{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":3,"sheets":["TDoc_List","CR_Packs_List","Parameters"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":6,"comments":1,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"TDoc_List","index":0,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":32,"rows_kept":14,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["TDoc #","Title","Source","Contact","Contact ID","Type","Type supplement","For","Abstract","Secretary Remarks","Agenda item sort order","Agenda item #","Agenda item description","TDoc sort order within agenda item","TDoc Status","Reservation date","Uploaded","Is revision of","Revised to","Release","Spec #","Version","Related WIs","CR #","CR revision #","CR category","TSG CR Pack","Reply to","To","Cc","Original LS","Reply in"]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0001","RAN4 MIMO-OTA adhoc meeting agenda","Intel","Ioffe Anatoliy",45015,"agenda","","Approval","","","2","2","Approval of the agenda",0,"available","2016-01-06T18:13:53.127","2016-01-14T08:50:43.950","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0002","Handling of MIMO OTA Results When EUT Fails to Meet Throughput Criteria","AT&T, Spirent, Sprint, T-Mobile USA and Verizon Wireless","Prather Scott",44242,"discussion","","Discussion","Handling of MIMO OTA Results When EUT Fails to Meet Throughput Criteria","","8","4.1","Working assumption on results that do not reach target throughput value",0,"available","2016-01-08T20:11:01.993","2016-01-14T08:46:57.877","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0003","Analysis of ADTF Measurements","Bluetest AB","Christian Lötbäck",45377,"other","","","Approval","","10","5.1","ADTF analysis",0,"available","2016-01-11T07:23:49.697","2016-01-13T18:49:53.270","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0004","Updates to Channel Model Validation Procedures for the RC and RC+CE Methodologies","Bluetest AB","Christian Lötbäck",45377,"discussion","","","","","4","3.1","Chanel model implementation",0,"available","2016-01-11T07:30:12.303","2016-01-13T16:08:14.190","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0005","CR to TR37.977: Updates to channel model validation procedures for the RC and RC+CE methodologies","Bluetest AB","Christian Lötbäck",45377,"CR","","","","","4","3.1","Chanel model implementation",0,"available","2016-01-11T07:38:10.583","2016-01-13T16:08:14.220","","","Rel-13","37.977","13.2.0","","","","F",null,"","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0006","Investigation of MPAC and RTS Differences Utilizing Conducted ADTF Model","Spirent Communications","Ronald Borsato",40556,"discussion","","","","","13","5.4","Resolution of the differences between RTS and MPAC results",0,"available","2016-01-11T10:32:05.953","2016-01-13T20:56:24.297","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0007","Aligning the FoM with user experience and network operation","Keysight Technologies UK Ltd","Moray Rumney",6630,"other","","Discussion","This paper compares the existing fixed MCS outage FoM with user experience and network operation towards a resolution of the issue in handling outlier performance.","","7","4","Figure of merit",0,"available","2016-01-11T12:34:52.190","2016-01-13T23:54:22","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0008","Analysis of AC method differences and work plan","Keysight Technologies UK Ltd","Moray Rumney",6630,"other","","Discussion","This paper reviews existing analysis of AC method differences and outlines plans for continued analysis.","","13","5.4","Resolution of the differences between RTS and MPAC results",0,"available","2016-01-11T12:37:08.377","2016-01-13T21:44:08.810","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0009","ADTF results with RC/RC+CE for MIMO OTA harmonization campaign","CATR","Zheng Liu",62259,"discussion","","Discussion","At the RAN4#77 meeting, a way forward for the approved MIMO OTA WI was agreed . The agreed way forward initiates a new ADTF test with RC/RC+CE , CATR is the lab that performs the ADTF test for the harmonization, this contribution submits the ADTF test results.","","10","5.1","ADTF analysis",0,"reserved","2016-01-11T14:50:38.667",null,"","","Rel-13","","","UTRA_LTE_MIMO_OTA-Core","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0010","Analysis of UE measurements used to augment the initial harmonization campaign","ROHDE & SCHWARZ","Thorsten Hertel",60675,"discussion","","Discussion","This paper presents the analysis of the UE measurements used to augment the initial harmonization campaign in order to determine a first approximation of the bias term \"b\"","","12","5.3","Update on additional DUT testing",0,"available","2016-01-11T16:20:23.037","2016-01-13T23:18:54.533","","","Rel-13","37.977","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0011","Averaging approaches","ROHDE & SCHWARZ","Thorsten Hertel",60675,"discussion","","Discussion","A variety of averaging approaches and definitions of an FOM for measurements that do not reach the target TP value have been discussed in the past. This paper reviews the most prominent approaches and introduces one new pass/fail certification approach.","","8","4.1","Working assumption on results that do not reach target throughput value",0,"available","2016-01-11T16:49:42.343","2016-01-13T23:22:26.067","","","Rel-13","37.977","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0012","On channel model implementation uncertainty","Intel Corporation","Anatoliy Ioffe",45232,"other","","Discussion","","","4","3.1","Chanel model implementation",0,"available","2016-01-11T19:49:18.830","2016-01-13T21:10:27.253","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]
["R4-77AH-OTA-0013","Updated ADTF analysis","Intel Corporation","Anatoliy Ioffe",45232,"other","","Discussion","","","10","5.1","ADTF analysis",0,"reserved","2016-01-11T19:49:18.847",null,"","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]

{"sheet":"CR_Packs_List","index":1,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":1,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["CR Pack TDoc #","WG TDoc #","WG TDoc decision","CR Individual TSG decision","Spec #","CR #","CR revision #","CR category","Release","Version","CR title"]

{"sheet":"Parameters","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Types of Tdocs","Possible statuses of Tdocs","Categories"]
[]
["agenda","reserved","A","Decision"]
["Work Plan","available","B","Agreement"]
["LS in","revised","C","Approval"]
["LS out","agreed","D","Information"]
["pCR","conditionally agreed","E","Discussion"]
["draftCR","approved","F","Action"]
["CR","conditionally approved",null,"Endorsement"]
["CR pack","partially approved",null,"Presentation"]
["ToR","treated"]
["WