated the UE has entered RRC_INACTIVE to the CN, the gNB also notifies the CN about the RRC State transition back to RRC_CONNECTED (as described in CR3555). ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2209958 | LS OUT | Approval | LS On long eDRX support for RRC_INACTIVE | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208258r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2209020 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3743 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of RRC_INACTIVE with eDRX cycle length of more than 10.24s | Qualcomm Inc | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209583 | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to consider this paper is merged into 8256 or NOTED. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2209023 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3593 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of RRC_INACTIVE with eDRX cycle length greater than 10.24s | Qualcomm Inc | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209675 | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to consider this paper is merged into 8257 or NOTED. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2209025 | CR | Approval | 23.700-68 CR0002 (Rel-18, 'F'): Remove editor s note in Conclusion | Qualcomm Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208654 | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to consider this paper is merged into 8654 or NOTED. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208256 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3705 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of RRC_INACTIVE with long eDRX | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209583, merging S2-2209020 Base for normative 23.501 CR. | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to use this paper as baseline paper for 23.501 CR. Lars (Sony) provides r01 and ask about NOTE4. Jinguo(ZTE) provides r02 Lars (Sony) responds to Jinguo(ZTE) Qian (Ericsson) provides comments. Steve (Huawei) comments and provides r03. Jinguo(ZTE) comments and provides r04 Lars (Sony) does not agree with r04 and r00. Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Lars (Sony) Lars (Sony) replies to Jinguo Qian (Ericsson) comments Lars (Sony) comments Steve (Huawei) comments on r04. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r05 Lars (Sony) provides r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qian (Ericsson) proposes to go with r06. Jinguo(ZTE) is ok with r06. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r06. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2209583 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3705R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of RRC_INACTIVE with long eDRX | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208256r06, merging S2-2209020. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208257 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3555 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of RRC_INACTIVE with long eDRX | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209675, merging S2-2209023 Base for normative 23.502 CR. | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to use this paper as baseline paper for 23.502 CR. Lars (Sony) provides r01. Qian (Ericsson) comments on r01. Lars (Sony) responds to Qian (Ericsson). Steve (Huawei) provides r02 Jinguo(ZTE) provides r03 Lars (Sony) cannot agree on r03 Jinguo(ZTE) comments Lars (Sony) replies to Jinguo(ZTE) Qian (Ericsson) comments and provides r04 Chris (Vodafone) provides comment Hannu (Nokia) provides r05 Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Lars (Sony) Lars (Sony replies to Jinguo(ZTE) Steve (Huawei) comments on <10.24 Lars (Sony) responds to Steve that it would not be power efficient an sustainable. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qian (Ericsson) provides comments Qian (Ericsson) proposes to go with r05. Lars (Sony) is ok with r05. Jinguo(ZTE) insists to go with r04. Qian (Ericsson) provides comments. Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to approve r03. Sorry for confusion. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r05. Lars (Sony) as mentioned before we objects to r03. Qian (Ericsson) asks Jinguo (ZTE) to see if there is a comprised way forward on top of r05. Jinguo(ZTE) objects to r00, r04, r05, is ok with r03, or r05 + following sentence in step 7 of 4.8.1.1a 'Based on NG-RAN configuration this step may be triggered after step 1'. Lars (Sony) Are not ok with the additional sentence as proposed. Qian (Ericsson) provides a comprised way in r06 by adding an EN on top of r05. Lars (Sony) is ok with the EN in r06 i.e. r05+EN Steve (Huawei) can live with the EN for the sake of progress. Jinguo(ZTE) can live with r06 Qian (Ericsson) thanks Jinguo and indicates that it's agreed to add following EN on top of r05 (submitted before revision deadline). Editor's note: It's FFS on the handling of NG-RAN indication after entering RRC_INACTIVE. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2209675 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3555R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of RRC_INACTIVE with long eDRX | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208257r05, merging S2-2209023. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208654 | CR | Approval | 23.700-68 CR0001 (Rel-18, 'F'): Conclusion update for KI#1 | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | Qian (Ericsson) proposes to use this paper as baseline paper for 23.700-68 CR. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 9.8.2 | S2-2208760 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion related to the EN in the TR Conclusion. | Sony | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | Study on Vehicle Mounted Relays (FS_VMR) | - | - | Docs:=30 | - | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | Solution Updates | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208384 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#3: Update of Solution#17. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | Hong (Qualcomm) asks for clarifications. LiMeng (Huawei) responds to Hong (Qualcomm). Hong (Qualcomm) replies to LiMeng. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.9 | S2-2208889 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#4, Solution#6 Update to remove EN. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.9 | S2-2208385 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#5: update of Solution#7. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Hong (Qualcomm) asks for clarifications. Alessio(Nokia) comments this solution update is not needed as we already say OAM will provide trigger ot TRP info exchange and this will be when the new cell Id is assigned At integration etc). once this is assigned the LMF knows the MBSR UEID for the cell ID and the cell ID is mobile. the assumption is the cell Id assignment is an OAM event that is therefore usable to trigger TRP exchange from donor gNB. Alessio(Nokia) cannot accept approving this document (for the record) LiMeng (Huawei) replies to Hong and Alessio. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LiMeng (Huawei) replies to Alessio and ask for re-considering his objection. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.9 | S2-2208816 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI #5, Sol #19: Update solution #19. | CATT | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.9 | S2-2208259 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7, Sol#20, Update to remove ENs . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209584. Used as the basis for merging in contents from S2-2208386 (Huawei). | Qian (Ericsson) provides r01 to consider content from 8386 Hong (Qualcomm) provides comments on r01. Qian (Ericsson) provides r02 Alessio(Nokia) has some questions: Qian (Ericsson) responds. Alessio(nokia) replies ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209584 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7, Sol#20, Update to remove ENs . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208259r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | Evaluation and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=12 | - | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | KI#1 | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2209085 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#1 evaluation and conclusion updates. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | CC#4: r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209967. | Qian (Ericsson) asks questions LiMeng (Huawei) asks questions Lars (Sony) as a question Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Qian, LiMeng, and Lars. alessio(Nokia) alessio(Nokia) comments for the aspect of PLMNs where the UE can operate: cannot we use the preferred PLMN list + forbidden PLMNs list mechanisms? Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Alessio. Qian (Ericsson) provides further comments. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Qian (Ericsson) provides comments and r01. alessio(nokia) comments a slice is always need it is a matter of WHICH. alessio(Nokia) provides r02 Hong (Qualcomm) provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LiMeng (Huawei) considers this issue is related to our discussion in KI#4, thus cannot accept all revisions including the original version. Proposes a way forward based on r03. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to LiMeng. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209967 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#1 evaluation and conclusion updates. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209085r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | KI#2, 3 | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208388 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#2 and KI#3: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209676. Used as the basis for KI#3 (clause 7.3 and 8.3), merging in contents of S2-2208741 (Sony). | LiMeng (Huawei) provides r02 with merging the content of S2-2208741, and asks to ignore r01. Lars (Sony) comments and ask question. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Alessio(Nokia) provides r03 to allow the stable TAC option. of course RAN3 feedback can be taken into account if it is negative Lars (Sony) disagree with dedicated TAC option. LiMeng (Huawei) comments on r03. Alessio(Nokia) comments that a dedicated TAC can be allowed at least within a donor control... change of TAC can be based on change of donor if needed. but this is not really something we should rule out right away as e.g. parial migration based options are still possible. alessio(Nokia) thinks the donor gNB is in control of the policy of TAC broadcasting so the text we proposed is consistent with that. whether we proceed with one of the options or both we can discuss after we get the feedback from RAN. for now all options should be on equal footing. Lars (Sony) comments. alessio(Nokia) ok to consider all the conclusion under a EN. Lars (Sony) responds to Alessio ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Lars (Sony) objects to r03 at this meeting and propose to go with r02. alessio(nokia) cannot live with r02. as a compromise we should add an EN to r03 to say that 'both options, stable tA and TA equal to the TA of the donor, require further study'. the truth is that eventually RAN decides what we can do in this space. Lars (Sony) responds to Alessio. Hong (Qualcomm) asks if EN + r02 works for Alessio. Alessio (nokia) r02 works with this note 'Editor's note: the alternatives assuming MBSR operates with dedicated TAC(s) or TAC from Donor are subject to the feedback of RAN WGs' Qian (Ericsson) supports to extend r02 with an EN. Lars (Sony) is ok with r02 + EN suggested by Alessio ==== Final Deadline ==== alessio(Nokia) is ok if the note applies to both options... both are subject to RAN evaluations I guess as maybe RAN can have some comment son it as well EN: 'Editor's note the above approach based on using same TA as Donor cell and the approach of using a stable TA rare to be further evaluated jointly with RAN WGs' | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209676 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#3: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Sony | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208388r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208733 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#2: Conclusions. | Sony, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209585. Used as basis for KI#2 (clause 7.2 and 8.2), merging in contents of S2-2208260 (Ericsson) and partial contents of S2-2208388 (Huawei). | Qian (Ericsson) provides r01. Lars (Sony) thanks Qian for the support and is ok with r01. LiMeng (Huawei) supports the document in general, has a question for the 3rd bullet. Lars (Sony) responds to LiMeng (Huawei). LiMeng (Huawei) responds to Lars. Lars (Sony) responds to LiMeng. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r02. Lars (Sony) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Lars (Sony) is ok with either r01 or r02. Lars (Sony) is ok with either r02 or r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209585 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#2: Conclusions. | Sony, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208733r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | KI#4 | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2209086 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#4 evaluation and conclusion updates. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | CC#4: r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209968. This is to be used as the basis for merging in contents of S2-2209170 (Samsung). Approve r07 + NOTE : Which NAS messageS(registration accept, registration reject or/and deregistration request) is used by the AMF of the MBSR for indicating to the MBSR that it is not allowed to act as MBSR will be determined during normative phase | Li Meng (Huawei) asks if we need to provide a revision on this. Lalith(Samsung) comments. Alessio(Nokia) provides an updated version in r01 Qian (Ericsson) provides r02 Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Lalith(Samsung) provides r03 Qian (Ericsson) responds LiMeng (Huawei) provides r04. Lalith (Samsung) provides r05. alessio(nokia) provides r06 Lalith(Samsung) provides r07 Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Qian. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Lalith(Samsung) objects r02,r04. OK with any other revision. Prefer r07. Request source company to add 'Samsung' as co-signer. LiMeng (Huawei) agrees with Qian regarding the issue if MBSR can be the normal UE, therefore objects with all revisions except for r04, propose a way forward. alessio(Nokia) can only accept r06, r07 Hong (Qualcomm) comments, and accepts r06 or r07. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to LiMeng. Lalith(Samsung) proposes to agree r07. With additional below NOTE. 'NOTE : Which NAS message(registration accept, registration reject or/and deregistration request) is used by the AMF of the MBSR for indicating to the MBSR that it is not allowed to act as MBSR will be determined during normative phase' Hong (Qualcomm) agrees with Lalith's proposal. ok r07. With additional below NOTE. 'NOTE : Which NAS messageS(registration accept, registration reject or/and deregistration request) is used by the AMF of the MBSR for indicating to the MBSR that it is not allowed to act as MBSR will be determined during normative phase' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209968 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#4 evaluation and conclusion updates. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209086r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | KI#5 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208387 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#5: Update of evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209586. This is to be used as the basis for merging in contents of S2-2208261 (Ericsson). | LiMeng (Huawei) provides r01. Lars (Sony) ask a question to LiMeng (Huawei). Hong (Qualcomm) comments and provides r02. Lars (Sony) provides r03. LiMeng (Huawei) comments. Lars (Sony) responds to LiMeng. alessio(Nokia) provides r04 Hong (Qualcomm) responds to LiMeng. LiMeng (Huawei) r provides r05. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Lars (Sony) is ok with r05. alessio(Nokia) can live with r05 Qian (Ericsson) is ok with r05 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209586 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#5: Update of evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208387r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208815 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI #5: Update conclusion of KI#5. | CATT | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | KI#6 | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208529 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#6 Conclusion Update . | Rakuten Mobile | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | KI#7 | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208262 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7, Evaluation and Conclusion. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209587. This is to be used as the basis for clause 8.7, merging in contents of S2-2208179 (IPLOOK), S2-2208389 (Huawei), S2-2209084 (Qualcomm) and S2-2209151 (Intel). | Qian (Ericsson) provides r01 considering the content from 8179/8389/9084/9151 Lalith(Samsung) request for clarification on r01. Qian (Ericsson) responds. Lalith (Samsung) responds. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Qian (Ericsson) provides comments. alessio(Nokia) comments Lalith (Samsung) provides r03. Kindly skip r02 there were some errors. Lalith(Samsung) comments alessio(Nokia0 provides r04 Qian (Ericsson) provides comments and r05 Aoken (Rakuten Mobile) provides comments and r06 LiMeng (Huawei) comments and provides r07. Lalith(Samsung) comments. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) comments. alessio(nokia) having read the comments by Lalit on energy efficiency I update the paper to r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Qian (Ericsson) is ok with r08 Lalith(Samsung) is ok with r08. I request source company to add 'Samsung' as co-signer before upload. Xiaoyan Shi(Intel) is ok with r08. Question mark on Intel in the co-sign company can be removed. Hong (Qualcomm) is fine with r08. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209587 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7, Evaluation and Conclusion. | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, Qualcomm, Intel, Samsung, IPLOOK, Rakuten Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208262r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | S2-2209084 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#7 evaluation and conclusion. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209588. This is to be used as the basis for clause 7.7, merging in contents of S2-2208179 (IPLOOK), S2-2208389 (Huawei), S2-2208262 (Ericsson) and S2-2209151 (Intel). | LiMeng (Huawei) wonders if we shall provide the revision. Qian (Ericsson) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.9 | S2-2209588 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#7 evaluation and conclusion. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209084r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.9 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.9 | S2-2208386 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7: update of Solution#20. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208259 (Ericsson). Incorrect clause number for 6.20.2.2. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2208260 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#2, Evaluation updates and Conclusion. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208733 (Sony, Nokia). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2208741 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#3: Conclusions. | Sony | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208388 (Huawei). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2208261 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#5, Evaluation and Conclusion updates. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208387 (Huawei). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2208179 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7: Evaluation of Solution for KI#7. | IPLOOK | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208262 (Ericsson) and S2-2209084 (Qualcomm). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2208389 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI#7:Evaluation and Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208262 (Ericsson) and S2-2209084 (Qualcomm). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2209151 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: TR 23.700-05: KI#7 Evaluation and conclusion. | Intel | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2208262 (Ericsson) and S2-2209084 (Qualcomm). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.9 | S2-2209170 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-05: KI #4, Update to conclusions. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled Contents to be merged into S2-2209086 (Qualcomm). | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | Study on 5GC LoCation Services Phase 3 (FS_eLCS_Ph3) | - | - | Docs:=59 | - | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | LS In and Response | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208140 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG2: LS on LCS framework for Network verified UE location (NTN) | RAN WG2 (R2-2208779) | Rel-18 | Responses drafted in S2-2208440, S2-2208812, S2-2208878. Final response in S2-2209589 | Replied to | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208440 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on LCS framework for Network verified UE location (NTN) | Samsung | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208140. Merged into S2-2209589 | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to NOTE this LS, and use S2-2208812 Yunjing (CATT) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208812. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | S2-2208812 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Response LS on LCS framework for Network verified UE location (NTN) | CATT | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208140. r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209589, merging S2-2208440 | David (Samsung) provides r01. Yunjing (CATT) provides r02 and r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) is okay with r03, r02, r00 but not r01 - and suggests to agree r03 Yunjing (CATT) suggests to agree r03 based on progress on S2-2208437 thread Leo (Deutsche Telekom) prefers r03 David (Samsung) supports r03. Guanglei (Huawei) supports r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209589 | LS OUT | Approval | Response LS on LCS framework for Network verified UE location (NTN) | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208812r03, merging S2-2208440. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208878 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on LCS framework for Network verified UE location (NTN) | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208140. Noted | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to NOTE this LS, and use S2-2208812 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | LS out | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208813 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Positioning Reference Units | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209590. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r01 but not r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209590 | LS OUT | Approval | LS Out on Positioning Reference Units | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208813r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208753 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on positioning information exchange between NG-RAN nodes | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) proposes to note the draft LS Guanglei (Huawei) confirms this draft LS can be noted ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.10 | S2-2209078 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on LPHAP information delivery to RAN | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209591 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209591 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on LPHAP information delivery to RAN | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209078r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2209124 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#1 Solution #2 Update. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2208476 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: TR 23.700-71-040: Sol#3_Updates to clause 6.3.3.5 . | Inspur, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2208716 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#4: Update of Solution 12 to include LOS/NLOS analytics. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2208811 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: update solution #25. | CATT | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2208808 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Update Solution #28. | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209592. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Cai Simon (Nokia) comments r01 Stephen (Qualcomm) replies to Cai Simon (Nokia) Cai Simon (Nokia) clarifies to Stephen (Qualcomm) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r01 but not r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209592 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Update Solution #28. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208808r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208748 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#8, Sol#31, Update of Sol#31 . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2209127 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#8 Update to Solution #33: Support of LCS continuity when UE moves between 5GS and EPS. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | Guanglei (Huawei) has technical concerns on the principle of this solution. Cai Simon (Nokia) clarifies Guanglei (Huawei) Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Guanglei (Huawei) further comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yunjing (CATT) can accept r0. Guanglei (Huawei) can accept the r0 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2208749 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9, update solution#34 to clarify impacts on service, entities and interfaces. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209593. | Yunjing (CATT) provides comments. Guanglei (Huawei) replies to Yunjing (CATT). Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanglei (Huawei) is fine with r01, thanks Leo (Deutsche Telekom) supporting ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209593 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9, update solution#34 to clarify impacts on service, entities and interfaces. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208749r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | Evaluation and Conclusions To | - | - | Docs:=15 | - | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#1, to support User Plane positioning | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208533 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#1: Conclusions. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | CC#4: r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209594, merging S2-2209123 | Guanglei (Huawei) comments for KI#1 papers, I propose to use 8533 for conclusion discussion, 8751 for evaluation. Cai Simon (Nokia) objects to the proposal Stephen (Qualcomm) agrees with the proposal to use 8533 for conclusion discussion and 8751 for evaluation. Guanglei (Huawei) replies and provides r01 Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r02 and objects to r00 and r01 Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r03 Richard (Ericsson) supports r01 and object r02 and r03 Yunjing (CATT) provides r04. Cai Simon (Nokia) accepts r04 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r05 for further discussion/revision Cai Simon (Nokia) accepts r05 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r06 based on r03 to avoid overlap with KI#10 Richard (Ericsson) provides an r07 Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r00 and r03 but no other version Guanglei (Huawei) comments on the AF/Client bullet Yunjing (CATT) suggests to approve r08. Guanglei (Huawei) thanks Yunjing(CATT) and can live with r08 Cai Simon (Nokia) thanks Yunjing(CATT) and supports r08 as well Richard (Ericsson) can live with r08 and proposal from Yunjing(CATT) ==== Final Deadline ==== Cai Simon (Nokia) supports Stephen that 'take the r08 and restore the last paragraph which is shown as deleted' Runze (Huawei) provides r09 in both revision and CC#4 folder. | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209594 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#1: Conclusions. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | CC#4: Revision of S2-2208533r09, merging S2-2209123. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#2, for NPN deployment | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208820 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Update of Key issue #2 conclusion. | ZTE | Rel-18 | CC#4: Noted | Yunjing (CATT) provides comments. Runze (Huawei) comments. Jinguo(ZTE) replies Jinguo(ZTE) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.10 | S2-2209075 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Update of Key issue #2 conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | CC#4: Approved | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to use 8820 thread for discussion Runze (Huawei) considers a potential SoH in the next CC. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | Ki#3 , Local Area Restriction for an LMF and GMLC | - | - | Docs:=17 | - | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#4, Interaction between Location Service and NWDAF | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208924 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#4: update to evaluation and conclusion update for KI#4. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209595. | Stephen (Qualcomm) comments and provides an r01 Vivian(vivo) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm) comments and provides r02 Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can accept the r03 but points out that usage of the term 'LCS System' in the Conclusions is ambiguous, and may lead to different interpretations and different solution proposals in a normative phase Vivian(vivo) thanks for Stephen's (Qualcomm) agreement and replies to his comments ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209595 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#4: update to evaluation and conclusion update for KI#4. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208924r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208968 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#4: Conclusions update for location accuracy analytics. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#7, Positioning Reference Units and Reference UEs | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208805 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Update Conclusion for PRU. | CATT | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209596. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Yunjing (CATT) provides an r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209596 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Update Conclusion for PRU. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208805r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208806 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Update Solution Evaluation for PRU. | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209597. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209597 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Update Solution Evaluation for PRU. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208806r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208807 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Add solution evaluation and conclusion for reference UE in key issue#7. | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209598. | Stephen (Qualcomm) agrees with and supports this evaluation and conclusion David (Samsung) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r01 Yunjing (CATT) can agree the r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209598 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7: Add solution evaluation and conclusion for reference UE in key issue#7. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208807r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2209126 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Updates to KI #7 Evaluation and conclusion. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209599. | Yunjing (CATT) provides comments and r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r01 but not the r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209599 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Updates to KI #7 Evaluation and conclusion. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209126r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2209081 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7, conclusion update . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | CC#4: r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209970. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Cai Simon (Nokia) comments r01 Runze (Huawei) replies to Stephen(QC) and provides r02. Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r01 but not any other version Runze (Huawei) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm) and proposes the paper for CC#3. Runze (Huawei) only accepts r00, r02, r03, not r01. Runze (Huawei) can live with r01 with a revision that replacing 'may include a UE subscription indication indicating whether this is a PRU' with 'may include a UE verification indication indicating whether this UE can serve as a PRU' ==== Final Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) provides r04, both in the revision and CC#4 folder. | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209970 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#7, conclusion update . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209081r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#8,location service continuity | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208747 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#8, Evaluation and conclusion of KI#8 . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209600 | Guanglei (Huawei) provides r01, proposes to use 8747 for EPC/5GC handover case discussion Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Guanglei (Huawei) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yunjing (CATT) proposes to merge this pCR into S2-2209125 Guanglei (Huawei) confirms this pCR merged to 9125r05 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | S2-2209125 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Analysis and Conclusion KI #8: support of location service continuity in case of UE mobility. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209600, merging S2-2208747 | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r02, proposes to use 9125 as baseline for intra-5GC handover case Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r04 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r05 Cai Simon (Nokia) accepts r05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree r01, r03 or r04 only and not other versions Guanglei (Huawei) can live with r04, prefer r05, agree that RAN requirement is needed in R18 Cai Simon (Nokia) supports r04 as well ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209600 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Analysis and Conclusion KI #8: support of location service continuity in case of UE mobility. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209125r04, merging S2-2208747. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#9,Related to Satellite Access | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208872 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9: Solution Evaluation. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209601. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Yunjing (CATT) provides comments. Yuxin (Xiaomi) provides r02. David (Samsung) provides r03 Yuxin (Xiaomi) provides r04 merging evaluation part of 8750 following rapporteur's proposal Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209601 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9: Solution Evaluation. | Xiaomi, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208872r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208750 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9, update evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209602 | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to mark this document as MERGED with S2-2208437. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanglei (Huawei) confirms this pCR merged to 8437r08 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | S2-2208437 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9 conclusion. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209602, merging S2-2208750, S2-2208809 and S2-2208873 | David (Samsung) provides r01 merging 8750, 8809 and 8873 following rapporteur's proposal Yuxin (Xiaomi) provides r02 Yunjing(CATT) asks questions for clarification. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments and an r03 Chunhui (Xiaomi) replies Stephen(QC) and provides r04. Yunjing (CATT) provides comments. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides comments. Yuxin (Xiaomi) replies to Leo (Deutsche Telekom) and Yunjing (CATT) Yunjing (CATT) replies to Yuxin (Xiaomi). Yunjing (CATT) provides r05. David (Samsung) provides r06. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r07 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r08 based on r07. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r08 Jean-Yves (Thales) agrees the r08 David (Samsung) supports r08, would like to confirm if companies that merged their tdocs would like to co-sign Yunjing (CATT) confirms to co-sign. Guanglei (Huawei) confirms to co-sign. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209602 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9 conclusion. | Samsung, CATT, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208437r08, merging S2-2208750, S2-2208809 and S2-2208873. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208809 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9: Add conclusion for key issue #9. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209602 | Jean-Yves (Thales) comments and asks question Yunjing (CATT) replies to Jean-Yves (Thales). Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to mark this document as MERGED with S2-2208437. Yunjing (CATT) confirms that this document can be MERGED with S2-2208437. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | S2-2208873 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#9: Solution Conclusion. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209602 | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) proposes to mark this document as MERGED with S2-2208437. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#10, Reduced Latency | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208752 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#10, evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209603. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Guanglei (Huawei) provides r02 based on r01. Stephen (Qualcomm) replies to Guanglei (Huawei) Guanglei (Huawei) replies to Stephen(Qualcomm) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanglei (Huawei) still has technical concerns on r01 Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r01 but not other versions Guanglei (Huawei) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm) Yunjing (CATT) can accept r01. Guanglei (Huawei) thanks Yunjing(CATT) and can live with r01 Richard (Ericsson) supports r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209603 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#10, evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208752r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#11, Triggered Location for UE power saving | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208925 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#11: evaluations of KI#11. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209604. | Amy (vivo) provides r01, merge the evaluation as mentioned in S2-2208810r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) agrees the r01 with the merger ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209604 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#11: evaluations of KI#11. | Vivo, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208925r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2208926 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#11: conclusions for KI#11. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209605 | Yunjing (CATT) proposes to merge this pCR into S2-2208810. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Amy (vivo) confirms to merge this pCR into S2-2208810. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | S2-2208810 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#11: Add evaluation and conclusion for key issue#11. | CATT | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209605, merging S2-2208926 | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Yunjing (CATT) provides an r02. Amy (vivo) provides r03, keep the conclusion and merges evaluation to S2-2208925r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r03 - given the evaluation merger to S2-2208925r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209605 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#11: Add evaluation and conclusion for key issue#11. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208810r03, merging S2-2208926. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#12, low power and/or high accuracy positioning | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2209077 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Key issue#12 conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | S2-2208751 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#1, update evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209606. | Guanglei (Huawei) comments for KI#1 papers, I propose to use 8533 for conclusion discussion, 8751 for evaluation. Cai Simon (Nokia) provides comments Guanglei (Huawei) replies and provides r01 for evaluation Cai Simon (Nokia) replies to Guanglei (Huawei) Yunjing (CATT) provides r02. Cai Simon (Nokia) accepts r02 Guanglei (Huawei) further replies Cai Simon (Nokia) clarifies to Guanglei (Huawei) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.10 | S2-2209606 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#1, update evaluation . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208751r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.10 | S2-2209123 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: KI#1 Evaluation and Conclusion Update. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209594 | Guanglei (Huawei) comments for KI#1 papers, I propose to use 8533 for conclusion discussion, 8751 for evaluation. Cai Simon (Nokia) objects to the proposal Guanglei (Huawei) proposes to merge to 8533, as the merging discussion is happening there ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) also proposed to merge this or note this if merging is not acceptable Cai Simon (Nokia) agrees to use 2208533 r08 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#2, for NPN deployment | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | Ki#3 , Local Area Restriction for an LMF and GMLC | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.10 | S2-2209076 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-71: Update of key issue#3 conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.10 | - | - | - | KI#4, Interaction between Location Service and NWDAF | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | Study on Edge Computing Phase 2 (FS_EDGE_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=50 | - | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | LS IN/OUT | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208112 | LS In | Action | LS from GSMA OPAG: Network federation interface for Telco edge consideration | GSMA OPAG (OPAG_34_Doc_06) | Revision of Postponed S2-2206963 from S2#152-e. Noted | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to note. | Noted | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208113 | LS In | Action | LS from GSMA OPAG: Network integration interface for Telco edge consideration | GSMA OPAG (OPAG_34_Doc_07) | Revision of Postponed S2-2206964 from S2#152-e. Noted | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to note. | Noted | |
| 9.11 | S2-2209155 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on shared EHE and HR PDU session with SBO in V-PLMN | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209884. | Yuan Tao (CATT) provides comments. Tangqing (China Mobile) provides comments. Dario (Qualcomm) replies to Tangqing and Yun Tao. Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Hyesung (Samsung) provides comments. Tangqing (China Mobile) provides r01. Dario (Qualcomm) replies and provides r02. Hyesung (Samsung) provides r03. Dario (Qualcomm) is OK w/ r03 and replies. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tangqing (China Mobile) provides r03_v1. Yuan Tao (CATT) provides comments on r03_v1. Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) asks whether r03_v1 is acceptable to all? Yuan Tao (CATT) can accept r03_v1. Dario (Qualcomm) uploaded r04 = r03_v1 ==== Final Deadline ==== Tangqing (China Mobile) reply to Yuan. | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209884 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on shared EHE and HR PDU session with SBO in V-PLMN | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209155r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | Rapporteur editorial pCR | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208800 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Editorial clean-up of TR23.700-48 . | Huawei (Rapporteur) | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#1 LBO | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208198 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #1, Conclusion and Evaluation Update for LBO Scenarios. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209885. | Huazhang (vivo) comments and don't understand that if we support in HR session with ULCL, why we still need this design. And the usrp rules of EAS can be used for UE to create session without any new design. Dynamic design has already been covered by ULCL + URSP rules. And if release the HR session, the traffic in the HR session will be impact. Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r02 Laurent (Nokia): answers: I stop on this thread for a while to avoid 'Magnus adding and Laurent removing solution 27' Huazhang (vivo) comments and doubt that whether the dynamic design is needed. Mike (InterDigital) replies to Huazhang (vivo) Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) comments, trying to find an actionable question for CC. Magnus (Ericsson) is fine to go with SoH with r00 vs r01 Huazhang (vivo) is ok for this SoH, thanks Patrice Mike (InterDigital) is also ok with the SoH proposal ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) comments and he is OK with the SoH Magnus (Ericsson) Asks if Dario comments on the right thread Patrice (Huawei,rapporteur) confirms based on CC#2 that r01 should be approved. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209885 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #1, Conclusion and Evaluation Update for LBO Scenarios. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208198r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208363 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Solution 27 update. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209886. | Patrice (Huawei) provides r01 with minor editorial corrections. Magnus (Ericsson) is fine with r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209886 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Solution 27 update. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208363r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#1 HR | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208978 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #1, Conclusion and Evaluation Update for HR Scenarios. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r17 agreed. Revised to S2-2209887, merging S2-2208290 and S2-2208563 | Jicheol (Samsung) provides r01. This version collidates the conclusions update on KI#1 HR and also proposed to merge S2-2208290, S2-2208563, S2-2208630 for the same clauses. Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r02. Laurent (Nokia): provides r03 Dan (China Mobile) support r03 Laurent (Nokia): Comments Hui (Huawei): comments Magnus (Ericsson) provides comments Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r04. Jicheol (Samsung) ask a question for the indication from H-PCF. Yuan Tao (CATT) replies to Jicheol (Samsung). Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r05. Hui (Huawei) provides r06. Jicheol replies to Yuan Tao (CATT). Tianqi (China Unicom) provides r07 Jicheol (Samsung) comments. Tangqing (China Mobile) provides r08. Jicheol (Samsung) provides r09 including EN for SOH question for authorization indication. Hui (Huawei) comments on r08. Tangqing (China Mobile) provides r10 and reply to Hui. Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r11 Jicheol (Samsung) provides r12, r13, r14 on top of r11 to reflect SoH question on authorization indication . r12 (Option A. UDM->AMF-VSMF), r13 (Option B. UDM->VSMF->HSMF) r14 (Option C. HPCF->HSMF->VSMF) Jicheol (Samsung) provides r12, r13, r14 on top of r11 to reflect SoH question on authorization indication . r12 (Option A. UDM->AMF-VSMF), r13 (Option B. UDM->VSMF->HSMF) r14 (Option C. HPCF->HSMF->VSMF) Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r15 Dan(China Mobile) provide a compromise way, and please Jicheol can find a version to put it? Hui(Huawei) supports Dan's proposal. Laurent (Nokia): Comments asking for changes Laurent (Nokia): provides r16 Magnus (Ericsson) comments Hui (Huawei) provides r17 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yuan Tao (CATT) requests a change on r17. Hui (Huawei) supports Jicheol's comments. Jicheol comments. Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) comments on the way forward. Laurent (Nokia): answers Hui (Huawei): replies Jicheol (Samsung) is checking the final proposal from offline discussion. Jicheol (Samsung) proposes the final resolution for this paper as follows: Accept r17 with the following changes in the clause 8.1.2: 1. Replace the description for 'AF triggered EAS Re-discovery for an AF interaction with VPLMN' of the bullet 4 with the following NOTE: 'NOTE: The baseline procedure for AF triggered EAS Re-discovery for an AF interacting with VPLMN will be determined in normative phase.' 2. Add 'and H-SMF' after V-SMF in the bullet 5. 3. Remove the following sentense from the bullet 1. 'During PDU session establishment/modification, AMF sends the indication to V-SMF, V-SMF selects and configures V-EASDF considering this indication' 4. Add CATT as co-signer. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209887 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #1, Conclusion and Evaluation Update for HR Scenarios . | Samsung, Huawei, HiSilicon, China Unicom, vivo, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208978r17, merging S2-2208290 and S2-2208563. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208290 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #1: update the solution evaluation and interim conclusion of scenario 2. | China Unicom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209887 | Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version of this Tdoc for the sake of having an unique thread (Rapporteur's penholder) Tianqi (China Unicom) confirms that 8290 is merged into 8978. Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8978. Laurent (Nokia): OK to consider this as merged (and not objected by me) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208563 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#1: Update Evaluation and Conclusion for HR case. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209887 | Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version of this Tdoc for the sake of having an unique thread (Rapporteur's penholder) Laurent (Nokia): if:as the paper is merged, please consider I have not objected ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208630 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Evaluation and conclusion update of solution 53 for KI#1. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208979 | Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version of this Tdoc for the sake of having an unique thread (Rapporteur's penholder) Huazhang (vivo) confirms this paper has already been merged to S2-2208978 Laurent (Nokia): if:as the paper is merged, please consider I have not objected ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208464 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Optimizing UPF selection to meet QoS requirements in Home Routed PDU sessions . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209888. | Magnus O (Ericsson) provides comments Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209888 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Optimizing UPF selection to meet QoS requirements in Home Routed PDU sessions . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208464r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#1 EACI | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208565 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#1: Update Conclusion for EACI delivery. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209889. | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 and R02 Hui (Huawei) provides r03 Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r04 Laurent (Nokia): provides r05 Dario (Qualcomm) provides r06 Hui (Huawei) fine with r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209889 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#1: Update Conclusion for EACI delivery. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208565r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#2 | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208566 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#2: Conclusion for Exposure. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209890, merging S2-2208364 and S2-2208890 | Hui(Huawei) provides r01. Changhong (Intel) replies to Hui. Magnus (Ericsson) proposes to use 8364 as the baseline for KI#2 conclusions Patrice (Huawei,rapporteur) comments that the study needs to have its own proper conclusion and explains why. Changhong (Intel) comments and provides r02. Hui (Huawei) comments to Changhong. Magnus (Ericsson) is not ok with r00-r03 Hui (Huawei) provide r03 Hui (Huawei) responses to Magnus. Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Magnus (Ericsson) Answers Hui Dario (Qualcomm) is OK only w/ r02 or with 8364 Hyunsook (LGE) provides a comment. Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r04, not ok with r00-r03 Hui (Huawei) can live with r04 for the sake of progress. Shubhranshu (Nokia) OK with r04 Ouerdia (Orange) provides a comment. Patrice (Huawei) asks for clarification. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hui(Huawei) replies to Ouerdia (Orange) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209890 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#2: Conclusion for Exposure. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208566r04, merging S2-2208364 and S2-2208890. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208364 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#2: Conclusion. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209890 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) objects to a conclusion that does not explicitly conclude the study work, and refers blindly to another study with different objectives, therefore has to object to r00. Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) indicates to merge to 8566. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208890 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#2: Conclusion on NG-RAN exposed QoS information. | Intel | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209890 | Hui(Huawei) provides r01. Hui(Huawei) suggest to merge this paper into S2-2208566. Changhong (Intel) replies to Hui. Magnus (Ericsson) proposes to use 8364 as the baseline for KI#2 conclusions Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) requests to use 8566 as baseline for KI#2. Shubhranshu (Nokia) ok to 8364 as baseline Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) indicates to merge to 8566. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#3 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208679 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Conclusions for KI#3: Policies for finer granular sets of UEs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209891, merging S2-2208365 | Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r01. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r02 Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r03. Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Laurent (Nokia): provides r04 Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r05. Xinpeng(Huawei) replies and provides r06. Magnus H (Ericsson) please ignore r07 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R02, R03, R07 Xinpeng(Huawei) suggest to go with r06. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209891 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Conclusions for KI#3: Policies for finer granular sets of UEs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208679r06, merging S2-2208365. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208365 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #3, Discussion, Evaluation and conclusion . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209891 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8679. Laurent (Nokia): considers that discussion takes place only in the thread of 8679 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging Patrice (Huawei,rapporteur) confirms it is merged to 8679. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#4 | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208888 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Update Conclusions for KI#4: Influencing UPF and EAS (re)location for collections of UEs. | Lenovo, NTT DOCOMO, Huawei, CATT | Rel-18 | r15 agreed. Revised to S2-2209892, merging S2-2208757, S2-2208789 and S2-2209187 | Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r01. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) starts the discussion for KI#4 conclusion update Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r02 Huazhang (vivo) provides r03 based on r02 Xinpeng(Huawei) comments. Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Huazhang (vivo). Huazhang (vivo) reply to Xinpeng(Huawei) Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) clarifies for r02 and Xinpeng's reply. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) replies to Huazhang. Yuan Tao (CATT) merges S2-2208789 into this paper per rapporteur's suggestion and provides r04. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) replies to Yuan. Yuan Tao (CATT) replies. Yuan Tao (CATT) replies to Xinpeng(Huawei). Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Yuan Tao (CATT). Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) follow-on reply to Yuan for the new timer Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) comments Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) asks clarification from Shubhranshu. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) replies. Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds, and asks for clarification Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments and provides r05 Yuan Tao (CATT) comments and provides r06. Magnus H (Ericsson) ask questions Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r07. Shubhranshu (Nokia) asks for clarification Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) replies and provides r07. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) provides r08 based covering update in r07. Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) replies to Shubhranshu. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r09 Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r10 Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r11. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) asks question to Magnus.H. Huazhang (vivo) want to ask, what does this sentence mean ' For common EAS, SMF may initiate EAS re-discovery if the UE has traffic to another EAS' in r11 Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) replies and comments on r11 and provides r12. Huazhang (vivo) thanks Tingfang, but this sentence needs polish as that, if the common EAS is changed for collection of UEs, that the EAS relocation is enforced. Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) comments and provides r13. Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) asks for clarification Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) asks clarification to Magnus H. Xinpeng(Huawei) replies. Tugce (NTT DOCOMO) provides r14 based on r13 Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r15 based on r13. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) confirms to agree with r15. Shubhranshu (Nokia) asks for clarification to r15 Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Shubhranshu (Nokia). Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) proposes to go with r15 with one update, to change 'applies' to 'may apply' in the first sentence of 'UE collection definition' part, based on further discussion. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209892 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Update Conclusions for KI#4: Influencing UPF and EAS (re)location for collections of UEs. | Lenovo, NTT DOCOMO, Huawei, CATT, Ericsson, Nokia | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208888r15, merging S2-2208757, S2-2208789 and S2-2209187. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208757 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#4 Conclusion Update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209892 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8888. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208789 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#4: Update conclusion for influencing UPF and EAS (re)location for collections of UEs. | CATT, vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209892 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8888. Yuan Tao (CATT) agrees to merge this paper into 8888 per rapporteur's suggestion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2209187 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Updates to KI#4 Conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209892 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8888. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208788 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #4, Sol #18: solution update. | CATT, vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209893. | Tingfang Tang (Lenovo) clarifies Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209893 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #4, Sol #18: solution update. | CATT, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208788r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#5 | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2209154 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5: Conclusion update to address EAS discovery. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Charter Communications, AT&T | Rel-18 | r13 agreed. Revised to S2-2209894, merging S2-2208758, S2-2208580 and S2-2208631 | Hyesung (Samsung) asks a question. Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r01. Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r02. Dario (Qualcomm) replies to Hyesung Magnus (Ericsson) comments Tangqing(China Mobile) provides r03. Huazhang (vivo) provide comments and also, that the revision 3 I can't open Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r04 Hiroshi (NEC) provides a comment for r04 Dario (Qualcomm) replies, provides r06 and asks to ingore r05. Dario (Qualcomm) provides r07 based on r06. Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r08. Huazhang (vivo) add the evaluation of solution 55 into r08, and create r09 Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r10 Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r11 Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) comments that r11 removes the Edge Relocation paragraph altogether from the TR, which seems not to be the intention. It is better to keep that text unchanged, as in r10. Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r12 Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds Magnus O (Ericsson) is not ok with r12, provides r13 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tangqing (China Mobile) is ok with r12 and r13 Dario (Qualcomm) accepts r13. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209894 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5: Conclusion update to address EAS discovery. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Charter Communications, AT&T | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209154r13, merging S2-2208758, S2-2208580 and S2-2208631. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208579 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5: conclusion for support of edge relocation based on GSMA OPG impacts and improvements. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209895, merging S2-2208790 | Patrice (Huawei), rapporteur) proposes to merge to 9154. Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r01 Tangqing (China Mobile) is ok with that take 8579 as baseline. Tangqing (China Mobile) provide r02. Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r03 Yuan Tao (CATT) can only accept r01, object r00, r02 and r03. Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) is forced to object to r01-r03 as they are badly formatted and would remove text that should be left untouched by this contribution. Proper updates are required instead. Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r04 based on r02. Yuan Tao (CATT) provides r05 based on r04 Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) clarifies that contrary to my original statement, 8579 is not to be merged to another document, but treated separately. Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yuan Tao (CATT) only accepts r05, objects other revisions. Shubhranshu (Nokia) is OK to r05 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209895 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5: conclusion for support of edge relocation based on GSMA OPG impacts and improvements. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208579r05, merging S2-2208790. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208580 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Conclusion update for KI#5 of EAS discovery. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209894 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 9154. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208631 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Evaluation and conclusion update for KI#5. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209894 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 9154. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208758 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5 update evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209894 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 9154. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208790 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5: conclusion for edge relocation based on GSMA OPG impacts and improvements. | CATT, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209895 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 9154. Yuan Tao (CATT) asks Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur)if keep the conclusions for EAS discovery and EAS relocation separately as we agreed in offline discussion. Shubhranshu (Nokia) asks for clarification Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) confirms Yuan (CATT) and Shubhranshu (Nokia) statements, and propose to indeed use a separate paper. Proposes 8579, but open for suggestion, as long as it properly integrates with the current section 8.5. Shubhranshu (Nokia) is OK to take 8579 as baseline and merge this tdoc into 8579 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2209153 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#5: Update of Sol. 22 to address pre-configured use case. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Charter Communications, AT&T | Rel-18 | Approved | Xinpeng(Huawei) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | KI#6 | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208366 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #6, Conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#3: Postponed | Sudeep (Apple) provides r01. Hyesung (Samsung) provides r02. Huazhang (vivo) comments that how to move forward that for KI6, we have a totally different view compared with 8632. Shubhranshu (Nokia) comments Huazhang (vivo) reply to Shubhranshu (Nokia), and no ok to directly go with current way forward and object r00 - r02 Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r03 Svante (Sony) replies to comments on the edge indication Patrice (Huawei) proposes r04. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments Shubhranshu (Nokia) provides r05, objects to r04 Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r06 Mike (InterDigital) is ok with r05 and objects to r06 Huazhang (vivo) only accept r06, object any other version Sudeep (Apple) agrees with Patrice's comments. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is OK with r06. We object to the rest of revisions as we see very little value in it. Magnus (Ericsson) is ok with r05 or r04 not ok with r06 Svante (Sony) ask question for clarification of r04 & r05 Dario (Qualcomm) replies. Mike (InterDigital) replies Svante (Sony) provide r07 based on r06 with Sony as supporting company Mike (InterDigital) objects to r07 and replies to Svante (Sony) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hyesung (Samsung) is fine with r05, but not ok with r06 and r07 Huazhang (vivo) only agree with r06 and r07, object any other version. And the design of indication doesn't bring any benefit to UE, and no normative work should do. Shubhranshu (Nokia) prefers r05 Magnus (Ericsson) ok with SoH Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) comments on the SoH for KI#6. Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) tries to see how we can work further to address the concerns based on r04. Svante (Sony) prefers r07 but will not object to r04/r05 ==== Final Deadline ==== Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) replies to Huawei, rapporteur. Sudeep (Apple) adds comments. | Postponed |
| 9.11 | S2-2208632 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#6 Evaluation and Conclusion for keeping EC traffic on 5GS. | Vivo, OPPO, Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208366 | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8366. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.11 | S2-2208799 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#6: Evaluation and Conclusion . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209896. | Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) proposes to merge to 8366. Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r01 Shubhranshu (Nokia) responds Huazhang (vivo) provides r02 Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r03 Patrice (Huawei, rapporteur) clarifies that contrary to my original statement, 8799 is not to be merged to another document, but treated separately. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Huazhang (vivo) ok to move forward r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.11 | S2-2209896 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#6: Evaluation and Conclusion . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208799r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208979 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#6, Sol#47: Update for AF influenced traffic switching guidance . | Apple, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.11 | S2-2209182 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: Updates to Sol#49. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai bell | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.11 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.11 | S2-2208564 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI#1: Update on Conclusion for LBO case. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.11 | S2-2208984 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #1, solution #2 update for clarification. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.11 | S2-2208367 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-48: KI #6, Solution evaluation . | Ericsson, InterDigital Inc., Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Apple | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.12 | - | - | - | Study on 5G System with Satellite Backhaul (FS_5GSATB) | - | - | Docs:=13 | - | |
| 9.12 | S2-2208374 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on reporting dynamic satellite backhaul parameters to CHF | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209607. | Hucheng(CATT) provides r01. DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Stefan (Ericsson) comments Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports the involvement of SA5 CH group in sending this LS. Hucheng (CATT) shares same understanding as Gerald (MATRIXX Software) . Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Hucheng and Gerald and provides r02 Chunhui(Xiaomi) shares the concern from Stefan(Ericsson) that the LS is not needed. Hannu (Nokia) comments that the LS is needed for the sake of conditional conclusion in clause 8.1 but agrees to take out the bulleted list of questions in r03 Gerald (MATRIXX Software) with comments and the support of r02. Hucheng (CATT) replies to Stefan (Ericsson). Gerald (MATRIXX Software) with comment to Hucheng/Stefan and suggest to move on with r03. Hannu (Nokia) prefers r03 but can also live with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) prefers r04, can live with r02 and r03, objects r00, and points out that there is another thread for this LS and some comments in that thread are not captured in the chair's notes. Guanglei (Huawei) can support r04 Stefan (Ericsson) can only accept r02. Object to other revisions. Hannu (Nokia) supports r04. Can also live with r02 or r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.12 | S2-2209607 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on reporting dynamic satellite backhaul parameters to CHF | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208374r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.12 | S2-2208380 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: Update of KI#3 conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209610 | Hucheng(CATT) comments. Guanglei (Huawei) comments and proposes to merge to 8746. Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Guanglei (Huawei) further comments Hannu (Nokia) agrees to merge this paper to S2-2208746 and believes that both main proposals in this paper are applicable on the merged document. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.12 | S2-2208745 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#1, update evaluation and conclusion of KI#1 to cover in sequence delivery. | Huawei, HiSilicon, China Telecom, CATT | Rel-18 | CC#4: Noted | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Haris(Qualcomm) provides r01 Hucheng (CATT) proposes to capture satellite backhaul case as an example. Hannu (Nokia) shares the concern of Stefan on N3 sequence numbering. DongYeon (Samsung) cannot agree on expanding to all kind of backhaul network, and provides r02. Guanglei (Huawei) prefers r02 Antoine (Orange) supports and provides r03. Guanglei (Huawei) thanks Antoine (Orange) supporting and is fine with r03 Heng (China Telecom) provide r04 Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r03 Hucheng (CATT) replies to Haris(Qualcomm). Haris(Qualcomm) responds Stefan (Ericsson) maintains concerns ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) proposes to focus on dynamical satellite backhaul case now and see whether this solution can be applied to wider scope later if necessary. Haris(Qualcomm) is ok with r01 since he sees no reason to restrict the already existing configuration for GTP-U SN to dynamic backhaul Stefan (Ericsson) comments that this use of SN is not existing functionality Stefan (Ericsson) objects to all revisions r00-r04 Guanglei (Huawei) asks for CC#3 or CC#4 ==== Final Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) supports Guanglei (Huawei) to wait for SoH in CC#3 or CC#4 Heng(China Telecom) propose go with case B for SOH | Noted |
| 9.12 | S2-2208746 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#3 Conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209610, merging S2-2208380 and S2-2208846 | Stefan (Ericsson) provides questions for clarification Guanglei (Huawei) replies to Stefan (Ericsson) and provides r01 Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Guanglei Guanglei (Huawei) thanks Stefan (Ericsson) comments and provides r02 Hannu (Nokia) provides r03 to merge S2-2208380 to this document. Hucheng (CATT) provides r04 for enhancement and merging S2-2208846 into it. Stefan (Ericsson) provides r05 Hucheng (CAT) provides response to Stefan (Ericsson). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CAT) prefers r04, can live with r05, and can not accept other versions. Stefan (Ericsson) can accept r03 and r05. Objects to other versions. Hucheng (CATT) asks clarifications from Stefan (Ericsson). Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Hucheng Hannu (Nokia) supports r05. Relja (TNO) supports r05. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.12 | S2-2209610 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#3 Conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208746r05, merging S2-2208380 and S2-2208846. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.12 | S2-2208755 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#1: Evaluation and conclusion updates . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#4: Noted Depends on 8745 outcome | Hucheng(CATT) comments. Guanglei (Huawei) provides comments. Heng(China Telecom) comments. Stefan (Ericsson) replies DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Hannu (Nokia) shares Stefan's concerns and is not convinced of the merits of the sequence numbering at N3. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Guanglei (Huawei) not agree the pCR, the result depends on the 8745 outcome ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.12 | S2-2208845 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#1: Update evaluation and conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209608. | Haris(Qualcomm) comments Hucheng (CATT) responds to Haris(Qualcomm)'s comments. Stefan (Ericsson) provides r01 Hannu (Nokia) supports Stefan and provides r02 DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Hucheng (CATT) relies to commnets. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) is OK with r02 Haris(Qualcomm) is ok with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.12 | S2-2209608 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#1: Update evaluation and conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208845r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.12 | S2-2208846 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#3: Update evaluation and conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209610 | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Hucheng (CATT) replies to Stefan (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) thinks this paper can be marked as merged into S2-2208746. Stefan (Ericsson) supports to mark this as merged into S2-2208746 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.12 | S2-2209193 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: KI#2: Update to Solution#10: Enable Satellite EAS re-discovery and re-allocation by means of local DNS. | TNO | Rel-18 | Approved | Hucheng(CATT) points out that no new or updated solution is allowed in this meeting according to the work plan. Relja (TNO) responds to Hucheng. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) is OK to include this paper into the TR if no other objection. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.12 | S2-2209194 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: Evaluation update of Solution#10 and addition of conclusions for Solution#10. | TNO | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209609. | Stefan (Ericsson) comments and provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hucheng (CATT) is OK with r01 Relja (TNO) is OK with r01 and thanks Stefan for providing it. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.12 | S2-2209609 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-27: Evaluation update of Solution#10 and addition of conclusions for Solution#10. | TNO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209194r01. Approved. Not provided. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 9.13.1 | - | - | - | Study on the support for 5WWC Phase 2 (FS_5WWC_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=15 | - | |
| 9.13.1 | - | - | - | KI#2 conclusions | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208226 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: Update to conclusions for KI2. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209897. | Laurent (Nokia): (rapporteur) It is proposed to discuss only one Update to conclusions for KI2 within the thread of S2-2208226, merging 8325 into 8226 Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r01 Laurent (Nokia): reasking my question Marco (Huawei) provides r02 removing the new solution and related conclusion since per plan agreed in SA2 the last opportunity was in Aug meeting for KI#2 Marco (Huawei) provide r02 since I forgot to merge text from 8325 Marco (Huawei) Errata corrige - provide r03 since I forgot to merge text from 8325 Heng (China Telecom) comment on r03 Yishan (Huawei) provides r04 to capture the comments from Heng (China Telecom) Laurent (Nokia): provides r05 Laurent (Nokia): provides r07, R06 skipped ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R02, R03, R04 Yishan (Huawei) answers to Laurent (Nokia) Marco (Huawei) object to r05, and r07 since include the bullet 3 where TNGF send slice supported per SSID. Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to r00 Marco (Huawei) object to r05, and r07: I can accept r07 without bullet 3. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209897 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: Update to conclusions for KI2. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208226r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208463 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#2: Updating solution 15 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | Heng(China Telecom) comments. Laurent (Nokia): answers ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.13.1 | - | - | - | KI#1 solution updates | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208274 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1, Sol#1: Update to address RG configuration and differentiated charging. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208275 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1, Sol#2: Update to resolve ENs and address per RG differentiation . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209898, merging S2-2208322 | Marco (Huawei) provides r02 Huan(vivo) comments Huan(vivo) provides additional comments Stefan (Ericsson) replies and provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Huan(vivo) comments that an existing paragraph in the TR is not included in the contribution and hope the rapporteur can fix it :) Yishan (Huawei) answers the questions from Huan (vivo) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209898 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1, Sol#2: Update to resolve ENs and address per RG differentiation . | Ericsson, Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208275r03, merging S2-2208322. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208322 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1, update Sol#2. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209898 | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments and asks about merging into 8275 Yishan (Huawei) answers to Stefan (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stefan (Ericsson) proposes to consider it merged into S2-2208275 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208781 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI #1, Sol #20: update to enhance the primary mechanism . | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209024 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1: Update to Solution#6 on FS_5WWC_Ph2. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209899. | Stefan (Ericsson) provides questions for clarification Yubing (China Telecom) replies to Stefan (Ericsson) and provides clarification Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Yubing Laurent (Nokia): Comments Yubing (China Telecom) replies to Stefan(Ericsson) and Laurent (Nokia), and provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209899 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1: Update to Solution#6 on FS_5WWC_Ph2. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209024r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209143 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1: 802.11e s user priority mapping with 5G QoS. | Meta USA, CableLabs, Charter Communications, Broadcom | Rel-18 | Postponed | Stefan (Ericsson) comments Sebastian (Qualcomm) proposes to postpone Marco (Huawei) comments Curt (Meta) replies to Marco/Sebatian/Stefan...and provides r01. Sebastian (Qualcomm) still prefers to postpone ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209144 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1: Update to solution 3 Resolving EN(s). | Intel | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209900. | Laurent (Nokia): Comments Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) replies to Laurent's (Nokia) comments and propose S2-2209144r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209900 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1: Update to solution 3 Resolving EN(s). | Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209144r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.13.1 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2209141 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#1: Update to solution 2 Resolving EN(s). | Intel | Rel-18 | Not Handled | Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments and asks about merging into 8275 Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) relies to Stefan's(Ericsson) queries Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) propose S2-2208275r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.13.1 | S2-2208325 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-17: KI#2, Update conclusion on KI#2 | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled Merge into S2-2208226 | Laurent (Nokia): (rapporteur) It is proposed to discuss only one Update to conclusions for KI2 within the thread of S2-2208226, merging 8325 into 8226 Heng(China Telecom) comments. Heng(China Telecom) please ignor my previous email which is in a wrong thread. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.13.2 | - | - | - | Support for WWC Phase 2 (5WWC_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2208319 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3707 (Rel-18, 'B'): N3IWF selection enhancement for support of S-NSSAI needed by UE | Huawei, HiSilicon, Qualcomm, China Telecom | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209901, merging S2-2208227 | Laurent (Nokia): (rapporteur) It is proposed to discuss only one 23.501 CR within the thread of 8319, merging 8227 into 8319 Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Myungjune (LGE) provides r02. Yishan (Huawei) provides r03. Myungjune (LGE) comments on r03. Yishan (Huawei) answers to Myungjune (LGE) Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r04 Laurent (Nokia): provides r05 Marco (Huawei) provide r06 with editorial revisions Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r07 with minor editorial fixes ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00, R03, R04 Marco (Huawei) support r07 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2209901 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3707R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): N3IWF selection enhancement for support of S-NSSAI needed by UE | Huawei, HiSilicon, Qualcomm, China Telecom, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208319r07, merging S2-2208227. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2208684 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3578 (Rel-18, 'B'): Introduction to N3IWF selection to support the slices needed by the UE | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r11 agreed. Revised to S2-2209902, merging S2-2208320 | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Laurent (Nokia): (rapporteur) It is proposed to discuss only one 23.502 CR within the thread of 8684, merging 8320 into 8684 Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Yishan (Huawei) asks for clarification Heng (China Telecom) share the same concern with Yishan Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies and provides r02 Laurent (Nokia): answers and provides r03 Myungjune (LGE) provides r04. Yishan (Huawei) provides r05. Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r06 Laurent (Nokia): provides r07 Ashok (Samsung) need clarifications Marco (Huawei) replies to Laurent (Nokia) Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r08 Ashok (Samsung) agrees with Sebastian Heng (China Telecom) agrees with Ashok Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies to Ashok Heng (China Telecom) provides r09 on top of r08 Ashok (Samsung) thanks Sebastian Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments; has concerns with r09 Heng (China Telecom) comments and think the issue may need FFS Marco (Huawei) provides r10 Ashok (Samsung) provides r11 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R09 Sebastian (Qualcomm) prefers r11; also ok with r02, r06, r08, r10; objects to other versions Marco (Huawei) ok with r11 & r10, objects any other versions Ashok (Samsung) OK with r11 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2209902 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3578R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Introduction to N3IWF selection to support the slices needed by the UE | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Qualcomm Huawei, HiSilicon, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208684r11, merging S2-2208320. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2208320 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3556 (Rel-18, 'B'): N3IWF selection enhancement for support of S-NSSAI needed by UE | Huawei, HiSilicon, Qualcomm, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209902 Merge into S2-2208684 | Laurent (Nokia): (rapporteur) It is proposed to discuss only one 23.502 CR within the thread of 8684, merging 8320 into 8684 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2208321 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0741 (Rel-18, 'B'): N3IWF selection enhancement for support of S-NSSAI needed by UE | Huawei, HiSilicon, Qualcomm, China Telecom | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Agreed |
| 9.13.2 | S2-2208227 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3702 (Rel-18, 'B'): Introduction to N3IWF selection to support the slices needed by the UE | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209901 | Marco (Huawei) this is merged into 8319 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Study on Network Slicing Phase 3 (FS_eNS_Ph3) | - | - | Docs:=43 | - | |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for all KIs | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208946 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Nokia comments on proposals for Conclusions . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to note this paper. The content is for discussion and will be considered during the discussion of each key issue ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for KI#1 | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208944 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#1 Evaluation and Conclusions. | Lenovo, ZTE, NEC, Apple, Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#4: r17 agreed. Revised to S2-2209298, merging S2-2208409, S2-2208980 and S2-2209028 | Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Dongeun(Samsung) provides r01 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Jinguo(ZTE) provides r03 Dongeun (Samsung) replies to Peter (Ericsson) Genadi (Lenovo) replies to some comments by Myungjune (LGE). Genadi (Lenovo) provides r04 and further comments to Dongeun (Samsung) and Haiyang (Huawei). Myungjune (LGE) replies to Genadi (Lenovo) and cannot accept r03/r04. Xiaowen (vivo) provides comments. Haiyang (Huawei) replies to Genadi (Lenovo). Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Myungjune (LGE). Ulises (InterDigital) agrees with Myungjune (LGE) regarding (1) re-evaluation of the URSP rule and (2) reverting changes to EN underneath bullet (3), and provides r05 to reflect this Stefano (Qualcomm) provides R06 to address concerns due to unnecessary updates to URSP rules. Krisztian (Apple) supports r06 and shares the concerns on unnecessarily updating URSP rules based on temporary network conditions. Xiaowen (vivo) provides comments which has been ignored in the email thread. Dongeun (Samsung) comments Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Dongeun (Samsung) on updating the URSP rules. Yi (China Mobile) comments. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r07 based on r06 Genadi (Lenovo) replies to Xiaowen (Vivo) and Yi (China Mobile). Further, r08 is provided. Dongeun (Samsung) cannot accept r02 r03 r05 r07 alessio(Nokia) provides r09 Haiyang (Huawei) comments to Dongeun (Samsung) Xiaowen (vivo) response to Genadi. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r10 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r11 Jinguo(ZTE) provides r12 Dongeun (Samsung) replies to Haiyang (Huawei) Myungjune (LGE) provides r13. Dongeun (Samsung) provides r14 Genadi (Lenovo) comments to r14. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Genadi (Lenovo) provides further comments to Dongeun (Samsung). Genadi (Lenovo) proposes to agree r13. Alessio(Nokia) can live with revisions up to 11. can accept r16 only if it minuted or added as EN that' it is FFS whether we need solutions where there is no change of IP address (i.e SMF/UP do not change) and also that the NSI change option is needed only for UP overload that is unforeseen (CP load is not mitigated by this solution rather is made worse)' Peter Hedman (Ericsson) ok with r16 + removal of 'The PCF notification can be triggered via the QoE improvement indication from AF.' Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to go with r16 + removal of 'The PCF notification can be triggered via the QoE improvement indication from AF.' + Dongeun (Samsung) also suggeset to go with r16 + removal of 'The PCF notification can be triggered via the QoE improvement indication from AF.' Iskren (NEC) we also want to go with r16 with removed 'The PCF notification can be triggered via the QoE improvement indication from AF' Haiyang (Huawei) also OK to go with r16 + removal of 'The PCF notification can be triggered via the QoE improvement indication from AF.' Alessio replies to jinguo (ZTE) that I can also accept just reinstating in r16 in EN for bullet 3 this sentence: 'it is FFS whether the same cannot be achieved by repartitioning resources where needed hence this solution may not be needed in normative phase' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209298 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#1 Evaluation and Conclusions. | Lenovo, ZTE, NEC, Apple, Ericsson, Huawei | Rel-18 | CC#4: Revision of S2-2208944r17, merging S2-2208409, S2-2208980 and S2-2209028. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208409 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#1: Support of Network Slice Service continuity. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209298 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to merge this P-CR in 8944 Alessio(Nokia) considers this paper status noted for the rest of the discussion and will only comment on 8944 . we ask to mark this paper noted. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haiyang(Huawei) is ok to merge this P-CR in 8944 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208980 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#1 Evaluation and Conclusions. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209298 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to merge this P-CR in 8944 Alessio(Nokia) considers this paper status noted for the rest of the discussion and will only comment on 8944 . we ask to mark this paper noted. Dongeun(Samsung) is ok to be merged into 8944 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2209028 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Solution Evaluation and Conclusions for KI #1. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209298 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to merge this P-CR in 8944 Xiaowen (vivo) agrees to merge. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2209047 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Conclusion on KI#1. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to merge this P-CR in 8944 Alessio(Nokia) considers this paper status noted for the rest of the discussion and will only comment on 8944 . we kindly ask to mark this paper noted. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | S2-2209108 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#1 Discussion and proposals on open issues. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to note this paper. The content is for discussion and will be considered during the discussion of 8944 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for KI#2 | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2209000 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#2: Conclusions. | NEC, LGE, Lenovo, Nokia, | Rel-18 | CC#4: r18 agreed. Revised to S2-2209299, merging S2-2208412 | Myungjune (LGE) provides r01. George (Ericsson) provides r02. The inclusion if assistance information is a CT1 discussion and we should let them decide. Genadi (Lenovo) provides r03. George (Ericsson) provides r04. Minor editorial in cyan. Dongeun (Samsung) provides r05. George (Ericsson) provides comments. U delete via UDM completely, SO the statement below ius incorrect. Can U please correct this or we have use r04 Dongeun (Samsung) comments Kundan (NEC) provides comments. Kundan (NEC) provides r06. George (Ericsson) provides comments. U forgot to restore via UDM in bullet 5. Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Myungjune (LGE) provides r07. George (Ericsson) asks question Myungjune (LGE) replies to George (Ericsson) Myungjune (LGE) replies to Dongeun (Samsung). Haiyang (Huawei) provides r08 Myungjune (LGE) provides r09. Dongeun (Samsung) provides r10. Haiyang (Huawei) provides comments George (Ericsson) provides response George (Ericsson) provides r11. Ericsson objects any mention of legacy UEs. CT1 will discuss that Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) provides r12 (mainly editorial and add EN). Ask question for clarification. Haiyang (Huawei) cannot accept to conclude explicit UE capability in SA2. Ask questions Myungjune (LGE) replies to Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO). Krisztian (Apple) provides r13 Haiyang (Huawei) objects r10~r13, provides r14 Dongeun (Samsung) provide comment to Haiyaing (Huawei) Haiyang (Huawei) comments to Dongeun (Samsung) George (Ericsson) provides r15 alessio(Nokia) provides r16 for approval and asks to note earlier revisions. Myungjune comments on r16. Haiyang (Huawei) agrees with Myungjune and provides r17 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) can accept only r15, r16 or r17 Kundan (NEC) are fine with only r15, r16 or r17 but prefers r17. Dongeun (Samsung) provide comments on r17 Haiyang (Huawei) can accept only r08, r09, r14 and r17 Alessio(Nokia) prefers R16 but can live with r17 with the understanding the any SA3 evaluation is not used to block any solution or progress of normative work. existing SoR info already today can take into account what slices a VPLMN supports because it is known by roaming agreements and so much so the subscribed s-NSSAIs sent to the VPLMN are per VPLMN. there is some assumption in rev17 text that this cannot be done already using rel-15 specs and it is incorrect (e.g. a HPLMN can in principle exclude or down prioritize a PLMN because it supports a reduced set of slices for the UE than other PLMNs in the visited country). Genadi (Lenovo) can prefers r17 and can accept r16. Alessio(Nokia) if r17 was pursue we want this to be minuted 'SA3 evaluation is not used to block any solution or progress of normative work. I.e. a WID can be agreed and SA3 work will occur normally if needed' Dongeun(Samsung) suggest to go with r16 Haiyang (Huawei) has a question on the minutes. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that SA2 cannot overrule SA3 Alessio(Nokia) replies to peter that nokia did not certainly mean what peter easy. to simplify we want to ask to remove this note from relp-17 then '34NOTE x: SA3 has to investigate whether the above principles present potential security risks and if so whether SA3 can resolve them. . Any SA3 feedback will be taken into account during the normative phase' ==== Final Deadline ==== Haiyang (Huawei) provides r18 which is: 'R17+ 1. change the NOTE 1: from 'Container' to 'mechanism' +2. delete the last NOTE. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question whether removing the note means that SA3 are assumed to not perform a security evaluation of the whole solution/principles? Haiyang (Huawei) clarify that R17 is still preferred by us Jinguo(ZTE) replies | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209299 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#2: Conclusions. | NEC, LGE, Lenovo, Nokia, Nokia shanghai Bell, Huawei, ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209000r18 (CC#4), merging S2-2208412. Approved. CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: S2-2209000r18 agreed. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208183 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI 2: Proposal for Conclusion on KI #2. | Ericsson, Apple | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209300. | Jinguo(ZTE) propose to use this paper as basis for evaluation part. The conclusion part can use 9000 as basis Myungjune (LGE) proposes to merge this pCR into S2-2209000. Kundan (NEC) agrees with Jinguo to use this paper as evaluation document and use 9000 as conclusion document. alessio (nokia) agrees with Jinguo Jinguo(ZTE) provides r01 to remove the conclusion part. alessio(Nokia) provides r02 to correctly evaluate the KI at least for some solutions (did not spend time on some solutions George bundled together in the evaluation so the companies that care about those solutions should take care of those) Haiyang (Huawei) provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209300 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI 2: Proposal for Conclusion on KI #2. | Ericsson, Apple | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208183r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208412 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Evaluation and conclusion of KI#2. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209299 | Myungjune (LGE) proposes to merge this pCR into S2-2209000. Dongeun (Samsung) comments George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the pCR. Please see additional comments Kundan (NEC) proposes to merge this in 9000 and further asking quesition. Haiyang (Huawei) provides feedback to Myungjune (LGE) and Kundan (NEC). Kundan(NEC) responds to Haiyang. Haiyang (Huawei) comments. Haiyang (Huawei) comments to Kundan (NEC). alessio(Nokia) also proposes to note this paper and use S2-2209000. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dongeun (Samsung) suggest to merge this into 9000 as the same topic is being discussed in 9000 Haiyang (Huawei) is OK to merge to 9000. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208414 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on slice SoR security | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Stefano Faccin (Qualcomm) provides concerns Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01 alessio(Nokia) cannot accept this LS unless Huawei can provide a view on the identified security risks on which there can be shared agreement these are real. this is more transferring to SA3 the evaluation of the study which to us is not right. Haiyang (Huawei) comments to Alessio (Nokia) alessio(Nokia) comments SA3 will open a WID on a contribution driven manner if some companies identify a security risk. we should send a LS to SA3 if a company has security risks they have identified that they want SA3 to assess... what security risk do you identify? Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Alessio (Nokia), provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== alessio(Nokia) requests to NOTE any version of this LS as CT1 will own the normative work and then interact with SA3 as needed. Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to use the LS to trigger the discussion in SA3 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | S2-2208782 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Slice based Steering of Roaming | NTT DOCOMO | Rel-18 | Postponed | alessio(Nokia) proposes to note this LS. Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) provides r01 and comments to Alessio (NOKIA). alessio(Nokia) thanks Srisakul for the clarification. I am ok to send a LS to cT1 to get them started but let's wait to send it till we have a conclusion to share ... so let's check whether we can send a LS already to cT1 at this meeting or postpone this to next meeting ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Alessio Nokia) asks to postpone this till we have a way forwards by a WID normative text that CT1 can consider our input. Jinguo(ZTE) support to send this LS to CT1. The WID in SA2 will not touch too much details on SoR since most of the work will be done at CT1. This LS is good chance to trigger the CT1 discussion? Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) agrees with Jinguo (ZTE) that this LS can be sent from this meeting to trigger CT1 discussion considering that SA2 seems to agree on some solution principles for KI#2 in this meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== Alessio(Nokia) thinks that it is more appropriate to have a discussion at next meeting on the work split on this KI and Send to CT1 a proposal of work split. so we thank docomo for starting this useful discussion but we believe we should send one LS where we also say we encourage CT1 to do normative work based on the outcomes... in any event they will not work on this next meeting as they need a WID discussion. Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) responded to Alessio (NOKIA). Please note that texts in the drafted LS OUT already stated that 'SA2 would like to request CT1 to consider the conclusion for this key issue#2 for normative work to be handled by CT1.' So it is fully aligned to what you are asking for. Could you please clarify what are your concerns and what work split do you have in mind? If no strong concern, we would appreciate to re-consider to send this LS OUT. | Postponed |
| 9.14 | S2-2209001 | DISCUSSION | Information | KI#2: Input from companies on basic procedures of slice based SoR. | NEC | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) proposes to note this discussion paper, and thanks Kundan(NEC) for the polling work. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for KI#3 | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208802 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Way forward proposal for Conclusions and Evaluations. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Docomo | Rel-18 | r07 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209301, merging S2-2208413 and S2-2208764 | Haiyang (Huawei) comments Ashok (Samsung) comments that URSP solution does not work for termination of temporary slice Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments, and propose to move forward with 08764 Jinguo(ZTE) suggest that this paper can focus on different TAs per cell and new time information to the UE. Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments and agrees with Ashok (Samsung). Suggest to keep slice termination aspect (graceful termination and gradual termination) and temporary slice aspect in this paper. Dividing different aspects on KI#3 in different tdocs would be difficult to follow. It is better to have a single Email thread to handle KI#3 and try to reach compromise. Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) responds to Jinguo (ZTE). Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to use 8802 as basis for evaluation discussion Alessio(Nokia) will object to any URSP based solutions as they solve none of the issues at hand (e.g. time based slice is still allowed even after it dies but if you say that the AMF can remove it with UCU then why to use your URSP rules at all?) while still requiring update of UE behaviour. the idea was to improve the system not to show the inefficient or non-suitable solutions one can use today. requests one signle document is updated per KI to avoid too many threads. alessio(Nokia) cannot agree to any of 8764 and we should proceed with this apper as baseline and people can comment on they as they see fit. alessio(nokia) proposes that we use this as baseline then if some other company has an alternative to baseline they cannot convince others to accept we can go to a resolution but please let us stick to one document per KI as we discussed ... Peter Hedman (Ericsson) same as Alessio cannot agree anything of 8764 I cannot see what is worth to progress in this paper that is not also in 8764 i.e. baseline would then be minimal common denominator? Stefano (Qualcomm) indicates that 8802 is surely not optimal, but it is a preferrable way forward than 8802. Kundan (NEC) suggests to use one document for all conclusions. Jinguo(ZTE) provides r01 Kundan (NEC) asks question, can we document something in conclusion which is pending to another group response. Alessio(Nokia) provides r02 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r03 alessio(Nokia) objects to r03 because it redefines the concept of time availability of a slice (it says slice is still there but not for the UE - this was not what the KI was about, it was about temporary slices) also it introduces a strange reconfiguration of TA concept that was never discussed (new TAs configured but other TAs still support the slices?). we did not remove options in r02 we just removed those that are not technically agreeable like use of existing URSP. Haiyang (Huawei) objects r02 alessio(nokia) clarifies that we kept (despite not agreeing with it) in r02 the description of the option to use 'updated URSPs ' but removed the option to use EXISTING URSPS unchanged. so asks Huawei to clarify whether they still keep the objection. Stefano (Qualcomm) expresses concerns and will object to solutions that mandate constant re-evaluation of URSP rules at every cell change. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r04 Jinguo(ZTE) provides r05 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r06 Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) provides r07 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r07 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides question Haiyang (Huawei) can only accept r04 r06, and r07 Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) ask question to Peter (Ericsson). alessio(Nokia) can only accept r02 or r04.r05 and beyond modify the evaluation in unacceptable ways. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Srisakul Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides questin to Alessio on what are the unacceptable changes in r05 (and beyond) Peter Hedman (Ericsson) Prefer r06 over r07, but both 'ok' with the understanding that we will not have any final conclusions at this meeting Iskren (NEC) objects to r00 to r04. We can only accept r05 or r06 or r07 Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to go with r07. This the baseline for further discussion. There is no final conclusion on each bullet. Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) provides comment to Peter's clarification. Alessio(Nokia) can ONLY accept r02, r04 and can live with r07 ONLY and ONLY if the evaluations are removed. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) objects also r02 and r04, as stated before 'ok' with r07 (with or without evaluation) Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) OK with r01, r02, r04 and r07. Object to r03, r05, r06. Alessio(Nokia) can then live with r07 WITHOUT evaluation text. Kundan(NEC) is fine with r07. Haiyang (Huawei) can also live with r07 with or without evaluation text. Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to go with r07+ remove evaluation text ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209301 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Way forward proposal for Conclusions and Evaluations. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Docomo, NEC | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208802r07 + changes, merging S2-2208413 and S2-2208764. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208413 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Evaluation and conclusion of KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209301 | Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) comments. Suggest to use 8802 as a basis. Perhaps, if conclusion part is controversial, we may think of dropping conclusion part in this meeting, and mainly focus on the evaluation part in 8802. alessio(Nokia) like docomo, we Suggest to use 8802 as a basis. we kindly ask this paper to be marked as we will only comment on 8802 for this KI from now on. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208764 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#3: Proposal for Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#3. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209301 | Haiyang (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into 8413 Ashok (Samsung) comments URSP solution does not work for temporary slice as proposed in 8764 and 8413 paper Jinguo(ZTE) suggest that this paper can focus on temporary network slice part, mainly on the URSP extension with a new indication. Srisakul (NTT DOCOMO) comments. Updating URSP for slice decommissioning is also quite complex and might not be backward-compatible with existing mechanisms/logics of other 5GC NF. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Srisakul Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Haiyang Stefano (Qualcomm) expresses concerns on the solution and cannot accept the conclusions of forcing a UE to re-evaluate URSP rules for existing PDU sessions. Suggests to use 8802 as the basis. Alessio(Nokia) proposes that this is noted and 8802 is used as basis. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to QC and r01 to address QC comment. alessio(Nokia) comments that we no longer want to discuss this paper based on Jinguo direction but the new added text in r01 is implying the RAN has to become aware if the UE supports the URSP enhancement. we do not understand why we need to go down this route that also requires anyhow UE vendors to implement the URSP enhancements . the text is unclear as it does not explain which node releases the session...so we do not accept this r01 also for this reason -please kleep discussion in one document. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments that RAN does not know whether there is any PDU Session established, but only if there is UP i.e. read again Peter Hedman (Ericsson) content was merged into 08802 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208970 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: ENS_Ph3 KI#3 Evaluation and Conclusion for the network slice patchy support requirement part only. | NEC | Rel-18 | CC#4: Merged into S2-2209302 | Jinguo(ZTE) comments Iskren (NEC) responds to comments from Jinguo (ZTE) Haiyang (Huawei) comments Alessio(Nokia) also agrees with Jinguo this paper is not suitable for KI#3 discussion and more focused on KI#5. of course this concept can be ancillary to solution like the one proposing smaller TAs are secondary TAs (a bit like sol 29,11 etc.). so it can be folded into KI#3 evaluation in the same bucket as the KI#5 solutions which enable the RA be linked to supporting uniformly the Allowed NSSAI only (i.e. to enable flexible RA allocation when e.g. smaller secondary Ras are supported. Iskren (NEC) provides r01 with added conclusion for KI#5 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== alessio(Nokia) believes we already have papers for KI#3/5 and so this is not needed. asks to not the paper as it is difficult to see how this can fit. (i.e. we cannot agree to approve this) ==== Final Deadline ==== Iskren (NEC) Tao, please mark this as merged to S2-2208802 | Merged |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for KI#4 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208184 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#4: Proposal for Evaluation Conclusion on KI #4. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209302 | Dongeun (Samsung) provides comments Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this paper to 8902 Alessio(Nokia) askes then to mark this as noted. Nokia will only comment to 8902 from now onwards. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208902 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#4: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#4. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, ZTE | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209302, merging S2-2208184 and S2-2208970 | Fenqin(Huawei) provides r01 George (Ericsson) provides r02. Removed change on change. Added Ericsson as co-signer Fenqin (Huawei) provides r03 to clarify the roaming case. George (Ericsson) provides response, I don't understand what the not means. Fenqin (Huawei) replies to George. George (Ericsson) provides response. I want that postponed for next meeting or normative phase. SO we are not Ok with r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) Ericsson OK only with r02 alessio(Nokia) notwithstanding the Ericsson position on this thread: the primary NSACF is used in roaming too. so this should be clear. So the normative work shall proceed for both roaming and non roaming . I hope Ericsson agrees. George (Ericsson) responds Jinguo(ZTE) suggests to go with r02, and leave the roaming aspect for next meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209302 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#4: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#4. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, ZTE, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208902r02, merging S2-2208184 and S2-2208970. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for KI#5 | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208411 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#5 . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r04 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209303, merging S2-2208881 and S2-2209114 | Jinguo(ZTE) propose to use this paer for conclusion of partially rejected NSSAI Haiyang (Huawei) is OK to use this paper for conclusion of partially rejected NSSAI Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to use 8765 as basis for evaluation part. Haiyang (Huawei) thinks 8411 has a better structure for evaluation. Jinguo(ZTE) is also fine to take 8411 as basis for evaluation Kundan(NEC) suggests to use one paper for all conclusions and provides further comments. Haiyang (Huawei) is also fine to take 8411 as basis for whole KI#5 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r01 Alessio(nokia) provides r02 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r03 Genadi (Lenovo) provides r04. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) (LGE) objects r01, r02, 03, 04. Can accept r00, r05. Krisztian (Apple) can accept r05. We also object to r01-r04 due to RAN impacts. r00 is incomplete. Tao(VC) ask to list the modification on top of r04 to reflect r05. Haiyang (Huawei) indicates r05 is : r04+ removing 'The connected mode behaviour can be based on sol.29 principle'+ add 'The S-NSSAIs of the Partially Allowed S-NSSAI are provided to the NG-RAN as part of Allowed NSSAI assuming there is no impact to the NG-RAN.' Genadi (Lenovo) prefers r05. alessio(Nokia) can live with r05 only if this is removed 'The S-NSSAIs of the Partially Allowed S-NSSAI are provided to the NG-RAN as part of Allowed NSSAI assuming there is no impact to the NG-RAN.' as in no solution this was proposed. the RAN impact if any can be judged when we have RAN feedback by the way we thing the text above has RAN impact as now we allow some S-NSSAIs where the S-NSSAI is not supported so the rAN may even enter error conditions and if it does note we also expect new behaviour (basically now we say a certain S_NSSAI si allowed but in reality it is not in a TA so the RAN can get confused!). At least solution 29 hadd a reasoned behaviour here it is totally open and not documented. alessio(Nokia) by the way r05 is after submission. so in principle we prefer r02/3/4 Myungjune (LGE) proposes to agree r00 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to agree r05 + moving the sentence 'The S-NSSAIs of the Partially Allowed S-NSSAI are provided to the NG-RAN as part of Allowed NSSAI assuming there is no impact to the NG-RAN' to an EN. Objects to r02-r04 and r00 is incomplete. Jinguo(ZTE) propose to agree r04+ removing 'The connected mode behaviour can be based on sol.29 principle'+ add EN: it is FFS whether the S-NSSAIs of the Partially Allowed S-NSSAI provided to the NG-RAN as part of Allowed NSSAI has any impact to the NG-RAN.' Alessio(Nokia) ok also to update r04+ removing 'The connected mode behaviour can be based on sol.29 principle' no need to add more EN or text that is probably not going to see much agreement. Jinguo(ZTE)suggest to go r04+ removing 'The connected mode behaviour can be based on sol.29 principle' ==== Final Deadline ==== Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and not really happy with the approved revision, and suggest to add 'EN: it is FFS whether S-NSSAIs of the Partially Allowed S-NSSAI can be provided to the NG-RAN as part of Allowed NSSAI assuming there is no impact to the NG-RAN' | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209303 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#5 . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208411r04 + changes, merging S2-2208881 and S2-2209114. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208765 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#5: Proposal for Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#5. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Jinguo(ZTE) propose to use this paer for conclusion of partially rejected NSSAI Haiyang (Huawei) thinks Jinguo(ZTE) meant to use this paper for conclusion of partially Allowed NSSAI Haiyang (Huawei) comments Myungjune (LGE) has concern on RAN impact. Ashok (Samsung) comments Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and r01 alessio(Nokia) cannot agree to use this paper as basis for partially allowed NSSAI as there is no pointer to any solution describing the handling of the connected mode for these s-NSSAI. for the rejected S-NSSAI there is the apple paper, our paper or Huawei paper. my suggestion is to use the Huawei paper as overall baseline and we see how we can add the partially allowed concept but in a complete manner including the connected mode mobility etc. the nokia paper is to use appropriate to handle the partially allowed (if anything because it posits to the solution defining how it actually works). Also the issue of overlapping TAs is not addressed and we need to cover that(see sol 29 update) Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Nokia Kundan(NEC) requests to use only one paper for all conclusions. otherwise it will be difficult to track the conclusions. alessio(nokia) assumes the discussion is not based on 8411 and asks to mark this as noted. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | S2-2208821 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Conclusion on KI#5. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Noted | Haiyang (Huawei) comments Myungjune (LGE) comments Ashok (Samsung) comments Jinguo(ZTE) replies Myungjune (LGE) replies to Jinguo(ZTE) Haiyang (Huawei) ask a question Jinguo(ZTE) replies to Myungjune (LGE) alessio(Nokia) proposes this is noted if agreeable the way forward of this paper added to 8411. we also note the discussion on whether this is in scope. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) proposes to NOTE. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | S2-2208881 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#5: Improved support of RAs including TAs supporting Rejected S-NSSAIs . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209303 | Jinguo(ZTE) propose to use 8411 for discussion on partially rejected NSSAI and 8765 for discussion on partially allowed NSSAI Myungjune (LGE) has concern on RAN impact. Alessio(Nokia) does not agree to split the conclusion on KI#5 over two threads. So either we use this paper or we use 8411 that was the baseline... up to you... Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and concerns. Alessio(Nokia) ok to merge this into 8411 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2209114 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#5: Evaluation and interim conclusion. | Apple | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209303 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to merge this paper into 8411 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Evaluation + Conclusion for KI#6 | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208871 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion. | Samsung | Rel-18 | CC#3: r13 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209945. | Myungjune (LGE) provides r02. George (Ericsson) provides r03 and comments below Myungjune (LGE) replies to George (Ericsson). Ashok (Samsung) provides comments Genadi (Lenovo) comments on the inactivity timer for PDU Session release and S-NSSAI deregistration. George (Ericsson) provides responses Genadi (Lenovo) comments on the implicit/explicit deregistration of S-NSSAI in AMF and UE. Iskren (NEC) expresses provides comments George (Ericsson) provides r04 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r05 George (Ericsson) Ericsson not OK with rev 05. The case for AF is very fluffy and is unclear. Questions asked not addressed at all. Fenqin (Huawei) responds to George George (Ericsson) asks. What do U mean by NSAC is to be controlled. And by who ? NSAC is an operator NF. U need to provide clarity how this works and why needed. Fenqin (Huawei) provides further responds to George Ashok (Samsung) comments Ashok (Samsung) clarifies to Genadi (Lenovo) Fenqin (Huawei) provides response to Ashok Myungjune (LGE) provides r06. George (Ericsson) provides r07 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r08. George (Ericsson) Not OK with this revision, I already indicated that this is already covered. NSAC is not an authorized AF. It belongs to the PLMN, so the wording is wrong. If it is an external server then definitely we are against that. If it is NSAC then this is not an AFG. SO which one is it./ U can add at most a NOTE stating that Ur case over r07. The note can say: this covers the case of NSAC...... Fenqin(Huawei) we are not ok with r07. George (Ericsson) provides response. This is not described in any of the solutions. Fenqin(Huawei) provides response to George. Fenqin(Huawei) ask one question to George. Fenqin(Huawei) give feedback to George. Ashok (Samsung) agrees with George (Ericsson) George (Ericsson) provides text inline George (Ericsson) provided what Ericsson will accept in a previosu email Ashok is correct. This cant be open ended as it is now. It is up to Fenqin now. Fenqin (Huawei) provides r09 George (Ericsson) provides r10 George (Ericsson) provides r11 George (Ericsson) provides r12 Ashok (Samsung) provides r13 George (Ericsson) provides comments Ashok (Samsung) provides reply George (Ericsson) responds Ashok (Samsung) replies ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) Ericsson accepts only r12 or r13 Myungjune (LGE) supports r13. Krisztian (Apple) supports r13 and objects to r12, r11. Fenqin (Huawei) support to go with r13. alessio(Nokia) provides r11 Genadi (Lenovo) is fine with r13, although it is not clear why the description of AF initiated inactivity timer configuration is described twice. alessio(Nokia) can only accept r12, r11 alessio(Nokia) replies to KKISS(Apple) the explicit release timer in supporting UE only causes an explicit release from UE not from network!! the non-supporting UE release if FROM the network with timers running in network. I hope this explains the difference. Ashok (Samsung) explains to Alessio(Nokia) and propose to agree r13 Jinguo(ZTE) supports to go with r13 Ashok (Samsung) not ok with r12, r11, propose to go with r13 George (Ericsson) Indeed this is not my revision. Alessio thinks too much about me so he added my name to his revision ?? Alessio(Nokia) replies to Ashok (Samsung) there is no duplication as the role is different and also the impact is different (in UE and especially in network). we object to moving forward without adding this options 2 as it mean the network ALWAYS has to run timers . so we only accept r12 or r11. Alessio(Unfortunately has to object to rel-13. we want an option where the network has not to run timers. Ashok (Samsung) comments that network cannot avoid the scenario of not running timer because it has to support non-supporting UE as well. Iskren (NEC) suggests to go with r13. We cannot accept versions with timers in the UE only. George (Ericsson) responds. So if the network does not enforce policies will the network really trusts all UEs. I mean it is incomprehensible that this will be acceptable. alessio(Nokia) if this is a matter of trusting the UE then we cannot really trust the UE either to have release the slice locally 9or to do anything really)... the UE behaviour is conformance tested... and the whole point to do this KI was to program the UE really. but maybe Krisztian can tell us if UEs can be trusted. George (Ericsson) responds No they cant be trusted. U can go to the GSMA and look at misbehaving UEs. Then U can understand why no operator will buy into Ur argument. alessio( Nokia) we can live with 13 keeping the explicit release of PDU sessions with the hysteresis timer. (the explicit release timer running in UE only to decide when to release a session after the last app is detected to not use the session anymore.). otherwise 12 or 11 Ashok (Samsung) provides reply. Jinguo(ZTE) asks for CC#3. alessio replies to jinguo: yes we want to reinstate this bullet: I ndication of the time after which a PDU session is explicitly released after no application is detected to need it at the UE (timer running at UE only). The timer is provided by HPLMN or VPLMN of HPLMN allows any existing methods for UE configuration. After the timer expiry UE explicitly update SMF about PDU release. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209945 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion. | Samsung, NEC | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208871r13 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208185 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI 1: Proposal for Evaluation and Conclusion on KI #6. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208871 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to use 8871 as basis for KI#6 discussion Fenqin (Huawei) also suggest to discuss in 8871. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208903 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#6, Evaluation and conclusion of Solutions of KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208871 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to use 8871 as basis for KI#6 discussion George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments George (Ericsson) provides r01. OK to use 8871 as a basis. alessio(Nokia) agrees with Jinguo and also there are some inaccurate evaluations in places as e.g. solution 38 is only considered to be PCF based. so we would ask to note this and use the Samsung paper 8871 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2209029 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI #6, Solution Evaluation and conclusions . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208871 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to use 8871 as basis for KI#6 discussion George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to consider the pCR merged in 8871. Xiaowen (vivo) agrees to merge. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | - | - | - | Solution update | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.14 | S2-2209033 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Update to Sol#43. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209304. | Jinguo(ZTE) believes this P-CR is not needed, i.e. can be noted. Xiaowen responses to Jinguo Xiaowen(vivo) provides r1. Jinguo(ZTE) comments that the figure is not updated. 3b) does not exist now. Xiaowen(vivo) provides r02 and updates the figure according to Jinguo's comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209304 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Update to Sol#43. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209033r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.14 | S2-2208410 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#3, Sol#21 update to remove EN. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | alessio(Nokia) provides r01 Haiyang (Huawei) comments to r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haiyang (Huawei) objects r01 alessio(Nokia) objects to r00 as the EN resolution is partial and does not address the issue of implementation based behaviour. we do not believe that this solution has been fully specified as it uses existing URSPs but they do not support what is claimed. can you comment on the eN content? ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.14 | S2-2208467 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#6, Sol #32: Update to allow the PCF initiate the move of a PDU session from one slice to another . | Verizon | Rel-18 | Approved | Jinguo(ZTE) provides r01 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.14 | S2-2208786 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#1, Sol#40: Update to enable input of QoE Improvement indication from AF | Alibaba Group, China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209305 | Jinguo(ZTE) suggest to merge this paper into 9046 since both papers are updating same figure in solution 40 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xiaobo Yu (Alibaba) agrees to merge 8786 into 9046. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.14 | S2-2208835 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: KI#3, Updated Solution 29: Editor's Note resolution and small optimization for MO interactions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.14 | S2-2209046 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Resolving ENs of solution #40. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209305, merging S2-2208786 | Jinguo(ZTE) comments Yi (China Mobile) provides r01 to resolve comment from ZTE. Genadi (Lenovo) comments that one Ed.Note seems not resolved. Xiaobo Yu (Alibaba) agree to merge 8786 into 9046 and provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Xiaobo Yu (Alibaba) requests to cosign this contribution. | Revised |
| 9.14 | S2-2209305 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Resolving ENs of solution #40. | China Mobile, Alibaba | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209046r02, merging S2-2208786. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.15.1 | - | - | - | Study on 5G AM Policy (FS_AMP) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.15.2 | - | - | - | 5G AM Policy (AMP) | - | - | Docs:=12 | - | |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208176 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0739 (Rel-18, 'B'): New timer from PCF along with RFSP Index to direct a UE to 4G | China Telecom, Ericsson | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209677, merging S2-2208422 | Haiyang (Huawei) provides comments Zhuoyi (China Telecom) suppose to unify the name as 'Validity time for RFSP Index in use' for the new timer and apply it to other CRs in 9.15.2. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Haiyang (Huawei) Haiyang (Huawei) comments Zhuoyi (China Telecom) responds to Haiyang (Huawei) Judy (Ericsson) comments Zhuoyi (China Telecom) provides r01. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02 Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 Zhuoyi (China Telecom) prefers r03. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r04 Pallab comments on r04. Haiyang (Huawei) provides reply to Pallab (Nokia) Zhuoyi (China Telecom) respondes to Pallab. Zhuoyi (China Telecom) provides r05. Judy (Ericsson) provides r06 Pallab responds to Zhuoyi (China Telecom) Zhuoyi (China Telecom) responds to Pallab. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) prefer r06, objects to r02/r04/r05 Pallab (Nokia) also proposes to approve r06. Would like to co-sign Zhuoyi (China Telecom) replies to Nokia. Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to approve r06 + 'Editor's Note: Whether PCF needs to be aware the modified RFSP index indicates a change of priority from 5GC to EPC is FFS.' As per discussion in 8343 thread ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2209677 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0739R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): New timer from PCF along with RFSP Index to direct a UE to 4G | China Telecom, Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208176r06, merging S2-2208422. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208343 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3710 (Rel-18, 'C'): RFSP index in use at 5GS to EPS mobility | Ericsson, China Telecom | Rel-18 | r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209678. | Haiyang (Huawei) comments Ashok (Samsung) comments and provides r01 Pallab (Nokia) comments and provides r02 Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r04 Judy (Ericsson) comments that r04 removes the high level description of the AMP function which should be added back and provides r05 Judy (Ericsson) provides r06, changing '4G access' to 'EPC/EUTRAN access' Pallab (Nokia) asks what is 'EPC/EUTRAN access' Judy (Ericsson) responds to Pallab (Nokia) that 'EUTRAN access' seems to be a better wording Judy (Ericsson) provides r07, removing 'EPC' from 'EPC/UETRAN access' Haiyang (Huawei) can only accept r04 Pallab (Nokia) provides r09 based on r07. Would like to co-sign. Please ignore r08 Judy (Ericsson) thanks Pallab (Nokia) for the support ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) objects to r04, prefers r09 Pallab (Nokia) proposes to approve r09 Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to postpone Judy (Ericsson) responds to Haiyang (Huawei) Zhuoyi (China Telecom) responds to Judy (Ericsson) Haiyang (Huawei) responds Haiyang (Huawei) is OK with r09 + 'Editor's Note: Whether PCF needs to be aware the modified RFSP index indicates a change of priority from 5GC to EPC is FFS.' Judy (Ericsson) provides postDL revision r10=r09 + 'Editor's Note: Whether PCF needs to be aware the modified RFSP index indicates a change of priority from 5GC to EPC is FFS' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2209678 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3710R1 (Rel-18, 'C'): RFSP index in use at 5GS to EPS mobility | Ericsson, China Telecom, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208343r09. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208344 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3557 (Rel-18, 'C'): RFSP index in use at 5GS to EPS mobility | Ericsson, China Telecom | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209611, merging S2-2208421 | Judy (Ericsson) responds to Haiyang (Huawei) Haiyang (Huawei) provides comments Haiyang (Huawei) comments Pallab (Nokia) provides comments Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02 Judy (Ericsson) provides r04 (please ignore r03) Haiyang (Huawei) objects r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) OK to approve r04. Would like to co-sign Judy (Ericsson) thanks Pallab (Nokia) for your support, and expect Huawei to withdraw objection to r04 per guidance from rapporteurs of 23.401/501/502. Haiyang (Huawei) comments and can accept r04 with expecting we will have clean up on AM Policy parameters in the future ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2209611 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3557R1 (Rel-18, 'C'): RFSP index in use at 5GS to EPS mobility | Ericsson, China Telecom, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208344r04, merging S2-2208421. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208420 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3713 (Rel-18, 'B'): RFSP index during interworking | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209612. | Haiyang (Huawei) comments Judy (Ericsson) comments that clause 5.3.4.3 is for 5GS thus should not be updated for EPS-5GS interworking Haiyang (Huawei) comments and thinks this paper should be handled separately Judy (Ericsson) proposes to merge this paper to 8343 and comment Ashok (Samsung) comments Zhuoyi (China Telecom) agrees with Ashok and Haiyang. Pallab (Nokia) agrees with Zhuoyi (China Telecom), Ashok (Samsung), Haiyang (Huawei) and proposes to keep this CR Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 and comments Haiyang (Huawei) provides r02 Haiyang (Huawei) provides comments Pallab (Nokia) has the same comment: what is 'EPC/EUTRAN access'? Can we change it to 'E-UTRAN access' or may be 'LTE access'? Judy (Ericsson) responds to Pallab (Nokia) that 'E-UTRAN access' seems to be a better wording, and comment on r02 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r03 Judy (Ericsson) provides r05 based on r01 (please ignore r04), changing '5GS' to '5G access', and 'EPS' to 'EUTRAN access' Zhuoyi (China Telecom) comments. Pallab (Nokia) comments Judy (Ericsson) provides r06, changing 'EUTRAN' to 'E-UTRAN' ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) can accept r01/r05/r06, objects to other revisions (including r00) Haiyang (Huawei) proposes to postpone Haiyang (Huawei) is OK with r06 now as per discussion in 8343 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2209612 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3713R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): RFSP index during interworking | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208420r06. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208421 | CR | Approval | 23.401 CR3712 (Rel-18, 'B'): RFSP index during interworking | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209611 | Judy (Ericsson) comment this paper is not needed as the impact to EPS due to 5GS interworking should be captured in 23.502 instead of 23.401. Ashok (Samsung) comments Haiyang (Huawei) provides feedback. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Judy (Ericsson) comments Ashok (Samsung) completely agrees with Judy (Ericsson) Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01. Zhuoyi (China Telecom) can live with r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson): this paper can be marked as merged to 8344 based on offline discussion. Pallab (Nokia) wants to check if this CR be considered as merged to 8344r04 Haiyang (Huawei) is OK to merge this paper to 8344r04 based on offline discussion ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208422 | CR | Approval | 23.503 CR0744 (Rel-18, 'B'): RFSP index during interworking | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209677 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson): Andy, this paper has been merged to 8176 based on discussion in 8176 thread ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2208423 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3564 (Rel-18, 'B'): RFSP index during interworking | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209679. | Haiyang (Huawei) thinks this paper can be handled separately as suggested by the Rapporteur Judy (Ericsson) proposes to merge this paper to 8344 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r01 (just to align the term) Judy (Ericsson) asks question about Rapporteur's proposal Zhuoyi (China Telecom) responses to Judy and provides r02. Judy (Ericsson) comment Haiyang (Huawei) provides r03 as an Alt Pallab (Nokia) comments on r03 Haiyang (Huawei) provides reply to Pallab (Nokia) Judy (Ericsson) comments that the change in r03 is not related to AMP Haiyang (Huawei) provides reply to Judy Zhuoyi (China Telecom) comments and provides r04. Judy (Ericsson) comment that r04 does not include any change to TS23.502, and propose to either NOTE this paper or merge to 8344 Zhuoyi (China Telecom) replies to Ericsson. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Zhuoyi (China Telecom) Haiyang (Huawei) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Zhuoyi (China Telecom) suggests to approve r04. Judy (Ericsson) does not agree to this paper as is, as the update is not aligned with 23.503 update. If the author really wants to keep this CR, adding a reference to 23.503 is acceptable. Pallab (Nokia) proposes to go with r02 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r05 as an Alt: which is r04+removing the exact values but add the reference to TS 23.503 Pallab (Nokia) is OK with r05 (which is r04+ removing the exact values but add the reference to TS 23.503) Judy (Ericsson) proposes an after-revision update Zhuoyi (China Telecom) is OK with r05 and I think it need to bring up to CC#? Haiyang (Huawei) provides r06: which is r04+removing the exact values but add the reference to clauses of TS 23.503 + add Ericsson as cosigner Ashok (Samsung) Ok with the proposal in r06 Zhuoyi (China Teleom) proposes to approve r04 + removing the exact values of 'AM Policy Information' but add the reference to clauses of TS 23.503 in Table 5.2.2.2.2-1 + add Ericsson as cosigner ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.15.2 | S2-2209679 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3564R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): RFSP index during interworking | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208423r04. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.16 | - | - | - | Study on Personal IoT Networks (5G_PIN) | - | - | Docs:=39 | - | |
| 9.16 | S2-2208263 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#1, Conclusion updates . | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208688 | Marco (Huawei) proposes to merge in S2-2208688 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208264 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#3, Conclusion updates . | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209903 | Marco (Huawei) proposes to merge into 8997 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208265 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#5, Conclusion updates . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209937, merging S2-2208462. R05? Revise based on SoH | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Pallab (Nokia) comments on r01. Qian (Ericsson) provides r02 and comments. Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Pallab (Nokia) Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment Marco (Huawei) provide r03 Serge (T-Mobile USA) objects to r02 and r03, accepts r01 Zhenhua (vivo) provides r04 to reinstate bullet 3 Pallab (Nokia) objects r04. Serge (T-Mobile USA) is ok with rev04 Zhenhua (vivo) asks question to Pallab (Nokia) and Serge (T-Mobile USA) and provide r05. Pallab (Nokia) is OK to keep only PEGC as proposed in r05. Marco (Huawei) r05 may be fine. Ask clarification Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Marco (Huawei) Marco (Huawei) replies Qian (Ericsson) provides comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jianning (Xiaomi) provide commemt Marco (Huawei) r05 should be revised based on SoH ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) requests rapporteur to provide revision of r05 based on discussions in SoH of CC#2 for further consideration and agreement Saad (interdigital) replies to Nokia Pallab (Nokia) responds to Saad (interdigital). Proposes to approve r05+ NOTE below NOTE: Whether PEMC UE needs a specific 5G subscription will be decided during normative phase Pallab (Nokia) responds to Saad (interdigital). Proposes to approve r05+ NOTE below NOTE: Whether PEMC UE needs a specific 5G subscription will be decided during normative phase Pallab (Nokia) responds to Saad (interdigital). Proposes to approve r05+ NOTE below NOTE: Whether PEMC UE needs a specific 5G subscription will be decided during normative phase Boren (OPPO) asks for clarification on the NOTE proposed by Pallab (Nokia) Marco (Huawei) asks also clarification on the NOTE proposed by Pallab (Nokia) Marco (Huawei) comments Pallab (Nokia) responds Marco (Huawei) and OK with the revised NOTE Boren (OPPO) comments Kefeng (Qualcomm) is OK to add the NOTE Qian (Qualcomm) provides m02 to reflect the proposed EN. Zhenhua (vivo) provides r06. Qian (Ericsson) provides r07 | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209937 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#5, Conclusion updates | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208265r07, merging S2-2208462. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2208266 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#6, Conclusion updates . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208302 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208302 Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208302 Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 8266 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 8266 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208302 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208267 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#7, Conclusion . | Ericsson, Qualcomm, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208629 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208629 Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208629 Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 8267 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 8267 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208629 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208302 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: 23.700-88: KI #6, Conclusions for KI#6. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | CC#4: r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209949. R06? Revise based on SoH | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments. Zhenhua (vivo) responds to Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm). Pallab (Nokia) comments and provides r02 Marco (Huawei) comments r02 Kefeng (Qualcomm) comments r02 Zhenhua (vivo) provides r03 according to offline CC Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) objects to all versions of S2-2208302 Pallab (Nokia) responds to Marco (Huawei) Pallab (Nokia) responds to Kefeng (Qualcomm) Zhenhua (vivo) provides r04 Marco (Huawei) provides r06 on top of r04 Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides r05. Marco (Huawei) objects to r05. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) comments on r06 Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to reinstate following text on top of r06: c) Non-3GPP QoS assistance information Marco (Huawei) agree to reinstate the N3GPP QoS on top of R06. Object r05. Furthermore r06 needs to be revised based on SoH ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) requests rapporteur to provide revision of r06 based on discussions in SoH of CC#2 for further consideration and agreement Zhenhua (vivo) provides r07 | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209949 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: 23.700-88: KI #6, Conclusions for KI#6. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208302r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2208462 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI #5, Interim conclusions update. | T-Mobile USA | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209937 Merged into S2-2208265? | Zhenhua (vivo) proposes merge into S2-2208265 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208465 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#3, Conclusion Update. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209953 Merged into S2-2209178? | Zhenhua (vivo) proposes merge into S2-2209178 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208466 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#7, New Conclusion . | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209950 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208629 Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208629 Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 8466 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 8466 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208629 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208499 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: 23.700-88: KI #4, update conclusion on KI#4 . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Merge into S2-2209952 | Marco (Huawei) proposes to considered merged into S2-2209013 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208501 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#4 & KI #6: update conclusion on KI #4 & KI#6 for PIN Route Selection Policy. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Merge into S2-2209952 | Zhenhua (vivo) proposes to merge into S2-2209013 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208629 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#1-7: Update of conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | CC#4: r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209950, merging S2-2208466. R04? Revise based on SoH | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Marco (Huawei) proposes to consider as basis for KI #7 (other KIs will be removed) Marco (Huawei) provides version r02 Zhenhua (vivo) provides r03 according to offline CC Saad (Interdigital) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) r04 shall to be revised based on SoH results ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) requests rapporteur to provide revision of r04 based on discussions in SoH of CC#2 for further consideration and agreement Zhenhua (vivo) provides r05 Qian (Ericsson) provides r06 | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209950 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#1-7: Update of conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208629r06, merging S2-2208466. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2208688 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#1, Conclusion Update. | OPPO | Rel-18 | CC#4: r11 agreed. Revised to S2-2209951. R10? Revise based on SoH | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r02. Zhenhua (vivo) asks questions to r02 Boren (OPPO) asks questions. Zhenhua (vivo) provides r03. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) replies Zhenhua (vivo) and Boren (OPPO) on r02. Pallab (Nokia) provides r04 based on r03. Marco (Huawei) provides to r05 on top of r04 Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments on r04. Zhenhua (vivo) comments on r03. Zhenhua (vivo) provides r06 Pallab (Nokia) responds to Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) Pallab (Nokia) responds to Zhenhua (vivo). Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Pallab (Nokia) Zhenhua (vivo) provides r07 Intel Objects to S2-2208688r07 Interdigital (Saad) also object to r07 Qian (Ericsson) provides comments Marco (Huawei) comments on r03. Marco (Huawei) provides comments Marco (Huawei) reply to couple of comments Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) relies to Qian (Ericson) and Marco (Hauwei) Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Marco (Huawei) on PIN signalling Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides comments. Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Kefeng (Qualcomm) Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment to Zhuanhua (vivo) and Kefeng (Qualcomm) Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment on agenda of the CC Marco (Huawei) reply to Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) Marco (Huawei) answer to Jianning (Xiaomi) Marco (Huawei) replies to Zhenhua (vivo) on PIN signalling Marco (Huawei) answer to Zhenhua (vivo) Suresh Srinivasan (Objects) to all version of S2-2208688 and propose S2-2208688r08 Zhenhua (vivo) provides r09 to remove all AF/no-AF staffs according to offline CC Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) Objects to S2-2208688r09 Zhenhua (vivo) provides r10 Pallab (Nokia) shares the same view as Qualcomm, Ericsson, Huawei that 5GC NF is not responsible for management of PIN Zhenhua (vivo) responds to Pallab (Nokia) Marco (Huawei) comments that some issues (AF vs NF and the consequent conclusion) will be solved only via SoH result ( Hopefully) Qian (Ericsson) shares the view from Macro and provides further comments Boren (OPPO) shares the same view as Zhenhua (vivo) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Suresh Srinivasan (Intel) comments on r10 Marco (Huawei) r10 should be revised based on SoH result. Object any other versions ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) requests rapporteur to provide revision of r10 based on discussions in SoH of CC#2 for further consideration and agreement Zhenhua (vivo) provides r11 | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209951 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#1, Conclusion Update. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208688r11. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2208692 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#4, Conclusion Update. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209013 | Marco (Huawei) proposes to considered merged into S2-2209013 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208996 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI #4, new Annex to describe PIN Session Model. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209903 | Pallab (Nokia) provides comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Zhenhua (vivo) propose to merge into S2-2208997 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2208997 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI #4, evaluation and conclusion update. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209903, merging S2-2208264 and S2-2208996 | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Boren (OPPO) comments. Zhenhua (vivo) comments and provides r02. Pallab (Nokia) comments. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment on r02 Marco (Huawei) provides r04 to remove conclusion part (skipped r03 due to error) Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Jianning (Xiaomi) Jicheol (Samsung) provides r03 to correct the figure and texts based on the discussion Jicheol (Samsung) clarified to Marco that all the versions do NOT include conclusion part. Jicheol (Samsung) provides r05 to make sure to remove the conclusion part from this paper. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) oj with r05, object any other versions ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209903 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI #4, evaluation update. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208997r05, merging S2-2208264 and S2-2208996. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2209007 | DISCUSSION | Information | Discussion on PIN issues and proposals | vivo | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.16 | S2-2209008 | DISCUSSION | Information | Consolidated solution proposal for PIN | vivo | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.16 | S2-2209009 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Consolidated solution. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Noted | Marco (Huawei) the consolidated solution must be aligned to final agreed KI conclusion Zhenhua (vivo) replies Qian (Ericsson) comments Marco (Huawei) considering current discussion and SoH, I propose to note the pCR ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) propose to note the pCR. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.16 | S2-2209010 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update interim conclusions on KI#1. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208688 | Marco (Huawei) proposes to considered merged into S2-2208688 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209011 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Editorial modification on interim conclusions of KI#2. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209904. | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209904 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Editorial modification on interim conclusions of KI#2. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209011r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2209012 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update interim conclusions on KI#3. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merge into S2-2209953 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2209178 Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2209178 Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 9012 was approved without any comments in the ChairNote. In fact 9012 was agreed to be merged into S2-2209178, but the ChairNote didn't capture that information ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209013 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update interim conclusions on KI#4. | Vivo, Inspur | Rel-18 | CC#4: r17 agreed. Revised to S2-2209952, merging S2-2208499 and S2-2208501. R14? Revise based on SoH | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r02. Boren (OPPO) comments. Zhenhua (vivo) comments on r02. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies Zhenhua (vivo) comments on r02. Zhenhua (vivo) answers to Kefeng (Qualcomm). Pallab (Nokia) provides r03 based on r02. Zhenhua (vivo) provides r04. Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides r05. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment on r05 Interdigital (Saad) asks question for clarification Qian (Ericsson) asks also for clarification Kefeng Zhang replies Jianning (Xiaomi) on Q2. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies Qian (Ericsson) comments on Bullet 1. Zhenhua (vivo) replies and provide r06 Yang (OPPO) provides comment Zhenhua (vivo) provides r07 according to offline CC Qian (Ericsson) provides comments and r08 Kefeng (Qualcomm) comments r08. Zhenhua (vivo) comments. Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides comments to r07. Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Kefeng (Qualcomm). Zhenhua (vivo) provides r09. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies Zhenhua (vivo). Zhenhua (vivo) replies Kefeng (Qualcomm). Pallab (Nokia) provides comments. Pallab (Nokia) provides further comments. Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Pallab (Nokia) Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Pallab (Nokia). Pallab (Nokia) responds to Zhenhua (vivo) Pallab (Nokia) responds to Zhenhua (vivo). Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Pallab (Nokia) and provides r10 Zhenhua (vivo) answers to Pallab (Nokia) Zhenhua (vivo) answers to Pallab (Nokia). Jicheol (Samsung) provides r11. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide view Marco (Huawei) provide r12 on top of r10 Qian (Ericsson) asks questions on r10 Zhenhua (vivo) answers to Qian (Ericsson) and provide r13 Walter Dees (Philips) requests clarification on x4 Zhenhua (vivo) replies to Walter Dees (Philips) Jianning (Xiaomi) provide r15 on top of r13 Michele Zarri (Huawei) provides revision 14 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jianning (Xiaomi) provides comment Pallab (Nokia) comments that r14 shall be revised based on SoH result in CC#2 Marco (Huawei) R14 should be revised based on SoH. Object any version from 00 to r12. ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) requests rapporteur to provide revision of r14 based on discussions in SoH of CC#2 for further consideration and agreement Pallab (Nokia) objects to revision R14-m01 as concerns raised in earlier revisions have not been addressed. Also proposes clean-up of the conclusions in a new revision Zhenhua (vivo) provides r16 Qian (Ericsson) provides r17 | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209952 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update interim conclusions on KI#4. | Vivo, Inspur | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209013r17, merging S2-2208499 and S2-2208501. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.16 | S2-2209014 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update interim conclusions on KI#5. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208265 | Zhenhua (vivo) proposes to merge into S2-2208265 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209015 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update interim conclusions on KI#6. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208302 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208302 Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208302 Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 9015 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 9015 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208302, but the ChairNotes didn't capture that information ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209016 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Add interim conclusions on KI#7. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208629 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208629 Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208629 Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 9016 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 9016 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208629, but the ChairNotes didn't capture that information ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209145 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#1: Update to Conclusion on Key Issue#1 Resolving EN(s). | Intel | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208688 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208688. Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208688. Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 9145 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 9145 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208688, but the ChairNotes didn't capture that information ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209146 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: KI#6: Update to Conclusion on key Issue#6. | Intel | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208302 | Zhenhua (vivo) proposes merge into S2-2208302 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209176 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update conclusion for KI#1 . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208688 | Marco (Huawei) proposes to consider this merged into S2-2208688 Jianning (Xiaomi) is ok to merge into 8688 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209177 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update conclusion for Key Issue#7 . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208629 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Kefeng (Qualcomm) proposes to merge into S2-2208629. Zhenhua (vivo) agree the merge into S2-2208629. Jianning (Xiaomi) noticed that 9177 was approved without any comments in the ChairNotes. In fact 9177 was agreed to be merged into S2-2208629, but the ChairNotes didn't capture that information ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.16 | S2-2209178 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update conclusion for Key Issue#3 . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CC#4: r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209953, merging S2-2208465 and S2-2209012. R03? Revise based on SoH | Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01. Qian (Ericsson) provides r02. Zhenhua (vivo) provides r03 according to offline CC. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide r04 to try to capture the both NF and AF based option Zhenhua (vivo) comments on r04 Marco (Huawei) objects to r04 since the intention of have both options for SoH is not clearly reflected ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) which revision is most suitable for revision to match SoH needs to be determined. Zhenhua (vivo) is OK to use r03 recorded in Chair note as basis for SOH. Jianning (Xiaomi) is ok for either r03 or r04 for furtuer revision based on SoH ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) requests rapporteur to provide revision of r03 based on discussions in SoH of CC#2 for further consideration and agreement Saad (interdigital) replies to Nokia Marco (Huawei) objects to r03-m3 Pallab (Nokia) NOT OK with r03-m3. OK with r03-m2 Qian (Ericsson) shares the same view that r03-m2 is ok, but is not ok with r03-m3 Kefeng (Qualcomm) is not OK with r03-m3., which is not align with the result of SOH. OK with r03-m2. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment on r03-m2 Qian (Ericsson) provides comments Marco (Huawei) provides comments Pallab (Nokia) comments Jianning (Xiaomi) comment and suggest to go r03-m2 with NOTE as 'NOTE: whether and how to support the validity duration and time validity of a PIN will determine in normative phase.' Zhenhua (vivo) provides r05 Qian (Ericsson) provides r06 | Revised |
| 9.16 | S2-2209953 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: Update conclusion for Key Issue#3 . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209178r06, merging S2-2208465 and S2-2209012. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | - | - | - | Study on evolution of IMS multimedia telephony service (FS_NG_RTC) | - | - | Docs:=27 | - | |
| 9.17.1 | - | - | - | General issues | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208530 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion related to IMS Data Channel and 3GPP PS Data Off. | Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | Noted | Hao (ZTE) comments. Yi (China Mobile) comments. Rainer (Nokia) agrees with Yi (China Mobile). Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) replies to Kenny, Yi, Rainer. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.17.1 | - | - | - | KI#1: Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=15 | - | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208181 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1, 4: Update to solution 20. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Postponed | Mu (Huawei) comments Yi (China Mobile) comments. Kefeng (Qualcomm) comments. James Jin(vivo) provides comments George (Ericsson) provides response. George (Ericsson) provides answer Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides further comments. George (Ericsson) provides More responses inline to Y, and more to Kenny Hao (ZTE) comments. George (Ericsson) provides responses in line George (Ericsson) provides r01. Removed the extra sequence diagram. Rainer (Nokia) asks for clarification. George (Ericsson) provides comments inline, and r02 Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides comments. George (Ericsson) provides r03 Rainer (Nokia) is ok to add the EN. George (Ericsson) provides response. Good question and I don't now the answer, I already asked Yi. He wanted a SOH and I don't think we are ready or this is needed. We need more discussion after this. May be can be captured. Rainer (Nokia) replies. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yi (China Mobile) ask to postpone this contribution to next meeting. Rainer (Nokia) is ok to postpone 8181 and 9041. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208442 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1: Sol#20 update of architecture figures. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the pCR and considers this merged into 8181 as it addressed the same thing. Rainer (Nokia) is ok to mark 8442 merged into 8181. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Rainer (Nokia) asks to agree on 8442. Hao (ZTE) supports approving this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209041 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1, Update of solution #20. | China Mobile, Huawei, Hisilicon, ZTE | Rel-18 | Postponed | George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Mu (Huawei) comments Yi (China Mobile) replies to Mu and George. R01 is provided. George (Ericsson) provides response. There are fundamental functional differences that needs to be resolve for the 2 updated solutions 20. Rainer (Nokia) comments. Hao (ZTE) responds. Yi (China Mobile) replies and provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) Ericsson not Ok with any revision including the original. We prefer to use 8181 as a basis for discussion as it has a lot more description and clarification. Hao (ZTE) proposes to POSTPONE this paper. Rainer (Nokia) agrees to postpone 9041. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208506 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1, Update solution #20 to merge with existing solution #18. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209613. | James Jin (vivo) replies to questions from George Foti (Ericsson) and explains that it is a separate problem different from 8181. George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the pCR. This can be incorporated in existing updates to solution 20 such as 8181 Yi (China Mobile) ask a question. James Jin (vivo) replies to questions from Yi (China Mobile). Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides r01. James Jin (vivo) replies to Kefeng (Qualcomm), I am ok with r01. George (Ericsson) provides response Rainer (Nokia) provides r02. James Jin (vivo) replies to Rainer (Nokia), Ok with r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) OK with rev 02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209613 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1, Update solution #20 to merge with existing solution #18. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208506r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208182 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1, 4: Update to solution 5. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209614. | Yi (China Mobile) provides r01. George Foti (Ericsson) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209614 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#1, 4: Update to solution 5. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208182r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208496 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, update Sol #22. | Qualcomm Incorporated, vivo | Rel-18 | Approved | Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) replies Hao (ZTE) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208498 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, new solution: UE capabilities detection for IMS DC applications. | Qualcomm Incorporated, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2206002 from S2#152E. r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209615. | Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) replies Hao (ZTE) comments and provides r01. Hao (ZTE) responds. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) replies Hao (ZTE) comments. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) clarified this is a re-submission of S2-2206002r01 in SA2 #152e, which was not correctly concluded in Chairman's note. George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the CR. Rainer (Nokia) agrees to note the CR. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies Rainer (Nokia) comments. Rainer (Nokia) replies. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies Rainer (Nokia) . George (Ericsson) provides response. This is more suitable for a GSM spec. Does not belong to 3GPP stage 2 specs. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies George (Ericsson) . George (Ericsson) provides response, I am not necessarily against it. But U have broken the rules and others can complain Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides r02. Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) Ok with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209615 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, new solution: UE capabilities detection for IMS DC applications. | Qualcomm Incorporated, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208498r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208601 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, Sol #6, Update Procedures. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208602 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, Sol #17, Update to Resolve ENs. | ZTE | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209616. | George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides comments Hao (ZTE) responds and provides r01. George (Ericsson) provides response George (Ericsson) provides response. I prefer we simply add a note that the profile will align with solution 20, and we leave it there. Hao (ZTE) responds to George (Ericsson) and provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) OK with r02 Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209616 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, Sol #17, Update to Resolve ENs. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208602r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208495 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on the usage of DC application identifier in SDP | Qualcomm | Rel-18 | r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209617 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209617 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on the usage of DC application identifier in SDP | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208495r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | - | - | - | KI#2: Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208608 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#2, Sol#9 Update Supporting AR Communication. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Mu (Huawei) replies George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments George (Ericsson) provides response Mu (Huawei) replies and provide r01. George (Ericsson) provides comments. Not Ok with this revision. Mu (Huawei) replies and provide r02. George (Ericsson) provides comments on r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) NOT OK with any revisions including the original ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.17.1 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208497 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, update evaluation and conclusion on DC application ID . | Qualcomm Incorporated, vivo | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209618. | George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the pCR. We send an LS on this issue. We should wait for their response George Foti (Ericsson) proposes to note the CR. We sent an LS to SA4 and we should wait for their answer. Rainer (Nokia) comments. Kefeng (Qualcomm) replies George Foti (Ericsson) & Rainer (Nokia) comments. Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides r01. Rainer (Nokia) provides r02. Kefeng (Qualcomm) is OK with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) Ericsson Ok with rev. 02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209618 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, update evaluation and conclusion on DC application ID . | Qualcomm Incorporated, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208497r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208603 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, Evaluation Update. | ZTE | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209619. | Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) proposes to merge evaluation of Sol #22 into S2-2208497 and provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hao (ZTE) is fine with r01. Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209619 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI #1, Evaluation Update. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208603r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209042 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: Update on conclusion of KI#1. | China Mobile, Huawei, Hisilicon, ZTE | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209620. | Mu (Huawei) comments George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Rainer (Nokia) comments. George (Ericsson) provides response Mu (Huawei) replies to George Yi (China Mobile) replies to George and Rainer. R01 is provided. Rainer (Nokia) provides r02. George (Ericsson) provides r03 George (Ericsson) provides r04. Responses Mu (Huawei) replies to Rainer Rainer (Nokia) replies to Mu (Huawei). Yi (China Mobile) comments. George (Ericsson) provides responds ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yi (China Mobile) responds to George and can live with r04. Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r04. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209620 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: Update on conclusion of KI#1. | China Mobile, Huawei, Hisilicon, ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209042r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2208441 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#3: Conclusions for support of Third Party specific user IDs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Samsung | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209621. | George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Rainer (Nokia) provides r01. Mu (Huawei) comments Rainer (Nokia) replies. Mu (Huawei) provides r02, adding CRS as alternative. Rainer (Nokia) cannot accept r02. Mu (Huawei) replies to Rainer ==== Revisions Deadline ==== George (Ericsson) OK with rev. 01 Kefeng (Qualcomm) OK with r01. Ashok (Samsung) OK with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209621 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: KI#3: Conclusions for support of Third Party specific user IDs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208441r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209043 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: Evaluation and conclusion of KI#4. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209622. | Hao (ZTE) comments. George Foti (Ericsson) provides comments Yi (China Mobile) replies to George. George (Ericsson) provides response Rainer (Nokia) provides r01. Yi (China Mobile) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yi (China Mobile) are fine with r00 and r01. Rainer (Nokia) is only ok with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.17.1 | S2-2209622 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: Evaluation and conclusion of KI#4. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209043r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.17.2 | - | - | - | Evolution of IMS multimedia telephony service (NG_RTC) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | Study on 5G multicast-broadcast services Phase 2 (FS_5MBS_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=69 | - | |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | Resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario (LSs) | - | - | Docs:=13 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208147 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG3: LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | RAN WG3 (R3-225229) | Rel-18 | Responses drafted in S2-2208341, S2-2208730. Postponed | Postponed | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208150 | LS In | Action | LS from TSG RAN: Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | TSG RAN (RP-222678) | Rel-18 | Responses drafted in S2-2208285, S2-2208341, S2-2208851, S2-2208966. Final response in S2-2209306. Postponed | Postponed | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208851 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | CATT | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208150. r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209306, merging S2-2208285, S2-2208341, S2-2208713, S2-2208730, S2-2208869 and S2-2208966. Noted | zhendong (ZTE) agree with thomas LaeYoung (LGE) is OK to handle/cover broadcast only for KI#2 (i.e. RAN sharing scenario) in Rel-18. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Youngkyo(Samsung) agrees that it is too late to extend the scope of our study. Haris(Qualcomm) r01 is aligned with our view LiMeng (Huawei) prefers to not check this issue in the study phase, but considers the possibility in normative work. zhendong (ZTE) provides the response Youngkyo(Samsung) questions TU budget change for normative phase. LiMeng (Huawei) responds to Youngkyo (Samsung) and Zhendong (ZTE) Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments as indicated in our input paper (8340), we can take some TU time if companies agree otherwise as we have done for many WIs that are RAN led (e.g. eDRX, REDCap, NR_Slice, IoT_SAT_ARCH_EPS... to name a few), we will then use the alignment TU budget SA2 reserves for such purposes. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r02 according to comments below. Haris(Qualcomm) indicates why r02 is not acceptable Thomas (Nokia) does not agree to do normative work on MOCN MBS multicast session sharing without prior SA2 study or as RAN3 alignment, as fundamental technical issues need to be studied before by SA2. Thomas(Nokia) objects against r02 Youngkyo(Samsung) share the view with Thomas(Nokia) and Haris(Qulacomm) as r02 is not acceptable. Shabnam (Ericsson) comments it is quite premature for SA2 to assume RAN is not capable without seeing their outcome and we should follow normal procedure and let RAN work on this and let us know what they have achieved, objects to original and all revisions except r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) suggests to check r01 to move forward. Tao(VC) Let's further check r01 agreeable or not Haris(Qualcomm) is ok with r01 and supports approving the LS response at this meeting Zhendong (ZTE) proposes to move with r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that Ericsson did not withdraw their objection to r01, we can only accept r02 and object to all other revisions as stated already. | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2209306 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208851r01, merging S2-2208285, S2-2208341, S2-2208713, S2-2208730, S2-2208869 and S2-2208966. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208713 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | SAMSUNG | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208150. Merged into S2-2209306 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208851. Youngkyo(Samsung) is okay to merge it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208341 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208147 and S2-2208150. Merged into S2-2209306 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208851. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208730 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on MOCN multicast | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208147. Merged into S2-2209306 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208851. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208869 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208147 and S2-2208150. Merged into S2-2209306 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208851. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208966 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | ZTE | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208150. Merged into S2-2209306 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208851. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208285 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on on the scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208150. Merged into S2-2209306 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208851. Thomas (Nokia) agrees to merge this document into S2-2208851. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208286 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Scope of resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Noted | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to Note this DP, and discusses this in 8851 thread. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2208340 | DISCUSSION | Decision | Discussion & Way Forward on Resource Efficiency for Multicast MBS reception of RAN Sharing | Ericsson, FirstNet | Rel-18 | Noted | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to Note this DP, and discusses this in 8851 thread. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2208731 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion on MOCN Multicast issue. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | zhendong (ZTE) proposes to Note this DP, and discusses this in 8851 thread. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | Resource efficiency for MBS reception in RAN sharing scenario (CR) | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208965 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI2#, discussion and proposal for the LS on the MOCN scope. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) comments it needs to be decided together with the reply LS S2-2208851. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | Other LSs | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208879 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on UE capabilities for MBS | Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2205431 (noted at S2#152E). Noted | LiMeng (Huawei) comments. Haris(Qualcomm) responds Judy (Ericsson) comment LaeYoung (LGE) comments. Haris(Qualcomm) provides r01 Thomas(Nokia) provides comments Wanqiang(Huawei) provides comments and proposes to note the paper. Haris(Qualcomm) responds to Wanqiang (Huawei) Wanqiang(Huawei) responds to Haris (Qualcomm) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) asks to approve r01 Tao(VC) further check whether r01 agreeable or not Wanqiang(Huawei) objects the LS as RAN1 already gave the feedback. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2210160 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on re-establishment of the MBS context during mobility registration update or service request procedure | CATT | CC#4: r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209965. | Revised | ||
| 9.18 | S2-2209965 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on re-establishment of the MBS context during mobility registration update or service request procedure | SA WG2 | - | Revision of S2-2210160r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#1: Solution update | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208288 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1 and KI#6, Sol#26 Update to address ENs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209307. | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Judy (Ericsson) asks question Thomas (Nokia) replies to Fenqin and provides r02 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r03 Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xiaoyan (CATT) only accepts r04 and objects to other revisions (including r00). Thomas (Nokia) replies to Xiaoyoan Ask her to reconsider objection ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209307 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1 and KI#6, Sol#26 Update to address ENs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208288r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208332 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, Sol#18: update to resolve ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209308. | Fenqin (Huawei) provide comments and provide r01 Haris(Qualcomm) comments that removing the EN 'It is FFS whether there is a need for the UE to become aware the group paging is the CN initiated paging, and if yes how.' is not acceptable without feedback from RAN2 Judy (Ericsson) responds and provide r02 Thomas (Nokia) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) is fine with r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209308 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, Sol#18: update to resolve ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208332r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208333 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, Sol#27: update to resolve ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209309. | Fenqin (Huawei) provide comments and r01 Aihua(CMCC) provide comments. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Aihua (CMCC) Thomas (Nokia) provide r02 Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 Thomas(Nokia) raises concerns against r03 Provides r04 Judy (Ericsson) responds to Thomas(Nokia), and provide r05 Thomas(Nokia) and provides r06 Judy (Ericsson) responds to Aihua(CMCC) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Aihua(CMCC) disagrees with the EN removal, suggesting to keep EN as it was. Judy (Ericsson): Aihua(CMCC) please explain what is your real concern if an SMF gets UE's GPSI as part of the MBS Session context but the UE may not have joined or may have joined in different SMF. It does not help if you ignore the analysis and repeat the same comment. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209309 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, Sol#27: update to resolve ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208333r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208852 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1 Sol#20 update: resolving Editor's notes. | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xiaoyan (CATT) objects to r01 Thomas (Nokia) objects to r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2208963 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, update the solution 6. | ZTE | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209310. | Judy (Ericsson) comment zhendong (ZTE) provides the response Thomas(Nokia) comments that some justification for EN removal should be provided zhendong (ZTE) provides r01 Fenqin(Huawei) comments zhendong (ZTE) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fenqin(Huawei) is fine with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209310 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, update the solution 6. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208963r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208964 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, update the solution 28. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#1: Evaluation and conclusion | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208473 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: Evaluation for key issue 1 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209311. | Fenqin (Huawei) provides comment and r01. Thomas (Nokia) provides r02. zhendong (ZTE) provides r03 Judy (Ericsson) provides r04 Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r05 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) is ok with r06, indicates that contains typo 'to enable inavtive MBS reception' that needs to be corrected in final version ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209311 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: Evaluation for key issue 1 . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208473r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208904 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1: Further evaluation and conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r10 agreed. Revised to S2-2209312, merging S2-2208334, S2-2208472, S2-2208853 and S2-2208962 | Fenqin (Huawei) provides r01 Haris(Qualcomm) provides r02 Fenqin (Huawei) provides feedback and r03 Haris(Qualcomm) responds that r03 is not acceptable Fenqin (Huawei) responds to Haris Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r04 zhendong (ZTE) provides r05 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r06 Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r04's changes on how to re-establish the MBS context from CM-IDLE Haris(Qualcomm) responds that r06 is not acceptable Judy (Ericsson) provides r07 to allow further discussion which solution to adopt for SMF to get UE priority info if the requirement is confirmed by NG-RAN. Thomas (Nokia) provides r08 Xiaoyan(CATT) replies to Haris(Qualcomm) Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r09 Haris(Qualcomm) provides r10 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) objects to r01, r03~r06, cannot accept r09/r10 as is, request to remove 'service request' Haris(Qualcomm) can only accept r02 and r10. Objects to other revisions. Thomas (Nokia) can agree r10 + remove 'service request' Fenqin (Huawei) Provides r11==r10+ removing the 'service request' from the indicated paragraph Xiaoyan (CATT) objects to r11 (i.e. r10 + remove 'service request') and also requests to add a NOTE in r10. Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to go with r10 Judy (Ericsson) thanks to Xiaoyan's info and can live with r10. Thomas(Nokia) can live with r10. zhendong (ZTE) is fine with r10 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209312 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1: Further evaluation and conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, CATT, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208904r10, merging S2-2208334, S2-2208472, S2-2208853 and S2-2208962. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208334 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, Update to Evaluation and Interim Conclusion . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209312 | Judy (Ericsson) is OK with the rapporteur's merging proposal. LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208904. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208472 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, Interim conclusion updates . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209312 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208904. Thomas (Nokia) accepts to merge this document into S2-2208904. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208853 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1 conclusions update. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209312 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208904. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208962 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, update the conclusion of Key issue#1. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209312 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208904. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#2 | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208335 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2, Sol#7: update to MOCN RAN Sharing for TMGI Option. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209313. | LaeYoung (LGE) comments that Robbie (Ericsson) and LaeYoung (LGE) exchanged several emails such as questions from herself and answers from Robbie (Ericsson), but used wrong end tag (i.e. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r01 based on the comments from LaeYoung (LGE). LaeYoung (LGE) is fine with the text updates in r01 and provides comment. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209313 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2, Sol#7: update to MOCN RAN Sharing for TMGI Option. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208335r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208395 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2, Evaluation Update. | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209314. | Haris(Qualcomm) comments Robbie (Ericsson) replies to Haris(Qualcomm), provides r01 Haris(Qualcomm) asks question for clarification LaeYoung (LGE) comments. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r02 and replies to LaeYoung(LGE) LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Robbie (Ericsson). Robbie (Ericsson) provides r03 and replies to LaeYoung (LGE). Thomas (Nokia) provides r04. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r05. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r06. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r07 based on r05 but can accept r06. Thomas (Nokia) provides r08 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r09 Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r07 Robbie (Ericsson) asks clarification on the comments from Haris(Qualcomm) Haris(Qualcomm) responds ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) is fine with r09. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209314 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2, Evaluation Update. | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, LG Electronics, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208395r09. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208732 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: Conclusion update on KI #2(MOCN network sharing). | Samsung | Rel-18 | Noted | Robbie (Ericsson) asks for clarification Youngkyo(Samsung) replies. Robbie (Ericsson) asks for clarification again. LiMeng (Huawei) asks for clarification. LaeYoung (LGE) does not prefer to update KI#2 conclusion in this meeting without feedback from RAN2 and RAN3. Youngkyo(Samsung) replies to LaeYoung and provides r01. Robbie (Ericsson) provides comments. zhendong (ZTE) comments Robbie (Ericsson) replies to zhendong (ZTE) Thomas (Nokia) provides r02 Robbie (Ericsson) objects to r02, provides r03. LiMeng (Huawei) agrees with Robbie that it is not possible to conclude to use common TMGI as the identifier. LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to NOTE this pCR because it is considered not much meaningful to update KI#2 conclusion in this meeting w/o RAN2/3. Thomas (Nokia) provides r04 and objects to r03 asks Robbie to explain his objection to r02 Robbie (Ericsson) explains the reasons to Thomas (Nokia) Thomas (Nokia) provides r05 and replies to Robbie Robbie (Ericsson) thanks Thomas (Nokia) and provides comments zhendong (ZTE) provides the r06 Thomas (Nokia) provides r06 based on the proposal of Robbie Thomas Nokia provides r07 Clarifies that r06 was in fact provided by zhendong (ZTE) Haris(Qualcomm) asks question Haris(Qualcomm) provides r08 LaeYoung (LGE) cannot accept all versions. LiMeng (Huawei) comments on the last bullet . ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Thomas(Nokia) replies to LaeYoung LaeYoung (LGE) responds to Thomas (Nokia). Thomas (Nokia) responds to LaeYoung (LGE) LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Thomas (Nokia). ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2208725 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2: Update the conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208732 | LiMeng (Huawei) suggests to merge this document into S2-2208732. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.18 | S2-2208844 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: Conclusions for KI#2. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Noted | LiMeng (Huawei) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to NOTE this pCR or mark as MERGED into 8732. Haris(Qualcomm) agrees with LaeYoung. It should be marked noted or merged ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#3 | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208287 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#3, Sol#30 Update to address ENs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209315. | Judy (Ericsson) comments Thomas (Nokia ) replies to Judy Fenqin (Huawei) comments Thomas(Nokia) replies to Fenqin Fenqin (Huawei) replies to Thomas Thomas (Nokia) replies to Judy Thomas(Nokia) provides r01 and replies to Fenqin (Huawei) Fenqin (Huawei) further replies to Thomas Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Thomas (Nokia) comments that r03 disregards the previous revisions and suggest using r02 instead. Judy (Ericsson) can accept r02/r03, object to r00/r01 which removes EN withotu resolution Xiaoyan (CATT) prefers r03, can live with r02, and objects to r00/r01 Thomas (Nokia) still prefers r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209315 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#3, Sol#30 Update to address ENs. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208287r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208657 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: FS_5MBS_Ph2 KI#3, Sol#11 Update for making clarification. | China Mobile, CATT, vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209316. | Aihua (CMCC) provides r01. Judy (Ericsson) asks question Aihua (CMCC) replies. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) comment ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209316 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: FS_5MBS_Ph2 KI#3, Sol#11 Update for making clarification. | China Mobile, CATT, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208657r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208660 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#3 Update to evaluation and conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Postponed | Aihua (CMCC) provides r01 Judy (Ericsson) provides r02 Thomas(Nokia) provides r03 and raises concerns against r02 Aihua (CMCC) replies and provides r03. Thomas(Nokia) provides r04 Clarifies that r03 was provided by Aihua (CMCC) and raises concerns against r02 and r03 Aihua (CMCC) objects r04 and provides r05. Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r06. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Thomas (Nokia) objects against r02, r03 and r06. Haris(Qualcomm) proposes to postpone conclusions Judy (Ericsson) accepts only r02 and objects to other revisions (r00 included). Thomas (Nokia) objects against r02 and r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.18 | S2-2209190 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#3 evaluation updates . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209317. | Judy (Ericsson) provides r01 Thomas (Nokia) provides r02, raises concerns against r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) prefers r01, can live with r02 and objects to r00 Thomas (Nokia) objects against r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209317 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#3 evaluation updates . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209190r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#4 | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208724 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#4, Sol#13: Update and clarification. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.18 | S2-2208337 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#4, Evaluation and Conclusion Update. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#5 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208868 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: Conclusions for KI#5. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Noted | LiMeng (Huawei) asks questions regarding the deferred activation. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Haris(Qualcomm) comments Thomas(Nokia) replies to Haris Judy (Ericsson) comments and provides r02 based on r00, only change is to add Ericsson as co-source Haris(Qualcomm) responds to Thomas (Nokia) Thomas(Nokia) replies to LiMeng Thomas(Nokia) objects against r00 and r02. Provides r03 replies to Judy and Harris. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) can only accept r0 and r02. Objects to other revisions Judy (Ericsson) accept r00 and r02, objects to other revisions ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.18 | S2-2208726 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#5: Evaluation and Conclusion on broadcast MBS session. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209318. | LiMeng (Huawei) provides r01 Judy (Ericsson) provides r02 Thomas (Nokia) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209318 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#5: Update to Evaluation on MBS session. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208726r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | KI#6 | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208727 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6, Sol#31: Update and clarification. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209319. | Robbie (Ericsson) provides comments Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209319 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6, Sol#31: Update and clarification. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208727r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208339 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6, Evaluation Update and Conclusion. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209980. | Robbie (Ericsson) provides r01. Haris(Qualcomm) provides r02 Fenqin (Huawei) provides comment. Haris(Qualcomm) responds Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r03 Robbie (Ericsson) supports Fenqin(Huawei) and raise concerns against r02, r03 Haris(Qualcomm) responds to Robbie (Ericsson) Thomas (Nokia) provides r04 and supports the concerns against r02, r03 Robbie (Ericsson) replies to Haris(Qualcomm) Haris(Qualcomm) comments that without explicit acknowledgment from SA2 that this scenario is possible SA6 cannot do the job Robbie(Ericsson) comments that SA6 can utilize both MBS broadcast and MBS multicast without further standardization in SA2 Fenqin (Huawei) share the same view as Robbie Haris(Qualcomm) provides r05 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r06 Robbie (Ericsson) provides r07 Haris(Qualcomm) indicates that neither r06 or r07 are acceptable Robbie (Ericsson) provides r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Thomas (Nokia) objects against r07 and r08 Robbie (Ericsson) asks Thomas (Nokia) to explain why the evaluation of not relevant KIs need to be recorded in this KI Tao(VC) further check whether r05 agreeable or not Robbie(Ericsson) asks Thomas (Nokia) to withdraw his objection on r08 Fenqin (Huawei) is ok with r05 or r08. The NOTE should not impact the KI#6 conclusion. Thomas(Nokia) can agree r04 and r06. Object to other revisions. suggest agreeing r06 + remove 'simultaneously ' Haris(Qualcomm) is ok with r08 or r05. Objects to other revisions. Robbie (Ericsson) accepts r08, r07, r01 and objects to other revisions. LiMeng (Huawei) asks if the following can be acceptable. Robbie (Ericsson) agrees with the suggestion from LiMeng (Huawei). Thomas(Nokia) has concerns with the proposals of LiMeng LiMeng (Huawei) proposes the way forward. ==== Final Deadline ==== Haris(Qualcomm) is ok with the WF proposal from LiMeng Robbie(Ericsson) is ok with the WF proposal from LiMeng | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209980 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6, Evaluation Update and Conclusion. | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208339r09. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208854 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6 evaluation update. | CATT | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209320. | Robbie (Ericsson) asks for clarification Xiaoyan (CATT) clarifies to Robbie (Ericsson) Robbie (Ericsson) replies to Xiaoyan (CATT) Robbie (Ericsson) asks for further clarification. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r01. Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r02. Xiaoyan (CATT) provides further clarifications to Robbie (Ericsson) Robbie (Ericsson) provides comments. Robbie (Ericsson) provides r03. Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Robbie (Ericsson) is fine with r04. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.18 | S2-2209320 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6 evaluation update. | CATT, Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208854r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.18 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 9.18 | S2-2208961 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#1, update the evaluation of Key issue#1. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208474 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2, Interim conclusion updates. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Not Handled | LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to 8732. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208967 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#2, update the evaluation and conclusion for the Key issue#2. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Not Handled | LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to 8395 for evaluation and to 8732 for conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208336 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#3, Evaluation update . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208338 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#5, Evaluation update and Conclusion . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208475 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#5, conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208728 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6: Evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208855 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: KI#6 conclusions. | CATT | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.18 | S2-2208867 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-47: Conclusions for KI#6. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | Study on XR (Extended Reality) and media services (FS_XRM) | - | - | Docs:=96 | - | |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | LS & TR clean up | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208143 | LS In | Information | LS from RAN WG2: LS on Pose Information for XR | RAN WG2 (R2-2209213) | Rel-18 | Noted | Noted | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208144 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG2: LS on XR-awareness in RAN | RAN WG2 (R2-2209215) | Rel-18 | Responses drafted in S2-2209107, S2-2209157. Final response in S2-2209979 | Replied to | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208157 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: Reply LS to Follow-up LS on QoS support with Media Unit granularity | SA WG4 (S4-221174) | Rel-18 | This was Postponed | Postponed | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208105 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG1: Reply LS on UE Power Saving for XR and Media Services | RAN WG1 (R1-2205531) | Rel-18 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205421 from S2#152-e. Responses drafted in S2-2208197, S2-2208392. Final response in S2-2209979 | Replied to | |
| 9.19 | S2-2209257 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: Reply LS on further details on XR traffic | SA WG4 (S4aV220921) | Rel-18 | Postponed Not in Chair notes | Postponed | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208392 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on XR and Media Services | Ericsson | Response to S2-2208105. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208209 | Dan (China Mobile) proposes to merge this LS to S2-2208209 and we only need one LS to RAN WGs. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208197 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on UE Power Saving for XR and Media Services | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208105. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208209 | Dan (China Mobile) proposes to merge this LS to S2-2208209 and we only need one LS to RAN WGs. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209107 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on XR-awareness in RAN | Intel | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208144. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208209 | Dan (China Mobile) proposes to merge this LS to S2-2208209 and we only need one LS to RAN WGs. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209157 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on XR-awareness in RAN | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Response to S2-2208144. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208209 | Dan (China Mobile) proposes to merge this LS to S2-2208209 and we only need one LS to RAN WGs. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208209 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on XR and Media Services | vivo | Response to S2-2208105 and S2-2208144. CC#4: r26 agreed. Revised to S2-2209979, merging S2-2208779. | Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r01 to merge LSs to RAN Paul (Ericsson) provides r02. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r03 Lei(Tencent) provides comments. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Lei(Tencent) and seek clarification from proponent for the question in KI#8; If no clarification, it is proposed to remove it in later revision. Devaki (Nokia) comments that it is better to wait for conclusions to be stable to discuss the LS. Also, for KI#8 specifically, we already have significant input in the LS from RAN1. Xiaowan(vivo) relies to Devaki (Nokia) and provide r04. Mukesh (MediaTek) and provides r05. Mike (InterDigital) comments and provides r06 and points out that this is a reply LS to R1-2205531/S2-2208105. Chunshan(CATT) provides r07. Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r08 Zhuoyun (Tencent) comments and provides r09. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r10 Hui (Huawei) provides r11. Mike (InterDigital) comments and provides r12 Mukesh (MediaTek) objects to r12. Mukesh (MediaTek) no longer objects to r12. Curt (Meta) comments.. provided r13 (based on r12). Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Curt (Meta) and provides r14 Lei(Tencent) provide comments and r15. Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r16. Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Dario (Qualcomm). Hui (Huawei) objects to r16. Saso (Intel) seeks clarification on 'per-RAN node congestion' and the relevance of 'per-DRB congestion'. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Saso (Intel) on 'per-RAN node congestion' and the relevance of 'per-DRB congestion'. Curt (Meta) replies Xiaowan Saso (Intel) replies to Xiaowan. Paul (Ericsson) provides r17. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides 18 Paul (Ericsson) asks Xiaowan question for clarification. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Paul (Ericsson) Mukesh (MediaTek) agree with Paul (Ericsson) Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Mukesh (MediaTek) and Paul (Ericsson) and provide 19 Xiaowan(vivo) provide r19 Paul (Ericsson) provides r20 to find a compromise text. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) cannot accept the text regarding Uplink for KI#4/5 in the LS as it is technically incorrect. I have indicated # of times, SA2 specified reflective QoS framework also addresses UL. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Devaki (Nokia) Hui(Huawei) clarify that we have definition for 'congestion level info' then Q0 is not needed. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) proposes to agree r20 with addition of agreed pCR 2208536rZZ for KI#3 and removal of 'SA2 understands the uplink PDU Set handling is closely related to the interaction between the UE and RAN. Hence, SA2 decides to focus on the downlink PDU Set handling and to align with RAN's progress and decision for uplink, if any. ' Paul (Ericsson) provides r21. Hui (Huawei) provide r22 and r23, objects other versions. Devaki (Nokia) agrees with r20 with addition of agreed pCR 2208536rZZ for KI#3 and removal of 'SA2 understands the uplink PDU Set handling is closely related to the interaction between the UE and RAN. Hence, SA2 decides to focus on the downlink PDU Set handling and to align with RAN's progress and decision for uplink, if any. ' Hui (Huawei) asks to pending the LS until the comments from Ericsson and Qualcomm on 'congestion level info' is resolved in S2-2208673. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) agrees with option1 and option1_plus and prefers option1; Option1: r20 with addition of agreed pCR 2208536rZZ for KI#3 and removal of 'SA2 understands the uplink PDU Set handling is closely related to the interaction between the UE and RAN. Hence, SA2 decides to focus on the downlink PDU Set handling and to align with RAN's progress and decision for uplink, if any. ' and removal of 'SA2 is also considering per QoS flow congestion information exposure on N2 as well as on N3 for which SA2 seeks RAN WGs feedback.'. Option1_plus: further remove all the questions for KI#3 based on Option1 Hui (Huawei) can accept option 1 only after we agreed on a definition on 'congestion level info' in S2-2208673 since the question use it but some companies challenge the definition. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) ask for CC#3 if it is not agreed Dan(China Mobile) ask for CC#3 and suggest to send the LS out to RAN in this meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) proposes to attach to r23 the agreed 8673rXX and add: 'Q3: whether it is feasible for NG-RAN to provide the congestion level to 5GC at QoS flow level' Hui (Huawei) proposes to attach to r23 the agreed 8673rXX and add: 'Q3: whether it is feasible for NG-RAN to provide the above congestion level to 5GC at QoS flow level' And change 'congestion' in Q1 and Q2 to 'congestion level' Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r24 on top of r20 and ask people to check Saso (Intel) proposes (again) to remove 'per-DRB' from Q1 and Q2. Paul (Ericsson) asks Xiaowan (vivo) to clarify what 'without UE involvement' in context of this LS means. Paul (Ericsson) replies to Xiaowan) and asks for further clarification. Paul (Ericsson) can't accept stage 3 like statements in this LS and provides an alternative wording in r25. Hui (Huawei) asks why congestion level info is stage 3 statements. Hui (Huawei) insist on asking 'per-DRB' congestion. Hui (Huawei) asks to remove Q3 assume the definition is clear. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) uploads r24 in CC#3 folder Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r25 for CC#4 based on offline consensus Curt (Meta) provides r26 which removes 'UE involvement...'from 2ndQ. Dan (China Mobile) suggest that r25 can be approved | Revised | |
| 9.19 | S2-2209979 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on XR and Media Services | SA WG2 | - | Revision of S2-2208209r26, merging S2-2208779. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208779 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Use of advanced jitter statistics for XR service power saving | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209979 | Dan (China Mobile) proposes to merge this LS to S2-2208209 and we only need one LS to RAN WGs. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209158 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on N6 PDU Set identification and marking | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r11 agreed. Revised to S2-2209905. | Mike (InterDigital) comments and provides r01 Dario (Qualcomm) replies to Mike and provides r02. Dan (China Mobile) comments and this LS is not needed Lei (Tencent) shares the concern of Dan. Boren (OPPO) shares the same view as Dan. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) shares the view with Dan and Yixue. The necessity for this LS is not confirmed Mike (InterDigital) responds to Dario and is ok to send the LS Youngkyo(Samsung) is okay to send an LS excluding traffic classification topic( see the revision r03). Hui (Huawei) provides r04 Chunshan(CATT) provides r05. Kenichi (KDDI) provides r06. Mike (InterDigital) provides r07 Hui (Huawei) comments on r07 Mike (InterDigital) provides r08 in reply to Hui (Huawei) Lei (Tencent) provide comments and also r09. Can not accept only ask whether will specify but without timeline information. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Paul (Ericsson) provides responses to Dario and Mike and r10. Dario (Qualcomm) OK with removing 'Late PDU set delivery indication' from example. Lei (Tencent) prefers r09, objects r00-r08. Lei (Tencent) provides comments Paul (Ericsson) we are ok to remove'Late PDU set delivery indication' from example. Dario (Qualcomm) provides r11 = r10 - 'Late PDU set delivery indication'. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) comments r10 an its plus Dario (Qualcomm) I am fine with r09, r08, r07. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209905 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on N6 PDU Set identification | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209158r11. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208674 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Clean up for TR 23.700-60. | China Mobile, Tencent | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209906. | Dario (Qualcomm) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dan (China Mobile) accept r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209906 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Clean up for TR 23.700-60. | China Mobile, Tencent, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208674r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | KI1&2 evaluation & conclusion | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208189 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #1 and KI#2, New Evaluation: Overall Evaluation for Key Issues #1 and #2. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 and S2-2208390 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208190 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #1, New Conclusion: Overall Conclusion for Key Issue. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208191 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #2, New Conclusion: Overall Conclusion for Key Issue. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208390 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208210 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1&2, Conclusions. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 for KI#1 and S2-2208390 for KI#2 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208390 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1 and KI#2, Solutions evaluation and conclusion. | Ericsson, Deutsche Telekom, Meta, Apple, Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209907, merging S2-2208189, S2-2208190, S2-2208191 and S2-2208667 | Dan(China Mobile) provide r01 to show the update version Dan(China Mobile) suggest to use this paper for KI#2 evaluation and conclusion discussion. And all the other related KI#2 conclusion paper should be merged into this one in order to reduce the parallel discussion. Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, about MMCI Saso (Intel) comments on r01 and why it is not acceptable Youngkyo(Samsung) provide comments. Mengzhen (China Telecom) comments. Saso (Intel) replies to Youngkyo Markus (Nokia) comments. Saso (Intel) replies to Markus Markus (Nokia) provides r02 which builds on top of KI#1 conclusions. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that it will be difficult to converge so many various solns and also majority proposed KI 1 & 2 conclusion together. And updates are not acceptable since removes simple soln possible already. Curt (Meta) supports Ericsson's view. KI 1&2 conclusion should be dealt with together to get a holistic view. Dan(China Mobile) suggest if company suggest to have single paper for KI1&2, this paper is suggested to be merged into 8662, I will provide a update for 8662, the first step is to generate the version which we can converged, Xinpeng(Huawei) supports to merge 8390 into 8662. Dan(China Mobile) provide information Jinhua (Xiaomi) provided comments, merged both KIs can live with me. Muti-modality Communication Group Identifier (MMCGI) is proposed to combined the Group ID and MMCI. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and r03 Dan (China Mobile) provides r04, and this paper is individually to be handled, not merged. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that I see on the other thread we added only for Multiple UEs, I think we are now working in tandem difficult to work through. Dan (China Mobile) reply that separate the paper is ok, since we are ok with the content of r04 in this paper. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) is OK only w/ r0 and r03. Other revisions are NOT OK. Dan (China Mobile) request Dario to double check the r04. The conclusion part of r04 is the same as r03, the only difference is r04 without the evaluation part.So I hope you can accept r04. Dan(China Mobile) suggest to go with r04. Xinpeng(Huawei) suggests to go with r04. Dan(China Mobile) object r03 and support r04. Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, suggest to go with r04, which achieved all of the concern, with same conclusion with r03 and better evaluation process. Lei (Tencent) is fine to go with r04 Dan(China Mobile) object to r03 and suggestion to go with r04 Dario (Qualcomm) is OK w/ r04 (please ignore my previous comment). ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209907 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1 and KI#2, Solutions evaluation and conclusion. | Ericsson, Deutsche Telekom, Meta, Apple, Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208390r04, merging S2-2208189, S2-2208190, S2-2208191 and S2-2208667. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208532 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1, Conclusion. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208546 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #1,2: Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 for KI#1 and S2-2208390 for KI#2 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208547 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1 and KI#2, Solutions evaluation. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 and S2-2208390 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208548 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1 and KI#2, Conclusions . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 and S2-2208390 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208662 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Evaluation and conclusion for KI1. | China Mobile, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r20 agreed. Revised to S2-2209908, merging S2-2208210, S2-2208532, S2-2208546, S2-2208547, S2-2208548, S2-2208687, S2-2208759 and S2-2208803 | Dan(China Mobile) provide r01. And suggest to use this paper for KI#1 evaluation and conclusion discussion. And all the other related KI#1 conclusion paper should be merged into this one in order to reduce the parallel discussion. Markus (Nokia) provides r02 and explains the updates from r01 to r02. Boren (OPPO) provides r03. Saso (Intel) seeks clarification on the feasibility of 'The maximum 5GS delay difference threshold for the group of flows'. Boren (OPPO) provides comments. Markus (Nokia) reponds to Boren (OPPO) and Saso (Intel) comments on joint resource allocation/admission control. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Boren (OPPO) Lei (Tencent) provides comments. Xinpeng(Huawei) comments. Mengzhen (China Telecom) comments. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r04 Dan(China Mobile)reply to Saso Dan(China Mobile)provide r05 Mike (InterDigital) provides r06 Dario (Qualcomm) comments and proposes to take 8390 as baseline also for KI#1. Mengzhen (China Telecom) comments and provide r07. Dan(China Mobile) comments and cannot accept to 8390 as baseline for KI#1. Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Dario (Qualcomm). Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, separate the discussion into 8662 and 8390 is prefer, and proposals with clarification. Saso (Intel) replies to Xinpeng(Huawei). Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Saso (Intel). Markus (Nokia) provides r08. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that it seems majority of proposals used KI 1/2 together so seems we are artificially separating the conclusion to a certain extent. We propose the simple approach be used as baseline first as in 8390. Jinhua(Xiaomi) provides comments, keep the conclusion of KI#1 and #2 separately as it is now is prefer. Mixed the different issues with no consensus achieved together at the DDL day of revisions, that has no help for progress. Mengzhen (China Telecom) shares the same view with Jinhua. Dan(China Mobile) provide a merged paper with include 8390 into 8662, please check it Mike (InterDigital) provides r10 Markus (Nokia) comments. Jinhua(Xiaomi) provides comments, and r11 Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Markus, Dan(China Mobile) provides r12 Youngkyo(Samsung) provides comment. Dan(China Mobile) provides r13. Jinhua(Xiaomi) replies to Dan, can live with r12 Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r14 Saso (Intel) comments on r13 Markus (Nokia) provides r15. Dan (China Mobile) provides r16. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that we can not accept this version as from our perspective we need to include the baseline that we can support this without such changes. r17 provides baseline and an FFS of if any other impacts are needed. Sudeep (Apple) comments that r17 still has references to KI#2 (multiple UE case). Xinpeng(Huawei) objects to r17, and disagree r17 is baseline. Mengzhen (China Telecom) is OK with r16, and objects to r17. Dan (China Mobile) not ok with r17 and provide r18 based on r17. This paper is changed to support Ki#1 Saso (Intel) prefers the approach in r17. Markus (Nokia) provides r19. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the concept of group we still are not convinced so take that off until further work, r20 provided ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) seeks clarification on r20. Dan (China Mobile) response Dan (China Mobile) is ok with r20, suggest to go with r20 Shabnam (Ericsson) agrees that r20 has inconsistencies which can be clarified with simple post revision update, provides a revision in the Drafts folder as r20_ER. We can't accept any revision with assumption that we need to have this group concept to make the soln work. Dan (China Mobile) summary some udpate based on r20: 1) adding'any additional' in bullet:Normative impact to AF and NEF/PCF 2) change'PCF enforces the flow admission.' into'PCF performs the flow authorization .' 3) change'PCF enforces QoS fulfilment i.e. updates one flow policy with considering other multi-modality flows policies. ' into 'PCF provisions QoS information considering the requirements provided by the AF for all data flows associated to a multi-modal (XRM) application.' 4) Update the last EN into 'Editor's Note: Whether the PCF sends the policy information to SMF/NG-RAN, and Whether the NG-RAN should support the additional policies and how NG-RAN uses them is FFS.' Markus (Nokia) asks for clarification and about potential inconsistencies still in r20_ER. Proposes to add 'alternative service requirements' to the list of information AF can provide. Shabnam (Ericsson) thanks Nokia and comments in line Dan (China Mobile) suggest to go with r20+ following changes: 1) adding'any additional','alternative service requirements' in bullet:Normative impact to AF and NEF/PCF 2) change'PCF enforces the flow admission.' into'PCF performs the flow authorization .' 3) change'PCF enforces QoS fulfilment i.e. updates one flow policy with considering other multi-modality flows policies. ' into 'PCF provisions QoS information considering the requirements provided by the AF for all data flows associated to a multi-modal (XRM) application.' 4) remove 'group level ' in 'PCF enforces the group level policy for the use of Alternative QoS parameters.' 5) change last EN into 'Editor's Note: Whether the PCF sends the policy information to SMF/NG-RAN, and Whether the NG-RAN should support the additional policies and how NG-RAN uses them is FFS.' Jinhua (Xiaomi) supports the proposal from Dan, ==== Final Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) ok with the proposed way forward by CMCC/Rapporteur. Dario (Qualcomm) is OK with Dan's proposal except for bullet 1). The change vs. r20 needs to be 1) remove 'and requirements' in bullet: Normative impact to AF and NEF/PCF Dan (China Mobile) is OK with this proposal from Dario, and I suppose this is editorial correction, if chairman have time, we can open discussion in CC#3, Xinpeng(Huawei) proposes to chang 'Normative impact to AF and NEF/PCF: extend the existing Nnef_AFsessionWithQoS service to allow the AF to provide, at the same time, service requirements, a common ID and requirements for multiple IP data flows associated to a multi-modal (XRM) application.' INTO 'Normative impact to AF and NEF/PCF: extend the existing Nnef_AFsessionWithQoS service to allow the AF to provide, at the same time, a common ID and service requirements for multiple IP data flows associated to a multi-modal (XRM) application.' for better readbility. ' | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209908 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Evaluation and conclusion for KI1. | China Mobile, Huawei, HiSilicon, China Telecom, InterDigital, Nokia, OPPO,Samsung, vivo, Ericsson, ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208662r20, merging S2-2208210, S2-2208532, S2-2208546, S2-2208547, S2-2208548, S2-2208687, S2-2208759 and S2-2208803. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208667 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#2. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208390 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208687 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Conclusion on KI #1 and #2. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 and S2-2208390 Youngkyo(Samsung) propose to have one paper between KI#1 and #2 Dan(China Mobile) answer the comment ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208759 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Evaluation and conclusion of KI #1/2 Policy control enhancement and QoS policy coordination for multi-modal traffic for single. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) propose to merge this paper into S2-2208662 and S2-2208390 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208803 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#1, KI#2: Conclusion. | Intel | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209908 and S2-2209907 | Dan(China Mobile) provide comment for this paper, also suggest to merge into S2-2208662 and S2-2208390 to avoid parallel discussion ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | KI3 evaluation & conclusion | - | - | Docs:=14 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208211 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3, Conclusion update for normal data interruption event. | Vivo, Meta, China Mobile, China Telecom, MediaTek, OPPO, Xiaomi, Apple, Tencent | Rel-18 | CC#3: This was postponed. | Devaki (Nokia) raises question regarding the proposal Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Devaki (Nokia) Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Paul (Ericsson): we have studies it half year and you didn't attend before. We also take long time offline + CC with you. You can object but you cannot judge it 'not been sufficiently studied'. It is totally untechnical and unfair comment. I encourage technical comment Ellen (Google) supports this document with the clarification on exposure of mobility event Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r01 Devaki (Nokia) comments. Hui (Huawei) share concerns as other companies. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Devaki (Nokia) and hui(Huawei) and provide r02 Paul (Ericsson) objects to r0, r01 and r02 and that proposal in general, i.e. all revisions. This has not been studied enough and thus too many aspects are unclear to make any conclusions. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) request a show hand for this item Curt (Meta) supports Vivo's view. Hui (Huawei) asks question. Saso (Intel) seeks clarification from Xiaowan Ke(vivo) Xiaowan Ke(vivo) to Hui (Huawei) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dan(China Mobile) provide a document for SoH for CC#2 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.19 | S2-2208212 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3, Conclusions update for L4S, etc. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208536 | Dan (China Mobile) suggest to merge this paper to S2-2208536 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208393 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3, Update to conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Xiaowan Ke(vivo) objects to this paper ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.19 | S2-2208449 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3: Exposure information via QNC Notification: Evaluation and Conclusion. | MediaTek Inc., vivo | Rel-18 | Noted | Hui (Huawei) comments Mukesh (MediaTek) responds to Hui (Huawei) Hui (Huawei) provides further comments Devaki (Nokia) comments. Hui (Huawei) provide r03 Mukesh (MediaTek) provides r04 Mukesh (MediaTek) provides r05 Yali (OPPO) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) comments that r04 is misleading and wrong. Devaki (Nokia) proposes to NOTE the CR and its revisions as existing conclusion already includes data rate anyway. Mukesh (MediaTek) replied to Devaki (Nokia) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.19 | S2-2208536 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3: Conclusion update about L4S enabling. | OPPO | Rel-18 | CC#4: r24 agreed. Revised to S2-2209977. | Yali (OPPO) provides r02 Hui (Huawei) provides r01 Hui (Huawei) provides r03 and comments Xiaowan replies to HW (Huawei) and provider04 Hui (Huawei) replies to Xiaowan. Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r05. Chunshan (CATT) comments. Hui (Huawei) replies to Zhuoyun. Hui (Huawei) response to Chunshan. Yali (OPPO) provides r06. Chunshan (CATT) response to Hui. Devaki (Nokia) comments that it is important to clarify that the alt.1/alt.2 being added on-the-fly applies only to Method 2. Dario (Qualcomm) questions the need for two alternatives to perform ECN marking in the UPF. Chunshan (CATT) response to Hui and provides r08. Hui (Huawei) provides r09. Yali (OPPO) provides r10 Xiaowan(vivo) objects to r09. Dan (China Mobile) reply to Dario, as the operator view, and support to introduce two options for L4S Hui(Huawei) replies. Xiaowan(vivo) replies Hui(Huawei). Saso (Intel) supports Qualcomm's view and provide r11 removing Method 2. Hui(Huawei) objects to r11 and explain. Yali (OPPO) cannot accept r11. Mukesh (MediaTek) also objects to r11 and provides r12 based on r10 Paul (Ericsson) clarifies that r07 was uploaded yesterday evening by mistake, but we are ok with as it has come into the revisions stream. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r13 Mukesh (MediaTek) objects to r13. UPF is not required to store information related to congestion in L4S. Jaehyeon (Samsung) objects to r13. UPF is not required to store information related to congestion and 'if L4S traffic detection is used to trigger a L4S dedicated QoS flow establishment' is not clear. Chunshan (CATT) provides r14. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Chunshan (CATT), Mukesh (MediaTek) and Jaehyeon (Samsung) and provides r15. Yali (OPPO) provides r16. Hui (Huawei) provides r17. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies Hui (Huawei) and Yali (OPPO) and provide r18 Paul (Ericsson) provides r19 and objects to r18, r17, r16, r15, r14, r13, r12, r10, r6, r5, r4, r3, r2, r1, r0. Saso (Intel) provides r20 (on top of r19). Dan (China Mobile) provides r21 (on top of r20). Hui (Huawei) provides r22. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r23 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) can accept r19-r23 only if LS Out 8209 includes question on semantic and definition of 'congestion level information'. Devaki (Nokia) cannot accept the CR / any of the revision unless it is clearly clarified that the two new alternatives are applicable only for Method 2. Yali(OPPO) clarifies to Devaki (Nokia), there's no alternative2, and the alternative1 is clearly stated only for Method2. Yali (OPPO) proposes to approve r23 or r23 with removing the sentence which Dario has concern. Hui(Huawei) can accept r22, r23, and object any other versions. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Yali (OPPO) Yali (OPPO) proposes to approve r23 as the term is not introduced by this paper, it's already in the existing TR conclusion. I can also live with r23 with removing 'when the UL/DL congestion level information changes (e.g. UL/DL congestion start, degree of UL/DL congestion, UL/DL congestion end) , NG-RAN reports the latest UL/DL congestion level information to PSA UPF via GTP-U header of UL packet.'. Dan (China Mobile) support OPPO's suggested way forward: r23+removing the sentence ==== Final Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) is OK with CMCC and OPPO's proposal provided that 8673 has a clear defintion of 'congestion level'. Yali (OPPO) provides r24 based on r23, with following changes: 1. Remove 'In this method, when the UL/DL congestion level information changes (e.g. UL/DL congestion start, degree of UL/DL congestion, UL/DL congestion end), NG-RAN reports the latest UL/DL congestion level information to PSA UPF via GTP-U header of UL packet.' 2. Add 'In Method2' 3. Replace 'generates' by 'may generate' Yali (OPPO) provides r24 based on r23, with following changes: 1. Remove 'In this method, when the UL/DL congestion level information changes (e.g. UL/DL congestion start, degree of UL/DL congestion, UL/DL congestion end), NG-RAN reports the latest UL/DL congestion level information to PSA UPF via GTP-U header of UL packet.' 2. Add 'In Method2' 3. Replace 'generates' by 'may generate' | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209977 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3: Conclusion update about L4S enabling. | OPPO, vivo, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208536r24. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208567 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3: Update conclusion for network exposure. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208673 | Dan (China Mobile) suggest to merge this paper to S2-2208673 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208658 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Update conclusions for Key Issue#3. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208673 | Dan(China Mobile) merge this paper into S2-2208673. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208663 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3, Evaluation. | Tencent, Tencent Cloud | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208673 | Dan (China Mobile) suggest to merge this paper to S2-2208673 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208673 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3, conclusion update. | Tencent, Tencent Cloud, Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CC#4: r24 + changes (r25) agreed. Revised to S2-2209978, merging S2-2208823 and S2-2208999. | Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r01 by merging S2-2208567, S2-2208658, S2-2208663, S2-2208823 and S2-2208999 as suggested by rapporteur. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r02 Dan(China Mobile) provides r03 Mukesh (MediaTek) provides r04 Zhuoyun (Tencent) suggests to follow the suggestion of rapporteur that 8449 and 8211 are handled individually, so there is no need to add the revisions from 8449 and 8211 into this contribution. Dan (China Mobile) suggests to avoid such merging. So MTK's requirement of parameter exposure should not be discussed in this paper. Hui(Huawei) provides r05 Mukesh (MediaTek) responds to Dan (China Mobile) Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r06 Paul (Ericsson) provides r07 based on r05. Zhuoyun (Tencent) comments. Chunshan(CATT) comments. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) object to r07 and replies Zhuoyun (Tencent) Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r08 based on r07 to solve the concern on the Note from Xiaowan. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r09 Hui (Huawei) provides r10. Paul (Ericsson) asks question for clarification. Devaki (Nokia) provides r13. Hui (Huawei) replies. Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r11 and r12. Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r14, r15 and r16. Hui (Huawei) provides r17. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Zhuoyun (Tencent) Saso (Intel) seeks clarification on 'delay difference'. Paul (Ericsson) asks for clarification on what interfaces RAN/CN QNC and congestion level is intended to be exposed. Paul (Ericsson) replies to Hui. Zhuoyun (Tencent) clarifies. Saso (Intel) proposes r18 with a clarification on 'delay difference'. Hui (Huawei) replies to Paul. Zhuoyun (Tencent) is fine with r18. Hui(Huawei) provides r19. Zhuoyun (Tencent) replies. Mukesh (MediaTek) provides r20. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Chunshan (CATT) replies to Hui (Huawei). Mukesh (MediaTek) supports r20 and objects to all other revisions. Hui (Huawei) replies to Chunshan. Hui (Huawei) asks question on the new sentence in r20. Mukesh (MediaTek) responds to Hui (Huawei) Paul (Ericsson) can only accept r0. Dan (China Mobile) ask further Dan(China Mobile) propose a way forward. r20+ remove 'Congestion level information: values denoting the following: the degree of current congestion, no congestion/congestion end, congestion start, directions.. A lower value means less congestion is experienced. NOTE: Whether congestion start/end can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3. ' Mukesh (MediaTek) replies to Dan (China Mobile) Paul (Ericsson) objects to all revisions except r0. Zhuoyun (Tencent) proposes to go forward with the suggestion by Paul: r20 with removing the following text: 'Congestion level information: values denoting the following: the degree of current congestion, no congestion/congestion end, congestion start, directions.. A lower value means less congestion is experienced. NOTE: Whether congestion start/end can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3.' Hui (Huawei) propose r20 + changes. Dan(China Mobile) reply and request Paul to find other version which we can work on besides r0 Chunshan (CATT) supports r20. >Hui (Huawei) propose r20 + changes. > Dario (Qualcomm): definition of congestion level and instructions to RAN need to be clearer. Zhuoyun (Tencent) proposes to go with r20 with the following changes: 'Congestion level information: E.g., values denoting the following: including a value to denote the degree of current congestion level, no congestion/congestion end, congestion start, and directions on which congestion happens. A lower value degree means less congestion is experienced. NOTE: Whether congestion start/end can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3.' ==== Final Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) propose to include in r20: Congestion level = a value denoting the level of congestion in the RAN. The lower the value, the lower the level of congestion. Congestion level information: congestion level, and indication of the direction(s) in which the congestion happens. NOTE: The coding of congestion level and related range, whether congestion start/end indications can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3. Dario (Qualcomm) propose to include in r20: Congestion level = a value denoting the level of congestion in the RAN. The lower the value, the lower the level of congestion. Congestion level information: congestion level, and indication of the direction(s) in which the congestion happens. NOTE: The coding of congestion level and related range, whether congestion start/end indications can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3. Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r24 for CC#4 based on offline consensus. r24 is r20 plus following changes: (1) changing 'Congestion level information: values denoting the following: the degree of current congestion, no congestion/congestion end, congestion start, directions.. A lower value means less congestion is experienced. NOTE: Whether congestion start/end can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3.' to 'RAN provides the congestion information enabling PSA UPF to perform API exposure towards the AF and ECN marking for L4S;' (2) for Note 3, move '(e.g. per QoS flow congestion level)' to the end of the sentence. Chunshan (CATT) provides r25 based on r24. r25 is r20 plus following changes: (1) changing 'Congestion level information: values denoting the following: the degree of current congestion, no congestion/congestion end, congestion start, directions.. A lower value means less congestion is experienced. NOTE: Whether congestion start/end can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3.' to 'RAN provides the congestion information to PSA UPF enabling PSA UPF to perform API exposure towards the AF and ECN marking for L4S;' (2) for Note 3, move '(e.g. per QoS flow congestion level)' to the end of the sentence. Chunshan (CATT) provides r25 based on r24. r25 is r20 plus following changes: (1) changing 'Congestion level information: values denoting the following: the degree of current congestion, no congestion/congestion end, congestion start, directions.. A lower value means less congestion is experienced. NOTE: Whether congestion start/end can be denoted by specific level values or need separated IEs is up to Stage 3.' to 'RAN provides the congestion information to PSA UPF enabling PSA UPF to perform API exposure towards the AF and ECN marking for L4S;' (2) for Note 3, move '(e.g. per QoS flow congestion level)' to the end of the sentence. | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209978 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3, conclusion update. | Tencent, Tencent Cloud, Xiaomi, China Mobile, Huawei, Vivo, ZTE, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208673r24 + changes, merging S2-2208823 and S2-2208999. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208823 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Update Conclusion for KI#3. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209978 | Dan(China Mobile) suggest this paper merged into S2-2208673 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208999 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #3, conclusion update for clarification. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209978 | Dan(China Mobile) suggest this paper merged into S2-2208673 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209068 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3: update conclusion for support of 5GS information exposure. | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | Chunshan (CATT) provides r01. Dario (Qualcomm) comments. Chunshan (CATT) response to Dario (Qualcomm). Chunshan (CATT) provides r02. Devaki (Nokia) comments that it is unclear whether these enhancements are actually necessary for non-GBR. We object to the RAN exposing data rate for non-GBR (first bullet added). Can live without the additions but if it remains, our revision in r03. Chunshan (CATT) provides r04. Devaki (Nokia) comments. Chunshan(CATT) provides r05. Paul (Ericsson) provides comments and expresses concerns on inclusion of this solution in the conclusions. Chunshan(CATT) response to Paul (Ericsson) . Hui (Huawei) provides r06. Chunshan(CATT) objects r06 since it is not the target of the paper. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) objects to every revision of this paper. Chunshan (CATT) proposes to go with r03, since the bitrate for non-GBR notification is deleted. Devaki (Nokia) objects to the paper and its revisions. Chunshan responses to Devaki (Nokia) , you have provided r03, propose to go with r03 which delete the QNC for non-GBR QoS Flow. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | KI4&5 evaluation & conclusion | - | - | Docs:=19 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208213 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion on open issues on KI#4&5 | vivo | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208450 | DISCUSSION | Decision | KI#4 & KI#5: Email discussion. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.19 | S2-2208192 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #4 and 5, New Eval: Key Issue #4 and #5 Evaluation Text for Solution 55. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of (postponed) S2-2205912 from S2-152E. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208214 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4&5, Conclusions . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208228 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #4 and 5: New Evaluation and Conclusion. | Futurewei | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. John (Futurewei) is OK to merge into S2-2208568 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208391 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4 and KI#5: Solutions evaluation and conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208480 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Key Issues #4 and #5: evaluation and conclusion. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208538 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4: Conclusion for the PDU Set Info over N3. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208549 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4 & 5 Conclusion. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208568 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4&5: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon, China Mobile, KDDI, Lenovo | Rel-18 | CC#3: r34 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209938. | Hui (Huawei) provides r01, merged parts of evaluation/conclusion proposals from other papers. Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides r02, Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r03 and comments Kenichi (KDDI) comments on r03. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Kenichi (KDDI) and seek justification John (Futurewei) provides 04 and comments. Paul (Ericsson) provides comments and r05. Mike (InterDigital) provides r06 Devaki (Nokia) provides r07, proposes to focus only on conclusion and not evaluation (which is unnecessary at this time for KI#4/5 when the study is almost start of the year). Dario (Qualcomm) provides r08, but he is fine with focusing on the conclusions only. Jaehyeon (Samsung) provides comments and r09. Yali (OPPO) provides r10. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r11 Haley(Lenovo) replies to Paul (Ericsson) and provides r12. Hui(Huawei) provides r13 Hui (Huawei) comments Zhuoyun (Tencent) provides r14. Hui (Huawei) provides r15. Kenichi (KDDI) replies to Xiaowan(vivo). Paul (Ericsson) replies to Haley (Lenovo). Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r16. Hui (Huawei) provide r17 to merge some changes from Nokia Paul (Ericsson) provide r18 and comments. Xinpeng(Huawei) replies to Paul (Ericsson). Saso (Intel) provide r19 on top of r17. Chunhui (Xiaomi) provides a NOTE suggestion about charging. Paul (Ericsson) replies to Saso (Intel). Saso (Intel) replies to Paul. John (Futurewei) replies to Paul. Svante (Sony) provide r20 based on r19. Paul (Ericsson) provides r21 based on r17. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r22 Mukesh (MediaTek) ask Paul (Ericsson) to clarify why UPF dropping is removed when in RAN2 Ericsson is in favour? Paul (Ericsson) replies to John (Futurewei) and Saso (Intel). Paul (Ericsson) clarifies that R2-22100867 does not propose dropping by UPF. This contributions has a proposal that enables signaling of information to RAN to create app awareness etc (as it says). Saso (Intel) replies to Paul (Ericsson). Saso (Intel) provides additional reply to Paul (Ericsson). John (Futurewei) responds to Paul (Ericsson) Curt (Meta) comments...to Saso and Paul John (Futurewei) comments, responds to Paul (Ericsson) Devaki (Nokia) provides r23. Chunhui (Xiaomi) provides r24. Chunshan(CATT) provides r25. Hui(Huawei) provides r26. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r27 Dario (Qualcomm) provides r28 and comments. Svante (Sony) provides r29 that add content from r20 Chunhui (Xiaomi) provides r30 based on r28. Paul (Ericsson) provides comments. Svante (Sony) provides r32 based on r31 and missing sentence from r29 Hui (Huawei) asks for clarification on r32 Svante (Sony) respond to question and provide r33 with clarification. Hui (Huawei) comments to r33. Curt (Meta) comments to Svante (Sony)... Svante (Sony) respond to Hui (Huawei) on r33. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Svante (Sony) and provides r34 Svante (Sony) responds to Curt (Meta) and Xiaowan Ke(vivo) Dario (Qualcomm) provides r35 Hui (Huawei) comments on r35 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) thanks Hui, asks to ignore r35 and is fine w/ r34. Devaki (Nokia) comments that r34 is ok. John (Futurewei) is OK with revisions r26 - r34. Chunhui (Xiaomi) is fine with r34. Youngkyo(Samsung) questions what PDU Set Identifier implies. Devaki (Nokia) cannot accept any version up to and including r21. r34 is fine. Hui (Huawei) proposes to go with r34. Saso (Intel) points out that the intended use of PDU Set Importance is not defined in r34. Hui (Huawei) replies to Saso. Saso (Intel) replies to Hui (Huawei). Paul (Ericsson) we object to all revisions except r05, r18 and r21. Hui (Huawei) asks Paul to indicate what part is not acceptable in r34. Xiaowan(vivo) support to go r34; alternatively, can go with r21 with removal of 'except for 'PDU Set Importance'' in 8.X.2.3 Devaki (Nokia) cannot accept r21 with the removal of 'except for 'PDU Set Importance'' in 8.X.2.3 Saso (Intel) is OK to keep PDU Set Importance, even though its intended use is not defined; but in that case we cannot accept to further work on Q2 on SoH in this meeting. Paul (Ericsson) replies to Hui. Svante (Sony) prefer r33 and accept any version after r21 Saso (Intel) points out that the EN on PDU Set dependency can be removed. Yali (OPPO) cannot accept any version with PDU Set size as mandatory parameter, optional is ok but relies on the SA4 design. Hui (Huawei) support to remove the EN on PDU Set dependency based on the working assumption. ==== Final Deadline ==== Paul (Ericsson) asks Yali (OPPO) to clarify why PDU Set size, as requested by RAN1 is not acceptable? Saso (Intel) agrees with Yali (OPPO) on the 'number of PDUs in the PDU Set' parameter and proposes to remove it based on SA4 reply LS (9257). Hui (Huawei) provides draft r36 as way forward and asks to discuss in CC#3. R36 is based on r34 with the following changes. Hui (Huawei) provides r37 as way forward and asks to discuss in CC#3. R37 is based on r34 with the following 6 changes. Hui (Huawei) provides r38. R38 is based on r34 with the following 6 changes. Chunshan (CATT) provides the link of r38. Saso (intel) asks why 'PDU Set Size in Bytes' was added back in r38, given that SA4 reply LS (S2-2209257) clarified that such information is not available. Saso (Intel) replies that even though RAN1 have indicated that 'PDU set size (number of bits) or number of PDUs in a PDU set' may be helpful, SA4 replied that it is not possible to provide it. Paul (Ericsson) asks to clarify what is the reasoning to designate some PDU Set info as optional and provides r39. Devaki (Nokia) comments that we can still accept only r34, cannot accept r35-r38. Saso (Intel) supports Nokia's proposal to move forward with r34 + one proposed change. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) also propose to agree r34 or r34 minus Yali (OPPO) agree the NOTE from Xiaowan, cannot accept Saso's NOTE Paul (Ericsson) replies to Saso that SA4 LS was referring to Data Burst size and not PDU Set size. Hui (Huawei) proposes to put a FFS for PDU Set Size. Saso (Intel) is OK with the latest r34+ summary from Hui (Huawei). Saso (Intel) replies to Paul (Ericsson) that SA4 LS also states that the size of the video slice/frame is 'not explicitely signalled in the bitstream'. Devaki (Nokia) comments that we can live with r39 for now. Hui (Huawei) replies to Paul. Paul (Ericsson) the 'remove all' is preferred. Paul (Ericsson) clarifies that it means that the size is known to the encoder / server today, but the server does not write the size explicitly into the stream. Of course, the existence of the PDU Set concept is currently limited to the FS_XRM TR. | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209938 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4&5: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon, China Mobile, KDDI, Lenovo, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Xiaomi, vivo, Sony, ZTE, Tencent, CATT, Futurewei, Samsung, Ericsson, Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208568r34 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208681 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4 and KI#5, Conclusions. | Tencent, Tencent Cloud | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208690 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Conclusions on KI #4 and #5. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. Youngkyo(Samsung) is okay to merge this paper into baseline Tdoc S2-2208568. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208822 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Conclusion for KI#4&5. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208923 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4 and 5 evaluation of solution #50 and #70. | Sony | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209069 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4/5: Sub-QoS Flow for PDU Set and Conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209071 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4, KI#5: Additional conclusion on PDU Set Information identification. | Intel | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209072 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#4, KI#5: Conclusion on PDU Set Importance. | Intel | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209156 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Key Issues #4 and #5: Conclusion principles. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208568 | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | KI6 evaluation & conclusion | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208215 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#6, Overall evaluation and conclusion update. | Vivo, China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209909 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2208550 and take S2-2208550 as baseline for KI6 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208535 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#6, Conclusion Update. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209909 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2208550 and take S2-2208550 as baseline for KI6 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208543 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#6: Conclusion Update. | Tencent, Tencent Cloud | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209909 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2208550 and take S2-2208550 as baseline for KI6 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208550 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#6 Conclusion updates. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209909, merging S2-2208215, S2-2208535, S2-2208543 and S2-2208569 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to take this paper as baseline for KI6 evaluation/conclusion. Saubhagya (Nokia) proposes S2-2208550r01 as baseline, (merges S2-2208215, S2-2208535, S2-2208543 & S2-2208569) Hui (Huawei) proposes r02 Hui (Huawei) provides further comments Saubhagya (Nokia) responds to comments. Proposes r03 Hui (Huawei) provides comments for r03 Saubhagya (Nokia) responds to comments on r03. Proposes r04 Boren (OPPO) provides comments and r05. Dario (Qualcomm) provides r06 and asks question about r04. Saubhagya (Nokia) responding to questions on r04. Adds questions and comments on r05. Provides r07 Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r08 Boren (OPPO) responds to Saubhagya (Nokia) and provides r09 Lei (Tencent) provides comments. Boren (OPPO) comments. Lei (Tencent) provides r10. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dario (Qualcomm) proposes to go with r07, r06 or r08. R10 and r09 are not OK. Boren (OPPO) can live with r08. Chunshan(CATT) comments and r06,r07,r 08 is ok. Lei (Tencent) confirms that r06, r07, r08 are ok. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) propose to agree r08 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209909 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#6 Conclusion updates. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, OPPO, Tencent, Tencent Cloud, Huawei, Hisilicon, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208550r08, merging S2-2208215, S2-2208535, S2-2208543 and S2-2208569. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208569 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Conclusion update for KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209909 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2208550 and take S2-2208550 as baseline for KI6 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | KI8 evaluation & conclusion | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208194 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #8, New Conclusion: Key Issue #8 Conclusion . | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2209159 and take S2-2209159 as baseline for KI8 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208216 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#8, Conclusions . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2209159 and take S2-2209159 as baseline for KI8 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208451 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#8: Evaluation and Conclusion . | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2209159 and take S2-2209159 as baseline for KI8 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208551 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#8 Conclusion. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2209159 and take S2-2209159 as baseline for KI8 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208778 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Conclusion for KI#8. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Hui (Huawei) suggests to merge this paper into S2-2209159 and take S2-2209159 as baseline for KI8 evaluation/conclusion. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2209159 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Key Issue #8: Evaluation and conclusion. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | CC#3: r27 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209939. | Hui (Huawei) suggests to take this paper as baseline for KI8 evaluation/conclusion. Dan (China Mobile) provide comment Xiaowan Ke(vivo) shares comments of Dan (China Mobile and provides r01 Dario (Qualcomm) replies to Xiaowan and Dan and provides r02. Hui (Huawei) provide r03 Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r04 Mukesh (MediaTek) proposes the removal of NOTE X and provides r05 Saso (Intel) comments on Option 1 and provides r06. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r07 and replies to Saso (Intel) Mike (InterDigital) provides r08 Paul (Ericsson) object to any revision where UPF performs data buffering, i.e. r07, r05, r04, r03, r02. Curt (Meta) can't accept AF providing 'Traffic Jitter range' is a done deal from S2 side. Curt (Meta) provides r09. Devaki (Nokia) provides r10 and supports. Lei (Tencent) provides r11 and supports. Chunshan (CATT) provides r12. Hui (Huawei) replies to Chunshan. Chunshan (CATT) responds to Hui. Dario (Qualcomm) replies and provides r13 and r14. Chunshan (CATT) provides r15. jaehyeon (samsung) provides comments. Chunshan (CATT) provides r16 . Boren (OPPO) comments Lei(Tencent) comments Xiaowan Ke(vivo) object from r13 tor18 provides r19 based on r18 Chunshan (CATT) provides r20 and r21. Chunshan (CATT) response to jaehyeon (samsung). Xiaowan Ke(vivo) replies to Chunshan (CATT) : we OK with r20, object : r21, r13-r18. Michele Zarri (Huawei) provides revision 22 (based on r21) Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r23 Lei(Tencent) provides comments Curt (Meta) has different views w.r.t jitter range interpretation from SA4. Saso (Intel) comments on r23 and the need for further changes Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Saso (Intel) Xiaowan(vivo) provides r24 and replies to Saso (Intel) Saso (Intel) provides r25 Curt (Meta) provides r26 Curt (Meta) asks Xiaowan (vivo) to clarify - what is one media unit? Hui (Huawei) replies to Boren. Xiaowan(vivo) replies to Curt (Meta) Chunshan(CATT) comments to Hui (Huawei) . Hui(Huawei) replies to Chunshan. Curt (Meta) provides r27 Lei(Tencent) provides comments to Curt (Meta) and think an editorial correct to r27 is needed. Saso (Intel) comments to Hui (Huawei) . Lei(Tencent) provide r28 to correct the issue of r27 Hui (Huawei) replies to Saso . Dario (Qualcomm) provides r30 based on r28 and asks to ignore r29. Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides comments and provides r31 Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r31 and object r30 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Curt (Meta) r27 needs to be opened with mac and not PC to see the right formatting. We can't accept any version that requires the AF to provide Traffic Jitter information. Dario (Qualcomm) provides, after offline discussions, r32 that is r27 plus the deletion of the UPF implementation based example and no NOTE 4. Proposes to select this revision. Paul (Ericsson) objects to all revisions provided before deadline except r0, r06, r21, r22, r30. Curt (Meta) supports this version (r32) from Dario (QCOM). Dario (Qualcomm) if no agreement, asks to take this in CC#3. Hui (Huawei) supports r32 ==== Final Deadline ==== Xiaowan Ke(vivo) provides r33 based on r32, since original assistance information for EOB from AF in r32 is misleading,update it and clear changes on changes request to agree r33 in CC#4, i.e. with changes on top of R27: 1) remove the 'word' of 'Note4' (i.e. not the whole sentence) 2) remove: implementation method 3) add assistance information for EOB from AF Lei(Tencent) can accept r32, also fine with r33. Devaki (Nokia) comments Xiaowan (vivo) replies to Devaki (Nokia) Chunshan (CATT) comments that AS needs to be changed to AF. >Devaki (Nokia) comments > | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209939 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Key Issue #8: Evaluation and conclusion. | Qualcomm Incorporated, Huawei, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Tencent, Tencent Cloud, Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209159r27 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | KI9 evaluation & conclusion | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208196 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #9, New Conclusion: Key Issue #9 Conclusion. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208539 | Boren (OPPO) provides comments that this paper has been suggested to be merged into S2-2208539 as suggested by rapporteur. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Devaki (Nokia) comments that this paper shall be marked as NOTED or merged into 8539 as per rapporteur proposal. We have objection to this proposal as RAN2 has analyzed this approach provides no benefit. Hui(Huawei) confirms this paper was merged into S2-2208539. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208452 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#9: Evaluation and Conclusion . | MediaTek Inc., Apple | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208539 | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) comments that the subject of this discussion is wrong (8542): it is commenting on 8452 instead . LaeYoung (LGE) thinks that this pCR needs to be MERGED into 8539. Hui (Huawei) agree with LaeYoung that this pCR is merged into 8539. Jinhua (Xiaomi) provide comments, and 8542r01 (was not capture in the notes because of the wrong tdoc number) Hui(Huawei) replies. Dan (China Mobile) suggest to keep this paper merged into 8539 Jinhua(Xiaomi) replies to Dan, merged it into 8539 is OK. Jinhua replies to Hui, merge is confirmed, thanks. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208539 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#9, Evaluation and Conclusion. | OPPO | Rel-18 | CC#3: r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209940. | Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, and r01, Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r02 (waiting for r01) Dan (China Mobile) comment Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) comments Jinhua (Xiaomi) provide the comments, Dario (Qualcomm) comments and provides r03. Dario (Qualcomm) provides r04 and asks to ignore r03. Devaki (Nokia) supports r04 (this reflects our original version in 8552). Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Devaki, Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Dario, Boren (OPPO) comments. Hui (Huawei) asks whether SoH is needed. Paul (Ericsson) objects to r0, r01, r02. Boren (OPPO) replies to Hui (Huawei) and Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) and provides r05. Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, and r06, to capture the compromise achieved ever. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) ok with r06 - not r05. Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Paul (Ericsson), and provides r07, to capture the suggestion. Boren (OPPO) replies to Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) Dario (Qualcomm) is NOT OK with r06/07 an provides r08 Paul (Ericsson) provides comments and object to r07. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) responds Boren (OPPO) provides r09. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Curt (Meta) can only accept r04 or no conclusion in this meeting. Devaki (Nokia) shares the same view as Curt. We cannot accept any revision (or original version) except r04. We can accept only r04. Dario (Qualcomm) can accepts r04 or r08. Others are not OK. LaeYoung (LGE) can only accept r04 and objects to all other versions. Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Paul (Ericsson), and provides r10, update to state that no new procedures or impacts on RAN. Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Curt (Meta), Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to LaeYoung, pending or postpone the conclusion of KI#8 and KI#9, and find agreed content next meeting as your proposal, is fine for me. I'm neutral for combined the KIs discussion. Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Devaki, postpone the conclusion of KI#8 and KI#9 is fine for me. I'm neutral for combined the KIs discussion. Boren (OPPO) objects to r04. Jinhua (Xiaomi) replies to Dario, suggest to go with r08+ one EN, 'Editor's Note: Other conclusions are FFS.', to move forward Dan(China Mobile) object to r04 since this contain 'Refer to clause 8.y about conclusions for KI#8 for assistance parameters to be sent to NG-RAN for power savings. ' and put some observation for this KI discussion Hui(Huawei) supports Dan. Boren (OPPO) agree with Hui(Huawei)'s suggestion to approve evaluation part first, and proposes to go with r0+removing conclusion part. Jinhua (Xiaomi) request this paper for CC#3, Check if can go with r08+ one EN, 'Editor's Note: Other conclusions are FFS.', to move forward Jinhua (Xiaomi) request this paper for CC#3, Check if can go with r08+ one EN, 'Editor's Note: Other aspects are FFS.', to move forward ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.19 | S2-2209940 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#9, Evaluation and Conclusion. | OPPO, Xiaomi, China Mobile, Tencent | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208539r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208552 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#9 Conclusion. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, all the comments were not captured in the ChairNotes, because of One '<' was missing. Confirm that 8552 is merged into 8539 for the discussion. Dan(China Mobile) provides comments, this paper should be merged into 8539 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208831 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Conclusion for KI#9. | Xiaomi, China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, merged 8831 into 8539 is OK, ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | S2-2208832 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Evaluation for KI#9. | Xiaomi, China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209159 | Jinhua (Xiaomi) provides comments, merged 8832 into 8539 is OK, ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.19 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.19 | S2-2208195 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #9, New Eval: Key Issue #9 Evaluation . | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208193 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #8, New Eval: Key Issue #8 Evaluation . | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208217 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Update according to the response SA WG4 LS. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208682 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: Fix on solution #66 multi-modality support (KI #1 and #2). | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208826 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: XRM_KI#2Sol#2 Remove the ENs. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208827 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: XRM_KI#2Sol#3 Remove the ENs . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208828 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: XRM_KI#2Sol#66 Remove the ENs . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208829 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: XRM_KI#3Sol#47 the Update of Measurement Description. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208830 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: XRM_KI#4Sol#52 Remove the ENs . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208833 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: XRM_KI#9Sol#75 Update the PCC Rules as Exist Mechanism . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.19 | S2-2208998 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI #3, Solution #43 update for clarification. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Study on Ranging based services and sidelink positioning (FS_Ranging_SL) | - | - | Docs:=46 | - | |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Terminology | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208250 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Update terminology: Remove SL Positioning Server UE. | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) proposes to note this document. Richard (Ericsson) answering to MediaTek Inc. Sherry (Xiaomi) comments and provides r01. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) comments on the SL Positioning Server UE's new function and has concerns on r01. Sherry replies to Xiaoyan. Richard (Ericsson) answering to Xiaomi and not support r01 Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) responds to Xiaoyan Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) responds to Richard (Ericsson) Sherry (Xiaomi) replies. Richard (Ericsson) answering to Xiaomi and MediaTek Inc. LiMeng (Huawei) replies and supports Richard (Ericsson). LiMeng (Huawei) correct the wording in the last email. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies to LM and Richard. Sherry (Xiaomi) comments. Richard (Ericsson) providing comments Guillaume (MediaTek inc.) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sherry (Xiaomi) objects r00 and support r01. Runze (Huawei) objects r01 and supports r00. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Solution of KI#2 | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208205 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#2 Update of Sol#29 to address the EN. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | LiMeng (Huawei) proposes to swap this document with S2-2208204, i.e., 8204 will be handled instead of 8205. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Solution of KI#5 | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208985 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Update on Sol#31. | Interdigital | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209623. | Lars (Sony) provides r01. Jungje(Interdigital) respond to Lars(Sony) Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) comments. Walter Dees (Philips) provides comments Jungje(Interdigital) responded to Xiaoyan(Intel) and provided r03 Xiaoyan Shi(Intel) comments. Jungje(Interdigital) comments. Xiaoyan Shi(Intel) is fine with r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungje (Interdigital) responds to Walter(Philips) Walter (Philips) responds to Jungje (Interdigital) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209623 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Update on Sol#31. | Interdigital | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208985r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2209110 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#4 KI#5, Update of Solution #32 . | Philips International B.V. | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.20 | S2-2209149 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: KI#5 Sol#6 update. | Intel | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209624. | Walter Dees (Philips) provides comments Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209624 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: KI#5 Sol#6 update. | Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209149r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Solution of KI#6, KI#7 | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208586 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#2&6, Sol#10_Update the Ranging service exposure to UE over PC5. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.20 | S2-2208453 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#2 KI#6: MT-LR and MO-LR signalling for peer-to-peer SL Positioning and Ranging. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209626. New solution has to be deprioritized | Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r01 Walter Dees (Philips) provides r02 Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) r02 ok ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209626 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#2 KI#6: MT-LR and MO-LR signalling for peer-to-peer SL Positioning and Ranging. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208453r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Others Solutions | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2209088 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Revision of Solution #19 for Addition of LMF Positioning Support . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209627. | Sherry (Xiaomi) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Sherry and provide r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209627 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Revision of Solution #19 for Addition of LMF Positioning Support . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209088r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Evaluation & Conclusion | - | - | Docs:=14 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208207 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#1 and KI#8: Evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209628. | Deng Qiang (CATT) asks questions for clarifications. Fei (OPPO) asks questions. LiMeng (Huawei) responds and provides r01. Walter Dees (Philips) comments. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) provides r02. Deng Qiang (CATT) comments on Ranging QoS. LiMeng (Huawei) replies to Deng Qiang (CATT). Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r04. (r03 is also provided, but pls ignore r03) Sherry (Xiaomi) replies to DQ. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungje(Interdigital) comments. Deng Qiang (CATT) accepts r04. LiMeng (Huawei) is fine with r04 and replies to Jung Je (InterDigital). ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209628 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#1 and KI#8: Evaluation and conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208207r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208443 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#7: Evaluation and conclusion . | Samsung | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209629. | Lars (Sony) provides r01. Hong (Qualcomm) asks for some clarifications. LiMeng (Huawei) comments on r01. Lars (Sony) responds. David (Samsung) provides r02. Lars (Sony) ask David to explain more. David (Samsung) replies to Sony. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r03. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Wen (vivo) comments. Lars (Sony) comments. Walter Dees (Philips) requests clarification. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r06. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Lars (Sony) is ok with either r05 or r06, but prefer r05. David (Samsung) prefers r06. Sherry (Xiaomi) can only accept r06. Lars (Sony) as said before it is fine to go with r06. Wen (vivo) is fine to go with r06. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209629 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#7: Evaluation and conclusion . | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208443r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208484 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#3: Overall Evaluation and Conclusions. | CATT | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209630. | Wen (vivo) comments Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r01. Fei (OPPO) asks questions on r01. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r02. Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r03. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r04. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r05. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Xiaoyan. Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r06 and comments. Fei (OPPO) comments on r06. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Deng Qiang. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Fei. Fei (OPPO) is ok with r06. LiMeng (Huawei) prefers r05. Deng Qiang (CATT) is fine with either r05 or r06. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) prefers r05. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209630 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#3: Overall Evaluation and Conclusion. | CATT, Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208484r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208587 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: Evaluation and conclusion on KI#6. | Vivo, Sony | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209631. | LiMeng (Huawei) provides r01. Lars (Sony) comment on r01. Hong (Qualcomm) comment. Lars (Sony) just to be clear we cannot agree on r01. Wen (vivo) replies. LiMeng (Huawei) replies. Walter Dees (Philips) provides comments. Wen (vivo) replies to Walter Dees (Philips) and provides r02. Walter Dees (Philips) responds to Wen (Vivo). Wen (vivo) responds to Walter Dees (Philips) and provides the r03. Walter (Philips) responds to Wen (Vivo). Lars (Sony) provides r04. Walter (Philips) comments on r04. Wen (vivo) provides r05 on top r03. Lars (Sony) responds to Walter. Lars (Sony) provides r06. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r07 and comment on r06. Lars (Sony) comments on r07. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r08. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Lars (Sony) is ok with r08. Walter (Philips) can live with r08 under the assumption that this conclusion can be updated with additional scenarios in a next meeting. Wen (vivo) can live with r08 as well. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209631 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: Evaluation and conclusion on KI#6. | Vivo, Sony | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208587r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208715 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#5: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Sony | Rel-18 | r21 agreed. Revised to S2-2209680. | Wen (vivo) provides r02. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r01. Lars (Sony) replies to Hong and Wen (vivo) and provides r03. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r04. Lars (Sony) provides r05. David (Samsung) provides r06. Lars (Sony) provides r07. Jungje(Interdigital) provides r08. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) provides r09. Wen (vivo) provides r10. Lars (Sony) provides r11. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r12. Lars (Sony) provides r13. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r14. Lars (Sony) responds to Sherry (Xiaomi) on r14 and provides r15. Hong (Qualcomm) comments on r15. Walter Dees (Philips) provides r16. Wen (vivo) provides r17. LiMeng (Huawei) replies to Hong. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to LiMeng. Lars (Sony) ask Wen (vivo) to provide r18 with change marks. Wen (vivo) replies and provides r18 on top of R16. Lars (Sony) comments and provides r19. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r20. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r21. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Sherry (Xiaomi) responds Lars. Sherry (Xiaomi) objects to all revisions except r14 and provides r22 in the draft folder. Wen (vivo) objects to r22, r14 and any versions that removes the case where If Target UE is not in network coverage and does not have NAS connection with AMF, can accept r21 in the chairman note Jungje(Interdigital) comments LiMeng(Huawei) on r21. Lars (Sony) comments on r21. Sherry replies to Wen (vivo). LiMeng replies to Jung Je (InterDigital). Lars (Sony) ask Sherry to re-check r21. Wen (vivo) replies to Sherry. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies to Lars (Sony). Sherry (Xiaomi) replies to Wen. Wen (vivo) replies to Sherry and keeps the original view that vivo objects to r22, r14 and any versions that removes the part where If Target UE is not in network coverage and does not have NAS connection with AMF, can accept r21. Lars (Sony) replies to Sherry (Xiaomi). Sherry objects any revision except r22 and r14 but may agree a new revision if the concern is removed. Lars (Sony) remind Sherry that r22 was not submitted before revision deadline. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r23. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies that r23 is provided on top of r21, with some small changes. Wen (vivo) is ok with r23. Lars (Sony) I can't agree to r23. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies. Lars (Sony) replies. Sherry replies to Lars (Sony). Lars (Sony) propose a WF Wen (vivo) replies to Lars (Sony) Sherry (Xiaomi) is fine with the texts proposed by Lars and the way forward. Lars (Sony) let me study r23 one more time. Lars (Sony) let's go with the following. Wen (vivo) is ok with the process provided by Lars (Sony). Sherry (Xiaomi) is fine with the texts provided by Lars (Sony). Lars (Sony) WF: based on r21+ add In the third bullet from the end ',MO-LR,' + add in the last EN 'MT-LR'. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209680 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#5: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Sony, Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208715r21. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2209130 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#4. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CC#4: r10 agreed. Revised to S2-2209959. | Hong (Qualcomm) provides r01. LiMeng (Huawei) comments. Wen (vivo) comments. Lars (Sony) provides r02. Jungje(Interdigital) comments Lars(Sony) LaeYoung (LGE) comments. Jingran (OPPO) provides comments. Dimitris (Lenovo) requests clarification for the EN on the Ranging/Positioning Layer Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r03 Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r04. Walter (Philips) provides r05. Runze (Huawei) provides r06. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r07 - r06 is not ok. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r08. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LiMeng (Huawei) objects to r07 and r08, but is fine if we remove 'and will be aligned with RAN WGs' from EN in r08. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) comments: r08 with LiMeng (Huawei) suggestion wrt EN: OK! Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r09. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.): ok with r09! Runze (Huawei) comments on r09, only accept if removing 'SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling and/or' in the bullet 'A SL Positioning Server UE can be discovered and selected for SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling and/or result calculation for the case of partial coverage and out of coverage' Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) recommends to agree with Andy (Vice-Chair) summary as proposed by Huawei: r08 + change EN to 'Editor's Note: Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can be provided by a stand-alone SL Positioning Server UE is FFS' ==== Final Deadline ==== Sherry (Xiaomi) recommends to agree with Andy (Vice-Chair) summary as proposed by Huawei: r08 + change EN to 'Editor's Note: Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can be provided by a stand-alone SL Positioning Server UE is FFS' Runze (Huawei) replies to Sherry (Xiaomi). Runze (Huawei) can only agree r08 + change EN to 'Editor's Note: Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can be provided by a stand-alone SL Positioning Server UE is FFS' + removing 'SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling and/or'. Sherry (Xiaomi) propose to agree r08 + change EN to 'Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can support more functionalities, e.g. SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling, in addition to result calculation if FFS.' + removing 'SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling and/or'. Sherry (Xiaomi) propose to agree r08 + change EN to 'Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can support more functionalities, e.g. SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling, in addition to result calculation is FFS.' + removing 'SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling and/or'. Runze (Huawei) supports Sherry (Xiaomi)'s proposal to agree r08 + change EN to 'Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can support more functionalities, e.g. SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling, in addition to result calculation is FFS.' + removing 'SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling and/or'. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) thanks Runze (Huawei) and Sherry (Xiaomi) - we support Sherry proposal as well. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r10. | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209959 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#4. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209130r10. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2209148 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: KI#2 Evaluation and conclusion. | Intel | Rel-18 | CC#4: r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209960. | Deng Qiang (CATT) asks questions for clarifications. Fei (OPPO) comments. Lars (Sony) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) provides R01. Wen (vivo) provides R02. LiMeng (Huawei) provides R03. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r04. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) provides r05. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r06. Limeng (Huawei) provides r07. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungje(Interdigital) comments on r07 Runze (Huawei) replies to Jungje(Interdigital). Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Runze(Hauwei) Sherry (Xiaomi) comments. Sherry (Xiaomi) objects to r06 and r07, and proposes a way fwd. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) replies to Sherry (Xiaomi). Runze (Huawei) supports Xiaoyan Shi (Intel)'s view, suggest to agree r06. ==== Final Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) agrees to approve r07+combine the 3rd bullet of the last paragraph into the first bullet (i.e. remove 'Otherwise, existing Assistant UE continues to be used' and add the 'existing Assistant UE continues to be used' after 'If the assistant UE is still required' + remove 'by the Target UE' of the 1st bullet Sherry (Xiaomi) thanks Runze for the compromise. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r08 based on the agreement. | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209960 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: KI#2 Evaluation and conclusion. | Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209148r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | LS Out | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208487 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on transport of RSPP | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2209134 | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) proposes to merge 8487 with 9134 Hong (Qualcomm) objects to this LS draft. Sherry (Xiaomi) proposes to merge this paper into 9134. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.20 | S2-2209134 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on RAN dependency for Ranging/Sidelink Positioning | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CC#4: r18 agreed. Revised at CC#4 to S2-2209961. | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r01 Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r02. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r03. Wen (vivo) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Wen. Lars (Sony) provides r04. Deng Qiang (CATT) comments. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies to Wen. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) comments. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r05. Lars (Sony) responds to Sherry and does not agree to r05. Sherry (Xiaomi) replies to Lars. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r06. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides r07. Walter (Philips) provides r08 Sherry (Xiaomi) is fine with the rewording in r07. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r09. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r10. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) provides r11. Walter (Philips) responds to Hong (Qualcomm) and provides r12. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Runze (Huawei) provides r13, and objects to all other versions. Sherry objects r13 provided by Runze (Huawei), and expects Huawei to be reasonable for the issue of SL Positioning Sever UE, which is already defined and described in several solutions and in the architecture assumptions. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r14. Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) objects to r13 Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) objects to r14 (which is based on r13), and to r15 in the rev folder. Supports R16 is ok (still waiting for the email though...) (r16 contains Hong (Qualcomm) changes from r14) Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides ref to r15 and r16 (neither are from us) on the server (but missing the emails). ==== Final Deadline ==== Sherry (Xiaomi) provides both r15 and r16, and prefers r16. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r17. Runze (Huawei) provides r18, reword the Q7 to: A SL Positioning Server UE can be discovered and selected for result calculation for the case of partial coverage and out of coverage, in case a constrained UE is not able to support all SL Positioning/Ranging features. Whether the SL Positioning Server functionalities can support more functionalities, e.g. SL Positioning/Ranging method determination, operation coordination, resource coordination and scheduling, in addition to result calculation is FFS. SA2 would like to understand whether this is reasonable from RAN perspective. Sherry (Xiaomi) is fine with r18. | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209961 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on RAN dependency for Ranging/Sidelink Positioning | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209134r18. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Discussion | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208486 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Way-forward proposal on transport of RSPP. | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) comments Sherry (Xiaomi) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) comments and does not agree with the statements of the discussion paper. Wen (vivo) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Deng Qiang (CATT) comments. Jingran(OPPO) provides comments. LiMeng (Huawei) agrees with Jingran(OPPO), and suggests to move forward with PC5-S. Sherry(Xiaomi) comments. Walter Dees (Philips) comments to Hong (Qualcomm) Walter (Philips) responds to Hong (Qualcomm) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.20 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 9.20 | S2-2208485 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#4: Overall Evaluation and Conclusions. | CATT | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2209130 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208588 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: Evaluation and conclusion on KI#2. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2209148 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208589 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: Evaluation and conclusion on KI#5. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2208715 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208590 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: TR 23.700-86: Evaluation and conclusion on KI#7. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2208443 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2209080 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#5: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#5. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2208715 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208454 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Correction to the definition of SL Positioning Server UE. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Not Handled | Guillaume (MediaTek Inc.) provides r01 (merger of 8454, 9131, 9137) Sherry (Xiaomi) clarifies that this paper is one of the unhandled papers. :) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208204 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#5, Sol#20_Update to support multiple Located UEs case, partial network coverage and located UE discovery for specific coordinate systems . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209625. Can be swapped with any Huawei terminology & Solution update paper that is to be handled | LiMeng (Huawei) proposes to swap this document with S2-2208205, i.e., 8204 will be handled instead of 8205. Sherry (Xiaomi) is fine to handle this Tdoc instead of S2-2208205, but we need to check with Chairman's view. Lars (Sony) comments on r00. Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) asks question for clarification. Runze (Huawei) replied to Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) and Lars (Sony), provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xiaoyan Shi (Intel) replied to Runze. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.20 | S2-2209625 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#5, Sol#20_Update to support multiple Located UEs case, partial network coverage and located UE discovery for specific coordinate systems . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208204r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.20 | S2-2209150 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Sol#7 update: Network assisted UE Sidelink Positioning capability. | Intel | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be swapped with any Intel terminology & Solution update paper that is to be handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208251 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#5, Sol#27: Update to add LMF reselection factors. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be swapped with any Ericsson terminology & Solution update paper that is to be handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2208208 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#4, Sol#3 Update: adding RSPP procedure. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be swapped with any Huawei terminology & Solution update paper that is to be handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2209099 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Sol#12: Update to address EN . | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2209137 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#2&3&4&5&6&7, Solution#26: Update to clarify SL Positioning Server UE functionalities. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2208454 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2209132 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#6, Solution#25: Update to consider SL Positioning Server UE. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2209088 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2209133 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: KI#2, Solution#16&Solution#29: Update to clarify the impact to RAN. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2208205 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.20 | S2-2209131 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-86: Update to Terminology. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Not Handled Can be merged into S2-2208454 | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | Study on System Support for AI/ML-based Services (FS_AIMLsys) | - | - | Docs:=78 | - | |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | Incoming LSs | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208109 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: LS on User plane solution for 5GC information exposure to UE | SA WG4 (S4-220846) | Rel-18 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205451 from S2#152-e. Response drafted in S2-2209206. Final response in S2-2209910 | Zhang (Ericsson) suggest to send a LS back to SA4 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia notes there are two incoming LSs from SA4 on the same topic of 5GC information exposure to UE, S2-2208109 and S2-2208156. We could note S2-2208156 and keep S2-2208109 open for any reply we may wish to provide to SA4 on the status for KI#2 conclusions. Jungshin (Samsung) supports to send an LS to SA4 and SA3 replying to S2-2208109, and suggests to note other related LSs, S2-2208110 and S2-2208156. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) We agree to send a LS with KI#2 status, rapporteur can request the LS_reply number in CC#1. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) also agrees with the suggestion that one LS to stay open for a possible reply but to note the rest. LaeYoung (LGE) also supports to send reply LS to SA4 and SA3 to let them know KI#2 study outcome. Jingran (OPPO) provides a draft LS reply to the 2208109 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides a few revisions suggestions to the draft LS out. LaeYoung (LGE) comments to draft version of 9206 (Reply LS). Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided comment. Jingran(OPPO) replies to the comments. | Replied to |
| 9.21 | S2-2209206 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on User plane solution for 5GC information exposure to UE | OPPO | Rel-18 | Created at CC#1. Response to S2-2208109. r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209910. | Jingran(OPPO) provides r01 and put r00 and r01 in the revision folder. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is fine with r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) is also OK with r01. Jungshin (Samsung) is ok with r01. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) agrees with r01, and we suggest also attaching S2-2208659 pCR. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia supports the proposal from NTT DOCOMO to attach conclusion related pCR to the LS. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r02 mentioning the KI#2 conclusion pCR. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is ok either with r02 suggested by LGE or with r01 + final version of S2-2208659 attached. LaeYoung (LGE) answers to Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) that revision of LS Out is allowed after revision deadline according to guidance from SA2 leadership. Jingran(OPPO) agree the r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209910 | LS OUT | Approval | Reply LS on User plane solution for 5GC information exposure to UE | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209206r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208110 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3: LS reply on 5GC information exposure to UE | SA WG3 (S3-221621) | Rel-18 | Revision of Postponed S2-2205455 from S2#152-e. Noted | Zhang (Ericsson) suggest to NOTE the LS Jungshin (Samsung) supports to note the LS. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) supports to note the LS as well. | Noted |
| 9.21 | S2-2208156 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG4: Reply LS to SA2 on 5G Core Information Exposure to UE via DCAF Solution | SA WG4 (S4-221123) | Rel-17 | Noted | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia notes there are two incoming LSs from SA4 on the same topic of 5GC information exposure to UE, S2-2208109 and S2-2208156. We suggest to note S2-2208156 and keep S2-2208109 open for any reply we may wish to provide to SA4 on the status for KI#2 conclusions. Jungshin (Samsung) supports to note the LS. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) also supports to note the LS. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) also agrees with the suggestion that one LS to stay open for a possible reply but to note the rest. | Noted |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | General Architecture Principles | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208570 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Conclusion for the General Architecture Principles . | Qualcomm Incorporated, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#3: Noted Basis evaluation/conclusion document. R14? | Tricci (OPPO) proposed r03 for OPPO's comment on the General Architecture Principles to limit the new NF for FL operation only. Tricci (OPPO) moves BOTH r01 (Ericsson) and r02 (OPPO) into the draft/revision folder per SA2 chair's instructions Tricci (OPPO) clarifies the rapporteur proposed merge revision is r02 for tdocs 8233 (from Ericsson), 8430 (from Samsung), 9188 (from OPPO, Oracle), 9183 (from InterDigital) to be merged into this 8570 (from QC et al) Tricci (OPPO) submits the merged revision for tdocs 8233 (from Ericsson), 8430 (from Samsung), 9188 (from OPPO, Oracle), 9183 (from InterDigital) to be merged into this 8570 (from QC et al) Zhang (Ericsson) provides r01 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments and r04. David (Samsung) comments on Nokia's proposal Tricci (OPPO) thanks Yannick (Nokia) feedback and provide r06. OPPO cannot accept r04. Please ignore r05 uploaded by OPPO by mistake. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Yannick (Nokia): Nokia replies to Samsung. David (Samsung) replies to Nokia Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided comments. Tricci (OPPO) would like to respond to Juan (Qualcomm) inline below. Tricci (OPPO) responds to Malla (NTT DOCOMO) for his question for the justification of new NF for this feature. Tricci (OPPO) would like to respond to Nokia's questions what are the major significant architecture impacts towards NWDAF if extending NWDAF as the anchor NF to assist member selections for AI/ML operation. David (Samsung) wonders if Nokia is planning to address Samsung's arguments against NWDAF as NF to provide assistance for FL by means other than statistics/predictions on this thread, shared almost 24h ago. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments on other aspects than 'dedicated NF'. Zhang (Ericsson) provides comment Malla (NTT DOCOMO) comments on aspects rather than 'Dedicated new NF' Tricci (OPPO) responds to Malla (NTT DOCOMO) comments David (Samsung) replies to Ericsson Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r07. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments on r07. David (Samsung) provides comments on r07. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments on Samsung's point regarding principle and dedicated NF discussion. Tricci (OPPO) would like to comments on r07 and responds to Yannick (Nokia) and Juan (Qualcomm) Zhang (Ericsson) response to David (Samsung) Zhang (Ericsson) provides r08 Tricci (OPPO) has fundamental questions to Zhang (Ericsson) Tricci (OPPO) responds to Zhang (Ericsson) and would like to keep AP#4. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments on principles #4 and #7. In their current form, they are not acceptable to us. Tricci (OPPO) responds to Yannick (Nokia). David (Samsung) replies back to Ericsson Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments on principle #4. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) for the kind acceptance of the motivation of AP#4. OPPO provides r09 with an other suggested wordings. In addition, OPPO restore AP#6 with revised descriptions for the support for dedicated NF for the AIML assistance operation. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia replies to OPPO. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Yannick (Nokia) provides responses. Tricci (OPPO) would like to respond to Yannick (Nokia) question. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r10 Tricci (OPPO) thanks Zhang (Ericsson) for r10 and happily support this. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r11. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Yannick (Nokia) for the rewordings for AP#4 and AP#7. But OPPO was not part of the 'we' that Nokia has referred. David (Samsung) provides r12 Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r13. David (Samsung) provides r14. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments on r14 David (Samsung) confirms the r14 zipped file was corrupt; re-uploads it in the drafts folder. Zhang (Ericsson) propose to go for r11, but can live with r13 and r14, object all the other revisions Wang Yuan (Huawei) accepts r13, objects r14. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia supports going forward with r11. We cannot accept r14 nor r12. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) replies to Yannick (Nokia) Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) objects r12 and r14, we can support r11, or r13, r15 is also OK which uploaded in draft folder based on r13. David (Samsung) can live with r13 only if there's a minor wording change as a compromise, see r15 David (Samsung) objects to r11 and late r15 as provided by Qualcomm. We provide r16 with one word on top of r15 Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) objects r16. David (Samsung) replies to Qualcomm. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) replies to David (Samsung). ==== Final Deadline ==== Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r17 and askes feedback. David (Samsung) thanks Qualcomm and confirms r17 is OK for us. | Noted |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#1: Monitoring of network resource utilization for support of Application AI/ML operations | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208671 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80 KI#1: Updated evaluation and conclusion for KI#1. | OPPO, Samsung, CATT | Rel-18 | r11 agreed. Revised to S2-2209911. Basis evaluation/conclusion document | Tricci (OPPO) moves r01 of 8671 (from OPPO, Samsung, CATT) rapporteur proposed revision merger with Qualcomm to draft/revision folder per SA2 Chair instructions Tricci (OPPO) provides rapporteur merged r01 to merge 8571 (from Qualcomm) into this 8671 (from OPPO, Samsung, CATT). Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r02. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Yannick (Nokia) kind checking and provides r03 to add the missing text from Qualcomm's 8571. David (Samsung) provides r04. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r05. Belen (Ericsson) provides r06 David (Samsung) provides r07 Tricci (OPPO) request clarifications from Belen (Ericsson) to justify the removal of the service trigger of Group-MBR monitoring via Nnef_AFInfluenceTrafficRouting. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) can not agree with r07. David (Samsung) provides r08, objects to r05 and r06. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r09. David (Samsung) can live with r09. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r10. David (Samsung) is OK with r10, provides comments to Nokia. Belen (Ericsson) is okay with r10, replies to OPPO again, same view as in previous meetings Tricci (OPPO) would like to assure to Belen (Ericsson) and promises to work together with Ericsson during the normative phase to determine the proper AF service trigger for the Group MBR Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r11. David (Samsung) can live with r11, comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209911 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80 KI#1: Updated evaluation and conclusion for KI#1. | OPPO, Samsung, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208671r11. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#2: 5GC Information Exposure to UE | - | - | Docs:=16 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208659 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Conclusion for KI#2. | OPPO, LG Electronics, Ericsson, MediaTek, Samsung | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209912, merging S2-2209181 Basis conclusion document | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r01. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r02. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides r03. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) is OK with r03. Susan (Huawei) provides r04. LaeYoung (LGE) objects to r04 and proposes to go with r03. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) objects to r04 and proposes to go with r03. Zhang (Ericsson) propose to go with r03 Susan (Huawei) replies and is ok to go with r03 for this meeting. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is OK with r03 but objects to r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) is ok with r03 and object to r04. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia supports going forward with r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209912 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Conclusion for KI#2. | OPPO, LG Electronics, Ericsson, MediaTek, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208659r03, merging S2-2209181. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208614 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-88: TR 23.700-80: Evaluation updated for KI#2. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209913 | LaeYoung (LGE) comments that this pCR can be marked as MERGED into 9097. Jungshin (Samsung) supports the MERGE into 9097. Jingran(OPPO) agree and confirm this pCR has already merged into 9097. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2209097 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Update on evaluation of KI#2. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209913, merging S2-2208614 Basis evaluation document | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments. Also can we assume this contribution will take onboard changes from S2-2208614? Jingran(OPPO) provides r01 to merge 8614 into the 9097 Jungshin (Samsung) provides r02. Susan (Huawei) provides r03. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) provides r04. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) is ok with r04. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209913 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Update on evaluation of KI#2. | Samsung, OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209097r04, merging S2-2208614. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2209181 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Conclusion for key issue#2. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209912 | LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to S2-2208659. Jungshin (Samsung) proposes to merge the pCR with S2-2208659. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) objects r00 and proposes to MERGE this pCR to S2-2208659. Jianning (Xiaomi) is ok to merge into 8659 as suggested ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208240 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2, Sol#30: Update: AI/ML Translator (AI/ML-T) for 5GC Information Exposure to UE. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209914. | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments. Jungshin (Samsung) provides comments Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) asks for a few clarifications. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r01 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) provides r02. Zhang (Ericsson) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209914 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2, Sol#30: Update: AI/ML Translator (AI/ML-T) for 5GC Information Exposure to UE. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208240r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208447 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2, Sol#2 Update: User Plane solution for 5GC information exposure to UE. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209915 | Wang Yuan (Huawei) provides comments. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments. Jungshin (Samsung) provides comments Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) suggests either 08447 or 08593 threads to be used as the baseline for further discussions and replies to Huawei, Nokia, Samsung, Qulacomm. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) provides comments. Jingran(OPPO) provides comments. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) replies to Qualcomm. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) replies to InterDigital and OPPO. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) replies to Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.). Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) replies to InterDigital. Jingran(OPPO) comments. Jungshin (Samsung) provides comments. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) replies to Samsung. Jungshin (Samsung) thanks Mehrdad (MediaTek) for clarification and asks further questions. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) proposes to mark this PCR as merged into 8593r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208593 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2: Clean up of solution#2. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209915, merging S2-2208447 and S2-2209186 | Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) suggests either 08447 or 08593 threads to be used as the baseline for further discussions and requests some clarifications on 08593 Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) replies to Mehrdad (Mediatek.Inc) Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) provides r01. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r02. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r03 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) clarifies that r03 provided by MediaTek Inc. not Qualcomm. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) is OK with r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) can live with r03. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is ok with r03 and r01 but objects to the rest of revisions and original version. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) agrees to proceed with 8593r03, and notes that there's still some work to be done. E.g., further details of how the AIML policy is used by the DEC ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209915 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2: Clean up of solution#2. | Qualcomm Incorporated, MediaTek Inc., InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208593r03, merging S2-2208447 and S2-2209186. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208694 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Update of Solution #8. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.21 | S2-2208710 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2, Sol#2: Updates of network consent. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209916. | Jungshin (Samsung) provides comments Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) wonders what is the role of DCAF here. At least, this should be changed to IEAF to align with the rest of solution #2. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Jungshin (Samsung), Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) and Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.), and provides r01. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) provides r02. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) and provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) is ok with r03 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is ok with r03 and r02 but objects to the rest of revisions and original version. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209916 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2, Sol#2: Updates of network consent. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208710r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2209102 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Update on Solution #31. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.21 | S2-2209186 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#2, Sol#2: Update: User Plane solution for 5GC information exposure to UE. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209915 | Jungshin (Samsung) provides comments Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) requests several clarifications and suggests either 08447 or 08593 threads to be used as the baseline for further discussions. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) replies to Jungshin (Samsung) and provides r01 to address his comments. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) replies to Mehrdad (Media Tek Inc.) and provides to r02 to address his comments. Mehrdad (Media Tek Inc.) can not agree with original version, r01 or r02. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) replies to Juan (Qualcomm) Jungshin (Samsung) asks for clarification Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) requests to mark this PCR as merged into 8593r03 or noted. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) thanks Ulises (InterDigital) for the clarification and is ok with r03. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) agrees with the proposal to merge onto 8593r03, and notes that there's still some work to be done in 8593r03. E.g., further details of how the AIML policy is used by the DEC ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#3: 5GC Information Exposure to authorized 3rd party for Application Layer AI/ML Operation | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208406 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3, Updates to evaluation and conclusions. | Samsung, OPPO, CATT | Rel-18 | r17 agreed. Revised to S2-2209917, merging S2-2208241, S2-2208307, S2-2208619, S2-2208693, S2-2209021 and S2-2208709 Basis evaluation/conclusion document | Wang Yuan (Huawei) found that the evaluations of Solution#8 is omitted thus provides r01. Tingyu (Samsung) provides r02 by merging 8241, 8307, 8619, 8693 and 9021 with 8406 according to the chair's notes, and suggests using this email thread to discuss the evaluations and conclusions of KI#3. Wang Yuan (Huawei) objects to the principle in r02 that RAN node provides available UL/DL data rate to the AF, and provides r03. Zhang (Ericsson) raise concerns for the paper Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r04. Vivian(vivo) provides r05 and adds vivo as co-signer. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments Tingyu (Samsung) replies and provides r06. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia replies to Samsung. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments Zhang (Ericsson) provide comment to r06 Wang Yuan (Huawei) proposes to merge user consent part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208406, provides r07 and cosigns this pCR. Ellen (Google) provides r08 to merge 9021 and cosigns this pCR. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r09 and co-sign Tingyu (Samsung) can live with r09. Vivian(vivo) provides r10 on top of r09. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) objects r10. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r11. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r12. Yingying(CATT) provides r13. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Malla (NTT DOCOMO) and Juan (Qualcomm), and provides r14. Vivian(vivo) replies to Malla (NTT DOCOMO) comments and provides r15 on top of r14. Ellen (Google) provides r16 or can live with r13 with the sentence about purpose removed. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r17 and r18. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) prefers r17. Tingyu (Samsung) can live with both r17 and r18. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r20 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) can live with both r17 and r18. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) accepts only r17 and object r20. Vivian(vivo) prefers r18 and r20, can live with r17 to make progress. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia supports going forward with r17 or r18. Tingyu (Samsung) is also OK with r20. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) prefers 17, but can live with r18 and r20. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Yannick (Nokia) Yingying(CATT) agrees with r13, r17,r18 and r20. Ellen (Google) supports r17, r20. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209917 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3, Updates to evaluation and conclusions. | Samsung, OPPO, CATT, vivo, Huawei, HiSilicon, Google Inc., Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208406r17, merging S2-2208241, S2-2208307, S2-2208619, S2-2208693, S2-2209021 and S2-2208709. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208241 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3: Update: Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209917 | Wang Yuan (Huawei) provides comments for the initial version. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia also asks for clarification on initial version. Zhang (Ericsson) confirm the paper is merged into S2-2208406 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208307 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3: Update of conclusion . | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209917 | Wang Yuan (Huawei) objects to the proposal of RAN providing UL/DL data rate to the AF. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) objects r00. Tingyu (Samsung) comments and proposes to discuss the evaluations and conclusions for KI#3 based on 8406r02, according to the chair's notes. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments Tricci (OPPO) shares the same concern as Yuan (Huawei) and would like to ask for further clarification. Haley (Lenovo) replies. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Haley (Lenovo) response and would like to answer question from Lenovo. Haley(Lenovo) replies. LaeYoung (LGE) ask a Q. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Haley(Lenovo) and thinks that this pCR can be MERGED to 8406. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Haley (Lenovo) and still have concern about RAN provides UL/DL data rate to the AF. Haley(Lenovo) replies to Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) and Wangyuan (Huawei). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Malla (NTT DOCOMO) asked the Chair to change the status of the report to NOTED, not merged. Wang Yuan (Huawei) agrees with Malla (NTT DOCOMO) and suggests the status of this doc should be NOTED. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208619 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3, Update conclusion. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209917 | Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Vivian(vivo) replies to Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) comments and provides r01. Tingyu (Samsung) proposes to merge this with 8406r02, according to the chair's notes. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Vivian(vivo) agrees to merge this paper to S2-2208406 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208693 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Evaluation and Conclusions for KI#2 and KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209917 | Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE KI#2 parts and KI#3 parts to 8659 and 8406, respectively, per rapporteur's recommendation. Tingyu (Samsung) proposes to merge this Tdoc with 8406, according to the chair's notes. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments and suggests to remove KI#2 conclusion. Susan (Huawei) replies and provides r01. David (Samsung) kindly asks Huawei to merge KI2 evaluation into basis document S2-2209097. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) requests to mark this PCR as merged or noted. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2209021 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-60: KI#3 Evaluation and Conclusion to enhance user consent checking. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209917 | Wang Yuan (Huawei) provides comments for the initial version and r01. Tricci (OPPO) supports Yuan(Huawei) r01. OPPO has the same opinion. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided comments. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments on r00 and r01. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Tricci (OPPO), Malla (NTT DOCOMO) and Yannick (Nokia), and provides r02. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r03. Vivian (vivo) suggests to merge this paper to S2-2208406 following rapporteurs' guideline, in order to avoid duplications and conflicts . Ellen (Google) agree r03 provided by Yuan (Huawei) and ask for Rapporteur's guidance on how to handle user consent aspects Tingyu (Samsung) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208406, according to the chair's notes. Ellen (Google) agrees to merge 9021 into 8406r08. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208611 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3, Update Sol#6: User consent enhancement for AIML operation. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209918. | Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r01. Vivian(vivo) replies to Yannick (Nokia) comment and accepts r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209918 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3, Update Sol#6: User consent enhancement for AIML operation. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208611r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#4: Enhancing External Parameter Provisioning | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208433 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#4: Updated evaluation and conclusion. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209919. Basis evaluation/conclusion document | Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments and suggest to remove CP UP related text Malla (NTT DOCOMO) asks for clarification Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments David (Samsung) provides r01 and replies to some of the comments Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r02. David (Samsung) is OK with r02, provides r03 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments on accuracy level. David (Samsung) responds to Nokia Malla (NTT DOCOMO) requests clarification. David (Samsung) replies to Docomo, provides r04 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r05. David (Samsung) thanks Nokia, provides r06 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia is ok with r06. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r06 Malla (NTT DOCOMO) is OK with r06 Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) is OK with r06. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209919 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#4: Updated evaluation and conclusion. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208433r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208435 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#4: Sol#36 updates to address remaining EN. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2209920. | Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments Tricci (OPPO) also would like to ask for clarifications for such CP-UP switching support and wonder how would this functionality benefit Application AI/ML data transfer? Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments David (Samsung) replies to comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Zhang (Ericsson) propose to add an NOTE to the paper to address people concerns 'NOTE: whether CP/UP related information is useful or not will be determined in the conclusion clause' David (Samsung) accepts Ericsson's proposal Yannick (Nokia): Nokia is fine with r00 + NOTE as suggested by Ericsson. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209920 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#4: Sol#36 updates to address remaining EN. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208435r00. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#5: 5GC Enhancement to enable Application AI/ML Traffic Transport | - | - | Docs:=5 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208777 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: KI#5 Conclusion. | NTT DOCOMO, Oppo, Huawei, Oracle, Toyota | Rel-18 | CC#3: r09 + EN agreed. Revised to S2-2209941. Basis conclusion document. R10? | Belen (Ericsson) provides r01, objects to initial revision Tricci (OPPO) thanks Belen (Ericsson) detailed update. OPPO provides r03 to correct some mistakes. OPPO cannot accept r02. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides r03. For chair's note, Oppo provided r02, not r03. In this case, Oppo's objection should be for r01. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Belen (Ericsson) and provides r04. Belen (Ericsson) objects to r02, r03 and r04. Cannot accept referring to solution#10 as we think it is wrong. It can accept specific parts as per principles Tricci (OPPO) thanks Belen (Ericsson) detailed feedback, however, Ericsson still does not explain clearly what exactly wrong with Solution#10, is it just because missing parameters that you would like to be included or just because of the name of the service, i.e. ADT vs, AAMDT? OPPO cannot accept the Ericsson's r01 for rejecting the multiple companies joint Solution#10 as the baseline without fundamental technical justifications. Wang Yuan (Huawei) thinks there may be some misunderstandings and provide further clarification for Sol#10. Wang Yuan (Huawei) further complete the clarification to Belen (Ericsson). David (Samsung) provides r05 and co-signs. Tricci (OPPO) thanks David (Samsung) for the update, however, the update should be related to transport routing configuration and NOT all transport configurations because Solution#10 itself also includes the transport configuration such as the PCC rules and transmission time windows etc. OPPO provides r06 to clarify the changes from Samsung. David (Samsung) confirms r06 is OK. Belen (Ericsson) provides r07, objects to r06, r05 David (Samsung) provides r08 Tricci (OPPO) thanks Belen (Ericsson) revision r07. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided r09 and r10. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) is ok with r07, r09 or r10. David (Samsung) supports going with r10, objects to r07 and r09 Belen (Ericsson) can accept r09 and objects to r10,r08 Malla (NTT DOCOMO) asks whether David (Samsung) can live with r09 + an EN Belen (Ericsson) can live with an EN as suggested by DOCOMO, assuming that this is resolved in the study phase David (Samsung) replies with a modified proposal Belen (Ericsson) provides comments to the modified proposal. Thinks that this is a study topic. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209941 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: KI#5 Conclusion. | NTT DOCOMO, Oppo, Huawei, Oracle, Toyota, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208777r09 + EN. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208244 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#5 Conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | Tricci (OPPO) provided r01 to update the baseline evaluation tdoc for KI#5 from Ericsson, S2-2208244 to reflect the latest Solution#10 status. Belen (Ericsson) provides r02, cannot accept r01. David (Samsung) corrects the subject of the email thread with the right contribution title. Tricci (OPPO) is very much confused with Belen (Ericsson) argument for objecting r01 from OPPO for updating the evaluation against Solution#10 to make it more accurate, and would like to ask for clarifications from Ericsson. Belen (Ericsson) provides replies to OPPO Tricci (OPPO) thanks Belen (Ericsson) response, and would like to provide further clarifications. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Malla (NTT DOCOMO) pointed that conclusion is overlap with 08777, only support on agreeing without the conclusion, or else we object r00 and any revision with conclusion. Tricci (OPPO) responds to Malla (NTT DoCoMo) with clarifications. Belen (Ericsson) cannot accept r01, it is okay to NOTE this contribution . ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.21 | S2-2208479 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: KI#5 Solution#10 Update for BDT Extensions. | Oracle, Toyota, NTT DoCoMo, Huawei, OPPO | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209921. | Belen (Ericsson) provides comments, cannot agree with initial revision. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Belen (Ericsson) comments and please kindly provide your feedback so that I can update the Solution#10 accordingly. Thanks. Tricci (OPPO) provides r01 based on the comments from Ericsson. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Tricci (OPPO) supports all revisions. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209921 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: KI#5 Solution#10 Update for BDT Extensions. | Oracle, Toyota, NTT DoCoMo, Huawei, OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208479r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#6: QoS and Policy Enhancement | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208617 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Comments for Evaluation Descriptions in Clause 7 on KI#6. | OPPO, Oracle | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209922 and S2-2209923 | Tricci (OPPO) merges the conclusion part of 8617 into 8695, and the evaluation part of 8617 into 8245. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208695 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#6: Update Evaluation and Conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209922, merging S2-2208405 and S2-2208617 Basis conclusion document | Susan (Huawei) provides r01. Tingyu (Samsung) proposes r02 with minor changes and confirms co-sourcing. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r03. Belen (Ericsson) provides r04, objects to r03, r02 and r01. It accepts also initial version (not merged) Yannick (Nokia): Nokia requests clarification on r04. Tingyu (Samsung) replies to Ericsson and provides r05. Tricci (OPPO) provides r06 to update the conclusion that no new Group QoS parameter is introduced for this study. Tricci (OPPO) merges 8617 into 8695. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia requests clarification on r06. Tingyu (Samsung) replies Nokia. Belen (Ericsson) provides r07, replies to Nokia and Samsung. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r08. Tingyu (Samsung) provides r09 with minor changes. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia thanks Samsung for the changes in r09. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209922 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#6: Update Evaluation and Conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon, OPPO, Oracle, Ericsson, Samsung, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208695r09, merging S2-2208405 and S2-2208617. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208245 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#6 Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209923. Basis evaluation document | Dongeun (Samsung) provides comments and provides r01. Tricci (OPPO) merges 8617 into 8245. Belen (Ericsson) provides r02, removing conclusions. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209923 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#6 Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208245r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208405 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#6: Updates to evaluation and conclusion. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209922 | Tingyu (Samsung) merged 8405 with 8695. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208993 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Solution #38 evaluation and conclusions for key issue #6. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Noted. CC#4: r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209983. | Belen (Ericsson) objects to this contribution. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r01, focusing on evaluation for solution #38 and removing conclusion part. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209983 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Solution #38 evaluation and conclusions for key issue #6. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208993r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208308 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#3&KI#6: Update of solution#7. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.21 | S2-2209192 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#6: Sol#15: Update: QoS monitoring for AIML application. | InterDigital | Rel-18 | Approved | Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Mehrdad (Media Tek Inc.) comments. Ulises Olvera (InterDigital Inc.) replies to Belen (Ericsson) and (Mehrdad). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | KI#7: 5GS Assistance to Federated Learning Operation | - | - | Docs:=17 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208509 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7: Evaluation and conclusion. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208651 | Dongjoo(Nokia) asks a question Malla (NTT DOCOMO) merged into S2-2208651 Tricci (OPPO) provided response to Dongjoo (Nokia) and believes NWDAF is the worst choice of NF in 5GC to be the anchor function to assist the member selection for the AF. Dongjoo(Nokia) replies to Tricci (OPPO) Jaewoo (LGE) replies to Dongjoo(Nokia) and Malla (NTT DOCOMO). Dongjoo(Nokia) comments David (Samsung) supports to mark this document as merged and continue the discussion in the relevant threads. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208651 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Evaluation and conclusion for Member Selection KI#7. | OPPO, Oracle | Rel-18 |
- Option-1 - NEF: - Option-2 - NWDAF: - Option-3 - New NF: NOTE: Option-3 does not preclude the New NF to be co-located with other 5GC NF and will be determined during the normative phase Regardless of the SoH result, S2-2208651 will be noted and the following EN added to cl. 8.7: Editor's note: Conclusions to KI7 need to be finalized in SA2#154 based on SoH result at SA2#153E Show of Hands: Qn-1: Should the FL Member Selection Assistance Functionality be supported in R18? Yes: 25 Samsung, OPPO, Tencent, China Telecom, Toyota, Oracle, InterDigital, LGE, ETRI, vivo, AT&T, China Unicom, CableLabs, Charter, MediaTek Inc., Intel , ZTE, LG Uplus, Google, Huawei, Alibaba, Xiaomi, DISH, Lenovo, CATT No: 6 Nokia, Ericsson, NTT DOCOMO, Deutsche Telekom, Apple, CMCC Way Forward: This will be further worked on at the next meeting. Progress should continue with the assumption that FL Member Selection Assistance Functionality will be supported in Rel-18. Qn-2: If the decision for Qn-1 is "Yes", which of the following 5GC NF is best suited to provide the FL Member Selection Assistance Functionality: - Option-1 - NEF: Yes: 8 Ericsson, NTT DOCOMO, Xiaomi, Nokia, vivo, T-Mobile USA, Lenovo, Intel - Option-2 - NWDAF: Yes: 14 CMCC, Nokia, Qualcomm, AT&T, Ericsson, China Telecom, CATT, CableLabs, vivo, T-Mobile USA, Charter, Huawei, ZTE, Lenovo - Option-3 - New NF: Yes: 16 Samsung , InterDigital, MediaTek Inc. , OPPO, Oracle, LGE, LG Uplus, ETRI, Toyota, China Unicom, Orange, DISH, Alibaba , Huawei , Intel, Xiaomi Samsung asked that the result of the show of hands should be captured in the conclusions in an editor's note. This was not considered necessary. S2-2208651 was postponed.">CC#4: Postponed Basis conclusion clause document (8.7.X): member selection. R08? | Tricci (OPPO) provides r01 to merge OPPO's 8644 into 8651 per rapporteur proposed agenda plan. Dongjoo(Nokia) comments Tricci (OPPO) thanks Dongjoo (Nokia) feedback and would like to provide responses. Zhang (Ericsson) object r00 and r01, provides r02 David (Samsung) provides r03 Tricci (OPPO) accepts r03 as the starting point to discuss the conclusions of member selection for KI#7 Tricci (OPPO) would like to request Zhang (Ericsson) to examine the technical justifications for dedicated 5GC NF in other email thread for S2-2208570 before deciding that there is no strong technical justification on this new NF. Thanks. Dongjoo(Nokia) provides further feedback to Tricci(OPPO) Jaewoo (LGE) provides r04 to merge 8509 into 8651. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Dongjoo (Nokia) feedback. OPPO prepared r05 to suggest a way forward towards conclusion on the member selection aspect for KI#7. Dongjoo(Nokia) responds to Tricci(OPPO) Aihua(CMCC) comments. Tricci (OPPO) responds to Dongjoo(Nokia) and requests Nokia to provide clarifications. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Aihua(CMCC) kind confirmation for the importance to specify the member selection criteria. OPPO has further question to CMCC and Nokia on the feasibility to leverage NWDAF to generate the candidate member list. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided r06. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Samsung and Oppo. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Malla (NTT DOCOMO) explanations, however, OPPO object r06 without any further clarifications from DoCoMo David (Samsung) provides r07, cannot accept r06 Tricci (OPPO) would like to further respond to Malla (DoCoMo). Dongjoo(Nokia) responds to Tricci(OPPO) and asks a question Zhang (Ericsson) provide comment to Dongjoo(Nokia) and Malla (Docomo) David (Samsung) provides views on Dongjoo's questions Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Tricci (OPPO). Tricci (OPPO) thanks Malla (NTT DOCOMO) responses. OPPO asks for further clarifications. David (Samsung) comments on Docomo's views. Dongjoo(Nokia) responds to David(Samsung) Wang Yuan (Huawei) is ok with r06 and r07, and proposes to merge FL member selection part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208651, provides r08 and cosigns this pCR. Dongjoo(Nokia) provides r09 David (Samsung) objects to r09 and co-signs r08 Dongjoo(Nokia) responses to David (Samsung) David (Samsung) replies to Dongjoo Aihua(CMCC) provides r10. Vivian(vivo) raises a concern about whether NWDAF analytics should be added as another criteria for FL member selection David (Samsung) can accept r10, asks CMCC if they'd be willing to merge their evaluation content into this paper. Menghan(China Telecom) comments on other than the controversial issue and provides r11 (based on r10) Tricci (OPPO) thanks Menghan(China Telecom) clarifications and update, and asks for more clarifications. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Tricci (OPPO) and David (Samsung). Belen (Ericsson) provides comments, ask not to include QoS information that is discussed in KI#6 Jihoon (ETRI) asks David (Samsung) about AI/ML session identifier (AMSID) for clarification. Aihua(CMCC) replies to David (Samsung): it looks not necessary to merge 8886 into this paper. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Malla (NTT DOCOMO) kind responses. Zhang (Ericsson) object all version from r08 Menghan(China Telecom) replies to Tricci(OPPO) Aihua(CMCC) replies to Belen (Ericsson) that QoS information is helpful for the AF to select the FL member, asking to keep in list. Dongjoo (Nokia) comments. Belen (Ericsson) replies to CMCC that the AF can use Analytics on QoS Sustainability Tricci (OPPO) responds to Dongjoo (Nokia) comments. David (Samsung) replies to Ericsson Zhang (Ericsson) response to David (Samsung) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jihoon (ETRI) replies to David (Samsung). Tricci (OPPO) responds also to Jihoon (ETRI) on clarifying the use of the AMSID Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments and thanks Tricci's comment Tricci (OPPO) would like to build common understandings on what exactly we are disagreeing before we can discuss how to move forward. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Tricci (OPPO) and provides r12 after revision deadline. Pointed out that the following sentence is not correct and all the version with the sentence should be objected. 'The criteria below provided by the AF is used for candidate UE list selected by 5GC NF for member selection.' Malla (NTT DOCOMO) only accept r09 (from Nokia) and can live with r12 (provided after deadline), and object all revisions. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Zhang (Ericsson) feedback and would like to provide some clarifications. Dongjoo (Nokia) also accepts r09 and can live with r12 (but further changes are required in the evaluation part from both r09 and r12), and objects all other revisions. Dongjoo (Nokia) response to Tricci (OPPO) on the 'fundamental disagreement on the requirements' Tricci (OPPO) thanks Dongjoo (Nokia) feedback for his clarifications, however, OPPO respectfully confused by Nokia's response because it is contradiction of itself. Tricci (OPPO) can live with r08. OPPO can NOT accept any version that exclude the support for Dedicated NF. Dongjoo (Nokia) answers to Tricci (OPPO)'s question. David (Samsung) agrees to r11, r10, r08; objects to r09 and late r12; agrees with OPPO a SoH is needed for this aspect ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.21 | S2-2208676 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7: Proposal for Conclusion for KI#7. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Noted | Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides r02 Tricci (OPPO) asks for clarifications regarding the 'new QoS mechanism' in conclusion for KI#7. David (Samsung) provides r03, objects to r02 Dongjoo (Nokia) asks questions for clarification David (Samsung) replies to Nokia Dongjoo (Nokia) provides further feedback to David(Samsung) and asks a question. Zhang (Ericsson) share the same view as Nokia David (Samsung) replies to Nokia and Ericsson, agrees to discuss dedicated NF on S2-2208651 Jihoon (ETRI) asks questions other than the controversial issue on the necessity of a dedicated NF. Wang Yuan (Huawei) proposes to merge FL performance part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208676, provides r04 and cosigns this pCR. Jihoon (ETRI) asks Wang Yuan (Huawei) about the FL performance part. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Jihoon (ETRI). Tricci (OPPO) provides r06 to update the conclusion that no new Group QoS parameter is introduced for this study. David (Samsung) raises the issue that the latest revision by OPPO has been shared in the wrong thread Tricci (OPPO) thanks David (Samsung) catching OPPO's mistake and please remove r06 on this email thread. David (Samsung) proposes to mark this document as merged into S2-2208651 Jihoon (ETRI) replies to Wang Yuan (Huawei). Zhang (Ericsson) also propose to merge the paper into S2-2208651 Zhang (Ericsson) response to r05 just in case the paper is not merged ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Menghan(China Telecom) asks a question Wang Yuan (Huawei) is ok with either r04 or r05, and thinks it's no need to merge into 8651, and proposes to add the following NOTE in r04 or r05 to address the concern raised by Jihoon (ETRI). NOTE: It does not limit that FL performance can be only assisted by DN Performance Analytics. Additional analytics other than DN Performance Analytics may need to be extended to assist with other aspects of FL performance, if any. Tricci (OPPO) supports Yuan (Huawei) and would like to keep the conclusion captured in this tdoc. Menghan(China Telecom) also supports Yuan (Huawei) and would like to keep the conclusion captured in this tdoc. Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r02 and r05, object all other versions Malla (NTT DOCOMO) is OK with r02 and r05, object all other revisions Jihoon (ETRI) supports Yuan (Huawei)'s proposal to add the suggested NOTE in r05. David (Samsung) clarifies this document should be marked as merged into S2-2208651. Whether any late version of S2-2208651 can be agreed is still to be seen In addition: David (Samsung) objects to r02 and r05 David (Samsung) replies to China Telecom; this document can stay un-merged but there is no agreeable revision Zhang (Ericsson) suggest to change the NOTE to an EN ==== Final Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) suggests a final try at CC#3 and proposes to go forward with r05 + two Editor's note. Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with Yuan's proposal + remove the EN about new NF | Noted |
| 9.21 | S2-2208709 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Conclusion of KI #7. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209917 Merged into multiple TDs? | David (Samsung) comments that this document should be marked as merged. Wang Yuan (Huawei) thanks David (Samsung) for the reminder, and proposes to merge FL member selection part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208651, merge Performance monitoring/exposure part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208842, merge FL performance part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208676, and merge user consent part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208406. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208783 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: KI#7 Conclusion. | NTT DOCOMO | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208651 | David (Samsung) comments that this document should be marked as merged. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) agrees to mark this pCR as merged with S2-2208651/S2-2208842. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | S2-2208842 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI #7, Evaluation and Conclusion for Performance Monitoring Exposure. | ETRI | Rel-18 | Noted | Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments David (Samsung) comments on Docomo's proposal Yannick (Nokia): Nokia requests for clarification. Belen (Ericsson) asks where to discuss Group MBR monitoring. Tricci (OPPO) responds to Yannick (Nokia). Tricci (OPPO) agrees with Belen (Ericsson), Solution#37 should be discussed in KI#1 as we have agree in last SA2#153E. Jaewook (ETRI) provides r01 and replies to Zhang (Ericsson). Jaewook (ETRI) replies to Malla (NTT DOCOMO) and David (Samsung). Jaewook (ETRI) provides r02 and replies to Yannick (Nokia) and Tricci (OPPO). Jaewook (ETRI) provides r03 and replies to Belen (Ericsson) and Tricci (OPPO). Zhang (Ericsson) provide r04 and co-sign Jaewook (ETRI) is fine with r04 and thanks for co-sign. Wang Yuan (Huawei) proposes to merge Performance monitoring/exposure part of S2-2208709 into S2-2208842, provides r05 and cosigns this pCR. Jaewook (ETRI) thanks for co-sign and comments on r05. Tricci (OPPO) provides r06 to clarify the list of aggregate monitoring parameters are analytics outputs and not 'new' QoS parameters. David (Samsung) provides r07 and co-signs. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Jaewook (ETRI) and David (Samsung), and provides r08. David (Samsung) provides r09. Wang Yuan (Huawei) thanks David (Samsung) for clarification and can accept r09. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia comments on r09. Cannot accept r09 and provides r10. Zhang (Ericsson) promote r10 Wang Yuan (Huawei) provides r11. Tricci (OPPO) provides r13, sorry for skipping r12 by mistake. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) can accept r13. Tricci (OPPO) thanks Yuan (Huawei) to accept r13. OPPO accepts ONLY r13. Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r13, object all other versions Malla (NTT DOCOMO) is OK with r13. Yannick (Nokia): Nokia objects to r13 and r11. Suggest to go with r10 in this meeting and come back to the debated sentence in next meeting. Zhang (Ericsson) is also OK with r10 Tricci (OPPO) responds to Yannick (Nokia), provides OPPO's perspective and asks for clarification from Nokia. Tricci (OPPO) supports ONLY r13. Sorry... ==== Final Deadline ==== Jaewook (ETRI) suggests to move forward with r10 + the editor's note. | Noted |
| 9.21 | S2-2208994 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Evaluations and conclusions for KI#7. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209924. Merged into S2-2208651 (Postponed at CC#4). Postponed | Dongjoo(Nokia) provides r01 David (Samsung) comments that this document should be marked as merged. Dongjoo (Nokia) replies to David (Samsung) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.21 | S2-2209924 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Evaluations and conclusions for KI#7. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208994r01. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208995 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Evaluation for analytics enhancements and new analytics, and conclusions for Key Issue #7. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Noted | Jingran(OPPO) moves r01 to draft/revision folder per SA2 Chair instructions Jingran (OPPO) provides r01 Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments Jihoon (ETRI) provides r02 with some comments and cosigns this pCR. Jingran(OPPO) provides comments. Menghan(China Telecom) provides r03 with some comments. Jihoon (ETRI) replies to Jingran(OPPO). Jingran (OPPO) provides r04. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r05 and co-sign David (Samsung) provides r06 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides r07. Jingran (OPPO) provides comments. Jingran (OPPO) provides r08. David (Samsung) provides r10 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia asks Samsung for clarification. David (Samsung) replies to Nokia Yannick (Nokia): Nokia replies to Samsung. Menghan (China Telecom) provides r11(based on r10) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yannick (Nokia): Nokia objects to r11 and r10. Supports r07 and r08. David (Samsung) objects to r07 and r08, can agree to a modified version of Nokia's proposal based on r10 ==== Final Deadline ==== Yannick (Nokia): Nokia suggests to go forward with r10 + editor's note. Menghan (China Telecom) objects to r10, can agree with r11+EN Yannick (Nokia): Nokia suggests to go forward with r10 + editor's note. Cannot agree to go with r11 + editor's note. | Noted |
| 9.21 | S2-2208886 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7 Update to Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209925. Basis general evaluation document | Megha(Intel) provides r01 David (Samsung) provides r02. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209925 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7 Update to Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208886r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208234 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7, Updates to Solution#41. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.21 | S2-2208510 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7, Sol#40 update UE-initiated request to join an AI/ML session for FL. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209926. | Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments David (Samsung) provides r01 and co-signs Jaewoo (LGE) replies to David (Samsung) and OK with r01. Zhang (Ericsson) ask question Jaewoo (LGE) replies to Zhang (Ericsson). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209926 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7, Sol#40 update UE-initiated request to join an AI/ML session for FL. | LG Electronics, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208510r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208711 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7, Sol#39: Update to remove ENs. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209927, merging S2-2209019 | Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments Dongeun (Samsung) provides comments Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments. Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Zhang (Ericsson), Dongeun (Samsung) and Yannick (Nokia), and provides r01. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) Changes overlap with S2-2209019, could Huawei and Google work and confirm the group for comments Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Dongeun (Samsung) and provides r02. Wang Yuan (Huawei) proposes to merge S2-2209019 into S2-2208711, and provides r03. Ellen (Google) provides r04 for S2-2208711 Dongeun (Samsung) provides r05 Wang Yuan (Huawei) can accept r05, and proposes to continue the discuss of 'AF purpose' in thread 8406. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.21 | S2-2209927 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7, Sol#39: Update to remove ENs. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Google Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208711r05, merging S2-2209019. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.21 | S2-2209019 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Resolve Editor s Note for user consent handling in Sol#39 . | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209927 | Zhang (Ericsson) suggest merge the paper into S2-2208711 Wang Yuan (Huawei) also propose to merge S2-2209019 into S2-2208711. Ellen (Google) agree to merge merge S2-2209019 into S2-2208711 and move the discussion in 8711 thread. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.21 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=9 | - | |
| 9.21 | S2-2208233 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: General: Updates to General Architecture Principles. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2208430 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Updates to General Architecture Principles. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2209188 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Proposal for Conclusions for General Architecture Principles . | OPPO, Oracle | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2209183 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Evaluation of General Architecture Principles, Principle #2. | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2208571 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#1: Conclusion for KI#1. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2209100 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Update on Conclusion for KI#2. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2208644 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: TR 23.700-80: Evaluations and conclusions for KI#7. | OPPO, Oracle | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2208683 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7: Proposal for Evaluation for KI#7. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.21 | S2-2209119 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: KI#7: Evaluation update. | Intel | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Study on Enhancement of 5G UE Policy (FS_eUEPO) | - | - | Docs:=41 | - | |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Solution Update for KI#1 (URSP in VPLMN) | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208647 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, updates to solution#2 and solution#6 in TR23700-85. | OPPO | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209321. | Mike (InterDigital) asks a question Yang (OPPO) replies to Mike Mike (InterDigital) replies to Yang (OPPO) Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Mike. Changhong (Intel) comments. Mike (InterDigital) replies and provides r01 Dimitris (Lenovo) comments on r01 Yang (OPPO) provides r02 Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r03. Objects to other versions Yang (OPPO): r03 is the version I can live with ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209321 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, updates to solution#2 and solution#6 in TR23700-85. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208647r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#1 (URSP in VPLMN) | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208199 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI #1, Conclusion Update on Re-evaluation Triggers. | InterDigital Inc., Intel | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209322. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for URSP re-evaluation trigger with PLMN change. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides the comments as raised during CC and offline discussions. Changhong (Intel) replies to Chia-Lin's comments. Mike (InterDigital) replies to Chia-Lin (MediaTek) Pallab (Nokia) comments Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides response to Pallab (Nokia) Pallab (Nokia) comments and provides r01 Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides r02 based on r01 Changhong (Intel) is OK with r02 and thanks Chia-Lin for compromising. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Changhong (Intel) provides r03 with deleting the misleading discussion part based on Hong's comment. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) is OK to approve r03 Chia-Lin (MediaTek) is ok with r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209322 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI #1, Conclusion Update on Re-evaluation Triggers. | InterDigital Inc., Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208199r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208345 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, Conclusions: Proposal to remove Editor s Notes . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209323. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for clause 8.1.1. Susan (Huawei) provides comments to the paper. Changhong (Intel) asks Susan on how to move forward with this paper. Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 Susan (Huawei) provides r02. Dimitris (Lenovo) comments Mike (InterDigital) provides r03 LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Dimitris (Lenovo). Changhong (Intel) provides r04 to remove the whole second change part for clause 8.1.2. Belen (Ericsson) provides is okay with r04, also replies to Lenovo. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209323 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, Conclusions: Proposal to remove Editor s Notes . | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208345r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208598 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, Conclusion update: EN resolution. | LG Electronics, Ericsson, Huawei, Intel, vivo, Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209324, merging S2-2208986 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for clause 8.1.3. LaeYoung (LGE) would like to seek how to move forward on the aspect about who provides Service Parameters to H-PCF. Dimitris (Lenovo) questions how the solution will work given that there is no procedure for the UE to identify VPLMN rules Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Mike (InterDigital) agrees with Dimitris (Lenovo) Susan (Huawei) shares the same view as Belen (Ericsson). LaeYoung (LGE) shares the same view with Susan (Huawei) and Belen (Ericsson). Changhong (Intel) kindly asks DK and Mike to compromise as the rapporteur. Wen (vivo) comments. Pallab (Nokia) provides comments and has some concerns with the conclusions Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r01 as a compromise LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Pallab (Nokia) and Dimitris (Lenovo) and is fine with r01. Belen (Ericsson) thinks that we need to reach some compromise, can live with r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) is also OK with the compromise proposal in r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209324 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, Conclusion update: EN resolution. | LG Electronics, Ericsson, Huawei, Intel, vivo, Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208598r01, merging S2-2208986. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208650 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, updates to clause 8.1.2 how to identify PLMN specific URSP Rules . | OPPO | Rel-18 | Noted | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for clause 8.1.2. Mike (InterDigital) expresses concerns Changhong (Intel) provides r01 as the rapporteur. Hong (Qualcomm) objects r01. Changhong (Intel) kindly ask Hong (Qualcomm) to compromise as the rapporteur. Hong (Qualcomm) replies and maintains the objection. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments, ask QC. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides a further compromise proposal Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Belen. Dimitris (Lenovo) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Chia-Lin (MediaTek) share the same view with Hong (Qualcomm) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.22 | S2-2208656 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, updates to the clause 7.1.1 evaluation and clause 8.1.1 general conclusion in TR 23.700-85. | OPPO | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209325. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208345. Yang (OPPO) provides r01 and suggests to keep the pCR with r01 which has removed the overlapped part to 8345 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209325 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1, updates to the clause 7.1.1 evaluation and clause 8.1.1 general conclusion in TR 23.700-85. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208656r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208756 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#1: Conclusions for provisioning and identifying VPLMN specific URSP rules. | Lenovo, Apple | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208650 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208650 (clause 8.1.2) and S2-2208598 (clause 8.1.3). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208986 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI #1, conclusion update to reflect the SA WG2#152e decision. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209324 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208598. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Solution Update for KI#2 (5GC awareness of URSP enforcement) | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208648 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: Solution#11 Update: 5GC awareness of URSP recognition. | Google Inc., OPPO, Apple | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209326. | Josep (DT) comments, provides r01. Wonders whether the solution is changes too much to be considered the same solution. Dimitris (Lenovo) request to clarify further 'unsupported URSP rule' Hong (Qualcomm) asks for clarifications on the use of the report. Haiyang (Huawei) comments Krisztian (Apple) provides r02. Ellen (Google) is fine with r02 provided by Krisztian (Apple) and feedback to Josep (DT), Hong (QC), Dimitris (Lenovo), Haiyang (HW) Haiyang (Huawei) further comments Yang (OPPO) disagree with HW's comment Elmira (Vodafone) disagrees with the current versions, comments and provides r03 Belen (Ericsson) provides r04 Ellen (Google) provides r05 and prefer r02 Josep (DT) comments on the terminology. TS 24.526 uses 'unrecognized' and not 'unsupported' Elmira (Vodafone) considers PCF should not blindly remove unrecognized components from URSP rules but act as per local policies. R06 is provided on the top of r04 from Ericsson. R05 is not acceptable for us. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Ellen (Google) feedback to Hong (Qualcomm) Antoine (Orange) replies to Hong and Ellen. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Ellen (Google) replies to Antoine. Josep (DT) objects to r00, r01, r02 r05. Strongly prefers r06 Ellen (Google) prefers r05 and can live with r06 (stage 3 can work on the details) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209326 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: Solution#11 Update: 5GC awareness of URSP recognition. | Google Inc., OPPO, Apple | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208648r06. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#2 (5GC awareness of URSP enforcement) | - | - | Docs:=13 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208206 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: 23.700-85: KI#2: Evaluation of need of UE assistance and interim conclusion. | Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Vodafone, Telef nica | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208346 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for UE reporting information during PDU Session Establishment. Josep (DT) asks questions for clarification to Iskren (NEC), can ultimately merge with S2-2208346. Krisztian (Apple) provides comments to Iskren (NEC). Iskren (NEC) answers comments from Krisztian (Apple) Josep (DT) replies to Iskren (NEC). Changhong (Intel) asks to merge this paper into S2-2208346 and focus on one thread discussion there. Josep (DT) is OK with the merge. 8346 is OK as way forward. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208346 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#2, Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#3: Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: r27 received support in SoH. Revised to S2-2209957. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for UE reporting information during PDU Session Establishment and out of PDU Session. Josep (DT) comments, provides r01, supports this compromise approach, co-signs. Hong (Qualcomm) provide r02. Yang (OPPO) comments to r02. Huazhang (vivo) answer a question about APP ID? Is the APP ID is the application on UE that identified, or the application identifier (APP ID)? Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Huazhang, and Yang. Krisztian (Apple) cannot accept r02, r01 or r00 (and other revisions) that describe the UE reporting an App ID in PDU Session Establishment or Modification. Josep (DT) comments, provides r03. Haiyang (Huawei) comments. Belen (Ericsson) replies to questions from vivo and comments Iskren (NEC) comments Josep (DT) comments, provides r04. Hong (Qualcomm) comments, provides r05. Krisztian (Apple) provides r06. We can only accept r06. Josep (DT) comments, provides r07, would like to provide Rapporteur outline for possible SoH. Pallab (Nokia) provides views. Can only accept r06 Changhong (Intel) provides r08 reflecting the solution without UE assistance. Iskren (NEC) provides comments Iskren (NEC) answers Pallab (Nokia) Pallab (Nokia) responds to Iskren (NEC) Josep (DT) replies to Pallab. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r09 (based on r08), r10 (based on r07), and r11 (based on r05) to merge 8891 Masaharu (KDDI) provides comments Belen (Ericsson) provides r12 Belen (Ericsson) provides r12 on top of r11. Changhong (Intel) provides SoH slides for KI#2. Yang (OPPO) supports the SoH slides proposed by Rapporteur Pallab (Nokia) responds to Josep (DT) Changhong (Intel) asks Haiyang to provide a non-corrupted revision for r09. Josep (DT) replies. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r13 (correction of r09) Huazhang (vivo) reply to Changhong, that for the option B, whether the report via registration NAS or session related NAS is not determined now, so I prefer we have a general description: Option B: UE reports URSP rule to network at during NAS procedure? (S2-2208346r05) Josep (DT) replies to Pallab (Nokia). Josep (DT) comments, provides r14, r15. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Pavan (Google) provides some comments based on Josep (DT)'s updates Changhong (Intel) replies to Huazhang and is surprised with your comments. Changhong (Intel) updated the SoH slides to v3. Pallab (Nokia) is OK to go with r11 as a way forward based on the SoH in CC#2, only if it is further revised to include a NOTE with warning on possible signaling load implications due to UE reporting at PDU Session Establishment/Modification. I will provide an acceptable NOTE text soon. Masaharu (KDDI) supports to move forward with r11 and KDDI co-signs r11. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) cannot accept r11 (from SoH) as way forward Yang (OPPO) provides one comments in r11, r15. Changhong (Intel) replies to Pallab and Intel cosigns r11. Changhong (Intel) replies to Chia-Lin. Haiyang (Huawei) clarifies to Yang (OPPO). Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Changhong (Intel) Krisztian (Apple) sustains objection to r11 as a way forward based on the SoH in CC#2 due to reasons discussed in-depth earlier in this mail thread and previous meetings. Yang (OPPO) replies to Haiyang Changhong (Intel) asks to polish the r11 and upload it to draft folder of FS_eUEPO. ==== Final Deadline ==== Krisztian (Apple) comments. Josep (DT) comments, tries to summarize. Pavan (Google) objects to r11 Krisztian (Apple) provides comments on Josep's summary. Josep (DT) comments, provides draft r16 based on r11. Pending NOTE 2 to be provided. Pallab (Nokia) provides the pending NOTE 2 text to be added on top of r16 NOTE 2: UE reporting the enforced URSP rule information in PDU Session Establishment/Modification can significantly increase the amount of signalling in the network. Care should be taken to ensure that such UE reporting is enabled for limited number UEs and limited number of applications. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r17 based on r16 Josep (DT) provides some formatting clean-up and correction on cover sheet in r18. Chia-Lin (MediaTek) provides r19 based on r18 Yang (OPPO) provides r19. Cannot agree the 'UPF based detection' related description. Pallab (Nokia) provides r20 based on r19 Josep (DT) provides r21 trying to accommodate comments from r19 (MediaTek), lost r19 (Oppo) and r20 (Nokia). Josep (DT) replies to Pallab (Nokia). Provides r22 on top of r21 Pallab (Nokia) responds to Josep (DT) and OK with r22 Dimitris (Lenovo) comments on the UPF-based detection description. Does not agree with r22 Pallab (Nokia) ask questions to Dimitris (Lenovo) Haiyang (Huawei) provides r23 based on r22 Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Yang (OPPO) Josep (DT) comments on Haiyang's (Huawei) and Dimitri's (Lenovo) comment. Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Josep (DT) Dimitris (Lenovo) ok with r23 Antoine (Orange) provides r24 to fix an accidental deletion of 'and'. Krisztian (Apple) objects to r25. Haiyang (Huawei) provides r25 Krisztian (Apple) objects to r24 and previous revisions. Josep (DT) replies to Krzistian, provides r26. Belen (Ericsson) asks Josep (DT) to present changes on top of r23 on CC#4. Antoine (Orange) provides r27 as an alternative to r26 but also accept r26. Josep (DT) replies to Belén (Ericsson): OK to present the changes. Uploaded revisions to CC#4 folder. | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209957 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#2, Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Vodafone, Telef nica, KDDI, Intel, NEC | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208346r27. CC#4: No consensus. Noted | Noted | |
| 9.22 | S2-2210163 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Introduction of URSP Rule ID | Deutsche Telekom | Created at CC#3. Postponed to CC#4. CC#4: No consensus. Noted | Josep (DT) provides first draft of the LS requested at CC#3. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Antoine (Orange) provides r01 with the change proposed by Hong. Pavan (Google) agrees with Hong (Qualcomm) and wonders if it is premature to send the LS now. Antoine (Orange) replies that this LS is not tasking CT1 to do any work but just asking questions. Huazhang (vivo) provides r02 that the URSP rule ID is equal to TD precedence + RSD precedence, so this question should be delivered to CT1, and for last sentence, I use () to include the option A and B to make this clear to reading. Haiyang (Huawei) agrees with Yang (OPPO) and provides r03. Yang (OPPO) comments Josep (DT) cleans up a bit, adds comment from Yang (Oppo), provides r04. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Antoine (Orange) comments. Josep (DT) cleaned-up, added further input, provides r06, please disregard r05. Belen (Ericsson) ok with r06 Yang (OPPO) is fine to r04, but concern to r05 and r06 due to too much subjective assesment Josep (DT) tries to apply suggested changes, provides r08, may have uploaded r07 by mistake. Belen (Ericsson) replies to OPPO Antoine (Orange) provides r09; also accepts r08. Belen (Ericsson) prefers r08 but it is okay with r09 Belen (Ericsson) prefers r09, not okay with r08 Thanks for the updating. OPPO is fine to r09 | Noted | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208634 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on impact of URSP rule enforcement report to 5GC | vivo | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209327. | Josep (DT) comments, provides r01. Haiyang (Huawei) supports to remove SA1 part and comments. Huazhang (vivo) provide r02 based on r01 Josep (DT) comments, provides r03. Huazhang (vivo) comments to URSP rule ID Josep (DT) comments, provides r04. Huazhang (vivo) thanks Josep, and this version is ok and see other's suggestions ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Huazhang (vivo) is ok with r04 and propose to go with r04, thanks for your help Josep ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209327 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on impact of URSP rule enforcement report to 5GC | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208634r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208787 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#2, Evaluation and way forward proposal . | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208206 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208206. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208804 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#2 Conclusions: Supporting URSP enforcement for well known app traffic to specific S-NSSAI/DNN. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209328. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for UPF reporting to NWDAF for analytics. Yang (OPPO) comments to the new NWDAF analytics Dimitris (Lenovo) responds Josep (DT) disagrees with Yang (OPPO). Yang (OPPO) comments and concerns Yang (OPPO) replies why the solution doe not work Josep (DT) provides an example. Haiyang (Huawei) comments Yang (OPPO) provides comments. Dimitris (Lenovo) does not understand Oppo's concerns Yang (OPPO) further replies to Dimitris Dimitris (Lenovo) provides additional responses Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 Dimitris (Lenovo) provides responses Yang (OPPO) responds to Dimirtris Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r02 and responds Haiyang (Huawei) have comments Yang (OPPO) cannot agree r00-r02 Pallab (Nokia) shares the same view as Yang (OPPO) Dimitris (Lenovo) responds and provides r03 Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r04 Yang (OPPO) provides r05 and can only accept r05 Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r06 to align with KI objectives Yang (OPPO) provides r07 based on r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209328 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#2 Conclusions: Supporting URSP enforcement for well known app traffic to specific S-NSSAI/DNN. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208804r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208891 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#2 Evaluation and Conclusion. | Intel, Lenovo, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208346 | Antoine (Orange) comments that the conclusion text does not clearly indicate what normative changes are recommended (if any). Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for UPF detection based solution without UE reporting. Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Antoine (Orange) Belen (Ericsson) objects to this contribution Haiyang (Huawei) responds to Belen (Ericsson) Changhong (Intel) replies to Belen (Ericsson) and asks to merge this paper into S2-2208346. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208974 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: EUEPO KI#2 Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#2. | NEC | Rel-18 | Revision of (Noted) S2-2206404 from S2#152E. Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208206 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208206. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208988 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI #2, conclusion. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208206 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208206. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2209112 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: Evaluation and conclusion for KI#2. | Apple, Google, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Oppo | Rel-18 | Noted | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for UE reporting information out of PDU Session. Haiyang (Huawei) comments that we should first focus on the discussion on 8648. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments. Krisztian (Apple) provides r01. Changhong (Intel) asks to merge this paper into S2-2208346. Hong (Qualcomm) also requests to merge this to 8364. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments that 8364 does not include any of this conclusions so far. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Krisztian (Apple) responds to Belen (Ericsson) Josep (DT) objects to this pCR. SoH is based on 8364. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#3 (Provision consistent URSP to UE across 5GS and EPS) | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208303 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: 23.700-85: Evaluation and Conclusions update for KI#3. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, KDDi | Rel-18 | CC#3: This was noted. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline removing the second EN. Yang (OPPO) comments Pallab (Nokia) responds to Yang (OPPO) Hong (Qualcomm) comments and cannot agree with the proposal. Huazhang (vivo) comments Pallab (Nokia) responds to Hong (Qualcomm) and Huazhang (vivo). DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Changhong (Intel) provides SoH slides for KI#3. Pallab (Nokia) responds to DongYeon (Samsung) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) responds to Changhong (Intel) and requests to change the description for SoH on KI#3 DongYeon (Samsung) proposes change text on KI#3 SoH Slide, and replies to Pallab. Pallab (Nokia) responds to DongYeon (Samsung). Cannot accept the proposed SoH text. DongYeon (Samsung) replies to Pallab. DongYeon (Samsung) provides SoH slide in CC#2 folder containing preferred text on KI#3. Changhong (Intel) uploads v4 with removing all evaluation statement in slide #2. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.22 | S2-2208304 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | 23.700-85: Discussion on Evaluation and Conclusions update for KI#3. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.22 | S2-2208347 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#3: Update to conclusion solving EN. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | CC#3: r03 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209946. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline removing the third EN. Huazhang (vivo) comments DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Belen (Ericsson) replies to comments and questions. Changhong (Intel) asks for clarification. Belen (Ericsson) replies to Intel Yang (OPPO) provides a question Changhong (Intel) replies to Belen. Huazhang (vivo) provides a way forward to remove the UE impact in this paper. DongYeon (Samsung) provides r01. Belen (Ericsson) replies to OPPO Belen (Ericsson) provides r02 DongYeon (Samsung) provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Changhong (Intel) objects to r01, r02 and r03 and provides a draft r04 for CC#2 or 3 discussion. ==== Final Deadline ==== DongYeon (Samsung) is OK with draft-r04 provided by Changhong. Huazhang (vivo) agree with DongYeon and ok to move forward with r04 | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209946 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#3: Update to conclusion solving EN. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208347r03 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208633 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#3: Evaluation and Conclusion update. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208892 | DongYeon (Samsung) comments, and provides r01. Belen (Ericsson) objects to r00 and r01, provides comments. Huazhang (vivo) ask to clarify, how to understand 'the (H-)PCF in roaming and the PCF in non-roaming may register to the BSF (not shall or must) as the PCF serving this UE' Belen (Ericsson) replies to vivo again that the BSF is conditional (and not optional) Huazhang (vivo) reply to Belen Changhong (Intel) agrees with Belen that BSF should be deployed as conditional to make the feature work. Changhong (Intel) provides r02. Belen (Ericsson) is okay with r02 Pallab (Nokia) comments on r02. Pallab (Nokia) provides r03. Belen (Ericsson) objects to r03 Huazhang (vivo) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Changhong (Intel) proposes to approve r02. Pallab (Nokia) proposes to approve r03. Objects to all other revisions including r00 DongYeon (Samsung) supports r02. r03 is conditionally OK when 1) change 'AMF shall use the Nbsf_Management discovery service' to 'AMF queries BSF'. Belen (Ericsson) can accept r02, objects to r01,r01 and initial version. Changhong (Intel) propose to NOTE this paper and use the thread of S2-2208892 for discussion in order to avoid cross checking. Huazhang (vivo) ask whether whether we can approve r02, to change the note as below: NOTE: BSF needs to be deployed in order to ensure a single UE-PCF is selected for a UE in both EPS and 5GS. Whether AMF queries BSF to discover the PCF and PCF set that may be already serving a UE policy association for the UE in EPS should be re-evaluate in normative phase. Huazhang (vivo) is ok to keep one discussion and suggest to merge this paper to S2-2208892 Belen (Ericsson) can accept the initial revision, and objects to all other revisions Belen (Ericsson) can accept r02, objects to r01,r03 and initial version. Huazhang (vivo) provides r04 and whether we can move forward of this. NOTE: Whether BSF is involved in order to ensure a single UE-PCF is selected for a UE in both EPS and 5GS should be re-evaluate during normative phase. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208892 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#3: Update on Conclusion. | Intel, OPPO, Qualcomm | Rel-18 | Noted | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline removing the first EN. Pallab (Nokia) comments for clarification and further discussion. Changhong (Intel) replies to Pallab and provides r02. Pallab (Nokia) provides comments on r02. Changhong (Intel) replies to Pallab. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Changhong (Intel). DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Note that there's no r02 yet. The previous comments must be for r01. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Changhong (Intel) and provides r03. Pallab (Nokia) responds to DongYeon (Samsung). Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Changhong (Intel) replies to Pallab and clarifies that r02 was not provided, it was a typo. Changhong (Intel) comments on r03. Huazhang (vivo) don't understand why UE should give the indication to 5GC, does the 5GC didn't know to use which association to deliver policy to UE? The 5GC or EPS can well solved the problem of multiple UE policy association, and also, 5GC and EPS can know where the UE is. Huazhang (vivo) can't accept r03 Pallab (Nokia) responds to Changhong (Intel) provides r04 that only removes the EN (no other text added in conclusion). Pallab (Nokia) responds to Huazhang (vivo). Pallab (Nokia) provides r05. Huazhang (vivo) reply to Pallab Huazhang (vivo) thanks Pallab, that maybe the BSF is the only way forward to reduce the impact, thanks. Let me check further. Pallab (Nokia) responds to Changhong (Intel) and provides r06. Which revision is agreed for this pCR is dependent on the decision of tdoc S2-2208633 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Changhong (Intel) proposes to approve r05. Huazhang (vivo) only agree with r05 and object any other version Pallab (Nokia) proposes to approve r06. Objects to all other revisions. Can accept r04 only if S2-2208633r03 is approved. DongYeon (Samsung) supports r02, objects to r03 and r04. r05 is conditionally OK when 1) change 'AMF shall use the Nbsf_Management discovery service' to 'AMF queries BSF' + add 'NOTE: BSF needs to be deployed in order to ensure a single UE-PCF is selected for a UE in both EPS and 5GS.' Changhong (Intel) provides draft r07. Huazhang (vivo) can accept r07, the only way forward. Pallab (Nokia) comments that bringing this discussion in this thread will cause more confusion and I do not see Ericsson participating in this thread and they were objecting to the changes proposed in r07 in 8633. Belen (Ericsson) objects to r07 as well, it cannot accept a solution that is not discussed. Changhong (Intel) comments. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#4 (Support standardized and operator-specific traffic categories in URSP) | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208172 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-85: KI#4, Update to Note in Conclusions . | AT&T, Meta USA, T Mobile USA, Orange | Rel-18 | Approved | Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 Farooq(AT&T) expresses concern on r1 Haiyang (Huawei) also think CT1 is better to handle the work ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Farooq (AT&T) can accept only r00. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) also can only accept r00. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.22 | S2-2208419 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS OUT on supporting Traffic Categories | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208461 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208461. Serge (T-Mobile USA) agrees to merge this paper into S2-2208461. Haiyang (Huawei) is OK to merge this paper into S2-2208461. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.22 | S2-2208461 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS On UEPO Traffic Categories | T-Mobile USA Inc. | Rel-18 | Approved. Revised by MCC to remove 'draft' in S2-2209348 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to use this paper as baseline for the LS OUT to GSMA on Traffic Categories. Serge (T-Mobile USA) proposes to merge 2208419 into this paper. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) prefers to keep the LS answer to GSMA in S2-2209036 separate from the information to CT1. Changhong (Intel) is fine with keeping this paper and S2-2209036 separate. Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 Farooq(AT&T) expresses concern on r01. Haiyang (Huawei) also think CT1 is better to handle the work Hong (Qualcomm) also supports leaving the definitions to CT1. Serge (T-Mobile USA) comments and prefers r00. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Farooq (AT&T) can only accept r00. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) also can only accept r00. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209348 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on UEPO Traffic Categories | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208461. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | S2-2209036 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Traffic Categories | Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209027. Response to S2-2203657 (Replied to at S2#151E). r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209329. | Changhong (Intel) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208461. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) prefers to keep the LS answer to GSMA in S2-2209036 separate from the information to CT1. Farooq (AT&T) would like to keep the content of the GSMA LS aligned with the conclusions of the TR as was done in CT LS even if it is sent as a separate LS to GSMA Hong (Qualcomm) provide r01. Farooq(AT&T) provides r02. Changhong (Intel) provide r02. Changhong (Intel) asks Farooq to provide r03. Haiyang(Huawei) provides r03. Belen (Ericsson) provides r04 Farooq(AT&T) expresses concern on r04. Haiyang (Huawei) also think CT1 is better to handle the work Curt (Meta) shares the same view as Farooq (ATT). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Farooq (AT&T) can accept only r03. Dieter (Deutsche Telekom) also can only accept r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.22 | S2-2209329 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on Traffic Categories | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209036r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.22 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.22 | S2-2208418 | DRAFTCR | Endorsement | New value of Connection Capability | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Study on Enablers for Network Automation for 5G - Phase 3 (FS_eNA_Ph3) | - | - | Docs:=104 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #1: How to improve correctness of NWDAF analytics | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208230 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, Sol#1: Update to remove ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209632. | Xiaobo (vivo) provides r01, clarifying how MTLF provide Multiple Models. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209632 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, Sol#1: Update to remove ENs. | Ericsson, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208230r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208243 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Terminology updates to Sol #29. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | S2-2208309 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update to solution#61 to remove EN | China Telecom | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209633. | Zhang (Ericsson) ask for clarification Menghan(China Telecom) replies to Zhang(Ericsson). Menghan(China Telecom) provides r01 Zhang (Ericsson) OK with r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209633 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update to solution#61 to remove EN. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208309r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208620 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, Sol#3: Sol Update: Accuracy based NWDAF Analytics Correctness Improvement . | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209634. | Costas (Lenovo) provides an editorial suggestion and asks for clarification Xiaobo (vivo) provides r01 and provide clarification to Costas (Lenovo) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209634 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, Sol#3: Sol Update: Accuracy based NWDAF Analytics Correctness Improvement . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208620r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208232 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Updates to Conclusions for KI#1. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208621 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this to S2-2208621 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208236 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Updates to Overall Evaluation for KI#1. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209635, merging S2-2208417, S2-2208887 and S2-2209060 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for evaluation. Antoine (Orange) provides r01, merging in S2-2208887. Antoine (Orange) provides r04, updating the evaluation of Sol#62. Fabio (Nokia) provides r05. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r06 Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r05 and r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dimitris (Lenovo) is only ok with r06 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209635 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Updates to Overall Evaluation for KI#1. | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, ETRI, Orange, China Mobile M2M Company Ltd. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208236r06, merging S2-2208417, S2-2208887 and S2-2209060. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208417 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Updating Evaluation and conclusion on KI#1. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209635 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this into S2-2208236 (evaluation part) and S2-2208621(conclusion part), respectively. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208468 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Update of KI#1 conclusion . | ETRI | Rel-18 | Revised to S2-2208887 | Revised | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208887 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Update of KI#1 evaluation and conclusion . | ETRI, Orange | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208468. Merged into S2-2209635 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this into S2-2208236 (evaluation part) and S2-2208621(conclusion part), respectively. Antoine (Orange) can consider this pCR merged into S2-2208236r01 but would like to keep S2-2208887 open in case no agreement is found on S2-2208236. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208544 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, conclusion update: expand the scope of Accuracy information by adding updated analytics. | China Telecom vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208621 | Jiahui (China Telecom) agrees this paper to be merged into S2-2208621. Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this to S2-2208621 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208621 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, conclusion Update . | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | CC#4: r16 agreed. Revised to S2-2209971. | Xiaobo (vivo) provides r01 by taking into account the content from S2-2208232 Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for conclusion. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides initial comments Zhang (Ericsson) object r00 and r01, provides r02 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r03 Fabio (Nokia) replies to comments from Zhang (Ericsson) and Dimitris (Lenovo) Antoine (Orange) provides r04. Soohwan (ETRI) provides r05. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r06 Xiaobo (vivo) provides r07 with clean revision. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Fabio (Nokia) Fabio (Nokia) answers to comments from Zhang (Ericsson) Zhang (Ericsson) provides r08 Haiyang (Huawei) comments to r08 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r09 Xiaobo (vivo) provides r10 with sort of summary as well as further clean-up. Haiyang (Huawei) objects r10. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r11 Haiyang (Huawei) provides r12. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Haiyang (Huawei) Haiyang (Huawei) response to Zhang (Ericsson) Aihua(CMCC) suggests to make partial conclusion in this meeting. Fabio (Nokia) provides r13 and comments Xiaobo (vivo) provides r14 and comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Haiyang (Huawei) can only accept r03~r07, r09, r12 and r13. Objects to others. Dimitris (Lenovo) is ok with r14 but can live with r13 as a compromise Xiaobo (vivo) support to go with r13 as a compromise to make progress. Zhang (Ericsson) can ONLY accept r08, r10, r11, object all the other revision Xiaobo (vivo) ask whether Zhang(Ericsson) could live with r14 and if yes, then propose to go with r14. Zhang (Ericsson) can go with r14 with the EN Xiaobo proposed, also there are two bullets need to be deleted from r14 'Consumers of AnLF and MTLF services may be capable of checking the performance of analytics IDs and/or ML models and accordingly to generate performance information. Such performance information can be stored in such a way that other service consumers can retrieve it.' '- When requesting an ML model via the MLModelProvision service, the AnLF can specify in the request additional parameters related to input data and their granularity to assist MTLF in the ML model selection. When notifying the AnLF about a trained ML Model, the MTLF can include in the notification additional parameters related to input data and their granularity.' Haiyang (Huawei) can live with r14 + replacing 'Editor's Note: Additional feedback information from an analytics consumer is FFS.' To ' The analytics consumer NF making some decision may change the trend indicated by the prediction output, the analytics consumer NF may provide a unified feedback related to the effect of an analytics on the changes in network status after the consumption of analytics and how to define unified feedback and based on which logic is FFS ' Xiaobo (vivo) thanks Zhang(Ericsson) for the compromise and corporation and propose go with r14 with the updated EN + two bullets deleted from r14 proposed by Zhang(Ericsson). Editor's Note: The analytics consumer NF making some decision may change the trend indicated by the prediction output, the analytics consumer NF may provide a unified feedback related to the effect of an analytics on the changes in network status after the consumption of analytics and how to define unified feedback and based on which logic is FFS ' Two bullets to be removed: 'Consumers of AnLF and MTLF services may be capable of checking the performance of analytics IDs and/or ML models and accordingly to generate performance information. Such performance information can be stored in such a way that other service consumers can retrieve it.' '- When requesting an ML model via the MLModelProvision service, the AnLF can specify in the request additional parameters related to input data and their granularity to assist MTLF in the ML model selection. When notifying the AnLF about a trained ML Model, the MTLF can include in the notification additional parameters related to input data and their granularity.' Xiaobo (vivo) thanks Haiyang(Huawei) for the compromise and corporation and agree r14 as baseline to make progress this meeting. Xiaobo (vivo) thanks Haiyang(Huawei) for the clarification and adds Huawei as co-signer and thanks Haiyang(Huawei) for the support. Dimitris (Lenovo) supports the proposal to include the text suggested by Haiyang (Huawei) Fabio (Nokia) is OK with r14 plus changes proposed by Haiyang (Huawei). Fabio (Nokia) is not OK with the removal of the bullets as suggested by Zhang (Nokia) and suggests turning them into the following: '- Consumers of AnLF and MTLF services may be capable of checking the performance of analytics IDs and/or ML models and accordingly to generate performance information. Such performance information can be stored in such a way that other service consumers can retrieve it.' Becomes the following EN: 'Editor's note: It is FFS if consumers of AnLF and MTLF services can generate and request storage of performance information in such a way that other service consumers can retrieve it.' And '- When requesting an ML model via the MLModelProvision service, the AnLF can specify in the request additional parameters related to input data and their granularity to assist MTLF in the ML model selection. When notifying the AnLF about a trained ML Model, the MTLF can include in the notification additional parameters related to input data and their granularity.' Becomes : '- When requesting an ML model via the MLModelProvision service, the AnLF can specify in the request additional parameters related to input data to assist MTLF in the ML model selection. When notifying the AnLF about a trained ML Model, the MTLF can include in the notification additional parameters related to input data' 'Editor's Note: It is FFS if input data parameter should include data granularity' ==== Final Deadline ==== Zhang (Ericsson) propose modifications on the proposal from Fabio (Nokia) Xiaobo (vivo) thanks all for the contributions and summarize the all agreed changes on top of r14. r14 + updated Editor's Note + two modified bullets 1. replaced 'Editor's Note: Additional feedback information from an analytics consumer is FFS.' with ' The analytics consumer NF making some decision may change the trend indicated by the prediction output, the analytics consumer NF may provide a unified feedback related to the effect of an analytics on the changes in network status after the consumption of analytics and how to define unified feedback and based on which logic is FFS ' 2. replaced '- Consumers of AnLF and MTLF services may be capable of checking the performance of analytics IDs and/or ML models and accordingly to generate performance information. Such performance information can be stored in such a way that other service consumers can retrieve it ' with 'Editor's note: It is FFS if consumers of AnLF and MTLF services can generate and request storage of performance information in such a way that other service consumers can retrieve it.' 3. replaced '- When requesting an ML model via the MLModelProvision service, the AnLF can specify in the request additional parameters related to input data and their granularity to assist MTLF in the ML model selection. When notifying the AnLF about a trained ML Model, the MTLF can include in the notification additional parameters related to input data and their granularity.' with '- When requesting an ML model via the MLModelProvision service, the AnLF can specify in the request the information about input data type to assist MTLF in the ML model selection' 'Editor's Note: It is FFS if data granularity also included in the request' Fabio (Nokia) thanks Xiaobo (Vivo) for the summary and is OK with it. Antoine (Orange) provides r15 = r14 + updated Editor's Note + two modified bullets. | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209971 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, conclusion Update . | Vivo, China Telecom, China Mobile, Ericsson, Huawei, Orange, ETRI, Lenovo, Nokia,CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208621r16. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208880 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1 Update the Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208621 | Zhang (Ericsson) indicate the evaluation part is merged into S2-2208236, the conclusion updates are merged into S2-2208621 Aihua (CMCC) confirms this paper can be merged into S2-2208621. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2209060 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1: Updates of Evaluation and Conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209635 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this into S2-2208236 (evaluation part) and S2-2208621(conclusion part), respectively. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #2: NWDAF-assisted application detection | - | - | Docs:=27 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208666 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #2, Sol #9: Update to make clarification on ENs . | China Mobile, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | S2-2208670 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, updates to solution#9 in TR23.700-81. | OPPO | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209636. | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209636 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#1, updates to solution#9 in TR23.700-81. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208670r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208431 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#2 Conclusion Updates to reduce network load. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | CC#4: r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209972. | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for conclusion. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 to perform merge suggested by rapporteur Belen (Ericsson) provides r02 Yang (OPPO) is okay with r01 but not ok with r02 Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Yang (OPPO) replies and provides r03 Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Yang (OPPO) Yang (OPPO) replies to Malla (DOCOMO) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) suggests a way forward to use r03 as basis and remove the last sentence in Note 3 Belen (Ericsson) objects to r03, ok with r02 Belen (Ericsson) objects to r01 Thomas(Nokia) suggest agreeing r00 Aihua(CMCC) suggests to go with r02, with one LS sending out to check user consent with SA3. Yang (OPPO) asks question to Ericsson Lei(Tencent) agrees with Yang that user consent is needed thus object r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== Yang (OPPO) privides drat LS to SA3 about the user consent. Wang Yuan (Huawei) is OK to agree r00 at this meeting if r02 or all other revisions cannot be agreed.. Aihua(CMCC) prefer r02, but can live with r00. Thomas(Nokia) uploaded late r04 as possible compromise Belen (Ericsson) is okay with r04 as compromise, then wait for SA3 feedback Yang (OPPO) is fine to 'r04+LSout'. Aihua(CMCC) is fine to r04+SA3 LS as a way forward. Wang Yuan (Huawei) is also fine with r04 + SA3 LS as way forward | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209972 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#2 Conclusion Updates. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, Oppo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208431r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2210159 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS_out_to SA WG3_for_user_consent_for_appliaction_detection | China Mobile | CC#4: r01 agreed (The LS title should be corrected). Revised to S2-2209973. | Yang (OPPO) provides drat LS to SA3 about the user consent. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 | Revised | |
| 9.23 | S2-2209973 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on User consent for Application Detection | SA WG2 | - | Revision of S2-2210159r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208672 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#2. | China Mobile, Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209637. | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for evaluation and merge its conclusion part into S2-2208431 Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 to remove conclusion part as suggested by rapporteur ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209637 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#2. | China Mobile, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208672r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208686 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Updates to conclusion for KI#2 in TR23.700-81. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208431 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this to S2-2208431 Thomas (Nokia) suggest to merge this PCR into S2-2208431 as suggested by rapporteur Yang (OPPO) agree to merge 8686 to 8431 Belen (Ericsson) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #3: Data and analytics exchange in roaming case | - | - | Docs:=18 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208622 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3, Sol#37, #38, #39, #40: Sol Update to extend user consent information for roaming cases. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209638. | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Jungshin (Samsung) provides r02 Vivian(vivo) thanks Thomas (Nokia) and Jungshin (Samsung) for providing wording improvements, and is fine with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209638 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3, Sol#37, #38, #39, #40: Sol Update to extend user consent information for roaming cases. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208622r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208623 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #3, Sol#39 Update . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of (Unhandled) S2-2206418 from S2#152E. r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209639. | Thomas (Nokia) raises concerns Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Vivian(vivo) replies to Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) and Thomas(Nokia)'s comments and provides r01. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) replies to Vivian (vivo). Vivian(vivo) replies to Juan Zhang (Qualcomm)'s comment and provides r02. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) is OK with r02. Thomas(Nokia) provides r03. Vivian(vivo) replies to Thomas(Nokia) and can live with r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209639 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #3, Sol#39 Update . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208623r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2209106 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update on Solution #40. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209640. | Thomas (Nokia) raises concerns Vivian(vivo) provides comments Jungshin (Samsung) provides clarification and r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209640 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update on Solution #40. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209106r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208397 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3 Conclusion Update to resolve editor s notes. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209681 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this to S2-2208856 Thomas (Nokia) agrees to merge this PCR to S2-2208856 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208708 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update the conclusion for KI#3. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209681 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this to S2-2208856 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208856 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3 conclusions update. | CATT | Rel-18 | CC#4: r10 + existing Editor's note agreed. Revised to S2-2209681, merging S2-2208397, S2-2208708 and S2-2209105 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for conclusion. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Zhang (Ericsson) provide comments Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r02. Jungshin (Samsung) provides comments on r02. Vivian(vivo) provides comments and r03. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r04 Vivian(vivo) provides comment and is fine with r04 Jungshin (Samsung) can accept r03 but cannot agree to r04. Xiaoyan (CATT) replies to Jungshin (Samsung). Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r05. Jungshin (Samsung) provides r06. Vivian(vivo) replies to Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) and provides r07 based on r06. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) objects r07. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) proposes the comments on r07. Vivian (vivo) replies to Juan(Qualcomm) and Malla (NTT DOCOMO)'s comment Thomas(Nokia) provides r08 Xiaoyan (CATT) objects to r08. Thomas (Nokia) Provides r09. Objects against r06 Zhang (Ericsson) provides r10 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) objects to r10, and can accept r08 and r09. Vivian (vivo) can accept r08 and r09, and suggests to go with r09. Wang Yuan (Huawei) support r10 and cannot agree with r09 and the comments from Jungshin (Samsung). Zhang (Ericsson) can only accept r10, object all other revision Vivian(vivo) can live with current r10, but still suggests to add r10 with an EN: whether other NF can also be the central NF is FFS. Aihua(CMCC) agrees with the suggestion from Vivian, going with r10 with newly added EN. Wang Yuan (Huawei) is OK with the suggestion from Vivian (Vivo), i.e., r10 with newly added EN to make progress. Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with EN added on top of r10 'EN: whether other NF can also be the central NF is FFS.' Thomas (Nokia) accepts r10 + 'EN: whether other NF can also be the central NF is FFS.' Thomas(Nokia) objects against r02 to r07 ==== Final Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) propose to add an additional EN on top of r10. 'EN: Whether other NF can also be the central NF is FFS. Whether an NWDAF can be used to forward collected data to another PLMN is FFS. Jungshin (Samsung) replies to Yuan (Huawei). Wang Yuan (Huawei) thanks for the clarification and is OK with the way forward. Jungshin (Samsung) objects to r10 +'EN: whether other NF can also be the central NF is FFS.', without additional note: Whether an NWDAF can be used to forward collected data to another PLMN is FFS. Xiaobo(vivo) can understood Jungshin (Samsung) and is ok to add additional part if it is allowed by chair in CC#4 but would kindly request Jungshin (Samsung) to indicate its objection in time before final comments deadline. | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209681 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3 conclusions update. | CATT, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208856r10 + existing Editor's note, merging S2-2208397, S2-2208708 and S2-2209105. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2209104 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update on evaluation of KI#3. | Samsung | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209642. | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for evaluation. Thomas (Nokia) comments that PCR assumes that changes in S2-2209106 are agreed Jungshin (Samsung) provides clarification and r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209642 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update on evaluation of KI#3. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209104r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #4: How to Enhance Data collection and Storage | - | - | Docs:=35 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208882 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4 Update to Sol#64 and evaluation and conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209643. | Aihua (CMCC) provides r01 and comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209643 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4 Update to Sol#64 and evaluation and conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208882r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208238 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4: Update to conclusion and solving EN. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209644. | Zhang (Ericsson) provides r01 by merging text from S2-2208707 Fabio (Nokia) provides comments and suggests including an EN about security. Aihua (CMCC) provides r02 Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provides r03 Megha(Intel) provides comments Aihua (CMCC) provides r04 Fabio (Nokia) provides comments to r04. Wang Yuan (Huawei) objects to r03 and r04 for MTLF directly sending ML model to ADRF. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Wang Yuan (Huawei). Zhang (Ericsson) provides r05 Aihua (CMCC) provides r06 Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r06 Zhang (Ericsson) objects r05 and r06 Wang Yuan (Huawei) replies to Malla (DOCOMO) Aihua(CMCC) suggests making a partial conclusion in this meeting and provides r07. Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r07 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wang Yuan (Huawei) is also OK with r07 Malla (NTT DOCOMO) previous objections to r05 and r06 is from NTT DOCOMO, not Ericsson. I forgot to update the name and affiliation, my apologies mainly to Zhang (Ericsson). Malla (NTT DOCOMO) replies to Wang Yuan (Huawei) and can live with r07. Megha (Intel) is ok with r07. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209644 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4: Update to conclusion and solving EN. | Ericsson, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208238r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208870 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4 Update the Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | CC#4: r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209974. Approve r05 + changes? | Aihua (CMCC) provides r02 as baseline for evaluation. Aihua (CMCC) provides r01 and comments Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to select this as baseline for evaluation and merge its conclusion part into S2-2209061 Fabio (Nokia) provides comments to Aihua and r03. Zhang (Ericsson) object r00, r01, r02, r03, provides r04 Aihua (CMCC) provides clarification to Zhang (Ericsson) Fabio (Nokia) objects to r04 and replies to comments from Zhang (Ericsson). Zhang (Ericsson) response to Aihua (CMCC) and Fabio (Nokia) Aihua (CMCC) clarify to Zhang (Ericsson) Aihua (CMCC) replies to Zhang (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Fabio (Nokia) provides further arguments to support that text should be removed. | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209974 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4 Update the Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208870r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2209061 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4: Evaluation and Conclusion for DCCF / MFAF relocation. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Noted | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes this paper mainly focuses on conclusion for DCCF / MFAF relocation. Zhang (Ericsson) provides r01 Aihua (CMCC) provides r02. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Aihua (CMCC) and object r02 Aihua (CMCC) clarify to Zhang (Ericsson) and provides r03 Zhang (Ericsson) provides r04 Fabio (Nokia) prefers r03 and objects to r04. Comments are also provided. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Fabio (Nokia) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Zhang (Ericsson) can accept r01 and r04, object all the other versions Aihua(CMCC) can't accept r01, prefer r03 and can live with r04. Fabio (Nokia) suggests to replace the following sentence from r04 'For data consumer or central DCCF reselecting target DCCF , Solution 44 and 66 is the baseline for normative work' with 'When a DCCF is no longer able to serve a data consumer, procedures for DCCF re-selection and DCCF re-location are supported.' Zhang (Ericsson) cannot accept what Nokia propose ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.23 | S2-2209062 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4: Evaluation and Conclusion for ADRF/NWDAF data management. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209645. | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes this paper mainly focuses conclusion on ADRF/NWDAF data management and its evaluation part merged into S2-2208870. Fabio (Nokia) provides r01 Zhang (Ericsson) object r00 and r01, provide r02 Antoine (Orange) provides r03. Aihua(CMCC) provides r04. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r05 Fabio (Nokia) objects to r05 and provides r06. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r07 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fabio (Nokia) is OK with r07 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209645 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#4: Evaluation and Conclusion for ADRF/NWDAF data management. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209062r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #5: Enhance trained ML Model sharing | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208235 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#5, Sol#47: Clarify the relationship between Interoperability token and container. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208239 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#5: Update conclusion and solving EN. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209646. | Vivian (vivo) provides comments and suggests to add Interoperability token into conclusion. Megha (Intel) provides comments/questions Wang Yuan (Huawei) raises concerns on 'Representative Ratio' part Malla (NTT DOCOMO) asks for clarification Zhang (Ericsson) provide comment Megha(Intel) provides further comments and raises concern on Representative Ratio parameter Wang Yuan (Huawei) shares the same concerns with Megha (Intel) on the Representative Ratio parameter and suggest to remove it from the conclusion of KI#5 Zhang (Ericsson) response to Yuan (Huawei) and Megha (Intel) Megha(Intel) responds to Zhang (Ericsson) and provides r02. Vivian (vivo) provides r03 based on r02, adding Interoperability token into conclusion. Soohwan (ETRI) provides r04 to align with KI#8 discussion. Wang Yuan (Huawei) provides comment on adding interoperability token into conclusion in r03 and r04 and question what will be the normative work for this interoperability token. Zhang (Ericsson) response to Yuan (Huawei) and Megha (Intel) and provide r05 Fabio (Nokia) asks a question to Zhang (Ericsson) for clarification Zhang (Ericsson) response to Fabio (Nokia) Fabio (Nokia) provides further comments to Zhang (Ericsson). Wang Yuan (Huawei) objects r05 since the texts captured in the conclusion doesn't reflect what has been clarified for interoperability token. Wang Yuan (Huawei) objects previous version as they didn't solve the concern regarding to interoperability token and provide r06. Megha(Intel) provides r07 and comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Megha(Intel) is ok with r02 and r07 only, objects to all other revisions. Wang Yuan (Huawei) is OK with r07. Vivian (vivo) is OK with r06 and r07. Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r07 Fabio (Nokia) is OK with r07. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209646 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#5: Update conclusion and solving EN. | Ericsson, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208239r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key issue #6: NWDAF-assisted URSP | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208641 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#6, Update Solution#16: NWDAF supports to provide combination of RSCs performance. | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209647. | Huazhang (vivo) reply to Thomas(Nokia) Thomas (Nokia) raises questions Wang Yuan (Huawei) shares the same concerns with Thomas (Nokia) and still confused for the explanations. Jihoon (ETRI) asks questions. Thomas(Nokia) replies to Huazhang Belen (Ericsson) provides comments. Huazhang (vivo) reply to Jihoon (ETRI) Huazhang (vivo) reply to Wang Yuan (Huawei) Huazhang (vivo) reply to Thomas (Nokia) Huazhang (vivo) provide r01 to reply the comments Jihoon (ETRI) provides r02 with some comments. Thomas (Nokia) replies to Huazhang Huazhang (vivo) thanks Thomas's guidance Huazhang (vivo) provides r03 based on r02 to reflect Thomas's suggestion, and thanks to Jihoon's revision and support Belen (Ericsson) provides comments to r03, still asks how it is proposed to enhanced the NWDAF subscribe or request. Huazhang (vivo) reply to Belen Huazhang (vivo) provides r04 based on r03 to state clearly that what is new in the input. Including SSC mode, PDU session type ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209647 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#6, Update Solution#16: NWDAF supports to provide combination of RSCs performance. | Vivo, China Telecom, ETRI | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208641r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=7 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208246 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#6: Update to conclusion Solving EN. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Abbas (Futurewei) provides r02 Belen (Ericsson) provides r03 Abbas (Futurewei) disagrees r03 Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Abbas (Futurewei) replies Belen (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Belen (Ericsson) objects to r02, can only accept r03. Abbas (Futurewei) objects to r03, can only accept r02 or r03 with the addition that the parameters from enhanced 'Redundant Transmission Experience' are included. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 9.23 | S2-2208404 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#6 Conclusion Updates to reduce network load. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | S2-2208640 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update evaluation and conclusion of KI#6. | Vivo, China Telecom | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209648. | Thomas (Nokia) comments that this PCR relies S2-2208641 being agreed. Belen (Ericsson) provides comments Huazhang (vivo) reply to Belen Huazhang (vivo) provides r01 to reflect the concerns Jihoon (ETRI) provides r02 with some comments. Huazhang (vivo) provides r03 based on r02, and thanks for Jihoon's support Huazhang (vivo) provides R04 based on R03 to reflect what is the enhancement in input of analytic request ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209648 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update evaluation and conclusion of KI#6. | Vivo, China Telecom, ETRI | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208640r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208699 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update evaluation and conclusions for KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted. CC#4: r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209982. | Huazhang (vivo) have comments Thomas (Nokia) raises concerns Yang (OPPO) comments and check if any new UE impact is there Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Belen (Ericsson) provides comments, has concerns on this contribution. Susan (Huawei) replies and provides r01. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments on r01. Belen (Ericsson) still has concerns with r01 Susan (Huawei) replies to Juan (Qualcomm) and Belen (Ericsson), and provides r02. Thomas(Nokia) comments that his concerns about new procedures for redundant transmission being out of scope have not been resolved in any revision ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Susan (Huawei) replies to Thomas (Nokia), and provides r03, and asks for CC#3 decision. Thomas (Nokia) also has concerns with late r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== Susan (Huawei) replies to Thomas (Nokia) and provides r04. | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209982 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update evaluation and conclusions for KI#6. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208699r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2209203 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#6, evaluation and conclusions update | Futurewei | Rel-18 | LATE DOC: Rx 10/03 14:30. Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #7: Enhancements on QoS Sustainability analytics | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208697 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Clarifications on Solution #19 Alt#2. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208696 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Clarification on Evaluation and Conclusions for KI#7. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209649. | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208696 as baseline for evaluation. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209649 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Clarification on Evaluation and Conclusions for KI#7. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208696r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208883 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#7 Update to Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209650. | Aihua (CMCC) provides r01 as the baseline for conclusion. Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208883 as baseline for conclusion. Lei (Tencent) provides comments and also r02 . Fabio (Nokia) provides some comments Susan (Huawei) replies and provides r03. Lei(Tencent) provides some comments and correct the name within macro. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209650 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#7 Update to Conclusion. | China Mobile, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208883r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #8: Supporting Federated Learning in 5GC | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208231 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8, Sol#24: Update: Horizontal Federated Learning among Multiple NWDAFs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | S2-2208817 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #8, Sol #24: Update to add the Service Area as one parameter. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=8 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208242 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8: Update: Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson, Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209651. | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge conclusion part into S2-2208797. Zhang (Ericsson) provide r01 based on rapporteur suggestion ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209651 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8: Update: Evaluation and Conclusions. | Ericsson, Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208242r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208625 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8, conclusion Update . | Vivo Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208797 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge into S2-2208797. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Vivian(vivo) agrees to merge this paper into S2-2208797. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208642 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8, Conclusion update. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208797 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge into S2-2208797. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hyesung (Samsung) confirms to merge this into S2-2208797. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208698 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8: Update Evaluation and Conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209652. | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge conclusion part into S2-2208797. Zhang (Ericsson) provides comment Susan (Huawei) replies to Zhang (Ericsson). Yang (OPPO) provides r01 and think the situation in Sol#69 is just one use case Zhang (Ericsson) object r01 and provide r02, since the paper is only focus on evaluation as suggested by rapporteur Susan (Huawei) replies to Yang (OPPO) and Zhang (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209652 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8: Update Evaluation and Conclusions. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208698r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208797 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8 Update to conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | CC#4: r09 agreed. Revised to S2-2209975. Approve r08 + changes? | Aihua (CMCC) provides r01. Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208797 as baseline for conclusion. Yang (OPPO) comments to r01 Dimitris (Lenovo) comments Vivian (vivo) provides comments and r02 Megha(Intel) provides r03 and comments Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments to r03 Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r04 Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments. Dimitris (Lenovo) requests more clarifications Aihua(CMCC) provides r05. Vivian (vivo) replies to Dimitris (Lenovo) and Juan(Qualcomm)'s question Yang (OPPO) suggest to clarify the principle#8 or reword the sentence Fabio (Nokia) provides comments. Zhang (Ericsson) provides r06 Hyesung (Samsung) provides clarification Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r07 Susan (Huawei) replies and provides r08. Zhang (Ericsson) ask for clarification Susan (Huawei) replies to Zhang (Ericsson) and Dimitris (Lenovo). Zhang (Ericsson) response to Susan (Huawei) Susan (Huawei) replies to Zhang (Ericsson). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Susan (Huawei) replies Zhang (Ericsson). Dimitris (Lenovo) prefers r07. R08 can be accepted with a few modifications Susan (Huawei) provides r09. Susan (Huawei) asks for CC#2 discussion on r09. Aihua(CMCC) is fine with r09. Dimitris (Lenovo) is ok with the proposed changes on top of r08 Zhang (Ericsson) is OK with r09 Vivian(vivo) is OK with r09 and confirms to be as a co-author Hyesung (Samsung) is fine with r09 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209975 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8 Update to conclusion. | China Mobile, Huawei, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208797r09. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #9: Enhancement of NWDAF with finer granularity of location information | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208310 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 Solution #59 updates to address editor s notes. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | S2-2208761 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9: Solution 58 update addressing ENs. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.23 | S2-2208930 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9, Sol #57: Update to resolve the EN related to the area defined with the finer granularity. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209653. | Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Amy (vivo) agrees with r01 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209653 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9, Sol #57: Update to resolve the EN related to the area defined with the finer granularity. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208930r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208342 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 Location Accuracy Enhancements & Evaluation/Conclusion . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209654, merging S2-2208857 and S2-2208928 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208342 as baseline for evaluation. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Xiao (Toyota) answers the questions for Solution #26 in this contribution. Amy (vivo) provides r02, merges the S2-2208928 evaluation into 8342r02 Antoine (Orange) asks why Sol #26 and #70 are classified under Aspect 2 rather than Aspect 1. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r03 with clarifications for Sol#58 Xiao (Toyota) comments on r02. (No questions for the part added in r03) Thomas(Nokia) questions whether 'aspects' added in r02 are helpful. Amy (vivo) provides r04 and replies to Thomas, Antoine Xiao (Toyota) provides r05 Thomas (Nokia) provides r06 Amy (vivo) replies to Thomas (Nokia) Xiao (Toyota) is fine with r06. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209654 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 Location Accuracy Enhancements Evaluation. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208342r06, merging S2-2208857 and S2-2208928. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208653 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 Conclusion . | Samsung, Orange | Rel-18 | r07 agreed. Revised to S2-2209655. | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208653 as baseline for Conclusion and focus on use cases.. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Xiao (Toyota) provides r02 Dimitris (Lenovo) comments Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments to r01 and r02 Thomas (Nokia) prides r03 replies to Zhang (Ericsson) Xiao (Toyota) is fine with r03 David (Samsung) is OK with r03 Amy (vivo) provides r05, to make this consistent with 8929 Thomas(Nokia) questions a change in r06 Zhang (Ericsson) provides comment to r06 Aoken (Rakuten Mobile) provides r06 David (Samsung) replies to Lenovo Amy (vivo) provides r06, and answers to Thomas, Zhang Amy (vivo) provides r07, to correct the name and copy the answers to Thomas and Zhang ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209655 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 Conclusion . | Samsung, Orange, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208653r07. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208857 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 Evaluation. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209654 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge into S2-2208342. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208858 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#9 conclusions. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209685 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge into S2-2208929. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208928 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #9, Evaluation for KI#9 | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209654 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge into S2-2208342. Amy (vivo) merges 8928 into 8342 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208927 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on possibility of providing per UE speed and orientation on FS_eNA_Ph3 | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209656. | David (Samsung) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209656 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on possibility of providing per UE speed and orientation on FS_eNA_Ph3 | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208927r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208929 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #9, Conclusion for KI#9. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209685, merging S2-2208858 | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208929 as baseline for conclusion and focus on general principles. Thomas (Nokia) provides r01 Amy (vivo) provides r02, a merged version based on rapporteur proposal Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r03 suggesting additional conclusion text Malla (NTT DOCOMO) asks for clarification Xiao (Toyota) provides r04. Amy (vivo) provides r05, and answers to Xiao, Malla and Thomas David (Samsung) provides r06 Amy (vivo) provides r07 Thomas(Nokia) provides r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Amy (vivo) agrees with r08 Antoine (Orange) proposes to approve r08 with replacement of 'Analytics Filter Information' and ' analytics filter' by 'Analytics Reporting Information'. Amy (vivo) proposes to agree with r08 with adding a NOTE to capture what Antoine means. Thomas (Nokia) can agree r08 + NOTE: Where to include the preferred granularity of location information, e.g. 'Analytics Filter Information' or 'Analytics Reporting Information', is to be determined in the normative phase. Antoine (Orange) also agrees to r08 + this Note. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209685 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI #9, Conclusion for KI#9. | Vivo, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai-Bell, Samsung, Orange, CATT, Toyota, NTT DOCOMO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208929r08, merging S2-2208858. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Key Issue #10: how NWDAF requests analytics from MDAS/MDAF | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Solution updates | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208229 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3, Sol#10: Resolving remaining ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209641. | Thomas (Nokia) raises concerns Wang Yuan (Huawei) shares the same concerns with Thomas (Nokia) and don't think a standalone NF is needed. Malla (NTT DOCOMO) agrees with Huawei and Nokia. Jinsook (DISH) seeks for clarification Jungshin (Samsung): We have the similar view as other companies, and do not agree to the proposed changes. Zhang (Ericsson) provide response and surprise on the comments from other companies. Ericsson is just provide its view on its solution, Ericsson does not provide a conclusion or evaluation in this pCR Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided response. Zhang (Ericsson) thanks Malla for the clarification Thomas replies to Zhang Zhang (Ericsson) provide r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jinsook (DISH) anybody can clarify me? ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209641 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3, Sol#10: Resolving remaining ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208229r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208982 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#10: Enhancing solution #74 for supporting NWDAF interaction with MDAF . | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Noted | Belen (Ericsson) prefers that conclusions take relevant parts of solution#73 and #74 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Evaluations and conclusions | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208785 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#10: Evaluation and interim conclusions . | Lenovo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209657. | Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208785 as baseline for evaluation. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r01 as suggested by rapporteur ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209657 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#10: Evaluation and interim conclusions . | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208785r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208884 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#10 Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209658. | Aihua (CMCC) provides r01 as the baseline for conclusion. Aihua(CMCC) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to use S2-2208884 as baseline for Conclusion. Dimitris (Lenovo) provides r02 Wang Yuan (Huawei) raises concerns on r02. Belen (Ericsson) provides r03, has concerns with previous revisions. Dimitris (Lenovo) comments Aihua (CMCC) provides r04. Wang Yuan (Huawei) thanks Aihua (CMCC) for providing r04 and would like co-sign r04. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.23 | S2-2209658 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#10 Evaluation and Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208884r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.23 | - | - | - | Documents exceeding TU Budget | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.23 | S2-2208706 | DISCUSSION | Discussion | Discussion on the information exchange architecture between two PLMNs | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.23 | S2-2209063 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#8: Updates to Evaluation and Conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Not Handled | Zhang (Ericsson) ask if the paper is merged into S2-2208797 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.23 | S2-2208624 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#3, conclusion Update . | Vivo | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.23 | S2-2209105 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update on Conclusion for KI#3. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209681 | Xiaobo (vivo) on behalf of rapporteur proposes to merge this to S2-2208856 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.23 | S2-2208707 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: Update the conclusion for KI#4. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Not Handled | Zhang (Ericsson) indicate the paper is merged into S2-2208238 Wang Yuan (Huawei) confirms this paper is merged into S2-2208238 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.23 | S2-2208237 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-81: KI#10: Evaluation and Conclusion. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Not Handled | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Not Handled |
| 9.24 | - | - | - | Study on satellite access Phase 2 (FS_5GSAT_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=40 | - | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208284 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1/KI#2: Proposal towards conclusions. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208379 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Preconditions of KI#1 and KI#2 conclusion. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208511 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Update Evaluation & Conclusion. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209659. | Yingying(CATT) provides comments. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Jaewoo (LGE) replies to Yingying(CATT). Jaewoo (LGE) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm). Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details Jean Yves (Thales) comments Jaewoo (LGE) responds to Jean Yves (Thales) and provides r01. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments and an r02 Jean-Yves (Thales) comments Jaewoo (LGE) responds to Stephen (Qualcomm) and provides comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r02 but not other versions ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209659 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Update Evaluation & Conclusion. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208511r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208531 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1 Sol#23 Update to apply Coverage Information Provisioning. | Rakuten Mobile | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.24 | S2-2208537 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1, KI#2: Evaluation. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209660, merging S2-2208876 | Jean-Yves (Thales) comments Stephen (Qualcomm) replies to Jean-Yves (Thales) Jean-Yves (Thales) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm) Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments and an r01 DongYeon (Samsung) provides r02, and both of the latest version of 8668 and 8537 can go into the TR. Jean-Yves (Thales) comments. Jean-Yves (Thales) provides r03. Jaewoo (LGE) provides r04. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r04 (as well as other versions) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209660 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1, KI#2: Evaluation. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208537r04, merging S2-2208876. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208540 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1, KI#2: Conclusions. | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Yingying(CATT) provides comments. Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) agrees the merger into S2-2208784 proposed by the rapporteur ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208668 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation Update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209682, merging S2-2208848 | Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments and an r01 Yuxin (Xiaomi) replies to Steve(Huawei) Yingying(CATT) provides r02. Lalith(Samsung) provides r03. Amy (vivo) provides r04. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree r04 (and r01, r02, r03) but not r00 Jean-Yves (Thales) cannot agree any revision until the question of §7.4.2 is solved (see mail on 9026 thread) Steve (Huawei) is ok with r04 and 'With changes removed from this pCR for clauses 7.4.2 and 7.5.3 (i.e. no changes in 7.4.2 and 7.5.3 compared to the TR in this pCR).' Jean Yves (Thales) is ok with r04 with below explanations (clause 7.4.2 in TR will come from 9026r02) Yingying(CATT) agrees with r02, r03 and r04. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209682 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation Update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208668r04, merging S2-2208848. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208669 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Steve (Huawei) comments Stephen (Qualcomm) replies to Steve (Huawei) Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok to MERGE to 8784. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208677 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Update Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#1 and KI#2. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209661. | Jean-Yves (Thales) As per discussed way forward, proposes to merge this document into S2-2209184 Ellen (Google) agree to merged the second change (conclusion part) into S2-2209184 and propose to handle the first change (evaluation) in this 8677 Steve (Huawei) thinks we should consider the evaluation part merged to 8847? Ellen (Google) clarify: 8847 and 8677r01 cover different aspects in Solution#13. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209661 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Update Evaluation and Conclusion for KI#1 and KI#2. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208677r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208740 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation update for coverage information provisioning to core network. | Thales | Rel-18 | Noted | Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.24 | S2-2208754 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Clarification on UE initiated Power Saving Mechanisms for Solution#21. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209662. | Steve (Huawei) comments Ellen (Google) feedbacks Steve (Huawei) comments Yuxin(Xiaomi) comments Stefan (Ericsson) comments Jean-Yves (Thales) comments Ellen (Google) thanks for the good comments and propose a way forward Ellen (Google) provided r01 to capture comments from companies ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209662 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Clarification on UE initiated Power Saving Mechanisms for Solution#21. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208754r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208784 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusions proposal for TR23.700-28. | Thales | Rel-18 | CC#4: r22 agreed. Revised at CC#4 to S2-2209962. | Jean-Yves (Thales) (rapporteur) provides a revision capturing a synthesis of Tdocs for conclusions and proposes it as single document to elaborate further conclusion on R1, R2, R5, R6 Steve (Huawei) comments Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Yingying(CATT) provides comments. Jean-Yves (Thales) answers Stephen and clarifies the rapporteur proposal (if necessary) Lalith (Samsung) provides r02 Yuxin (Xiaomi) replies to Lalith (Samsung) that r02 may have something wrong and cannot be opened Jean-Yves (Thales) comment that r02 has word issue, and answer Yingying questions Lalith (Samsung) provides r03 Yuxin (Xiaomi) provides r04 Stefan (Ericsson) provides r05 Lalith (Samsung) provides r06 Jaewoo (LGE) provides r07. Hannu (Nokia) provides r08. Steve (Huawei) comments and provides r10. Steve (Huawei) provided r09, but there was a zipping error so please ignore it. Ellen (Google) provides r011. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r12 Jaewoo (LGE) replies to Ellen (Google) and provides comment. Yingying(CATT) provides r13. Amy (vivo) provides r14, adds info on paging enhancement DongYeon (Samsung) comments: The EN regarding LS sending to CT1 regarding UP/CP based solution needs to be align with the result of S2-2209197. Stefan (Ericsson) provides questions Yuxin (Xiaomi) provides r15 to recover clause 8.3 Jaewoo (LGE) responds to Stefan (Ericsson). Amy (vivo) provides r16 Lalith(Samsung) comments. Steve (Huawei) provides r17 Jaewoo (LGE) replies to Lalith (Samsung) for clarification. Jean-Yves (Thales) comments on r17 and provides r18, asks also clarification on one sentence. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r12 and no other revision or version Jean-Yves (Tales) responds to Stephen and requests to clarify a sentence Yingying (CATT) replies to Stephen and can accept r13 and revisions after r13. Steve (Huawei) comments in proposed change. Stefan (Ericsson) comments Steve (Huawei) comments on potential differences Stefan (Ericsson) provides on potential differences Hannu (Nokia) supports the latest version in r18. Steve (Huawei) confirms it was about the bullet about RAN broadcasts Amy (vivo) supports the latest version in r18. Steve (Huawei) proposed to agree r18 the following change: The bullet 'Following Rel-17, the UE has UE unreachability information from RAN broadcasts.' Is changed to 'Following Rel-17, the UE has satellite assistance information for predication of discontinuous coverage from RAN broadcasts.' Jean-Yves (Thales) cannot accepted r18 as is ==== Final Deadline ==== Yingying(CATT) agrees with the proposal. Steve (Huawei) comments, suggested bullet rewording, and only 3rd bullet for UE needs to change. Lockheed Martin would like to co-sign. Thanks & KR Prasad Chandratre (LMCO) | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209962 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusions proposal for TR23.700-28. | Thales, Huawei, Samsung, Lockheed Martin, Xiaomi, CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208784r22. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208841 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1, Evaluation and conclusions for KI#1 R3 RAT/PLMN selection. | Spreadtrum Communications | Rel-18 | Merge into S2-2209184 (Noted at CC#4). Noted | Jean-Yves (Thales) As per discussed way forward, proposes to merge this document into S2-2209184 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.24 | S2-2208847 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1: Evaluation of solutions. | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209663, merging S2-2208874 and S2-2209185 | Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Yuxin (Xiaomi) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jean-Yves (Thales) is OK with r01 Yingying(CATT) agrees with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209663 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1: Evaluation of solutions for alternative RAT/PLMN selection. | CATT, Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208847r01, merging S2-2208874 and S2-2209185. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208848 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#2: Evaluation of solutions. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209682 | Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Yingying(CATT) agrees to merge into S2-2208668 as a proposal. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208849 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1, Conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Steve (Huawei) Ignore the suggestion to merge from me, it should be merged to 8784. Yingying(CATT) agrees to merge this T-doc into S2-2208784. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208850 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#2, Conclusion. | CATT | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details Yingying(CATT) agrees to merge this T-doc into S2-2208784. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208874 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1 solution evaluation. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209663 | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Yuxin(Xiaomi) provides r01 Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Yuxin (Xiaomi) comments this p-CR is merged into S2-2208847 as per proposed ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208875 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1 solution conclusion . | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merge into S2-2209184 (Noted at CC#4). Noted | Jean-Yves (Thales) As per discussed way forward, proposes to merge this document into S2-2209184 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.24 | S2-2208876 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1&KI#2: Evaluation of satellite coverage information provision. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209660 | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) proposes to merge this into S2-2208537 Yuxin (Xiaomi) is fine to merge this into S2-2208537 Yuxin(Xiaomi) informs this p-CR has been merged into S2-2208537 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208877 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI#1&KI#2: Conclusion on satellite coverage information provision. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208931 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusion of Key Issue #1 Paging enhancement aspect. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208932 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusion of Key Issue #2. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208784 | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2208933 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation of signalling overload on target RAT/PLMN. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209664. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Amy (vivo) provides r02 Amy (vivo) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r03 Jean-Yves (Thales) can agree the r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209664 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation of signalling overload on target RAT/PLMN. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208933r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2208934 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusion of Key Issue #1 signalling overload aspect. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r14 agreed. Revised to S2-2209665. | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Jean-Yves (Thales) As per discussed way forward, proposes this document to continue further discussions on R4 (signalling overload), including some parts of S2-2209184 (second part) Amy (vivo) provides merged version for discussion on signalling overload Amy (vivo) answers Stephen (Qualcomm) and copy paste Stephen's comments to avoid branching Steve (Huawei) comments, provides r02 Lalith(Samsung) provides r03 Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r04 Amy (vivo) comments on r02, and provides r05 Lalith(Samsung) provides r06 Amy (vivo) replies to Lalith Lalith(Samsung) replise Stefan (Ericsson) comments and provides r07 Steve (Huawei) comments, provides r08 Lalith(Samsung) provides r09 Amy (vivo) asks who provides r09, replies to Steve and Lalith, and provides r10. Lalith(Samsung) provides r11. Steve (Huawei) comments on setting the timer. Lalith(Samsung) provides r12 Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Lalith and provides r13 Lalith(Samsung) is OK with r13 Amy (vivo) is OK with r13 Steve (Huawei) comments on calculation Amy (vivo) provide r14 to capture the calculation in case people like this info ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r14 Steve (Huawei) is ok with r14 Jean-Yves (Thales) is ok with r14 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209665 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Conclusion of Key Issue #1 signalling overload aspect. | Vivo, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208934r14. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2209026 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation and Conclusion Update on Coverage Information Provisioning. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209683. | Jean-Yves (Thales) proposes to note the document as merged with 8784, like all conclusion based documents for R1,R2,R5,R6 and refers to 8784 for details SangMin (Google) replied to Jean-Yves, and provided r01. Jean-Yves (Thales) replied to SangMin Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) can agree the r02 but not other versions Jean-Yves (Thales) notices that r02 (and other revs) proposes different evaluation texts than S2-2208668 (r04 latest) and proposes this S2-2209026 as reference for §7.4.2 Steve (Huawei) is ok with r02 Jean-Yves (Thales) is ok with r02 SangMin (Google) is okay with r02 DongYeon (Samsung) is conditionally okay with r02 when adding 'Solution #22 proposes authentication procedure performed by external server to ensure that only the allwed UE receives the coverage data.' next to 'These solutions with communicating external server may have potential issues in terms of privacy and security.' ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209683 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Evaluation and Conclusion Update on Coverage Information Provisioning. | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209026r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.24 | S2-2209184 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI #1, conclusions. | Samsung | Rel-18 | CC#4: Noted | Lalith(Samsung) provides r01 Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments Lalith(Samsung) comments Yuxin(Xiaomi) comments and provides r02 merging 8841, 8875 and 8677 following rapporteur's proposal Lufeng(Spreadtrum) comments and share the view that more information are valuable when deciding RAT/PLMN selection. Hannu (Nokia) clarifies his comment and r03 that PLMN selection stage 1 is owned by SA1 and stage 2 is owned by CT1, so SA2 cannot change those without the requirements from SA1 and architecture work by CT1. Hannu (Nokia) agrees that the UE can change RAT or PLMN due to lack of coverage but proposes to re-use the existing procedures in r03. Ellen (Google) provides r04 on top of r03 provided by Hannu (Nokia) Steve (Huawei) provides r05 Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments and cannot agree with any of the versions Lalith(Samsung) replies to Stephen (Qualcomm) Yuxin(Xiaomi) comments and provides r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) cannot agree the r06 or other versions Hannu (Nokia) believes the CR can be noted. Jean-Yves (Thales) comments Stephen (Qualcomm) provides more comments ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.24 | S2-2209185 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: KI #1, Evaluations. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209663 | Steve (Huawei) comments on how to merge - see first email on 8668 Lalith(Samsung) is OK to mark merged into 8847. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.24 | S2-2209197 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Satellite coverage data transfer to a UE using UP versus CP | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209684. | Lalith (Samsung) comments. Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Hannu (Nokia) provides r01. Stephen (Qualcomm) provides comments DongYeon (Samsung) comments. Jean-Yves (Thales) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Stephen (Qualcomm) prefers r01 but can accept r02 Jean-Yves (Thales) is ok for r02 DongYeon (Samsung) supports r02, and agree to maintain the EN discussed in 8784. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.24 | S2-2209684 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on Satellite coverage data transfer to a UE using UP versus CP | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209197r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.25.1 | - | - | - | Study on UPF enhancement for Exposure And SBA (FS_UPEAS) | - | - | Docs:=23 | - | |
| 9.25.1 | - | - | - | KI#1 - solution updates and conclusion updates | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208508 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI #1, Sol #1: Update to add input of UPF registration in NRF. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Fenqin (Huawei): provides comments Yan (China Mobile) comments. Fenqin (Huawei): provides further comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to note this paper. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208219 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to conclusions on KI1. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209928 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8905 as the baseline paper for KI#1 evaluation&conclusion and merge this 8219 into it. Laurent (Nokia): OK to merge as requested by the rapporteur ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208505 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to evaluations and conclusions on KI#1. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209928 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8905 as the baseline paper for KI#1 evaluation&conclusion and merge this 8505 into it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208905 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#1, Further evaluation and conclusion of KI#1. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209928, merging S2-2208219, S2-2208505 and S2-2209161 | Yan (China Mobile) suggests to use this 8905 as the baseline paper to discuss evaluation and conclusion for KI#1. Yan (China Mobile) provides r01 by merging 8505 into it. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r02 Laurent (Nokia): provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yan (China Mobile) suggests to go with r03. Laurent (Nokia): objects to R02 whose text, sorry, looks unclaer to mle Fenqin (Huawei) is fine to go with r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2209928 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#1, Further evaluation and conclusion of KI#1. | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208905r03, merging S2-2208219, S2-2208505 and S2-2209161. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2209161 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI #1: Conclusion Update. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209928 | Laurent (Nokia): has concerns with this tDoc which is not aligned with what we agreed at last meeting Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8905 as the baseline paper for KI#1 evaluation&conclusion and merge this 9161 into it. Kisuk (Samsung) merges it into 8905. Kisuk (Samsung): comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | - | - | - | KI#2 - solution updates and conclusion updates | - | - | Docs:=17 | - | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208222 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to the solution 20 (UE IP address mapping information exposure by UPF) . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | CC#4: r08 received goos support in SoH. R08 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209954. | Yan (China Mobile) suggests to use this 8222 as the baseline paper to discuss solution 20 and then determine the conclusions of exposure of NAT information in 8221 based on this paper. Yan (China Mobile) has concerns on requesting public IP address via the BSF. Fenqin (Huawei) provides comment Magnus H (Ericsson) provides comment Laurent (Nokia): answers Fenqin (Huawei) provides feedback Saso (Intel) comments on the proposed IPFix alternative Jinsook (DISH) Questionable about the IPFix proposal Yan (China Mobile) comments. Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Saso (Intel) replies to Magnus Jinsook (DISH) Asking for a clarification to Magnus Rohit(AT&T) comments. Jinsook (DISH) comments. Jinsook (DISH) comments on the BSF interaction. Jinsook (DISH) sorry, clarifying my previous comment. Kisuk (Samsung) comments. Yan (China Mobile) provides r01. Laurent (Nokia): provides r02 Magnus H (Ericsson) dislikes any solution where BSF is in charge of finding the NATed address Magnus H (Ericsson) comments and point to DP 8273 Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r03. Jinsook (DISH) provides r04. Fenqin (Huawei) provides r05. Laurent (Nokia): provides r06,objects to R03 and R05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jinsook (DISH): comments and objects to R03 and R05 Kisuk (Samsung): is ok with R04 but objects to R03 and R05 Rohit (AT&T) provides comments Rohit(AT&T) is ok with r04 only if it is explicitly mentioned in the conclusion that it is an optional feature. Yan (China Mobile) is ok with r04 and r06 and objects r03 and r05. Magnus H (Ericsson) can only accept r03, r05 and r06 and objects to all other revisions. Yan (China Mobile) objects r06 and can only accept r04. Fenqin (Huawei) prefer r05, r03 and live with r06. Object other version. Jinsook (DISH) can we go with r04? Magnus H (Ericsson) comments and sustains the objection, and clarifies that we are not suggesting to remove solution 20. In r06 it should be clear that only second change should be left in the pCR, rest removed. Laurent (Nokia): I object to R03 and R05 ; I am asking a Show of hand on this topic whether to accept R04 ==== Final Deadline ==== Yan (China Mobile) supports to bring it to CC#3 whether to accept r04. | Revised |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2209954 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to the solution 20 (UE IP address mapping information exposure by UPF) . | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, DISH Network | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208222r08 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208635 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2, Sol #9: Update to clarify how to NWDAF obtain DNAI according to application server IP address/FQDN. | Vivo, ETRI, KDDI | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208220 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to conclusions on KI2: usage of SBA versus usage PFCP for SMF 3rd party subscription onto UPF. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Deutsche Telekom, DISH Network | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209929 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this paper to 8271 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): agree to merge in 8271, sorry I forgot to mention | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208221 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to conclusions on KI2 except for usage of SBA versus usage PFCP for SMF 3rd party subscription onto UPF. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | CC#3: r14 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209942. | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Huazhang (vivo) reply to Laurent (Nokia) on revision 1 Fenqin (Huawei): provides comments Huazhang (vivo) provides r02 Zhiwei (China Telecom) replies to Laurent (Nokia) and provides r03 Fenqin (Huawei): provides r04 Hyunsook (LGE) provides a comment on r04. Yan (China Mobile) provides r05. Josep (DT) includes some editorials + co-sign. Provides r06. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r07 Hyunsook (LGE) provides r08 Yan (China Mobile) provides r09 on top of r08. Fenqin (Huawei) provides r10 Hyunsook (LGE) provides r11 Laurent (Nokia): provides r12 Fenqin (Huawei) ask a question for clarification from Hyunsook Huazhang (vivo) ask question to Laurent, that I find the specification support to discovery of SMF by UE location, it might be the same as the AoI? Because the AoI is just the UE location or area of interest of UE location? Yan (China Mobile) replies to Laurent (Nokia). Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r13 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r14 Hyunsook (LGE) responses to Fenqin. Fenqin (Huawei) replies to Hyunsook(LGE) Yoohwa (ETRI) provides r15. Fenqin (Huawei) is not ok with r15 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yoohwa (ETRI) is fine with r15 not being accepted. Huazhang (vivo) prefers we go with r14. This is the only choice to move forward. Thanks for your hard work. Magnus H (Ericsson) suggests to go with r14 Aihua(CMCC) provides r16 based on r14, with leftover copied from 8885, and request to discuss in CC#2 or #CC3. Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to go with r14. Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version apart R12, R01, R00 I could live with R03, R04, R05,R06,R13 , R14, R15 provided that we add an EN (see below) Huazhang (vivo) ask a question about this ENs, because in eNA, that request for a certain application's analytic is defined in 6.4.4 of TS 23.288, so DNN and S-NSSAI can be optional, not madatory. Fenqin (Huawei) ask a question for clarification. ==== Final Deadline ==== Magnus H (Ericsson) disagrees with the proposed EN by Laurent, for the simple reason that the study is not dealing with what consumers to NWDAF use. | Revised |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2209942 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to conclusions on KI2 except for usage of SBA versus usage PFCP for SMF 3rd party subscription onto UPF. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, LG Electronics, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208221r14 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208271 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI #2, conclusion update for removal of ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209929, merging S2-2208220. | Laurent (Nokia): has concerns with this Tdoc for the reasons expressed in 8220 Yan (China Mobile) has concerns on requesting public IP address via the BSF. Yan (China Mobile) recalls the last comments by mistake. Yan (China Mobile) proposes to make an agreement on whether SBI and/or PFCP is used for interaction with UPF for SMF 3rd party subscription onto UPF. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides comment Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Laurent (Nokia): answers Yan (China Mobile) comments. Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Fenqin (Huawei) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yan (China Mobile) suggests to go with r01. Magnus H (Ericsson) supports Yan to go with r01 Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to bring this to CC#2 Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00 Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00 and R02 (replaces me previous mail) ==== Final Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) only accept r02 and suggest to bring this to CC#3 | Revised |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2209929 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI #2, conclusion update for removal of ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208271r01, merging S2-2208220. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208272 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2: Conclusion update and solution 2 correction and evaluation. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209930. | Yoohwa (ETRI) provides r01. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r02. Yoohwa (ETRI) provides r03. Fenqin (Huawei) ask a question for clarification. Yoohwa (ETRI) responds to Fenqin (Huawei). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yoohwa (ETRI) accepts r01 and r03 but objects r00 and r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2209930 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2: Conclusion update and solution 2 correction and evaluation. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208272r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208273 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI #2, Discussion, evaluation, and conclusion regarding exposure of NAT information. | Ericsson, Huawei | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208221 | Yan (China Mobile) suggests to discuss solution 20 under the 8222 thread firstly before merging the conclusion in this 8273 into 8221. Saso (Intel) seeks clarification on IPFix. Jinsook (DISH) Comment & Propose to note this paper Magnus H (Ericsson) comments. Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version of this Tdoc; Let's discuss in 8222 (one single thread as proposed by the rapporteur) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208507 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to evaluations and conclusions on KI#2. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208221 | Laurent (Nokia): Comments/concerns with some part Yan (China Mobile) replies to Laurent (Nokia) and merges this 8507 into 8221. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208519 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: Update to conclusions on KI #2 to resolve ENs. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208221 | Zhiwei (China Telecom) has merged this paper into 8221. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208523 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2: Conclusion update on UPF data reporting. | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208221 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this paper to 8221 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208636 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2 conclusions update. | Vivo, ETRI, KDDI | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208221 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this paper to 8221 Huazhang (vivo) agree to merge, thanks Yan and Fenqin ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208885 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2 Update to Conclusion. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208221 | Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to merge this paper to 8221 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Aihua(CMCC) suggests not to merge and keep it as it was. Fenqin (Huawei) suggest to mark this paper as merge to 8221. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.1 | S2-2208906 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-62: KI#2, Further update Evaluation and conclusion of KI#2. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Laurent (Nokia): has concerns with this Tdoc for the reasons expressed in 8220 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version of this tdoc (technical and to be merged in ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.25.2 | - | - | - | UPF enhancement for Exposure And SBA (UPEAS) | - | - | Docs:=17 | - | |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208527 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3720 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF event exposure service for TSC management | ETRI | Rel-18 | Postponed | Yan (China Mobile) suggests to only discuss TSC management related description in this 8527 and merge other general descriptions to the baseline papers. Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) proposes to remove 'Indication of event notification'. Yoohwa (ETRI) responds to Kefeng Zhang (Qualcomm) Laurent (Nokia): suggests to postpone this paper. we first need to understand the overall service/capability before dealing with extra work for TSC aspects ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yoohwa (ETRI) is fine with postponing this paper. Laurent (Nokia): Thanks Yoohwa ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208528 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3572 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF event exposure service | ETRI | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209932 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8638 as the baseline paper for UPF service update in 23.502 and merge this 8528 into it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yoohwa (ETRI) is okay with merging 8528. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208616 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3723 (Rel-18, 'B'): Update for UPF registration and event exposure related context concluded in FS_UPEAS | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r06 agreed. Revised to S2-2209931, merging S2-2208637 and S2-2209165 | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Yan (China Mobile) suggests to use this 8616 as the baseline paper to discuss UPF service update in 23.501. Yan (China Mobile) provides r02. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r03 Laurent (Nokia): provides r04 Fenqin (Huawei) provides r05 Yoohwa (ETRI) provides r06 and cosign it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209931 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3723R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Update for UPF registration and event exposure related context concluded in FS_UPEAS | China Mobile, Nokia, Nokia shanghai Bell, ETRI | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208616r06, merging S2-2208637 and S2-2209165. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208637 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3724 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF services update in 23.501 according to the conclusion in UPEAS | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209931 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8616 as the baseline paper for UPF service update in 23.501 and merge this 8637 into it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208638 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3576 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF service update in 23.502 according to the conclusion in UPEAS | Vivo | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209932, merging S2-2208528, S2-2208645 and S2-2209164 | Yan (China Mobile) suggests to use this 8638 as the baseline paper to discuss UPF service update in 23.502. Huazhang (vivo) provides r01 to merge 8528, 8645 and 9164 Yan (China Mobile) suggests to update this CR further based on the conclusions in 8221. Fenqin (Huawei) provides r02 Yan (China Mobile) comments. Yoohwa (ETRI) supports the merged version from Vivo. Huazhang (vivo) reply to Yoohwa(ETRI) Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r03 Laurent (Nokia): provides r04 Yoohwa (ETRI) provides r05. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Huazhang (vivo) prefer to go with r05, and can live with r01, r02, r03, r04 Thanks for your support. Yoohwa (ETRI) objects r04, but accepts any version. Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version except R04 and R05 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209932 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3576R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF service update in 23.502 according to the conclusion in UPEAS | Vivo, ETRI, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208638r05, merging S2-2208528, S2-2208645 and S2-2209164. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208639 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0548 (Rel-18, 'B'): NWDAF collects data from UPF via service based procedure. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209933 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8825 as the baseline paper for alignment for UPF service to NWDAF in 23.288 and merge this 8639 into it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208645 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3577 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF registration and event exposure service update based on conclusions in FS_UPEAS | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209932 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8638 as the baseline paper for UPF service update in 23.502 and merge this 8645 into it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to any version for the sake of merging ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208825 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0551 (Rel-18, 'B'): Alignment for UPF event exposure service to NWDAF via the SMF in TS 23.288 | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209933, merging S2-2208639 | Yan (China Mobile) suggests to use this 8825 as the baseline paper to discuss alignment for UPF service to NWDAF in 23.288. Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Laurent (Nokia): provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209933 | CR | Approval | 23.288 CR0551R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Alignment for UPF event exposure service to NWDAF via the SMF in TS 23.288 | China Mobile, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208825r02, merging S2-2208639. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208836 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3583 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF event exposure service to NWDAF via the SMF in TS 23.502 | China Mobile | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209934. | Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Aihua(CMCC) provides r01. Magnus H (Ericsson) provides r02 Huazhang (vivo) ask a question Aihua(CMCC) provides r03. Laurent (Nokia): provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00, R01, R02, R03 in R04 there is a typo to correct in § § 4.15.X.3: change '6' to '5' ==== Final Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00, R01, R02, R03 in R04 there is a typo to correct in § § 4.15.X.3: change '6' to '5' | Revised |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209934 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3583R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): UPF event exposure service to NWDAF via the SMF in TS 23.502 | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208836r04. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2208907 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3737 (Rel-18, 'B'): Introduction of UPEAS | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209935. | Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Yan (China Mobile) suggests to use this 8907 as the baseline paper to discuss new functions provided by UPF and UPF selection in 23.501. Fenqin (Huawei): provides r02 Magnus H (Ericsson) ask for some coherency in our specifications Fenqin (Huawei) provides a response to Magnus ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209935 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3737R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Introduction of UPEAS | Huawei, HiSilicon, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208907r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209164 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3599 (Rel-18, 'B'): Update UPF Event Exposure service | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209932 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8638 as the baseline paper for UPF service update in 23.502 and merge this 9164 into it. Kisuk (Samsung) merges this paper into 8638. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.25.2 | S2-2209165 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3750 (Rel-18, 'B'): Update UPF Event Exposure service | Samsung | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209931 | Yan (China Mobile) proposes to use 8616 as the baseline paper for UPF service update in 23.501 and merge this 9165 into it. Kisuk (Samsung) merges this paper into 8616. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | Study on Proximity-based Services in 5GS Phase 2 (FS_5G_ProSe_Ph2) | - | - | Docs:=66 | - | |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#1 (UE-UE Relay) | - | - | Docs:=20 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208383 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: resolve EN in conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209332 | Yali (OPPO) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208534 Wen (vivo) seeks the same clarification as asked by Zhang (Ericsson) Zhang (Ericsson) ask for clarification Hannu (Nokia) agrees to merge to S2-2208534 and replies to Zhang ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208488 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusions on per-hop link establishment of UE-to-UE Relay. | CATT | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209330. | Wen (vivo) comments Deng Qiang (CATT) replies to Wen (vivo) and provides r01. Steve (Huawei) comments Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r02. Yali (OPPO) comments and provides r03. Zhang (Ericsson) support OPPO view Deng Qiang (CATT) comments on r03. Steve (Huawei) comments and provides r04. Hong (Qualcomm) comments and provides r05. Yali (OPPO) replies to Hong (Qualcomm), comments on r05, provides r06. Wen (vivo) comments. Yali (OPPO) agree with Wen(vivo). Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r07. Steve (Huawei) provides r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Deng Qiang (CATT) is fine with r08. Hong (Qualcomm) accepts r08. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209330 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusions on per-hop link establishment of UE-to-UE Relay. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208488r08. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208489 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusion on Identifiers for UE-to-UE Relay discovery. | CATT | Rel-18 | r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209331, merging S2-2209180 | Wen (vivo) comments Deng Qiang (CATT) replies to Wen (vivo). Jianning (Xiaomi) provide r01 by merging 9180 Jianning (Xiaomi) provides comment Steve (Huawei) comments about the sharing of User Info ID, r01 is not good. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Deng Qiang (CATT) clarifies. Deng Qiang (CATT) replies to Hong (Qualcomm). Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r03, and please ignore r02. Yali (OPPO) provides r04. Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Steve (Huawei) Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Hong (Qualcomm) Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Qiang (CATT) Jianning (Xiaomi) provide r05 on top of r04 Deng Qiang (CATT) responds to Jianning (Xiaomi). Hong (Qualcomm) is fine with r03, and objects r04. Deng Qiang (CATT) replies. Yali (OPPO) comments and provides r06. Hong (Qualcomm) replies. Deng Qiang (CATT) replies and provides r07. Wen (vivo) comments. Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Qiang(CATT), Hong(Qualcomm) and Steve (Huawei) Wen (vivo) replies to Qiang. Yali (OPPO) shares the view from Wen (vivo). Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Wen (vivo) and Yali (OPPO) Steve (Huawei) provides r08 Wen (vivo) replies to Jianning. Jianning (Xiaomi) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Deng Qiang (CATT) is fine with r08. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209331 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusion on Identifiers for UE-to-UE Relay discovery. | CATT | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208489r08, merging S2-2209180. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208534 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusion update. | OPPO | Rel-18 | r11 agreed. Revised to S2-2209332, merging S2-2208383 and S2-2208977 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposed to discuss the resolution of ENs about integrated discovery and relay selection by target UE in this email thread. Yali (OPPO) provides r01 to merge S2-2208383/S2-2208911/S2-2208977. Steve (Huawei) comments Hong (Qualcomm) provides r02. Jungje (Interdigital) provides r03. Deng Qiang (CATT) comments on r03. Zhang (Ericsson) object r03 Yali(OPPO) is fine with r02 and object r03. Jungje(Interdigital) responded Den (CATT) Steve (Huawei) comments, provides r04. Jungje(Interdigital) responded to Zhang(Ericsson). Jungje(Interdigital) comments on r04 and provides r05. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Hong(Qualcomm) Hannu (Nokia) provides r06 Yali(OPPO) provides r07 Jungje(Interdigital) comments Yali(OPPO) Hannu (Nokia) provides r08 to correct the condition for the UE to not respond. Jungje(Interdigital) provides r09. Yali(OPPO) provides r10 based on r09. Steve (Huawei) comments on parts of, provides r11. Yali(OPPO) is fine with r11. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Hannu (Nokia) supports r11. | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209332 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusion update. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208534r11, merging S2-2208383 and S2-2208977. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208909 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Terms update for U2U Relay. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209333. | LaeYoung (LGE) provides comment. Hao (ZTE) comments. Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment Steve (Huawei) comments Zhang (Ericsson) provide comment LaeYoung (LGE) comments. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Steve (Huawei). Jungje(Interdigital) comments Steve (Huawei) changes peer to end and provides r01. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209333 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Terms update for U2U Relay. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208909r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208910 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1 Sol#7 Update: Add new option for L2 U2U Relay. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209334, merging S2-2209031 | Zhang (Ericsson) ask for clarification Jungje(Interdigital) comments and provides r01. Steve (Huawei) provides r02 Jungje(Interdigital) comments and provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungje (Interdigital) accepts only r03. Steve (Huawei) can live with r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209334 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1 Sol#7 Update: Add new option for L2 U2U Relay. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208910r03, merging S2-2209031. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208911 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209335. | Yali (OPPO) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208534 and S2-2209111 Steve (Huawei) provides r01, removing parts merged elsewhere. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209335 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#1: Conclusion update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208911r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208977 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI #1: Conclusion Update . | Interdigital | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209332 | Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments and ask for clarification Yali (OPPO) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208534 Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) Should be merged to 8534 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2209031 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Updates on Solution #7 . | Interdigital | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209334 | Steve (Huawei) comments Jungje(Interdigital) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yali(OPPO) think this paper has been merged into S2-2208910, as Jungje(Interdigital) mentioned in the previous email. Steve (Huawei) has been merged with 9310 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2209109 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Update to EN in conclusions for KI#1: Support of UE-to-UE relay . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209336. | Wen (vivo) comments. Deng Qiang (CATT) asks for clarifications on the 'additional UE-to-UE relay discovery information'. Yali (OPPO) comments and proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208489. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Deng Qiang (CATT). Steve (Huawei) supports r00. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Yali, Jianning, and Wen. Deng Qiang (CATT) further comments. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Deng Qiang. Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r01. Yali(OPPO) replies to Hong (Qualcomm). Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Yali, and DengQiang, and provide r02. Deng Qiang (CATT) is fine with r02. Yali(OPPO) replies to Hong (Qualcomm) and provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok with r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209336 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Update to EN in conclusions for KI#1: Support of UE-to-UE relay . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209109r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2209111 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Update to conclusions for KI#1: Support of UE-to-UE relay . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | r03+ changes agreed. Revised to S2-2209337 | Deng Qiang (CATT) asks for clarifications on the 'E2E links'. Wen (vivo) comments for clarification. Yali (OPPO) comments. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r01. Steve (Huawei) Yali replies to Steve (Huawei) Steve (Huawei) comments Deng Qiang (CATT) comments. Jungje(Interdigital) comments. Jungje(Interdigital) respond to Steve(Huawei). Jungje(Interdigital) responded to Steve(Huawei). Jungje(Interdigital) provides r02 Hong (Qualcomm) provides r03. Jungje(Interdigital) comments to r03. Deng Qiang (CATT) replies to Jungje (Interdigital). Jungje (Interdigital) responds to Deng(CATT) Deng Qiang (CATT) responds to Jungje (Interdigital). Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Steve (Huawei) comments on individually Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Hong(Qualcomm) Jungje(Interdigital) provides r04. Yali(OPPO) objects r04. Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Yali(OPPO). Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Hong(Qualcomm). ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Deng Qiang (CATT) supports r03 and objects r04. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to JungJe, and can only accept r03. Hong (Qualcomm) replies to JungJe. Jungje(Interdigital) respons to Hong(Qualcomm) Steve (Huawei) only supports r03, objects to all other revisions (r00, r01, r02, r04). Jungje(Interdigital) oppose to r03 but can accept r03 with following NOTE added. NOTE : If source UE or target UE has multiple application layer IDs (user info), it would be treated as different UEs per application layer ID and separate PC5 link between UE(source UE or target UE) and Relay UE shall be setup. This will be confirmed by RAN during normative phase. Deng Qiang (CATT) comments on the proposed NOTE. Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Deng(CATT) Hong (Qualcomm) comments: although we believe the NOTE is not needed technically, but can live with it w/ r03. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209337 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Update to conclusions for KI#1: Support of UE-to-UE relay . | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209111r03 + changes. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2209180 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Update conclusion#1 to remove the EN. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209331 | Deng Qiang (CATT) comments and proposes to discuss discovery parameters in S2-2208489. Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Deng Qiang(CATT) Deng Qiang(CATT) comments. Wen (vivo) comments Jianning (Xiaomi) is ok to merge into 8489 to focus on discovery parameters discussion ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#2 (path switching btw two indirect paths) | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208912 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#2: Conclusion update on rule priority. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#3 (path switching btw PC5 and Uu) | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208604 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#3, Sol#19 Update. | ZTE | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209338. | LaeYoung (LGE) asks a Q. Hao (ZTE) responds. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Hao (ZTE). Hao (ZTE) responds and provides r01. LaeYoung (LGE) comments on r01. Hao (ZTE) responds to LaeYoung (LGE) and provides r02. LaeYoung (LGE) is fine with r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209338 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#3, Sol#19 Update. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208604r02. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208605 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#3, Sol#22 Clarification on UE Address. | ZTE | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | S2-2208661 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: TR 23.700-33: Update on KI #3 conclusions. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209339 | Zhang (Ericsson) provides comments LaeYoung (LGE) provides comments. Wen (vivo) comments. Changzheng (China Telecom) replies to Zhang, LaeYoung, Wen. Jungje (Interdigital) comments. Changzheng (China Telecom) replies to Jung Je. LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to NOTE or MERGE this pCR to other KI#3 conclusion update pCR (e.g. 8981, 8914) and to discuss this aspect there. LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to 8914. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) also suggests to mark this PCR as either noted or merged into 8914. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) Should be marked as MERGED to 8914 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208717 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI #3, Sol #22: update to remove the EN . | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | S2-2208739 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: TR 23.700-33: Update on KI #3 conclusions. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209339 | LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to 8914. Heng (China Telecom) reply. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) also suggests to mark this PCR as merged into 8914. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Heng (China Telecom) agree to mark this PCR as merged into 8914. Steve (Huawei) Should be marked as MERGED to 8914 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208913 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#3 Sol#17 Update: Support of Multiple Services . | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | Hao (ZTE) comments. Wen (vivo) tries to reply to Hao (ZTE) . Steve (Huawei) comments Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments Steve (Huawei) comments on cases ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | S2-2208914 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#3: Evaluation and Conclusion Update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r10 agreed. Revised to S2-2209339, merging S2-2208661, S2-2208739, S2-2208981 and S2-2209179 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes to discuss the EN resolution in this email thread. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide r01 by merging the content from 9179 as suggested by Rapporteur. Steve (Huawei) comments on the merge Jungje(Interdigital) provide r02 Steve (Huawei) comments, r02 is not a good merge either. Jungje(Interdigital) provides r02 Hao (ZTE) comments. Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Steve (Huawei) Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Hao (ZTE) and provide r03 Heng (China Telecom) provide r04 to merge 8739 to r03. Jungje(Interdigital) respond Steve(Huawei) and provided r05 Steve (Huawei) provides r06 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments on latest revision, r06. Jungje(Interdigital) comments Steve(Huawei) and provides r07. Steve (Huawei) comments on doubling the negotiation Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Steve (Huawei). Hao (ZTE) asks for clarification. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r08 on top of r06 from Steve (Huawei). Heng (China Telecom) clarify to LaeYoung and Mehrdad Changzheng (China Telecom) provides r09 to merge 8661 to r08. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Heng (China Telecom). LaeYoung (LGE) responds to Jungje (Interdigital) and Changzheng (China Telecom). Heng (China Telecom) replies to LaeYoung (LGE). Hannu (Nokia) provides r10. Jungje(Interdigital) responds to Laeyoung(LGE) Heng (China Telecom) provides r11 on top of r10 to keep the removed two bullets. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Jungje (Interdigital). LaeYoung (LGE) cannot accept r11 and answers to Heng (China Telecom). LaeYoung (LGE) answers to Jungje (Interdigital). Jungje(Intedigital) responds to LaeYoung(LGE) and provides r12. Jungje(Interdigital) responds Heng(China Telecom)'s proposal Jungje(Interdigital) provides r14. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) accepts only r10, r09, r08 and objects to other versions. So, proposes to go with r10. Jungje(Interdigital) responds LaeYoung (LGE). Heng(China Telecom) reply to Jungje and Laeyoung Heng (China Telecom) reply to LaeYoung (LGE) Steve (Huawei) r10 looks like the baseline according to the comments. Supports r10. Heng (China Telecom) propose add the non IP case in r10 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209339 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#3: Evaluation and Conclusion Update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208914r10, merging S2-2208661, S2-2208739, S2-2208981 and S2-2209179. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208981 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI #3: Conclusion Update . | Interdigital | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209339 | LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to 8914. Changzheng(China Telecom) replies to LaeYoung(LGE) and provide r01 to merge 8661 to 8981. LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to MERGE this pCR to 8914 and to discuss KI#3 conclusion updates there. Hannu (Nokia) supports the proposal from LaeYoung to merge in order to discuss each KI in single document, please. So this tdoc won't be needed as any agreeable contents should go to a revision of the merged document. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) Should be marked as MERGED to 8914 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2209179 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: Update conclusion#3 to remove the EN. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209339 | Hao (ZTE) comments. Jianning (Xiaomi) provide comment Hao (ZTE) responds. Jianning (Xiaomi) replies to Hao (ZTE), and merge this paper into 8914 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#4 (path switching for L2 Relay) | - | - | Docs:=1 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208492 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#4: Remove RAN dependency ENs in KI#4 Conclusions. | CATT | Rel-18 | Approved | Hannu (Nokia) comments that this P-CR does not remove the RAN dependency but only pushes it to normative phase. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Deng Qiang (CATT) replies to Hannu (Nokia). Steve (Huawei) is ok with r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#5 (multi-path transmission) | - | - | Docs:=11 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208381 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Re-use of Rel-18 ATSSS study conclusions. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209340 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes this paper be merged into S2-2208490. Changhong (Intel) replies to Qiang and OK with using S2-2208490 for the second EN resolution. Steve (Huawei) comments Hannu (Nokia) agrees to merge to 8490. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208490 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Remove EN in KI#5 Conclusions. | CATT | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209340, merging S2-2208381 | Hannu (Nokia) provides r01 to merge S2-2208381 into this document and co-signs. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209340 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Remove EN in KI#5 Conclusions. | CATT, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208490r01, merging S2-2208381. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208517 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5, Conclusion update: Resolve EN for multi-path. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208893 | Changhong (Intel) proposes to discuss the first EN resolution in the thread of S2-2208893. Hannu (Nokia) agrees to merge this to 8893 but points out that the proposed change needs modification. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208652 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: TR 23.700-33: KI #5 conclusion: Update on MA-PDU Session Establishment. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Merged into (Covered by) S2-2208893 | Wen (vivo) comments. Fei (OPPO) comments and does not see any need to this new access type. Changzheng (China Telecom) replies. Changhong (Intel) supports the proposal and proposes to merge it into S2-2208893. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Changzheng (China Telecom) confirms to merge S2-2208652 to S2-2208893 and accept r00, r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208893 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Conclusion Update. | Intel | Rel-18 | Noted. CC#4: r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209981. | Fei (OPPO) comments. Wen (vivo) comments. Changhong (Intel) replies to Wen and Fei's comments. Wen (vivo) replies to Changhong. Steve (Huawei) comments Changhong (Intel) replies to Steve. Hannu (Nokia) provides r01. Changhong (Intel) replies to Hannu's comment and provides r02. Steve (Huawei) provides r03 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Changhong (Intel) objects to r03, r01 and can only accept r00, r02. Changzheng (China Telecom) supports r02 and objects r03. Fei (OPPO) can only accept r03. Wen (vivo) shares the same view with Fei and can only accept r03. Steve (Huawei) only accepts r03, objects to all other revisions Changhong (Intel) provides a draft r04 as way forward to resolve the EN in the conclusion for KI#3. Changhong (Intel) provides a draft r04 as way forward to resolve the EN in the conclusion for KI#5, sorry for typo. ==== Final Deadline ==== Fei (OPPO) is ok with draft r04 which is based on r03 plus one note (note1). Propose it can be discussed at CC#3 or CC#4. Hannu (Nokia) prefers r02 or r04. Can also live with r03. Steve (Huawei) proposes a clarified note: NOTE 1: For policy authorization for multi-path transmission via direct Uu path and Layer 3 U2N Relay UE with N3IWF, whether the current Access Type preference in URSP needs to be updated will be investigated in the normative phase. Changhong (Intel) clarifies that draft r04 reverse the removal of 'with an' in first bullet and add the 'NOTE: For policy authorization for multi-path transmission via direct Uu path and Layer 3 U2N Relay UE with N3IWF, whether the current Access Type preference in URSP needs to be updated will be investigated in the normative phase' on top of r03. | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209981 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Conclusion Update. | Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208893r04. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208915 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5 Sol#29 Update: Policy and Authorization for Multi-path Transmission. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Approved | Changhong (Intel) comments and don't think a solution can be updated to be same with an existing solution. Hao (ZTE) comments. Steve (Huawei) comments, not redundant, avoids backwards compatibility, it's a clarification. Changhong (Intel) thinks the updated Sol#29 becomes a new solution and asks Rapporteurs to clarify whether new solution is allowed at this meeting. Fei (OPPO) comments. Changhong (Intel) proposes to NOTE this paper since new solution is not allowed at this meeting. Steve (Huawei) it's not new and the clarifications have been seen before, provides r01. Changhong (Intel) replies to Steve. Changhong (Intel) prefers to agree r00 based on clarification from Steve. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is fine with r00 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | S2-2208916 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Evaluation update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209341. | Changhong (Intel) comments. Steve (Huawei) comments Changhong (Intel) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok with r01. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209341 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5: Evaluation update. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208916r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208917 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#5 Conclusion Update for Sol#27. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Noted | Fei (OPPO) comments and objects to this conclusion update. Deng Qiang (CATT) shares the similar view with Fei (OPPO), and proposes to NOTED this paper. Hannu (Nokia) shares the view of Fei and Deng Qiang ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) shares the view of Fei, Deng Qiang and Hannu ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#6: PC5 Parameter Provisioning | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208491 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#6: Overall Evaluation and Conclusions. | CATT, LG Electronics, Intel | Rel-18 | r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209342, merging S2-2208918 and S2-2208919 | Steve (Huawei) provides r01 LaeYoung (LGE) comments on r01. Deng Qiang (CATT) provides r02 to shorten the description and avoid duplication. Steve (Huawei) comments and provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== LaeYoung (LGE) is fine with r03. Deng Qiang (CATT) is fine with r03. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r03 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209342 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#6: Overall Evaluation and Conclusions. | CATT, LG Electronics, Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208491r03, merging S2-2208918 and S2-2208919. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208918 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#6: Evaluation. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209342 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes this paper be merged into S2-2208491. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok to MERGE with 8491 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208919 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#6: Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209342 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes this paper be merged into S2-2208491. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok to MERGE with 8491 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | - | - | - | KI#7 (Emergency service) | - | - | Docs:=18 | - | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208584 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on the feasibility of NG-RAN providing emergency indication | vivo | Rel-18 | Postponed | Judy (Ericsson) comments ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wen (vivo) : it is ok that this paper can be postponed. Judy (Ericsson): this paper should be either postponed or noted as the solution is still under discussion as previously commented. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.26 | S2-2208360 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Sol#42: update to resolve ENs. | Ericsson | Rel-18 | r04 agreed. Revised to S2-2209343, merging S2-2208448, S2-2208585 and S2-2208920 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes to discuss sol#42 update in this email thread. Steve (Huawei) comments on merge potential / how to discuss. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is happy to use either 8920 or 8360 as the baseline and merge 8448 into the baseline paper. Judy (Ericsson) comments and provides r01 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) asks a clarification based on evaluation in 8361 Steve (Huawei) provides r02 Judy (Ericsson) provides r03 Steve (Huawei) provides r04 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Judy (Ericsson) is fine with r04 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) requests to mark 8448 marked as merged into 8360r04 and co-signs 8360r04. Judy (Ericsson) responds to Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209343 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Sol#42: update to resolve ENs. | Ericsson, Mediatek Inc., vivo, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208360r04, merging S2-2208448, S2-2208585 and S2-2208920. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208361 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Evaluation on Emergency Services for UE to Network Relaying. | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Apple | Rel-18 | Revision of (Unhandled) S2-2205810 from S2#152E. r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209344, merging S2-2208583 and S2-2208921 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes to discuss KI#7 Evaluation in this email thread. Wen (vivo) provides r01. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments on r01 Wen (vivo) replies to Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) Judy (Ericsson) provides r02 Hannu (Nokia) provides r03 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) provides r04 Tingyu (Samsung) provides r05. Judy (Ericsson) provides r06 adding EN to allow to check whether L2 Relay UE should also prioritize its own emergency service Steve (Huawei) comments on L2 handling EN, does not agree with it. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) can live with r05, objects to r06. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) is OK with r05 and r04 but we objects to the rest of revision and original version. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209344 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Evaluation on Emergency Services for UE to Network Relaying. | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Apple | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208361r05, merging S2-2208583 and S2-2208921. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208362 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Conclusion on Emergency Services for UE to Network Relaying. | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Apple | Rel-18 | Revision of (Unhandled) S2-2205811 from S2#152E. r14 agreed. Revised to S2-2209345, merging S2-2208518 and S2-2208922 | Deng Qiang (CATT) proposes to discuss KI#7 Conclusions in this email thread. Steve (Huawei) provides r01 Wen (vivo) provides r02 Fei (OPPO) provides r03 and comments. Wen (vivo) replies to Fei. Steve (Huawei) comments, provides r04 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments on r04 Hong (Qualcomm) provide r05. Wen (vivo) replies to Steve (Huawei) Wen (vivo) replies to Hong and comments on r05. Hong (Qualcomm) comments. Wen (vivo) replies. Judy (Ericsson) provides r06 Wen (vivo) comments. Wen (vivo) provides r07 Fei (OPPO) provides responses inline Hannu (Nokia) provides r08. Judy (Ericsson) provides r09 adding EN whether limited service state applies to L3 remote UE is FFS Fei (OPPO) provides views on L3 remote UE. Hannu answers to Judy, Fei and Steve and provides r10. Fei (OPPO) replies. Steve (Huawei) comments and provides r11 Wen (vivo) provides r12 Steve (Huawei) comments on by implementation Hong (Qualcomm) replies to Wen. Wen (vivo) replies to Hong (Qualcomm). Fei (OPPO) provides comments to Wen Judy (Ericsson) provides r13 Tingyu (Samsung) comments. Steve (Huawei) provides r14 Wen (vivo) repines to Judy about the RRC messaged encrypted ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Fei (OPPO) is fine with r14. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r14. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) can live with r14 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209345 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Conclusion on Emergency Services for UE to Network Relaying. | Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Apple, OPPO | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208362r14, merging S2-2208518 and S2-2208922. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208375 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7 emergency: Update of solution #47. | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Approved | Judy (Ericsson) asks question Hong (Qualcomm) asks questions. Hannu (Nokia) answers to Hong ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | S2-2208407 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7: Updates to Solution #48. | Samsung | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 9.26 | S2-2208448 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Sol#42 Update: Emergency Services for UE to Network Relaying. | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209343 | Judy (Ericsson) assumes this paper is merged to 8362 Judy (Ericsson) corrects: this paper is assumed to be merged to 8360 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208518 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Conclusion on emergency service on U2N relay for access type. | OPPO | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209345 | Judy (Ericsson) assumes this paper is merged into 8362 Fei (OPPO) comfirms it should be marked as merged or noted ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208582 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7,Sol#45,Update to emergency indication from NG-RAN. | Vivo | Rel-18 | r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209346. | Hannu (Nokia) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.26 | S2-2209346 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7,Sol#45,Update to emergency indication from NG-RAN. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208582r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 9.26 | S2-2208583 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7_Sol#45_Evaluation and Conclusion. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209344 | Judy (Ericsson) assumes this paper merged into 8361 or 8362 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wen(vivo): this paper is ok to be merged into 8361 or 8362 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208585 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7, Sol#42, Update: EN removal about mobility restriction. | Vivo | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209343 | Judy (Ericsson) assumes this paper is merged to 8362 Judy (Ericsson) corrects: this paper is assumed to be merged to 8360 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Wen (vivo): this paper is ok to be merged to 8360 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208920 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7 Sol#42 Update: EN removal and solution clarification. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209343 | Judy (Ericsson) comments that the related discussion is in 8360 thread ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok to MERGE to 8360. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208921 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7: Evaluation. | Huawei, HiSilicon, MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209344 | Judy (Ericsson) assumes this paper is merged into 8361 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.26 | S2-2208922 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-33: KI#7: Conclusion. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Merged into S2-2209345 | Judy (Ericsson) comments the related discussion is in 8362 thread ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Steve (Huawei) is ok to MERGE to 8362 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Merged |
| 9.27.1 | - | - | - | Study on Seamless UE context recovery (FS_SUECR) | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 9.27.2 | - | - | - | Seamless UE context recovery (SUECR) | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.27.2 | S2-2209160 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3749 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of unavailability period | Samsung, Qualcomm, LG Electronics, Apple | Rel-18 | r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209666. | Hannu (Nokia): shares r01 on behalf of drafting group last week. Fei (OPPO) comments. Steve (Huawei) provides r02 Lalith(Samsung) is fine with r02 and replies. Fei (OPPO) provides r03. Qian (Ericsson) provides r04. Lalith (Samsung) provides r05. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) is ok with r05. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r05 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.27.2 | S2-2209666 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3749R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of unavailability period | Samsung, Qualcomm, LG Electronics, Apple, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, KDDI | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209160r05. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.27.2 | S2-2209163 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3598 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of unavailability period | Samsung, Qualcomm, LG Electronics, Apple | Rel-18 | r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209667. | Hannu (Nokia): shares r01 corresponding to the updates that were proposed in S2-2209160r01. Hannu (Nokia): corrects the AI from 9.27 to 9.27.2 Fei (OPPO) comments Steve (Huawei) provides r02 Lalith(Samsung) comments. Fei (OPPO) provides comments. Steve (Huawei) clarifies comment on service operations and storing times in context. Fei (OPPO) responds. Lalith(Samsung) replies to Steve (Huawei) Lalith (Samsung) comments. Fei (OPPO) provides response to Lalith Qian (Ericsson) asks a question for clarification Qian (Ericsson) provides further comments Lalith(Samsung) replies to Qian (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) ok with r02. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r02 ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.27.2 | S2-2209667 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3598R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Support of unavailability period | Samsung, Qualcomm, LG Electronics, Apple, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, KDDI | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209163r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.28 | - | - | - | Stage 2 of MPS_WLAN (MPS_WLAN) | - | - | Docs:=10 | - | |
| 9.28 | S2-2209049 | DISCUSSION | Information | MPS when access to EPC/5GC is WLAN. | Peraton Labs | Rel-18 | Noted | Robert (Peraton Labs) suggests for now to continue the discussion for this DP and related CRs on this thread. Laurent (Nokia): answers Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that Nokia input covers most of our views as well on this thread, see below Robert (Peraton Labs) responds to Laurent/Nokia. Robert (Peraton Labs) provides updated CRs based on the discussion so far. Haris(Qualcomm) proposes to revise the DP listing the open issues identified in this thread instead of revising the CRs Robert (Peraton Labs) provides a rev of the discussion paper ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.28 | S2-2209050 | CR | Approval | 23.401 CR3713 (Rel-18, 'B'): MPS when access to EPC is WLAN | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the CR is to be postponed allowing overall agreement and solution scope under the Discussion document thread. Pallab (Nokia) also proposed to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209051 | CR | Approval | 23.402 CR2998 (Rel-18, 'B'): MPS when access to EPC is WLAN | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that we see no reason to update PMIP support and we should also have a discussion on the Trusted WLAN case. Pallab (Nokia) provides comments Pallab (Nokia) proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209052 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3745 (Rel-18, 'B'): MPS when access to 5GC is WLAN | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments to decide in CC#1 if the DP should be used as basis for discussion and other associated CRs (for DP 9049) need to be aligned with potential way forward. Pallab (Nokia) also proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209053 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3595 (Rel-18, 'B'): MPS when access to 5GC is WLAN | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments to postpone the CR until discussion is completed on the overall solution scope. Pallab (Nokia) also proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209054 | DISCUSSION | Information | User plane QoS differentiation via control plane. | Peraton Labs | Rel-18 | Noted | Laurent (Nokia): Comments Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments and expresses concerns on the proposal overall, don't believe it is needed and complex for actual usefulness purposes Shabnam (Ericsson) resending comments of Nokia & Ericsson using correct email header, first email was missing agenda item on the Subject field, expresses concerns on the proposal overall, don't believe it is needed and complex for actual usefulness purposes Marco (Huawei) comments and expresses concern on adding an SBI interface to an Access node and this interface is a second one from a CN NF which is against the principle to have all control via N2 only. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 9.28 | S2-2209055 | CR | Approval | 23.401 CR3714 (Rel-18, 'B'): User plane QoS differentation via control plane | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the CR is to be postponed until we can sort out the need for this additional feature. Pallab (Nokia) also proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) neutral on noted or posteponed, but next time the technical proposal should be different. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209056 | CR | Approval | 23.402 CR2999 (Rel-18, 'B'): User plane QoS differentiation via control plane | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Marco (Huawei) object Pallab (Nokia) proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) Marco (Huawei) neutral on noted or posteponed, but next time the technical proposal should be different. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209057 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3746 (Rel-18, 'B'): User plane QoS differentiation via control plane | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Marco (Huawei) object since the proposal add an SBI interface to an Access node and this interface is a second one from a CN NF which is against the principle to have all control via N2 only. Pallab (Nokia) proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) neutral on noted or posteponed, but next time the technical proposal should be different. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.28 | S2-2209059 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3596 (Rel-18, 'B'): User plane QoS differentation via control plane | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-18 | Postponed | Marco (Huawei) object since the proposal add an SBI interface to an Access node and this interface is a second one from a CN NF which is against the principle to have all control via N2 only. Pallab (Nokia) proposes to postpone the CR as discussed in CC#1 and use the discussion papers for agreeing on the overall scope and impacts ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Marco (Huawei) neutral on noted or postponed, but next time the technical proposal should be different. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.29 | - | - | - | Multiple location report for MT-LR Immediate Location Request for the regulatory service (TEI18_MLR) | - | - | Docs:=2 | - | |
| 9.29 | S2-2208249 | CR | Approval | 23.273 CR0233 (Rel-18, 'B'): Multiple location report for MT-LR Immediate Location Request for the regulatory service | Ericsson, T-Mobile USA | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed. A revision of 8249 or 9128 acceptable? | Stephen (Qualcomm) provides an r01 Cai Simon (Nokia) comments r00 and r01 Richard (Ericsson) response to Nokia and Qualcomm Cai Simon (Nokia) comments further ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.29 | S2-2209128 | CR | Approval | 23.273 CR0236 (Rel-18, 'B'): Multiple location report for MT-LR Immediate Location Request for the regulatory service | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed. A revision of 8249 or 9128 acceptable? | Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r01 Richard (Ericsson) provides comments Cai Simon (Nokia) clarifies to Richard (Ericsson) Richard (Ericsson) answering to Simon (Nokia) Cai Simon (Nokia) provides r02 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that we cannot have same topic 2 CRs and it would have been appreciated if Nokia provided their view offline when we shared our CR well in advance. We object to original and all revisions and propose to combine efforts into one document 8249 to find common ground. Cai Simon (Nokia) clarifies to Shabnam (Ericsson) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 9.30 | - | - | - | Secondary DN Authentication and authorization in EPC IWK cases (TEI18_SDNAEPC) | - | - | Docs:=4 | - | |
| 9.30 | S2-2208224 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3701 (Rel-18, 'B'): Secondary DN authentication and authorization in EPS IWK case | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of (noted) S2-2205472 from S2-152E. r02 agreed. Revised to S2-2209668. | Fei (OPPO) comments. Chris (Vodafone) provides r01. Fei (OPPO) provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Ashok (Samsung) comments Fei (OPPO) replies. Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments. Fei (OPPO) provides replies and indicates that the first bullet should be updated to add one missing word-support. Ashok (Samsung) seeks a clarification from Fei (OPPO) Laurent (Nokia): answers, agrees with R01 (better) Fei (OPPO) can only accept r02. Fei (OPPO) replies to Ashok ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.30 | S2-2209668 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3701R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Secondary DN authentication and authorization in EPS IWK case | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208224r02. Approved | Agreed | |
| 9.30 | S2-2208225 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3553 (Rel-18, 'B'): Secondary DN authentication and authorization in EPS IWK case | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Revision of (noted) S2-2205473 from S2-152E. r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2209669. | Myungjune (LGE) provides comments. Laurent (Nokia): provides r01 Ashok (Samsung) comments. Stefan (Ericsson) provides comments Laurent (Nokia): Comments Laurent (Nokia): provides r02 Laurent (Nokia): provides r03 Fenqin (Huawei): ask a question for clarification Laurent (Nokia): provides r04 Fenqin (Huawei): provide comments and r05 Stefan (Ericsson) provides r06 Fenqin (Huawei) ask a question for clarification Stefan (Ericsson) replies to Fenqin Chris (Vodafone) provides r07 Ashok (Samsung) provides r08 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Myungjune (LGE) asks question whether there is impact to DN-AAA. Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments Chris (Vodafone) answers LGE. Ashok (Samsung) proposes to go with r08 Chris (Vodafone) supports r08. Can fine tune in next meeting. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 9.30 | S2-2209669 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3553R1 (Rel-18, 'B'): Secondary DN authentication and authorization in EPS IWK case | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, Samsung | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208225r08. Approved | Agreed | |
| 10 | - | - | - | Project Planning and Management | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 10.1 | - | - | - | Revised Rel-18 Study Items | - | - | Docs:=3 | - | |
| 10.1 | S2-2208218 | SID REVISED | Approval | Revised SID: Study on the support for 5WWC, Phase 2 | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Update to SP-220419 (TSG SA-96). CC#4: This was postponed. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.1 | S2-2209044 | SID REVISED | Approval | Revised SID: Study on system architecture for Next Generation Real Time Communication Services (FS_NG_RTC) | China Mobile | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed. | Antoine (Orange) comments that the 'Total TU' figures do not correspond to the sum of TU per WT. Rainer (Nokia) comments on no of TU for normative phase. Yi (China Mobile) thanks Antoine and Rainer for pointing out the mistake. R01 and r02 are provided. Rainer (Nokia) replies. Yi (China Mobile) replies and prefer r02 as well. Rainer (Nokia) provides r03. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Yi (China Mobile) comments and still prefer r02. Rainer (Nokia) is ok with r02 or r03. Mu (Huawei) is ok with r02 Leo (Deutsche Telekom) supports r02. ==== Final Deadline ==== Rainer (Nokia) comments. | Postponed |
| 10.1 | S2-2209136 | SID REVISED | Approval | Revised SID on Study on Architecture Enhancement to support Ranging based services and sidelink positioning. | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.2 | - | - | - | TS/TR Cover sheets | - | - | Docs:=6 | - | |
| 10.2 | S2-2208494 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-33 to TSG SA#98E for approval | CATT, OPPO | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Deng Qiang (CATT) this cover sheet should be postponed. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.2 | S2-2208738 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-62 to TSG SA for approval | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.2 | S2-2208894 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-85 to TSG SA#98E | Intel (Rapporteur) | Rel-18 | Postponed | LaeYoung (LGE) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.2 | S2-2209018 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-88 (FS_PIN) to SA#98 | vivo | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.2 | S2-2209045 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-87: Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-87 to TSG SA#97. | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.2 | S2-2209121 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Presentation of Report to TSG: TR 23.700-58 | Qualcomm Finland RFFE Oy | Rel-18 | Postponed. Not provided. WITHDRAWN | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.3 | - | - | - | New and revised Rel-18 Work Items | - | - | Docs:=27 | - | |
| 10.3 | - | - | - | Revised Rel-18 WIDs | - | - | Docs:=14 | - | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208943 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on generic group management, exposure and communication enhancements | Huawei, HiSilicon, Samsung | Rel-18 | Update of SP-220959. CC#4: This was postponed. | Laurent (Nokia): Concerns with some text of R00 that cannot be approved as is Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. Qianghua (Huawei) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) provides r02 at draft folder Laurent (Nokia): objects to R00 and R01 | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2208289 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revise WID on 5G AM Policy (AMP) | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | Update to SP-220807 (TSG SA#97E). CC#4: r03 agreed. Revised to S2-2209984. | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that SA#99 is not planned to be Electronic as per 3gpp portal so the E should be removed from #99. Zhuoyi (China Telecom) provides r01 according to Ericsson's comment. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Zhuoyi (China Telecom) provides r02 according to approved CRs at this meeting. Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r02 Zhuoyi(China Telecom) replies to Haris. Zhuoyi(China Telecom) provides r03 removing 'specific clause description'. | Revised |
| 10.3 | S2-2209984 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on 5G AM Policy. | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208289r03. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208458 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: 5G System Enabler for Service Function Chaining | Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of (Approved) S2-2207866 from S2#152E. CC#4: r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209985. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 10.3 | S2-2209985 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: 5G System Enabler for Service Function Chaining. | Intel | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208458r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208493 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Proximity-based Services in 5GS Phase 2 | CATT, OPPO | Rel-18 | Update to SP-220806 (TSG SA#97E). CC#4: This was approved. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 10.3 | S2-2208678 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: Support for 5WWC, Phase 2 | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | Update of SP-220800. CC#4: This was postponed. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2208798 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: Edge Computing Phase 2 | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Update of SP-220987. CC#4: r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209986. | Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. Patrice (Huawei) thanks Gerald (Matrixx Software) for his support, and will provide an r01 once the conclusions for the study are stable. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments on all revisions of the WID. Patrice (Huawei) replies. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 10.3 | S2-2209986 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: Edge Computing Phase 2. | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208798r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208814 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Enhancement to the 5GC LoCation Services Phase 3 | CATT, Huawei | Rel-18 | CC#4: r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209987. | Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Gerald (MATRIXX Software) with comment on rapporteurship. Runze (Huawei) supports r01. | Revised |
| 10.3 | S2-2209987 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Enhancement to the 5GC LoCation Services Phase 3. | CATT, Huawei | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208814r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208895 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: Enhancement of 5G UE Policy | Intel (Rapporteur) | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2209142 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID: Timing Resiliency and URLLC enhancements. | SA WG2 | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2209205 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Access Traffic Steering, Switching and Splitting support in the 5G system architecture; Phase 3. | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Apostolis (Lenovo) provides the revised WID on ATSSS_ph3 with a new objective to define a steering functionality based on the conclusions of KI#2. Rainer (Nokia) supports this update. ==== Final Deadline ==== | Approved |
| 10.3 | - | - | - | New Rel-18 WIDs | - | - | Docs:=13 | - | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208436 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on System support for AI/ML-based Services | OPPO, Samsung | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | Malla (NTT DOCOMO) provided comment David (Samsung) replies to Docomo LaeYoung (LGE) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Belen (Ericsson) objects to the current version of this WID. Tricci (OPPO) responds to LaeYoung (LGE) comments. Tricci (OPPO) would like to Belen (Ericsson) the current version of the WID is just a place holder for now until the ongoing discussions are concluded. David (Samsung) comments and provides r01 Yannick (Nokia): Nokia provides comments to the WID and on ongoing discussion points. Belen (Ericsson) replies to OPPO that it is a place holder with some assumptions we cannot agree at the moment Belen (Ericsson) objects to r01 Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) comments on original version and revision 01 ==== Final Deadline ==== Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments David (Samsung) provides r03 (you may disregard r02) Belen (Ericsson) objects to r03. David (Samsung) provides r04. | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2208649 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Enablers for Network Automation for 5G - phase 3 | China Mobile M2M Company Ltd. | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | Hui (Huawei) proposes to merge this paper into S2-2208568, and take S2-2208568 as baseline for evaluation/conclusion of KI4 and 5. Hui (Huawei) withdraws the previous comment to S2-2208649. Wrong tdoc number was used. Thomas (Nokia) suggests to remove last objective Comments that objectives need to be checked against conclusions achieved at the end of this meeting David (Samsung) concurs with Thomas (Nokia) and requests the last objective to be removed Jinsook (DISH) The list of supporting companies are different from SID Aihua(CMCC) provides r01. Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. Aihua(CMCC) provides r02, adding MATRIXX Software as supporting company. Abbas (Futurewei) asks to add Futurewei as a supporting company ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Belen (Ericsson) asks to add Ericsson as supporting company, asks questions Aihua(CMCC) provides r03. Thomas(Nokia) provides comments ==== Final Deadline ==== Aihua(CMCC) replies. Xiaobo(Nokia) provides clarification. Thomas(Nokia) replies to Aihua Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments. Aihua(CMCC) replies to Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) there is no impact on UE for FS_eNA_Ph3. And will remove UE impact in the revision. | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2208665 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID: 5GC/EPC enhancement for satellite access Phase 2 | THALES | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | Hannu (Nokia): comments that this WID needs to be aligned with the conclusions by the end of this meeting. Jean-Yves (Thales): answers to hannu's comment Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. Yuxin(Xiaomi) adds MATRIXX Software as support company as Gerald (MATRIXX Software) proposed. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2208703 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID: Architecture Enhancements for XR and media services | China Mobile, Tencent, Tencent Cloud, Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | Dan (China Mobile) provides r01. Gerald (MATRIXX Software) with comment on charging. Lei(Tencent) provides comments to Gerald(MATRIXX Software). Dan (China Mobile) provide r02 with adding SA5 for charging. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Shabnam (Ericsson) provides comments that the WI needs to reflect agreement and which items are actually ready for normative work. Currently it is missing any details. Dan (China Mobile) ask Dan (China Mobile) provide r03 Lei (Tencent) provides comments. Fine with r02 as there are still ENs in some KIs conclusion papers. One typo need to be corrected 'KIKI#9' Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r03 Dan(China Mobile) reply Saso (Intel) proposes for this meeting to refocus the WID only on KIs that have reached sufficient level of conclusion. Dan(China Mobile) provide r04 Saso (Intel) comments that r04 needs to be beefed up. Dan (China Mobile) comments Lei(Tencent) provides comments to Saso(Intel) Dan(China Mobile) provides r05 | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2208729 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Architectural enhancements for 5G multicast-broadcast services Phase 2 (5MBS_Ph2) | Huawei, HiSilicon | Rel-18 | CC#4: r01 agreed. Revised to S2-2209988. | Robbie (Ericsson) comments that the WID needs to be updated based on the conclusions agreed in this meeting. Thomas (Nokia) suggests improvement of bullet c ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 10.3 | S2-2209988 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Architectural enhancements for 5G multicast-broadcast services Phase 2 (5MBS_Ph2). | Huawei, CBN | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2208729r01. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2208819 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID: Enhancement of Network Slicing Phase 3 | ZTE, LG Electronic | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jinguo(ZTE) provides r01 in the draft folder Myungjune (LGE) provides r02 in the draft folder ==== Final Deadline ==== Fenqin (Huawei) provides r03 in the CC#4 folder Haiyang (Huawei) provides r04 in the CC#4 folder Kundan (NEC) comments. Let's not partially allowed NSSAI yet until we receive RAN3 response. so we suggest to not remove partially allowed NSSAI at this moment. Haiyang (Huawei) provides reply to Kundan (NEC) Kundan (NEC) further clarifies with Haiyang. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) propose to either postpone the WID to the November meeting or only include objectives for KIs without any EN in the conclusion. George (Ericsson) provides comment. We would like KI4 not to go to the WID yet as we have to address roaming. So please remove it Fenqin(Huawei) would like to keep KI#4 in the objective and update the objective to include the roaming part at the next meeting George (Ericsson) provides response. We need to state that roaming is not in the WID, and still part of the study. Please make sure this is clear Fenqin (Huawei) provides response. George (Ericsson) provides response. I prefer that we not include the KI4 in the WID at this meeting. We can update next mtg. alessio( nokia) suggests to keep this in the WID (which anyhow is not approved by SA yet) and say 'NOTE: the work on Partially allowed NSSAI can start once the RAN evaluation of feasibility is received and indicates feasibility' Fenqin (Huawei) How about we add a NOTE like this, Note: roaming part is to be started after it is concluded. George Foti (Ericsson) The note should say: roaming part is to be started after it is concluded in the SID. Jinguo(ZTE) provides r05 | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2209017 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID: Personal IoT Networks | vivo | Rel-18 | CC#4: r05 agreed. Revised to S2-2209989. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Pallab (Nokia) provides comments and uploaded r01 Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r01 Pallab (Nokia) replies Qian (Ericsson) provides comments Zhenhua (vivo) provides r01 Zhenhua (vivo) actually provides r02 but wrongly indicates r01 Zhenhua (vivo) provides r03 to add more supporting companies Kefeng (Qualcomm) provides r05 to add one more bullet: 5GC architecture enhancements to support PIN | Revised |
| 10.3 | S2-2209989 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID: Personal IoT Networks. | vivo | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2209017r05. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2209070 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Architecture Enhancements for Vehicle Mounted Relays | Qualcomm Incorporated, Sony, InterDigital Inc., AT&T, ZTE Corporation, vivo Mobile Communications Ltd, Philips International B.V., Xiaomi, FirstNet, LG Electronics, Apple, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Intel, Deutsche Telekom | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | LiMeng (Huawei) comments on the second bullet of the objective. Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Hong (Qualcomm) provides r02. Hong (Qualcomm) provides r03. | Postponed |
| 10.3 | S2-2209117 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Further Architecture Enhancement for UAV and UAM | Qualcomm Incorporated | CC#4: r01 + Supporting Companies agreed. Revised to S2-2209990. | LaeYoung (LGE) comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Revised | |
| 10.3 | S2-2209990 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Further Architecture Enhancement for UAV and UAM. | Qualcomm Incorporated | - | Revision of S2-2209117r01 + Supporting Companies. Approved | Approved | |
| 10.3 | S2-2209135 | WID NEW | Approval | New WID on Architecture Enhancement to support Ranging based services and sidelink positioning | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | CC#4: This was postponed | Gerald (MATRIXX Software) supports this WID. Walter Dees (Philips) suggests some changes. Sherry (Xiaomi) provides r01. Sherry (Xiaomi) thanks Gerald (MATRIXX Software) for supporting this WID. Walter (Philips) agrees with r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Postponed |
| 10.4 | - | - | - | Rel-18 SID/WID Status Reports | - | - | Docs:=52 | - | |
| 10.4 | S2-2208818 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status report for FS_eNS_Ph3 | ZTE | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209120 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | WI Status Report: Study on Phase 2 for UAS, UAV and UAM (FS_UAS_Ph2) | Qualcomm Finland RFFE Oy | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted | |
| 10.4 | S2-2209208 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Stage 2 for Proximity based Services Phase 2 | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209209 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on 5GC enhancement for satellite access Phase 2 | Thales | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209210 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Support of Satellite Backhauling in 5GS | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209211 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on architectural enhancements for 5G multicast-broadcast services Phase 2 | Huawei | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209212 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on 5G Timing Resiliency and TSC&URLLC enhancements | Nokia | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209213 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on the support for 5WWC Phase 2 | Nokia | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209214 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on 5G System Support for AI/ML-based Services | OPPO | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209215 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on 5G AM Policy | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209216 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Access Traffic Steering, Switching and Splitting support in the 5G system architecture; Phase 3 | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209217 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Extensions to the TSC Framework to support Deterministic Networking (DetNet) | Ericsson | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 10.4 | S2-2209218 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Stage 2 of Edge Computing phase 2 | Huawei | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209219 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Enhancement to the 5GC LoCation Services-Phase 3 | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209220 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Enablers for Network Automation for 5G - phase 3 | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209221 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on enhanced support of Non-Public Networks phase 2 | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209222 | WI STATUS REPORT | Huawei | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted | ||
| 10.4 | S2-2209223 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on generic group management, exposure and communication enhancements | Huawei | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209224 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on system architecture for next generation real time communication services | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209225 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Personal IoT Networks | vivo | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209226 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Ranging based services and sidelink positioning | Xiaomi | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209227 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on RedCap Phase 2 | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209228 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on System Enabler for Service Function Chaining | Intel | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209229 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Seamless UE context recovery | Samsung | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209230 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on UPF enhancement for Exposure And SBA | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209231 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on Architecture Enhancements for Vehicle Mounted Relays | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209232 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Study on architecture enhancement for XR and media services | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209189 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | SUECR Status Report | Samsung | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209233 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: 5GC LoCation Services - Phase 3 | CATT | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209234 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Stage 2 of 5GSATB | CATT | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209235 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Support for Wireless and Wireline Convergence Phase 2 | Nokia | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209236 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: 5G AM Policy | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209237 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Access Traffic Steering, Switch and Splitting support in the 5G system architecture; Phase 3 | Lenovo | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209238 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Extensions to the TSC Framework to support DetNet | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209239 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Edge Computing Phase 2 | Huawei Technologies | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209240 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Stage 2 of Non-Public Networks Phase 2 | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209241 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Enhancement of NSAC for maximum number of UEs with at least one PDU session/PDN connection | ZTE | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209242 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Enhancement of 5G UE Policy | Intel | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209243 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Generic group management, exposure and communication enhancements | Huawei | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== Qianghua (Huawei) provides r01 at draft folder | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209244 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Stage 2 of MPS_WLAN | Peraton Labs | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209245 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: System architecture for Next Generation Real time Communication services | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209246 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: NR RedCap UE with long eDRX for RRC_INACTIVE State | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209247 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: 5G System Enabler for Service Function Chaining | Intel | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209248 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: TEI18 on Enhancement of Application Detection Event Exposure | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209249 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Dynamically Changing AM Policies in the 5GC Phase 2 | China Telecom | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209250 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: General Support of IPv6 Prefix Delegation in 5GS | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209251 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: MBS support for V2X services | LG Electronics | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209252 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Multiple location report for MT-LR Immediate Location Request for regulatory services | T-Mobile USA | Rel-18 | Noted. Not provided. WITHDRAWN | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209253 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Secondary DN Authentication and authorization in EPC IWK cases | Nokia | Rel-18 | Noted | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 10.4 | S2-2209254 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Spending Limits for AM and UE Policies in the 5GC | Oracle | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209255 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: Stage 2 of Timing Resiliency and URLLC enhancements | Nokia | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.4 | S2-2209256 | WI STATUS REPORT | Endorsement | Status Report: UPF enhancement for Exposure and SBA | China Mobile | Rel-18 | Withdrawn | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 10.5 | - | - | - | Review of the Work Plan | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 10.6 | - | - | - | Planning future meetings | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 11 | - | - | - | Close of e-meeting | - | - | Docs:=0 | - | |
| 99 | - | - | - | Withdrawn and Reserved documents | - | - | Docs:=561 | - | |
| 99 | S2-2208680 | CR | Approval | 23.501 CR3726 (Rel-18, 'B'): Introduction to N3IWF selection to support the slices needed by the UE | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2209048 | DISCUSSION | Information | KI#2: Discussion paper on outstanding issues | NEC | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2209027 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on Traffic Categories | Deutsche Telekom (to be: SA2) | Rel-18 | Revised to S2-2209036. WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2209066 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3519R1 (Rel-17, 'F'): Support for 5QI Priority Level in QoS constraints | Peraton Labs, CISA ECD, AT&T, Verizon | Rel-17 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2209147 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-08: KI#4: Update Sol#42 and remove ENs. | Samsung | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2208675 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-28: Update Evolution and Conclusion for KI#1 and KI#2 | Google Inc. | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2209030 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-41: Update to Sol#43 | vivo | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2208664 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: FS_AIMLsys KI#7, Evaluation and Conclusion | China Mobile M2M Company Ltd. | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2208177 | CR | Approval | 23.502 CR3550 (Rel-18, 'B'): CR_23502_New timer for RFSP Index validity when mobility from 5G to 4G via N26 | China Telecom Corporation Ltd. | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2208178 | CR | Approval | 23.316 CR2071 (Rel-17, 'F'): Change the direction of the arrow in figure | IPLOOK | Rel-17 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2208202 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Sample 1 | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn | |
| 99 | S2-2208203 | P-CR | Approval | 23.700-80: Sample 3 | MediaTek Inc. | Rel-18 | WITHDRAWN | Withdrawn |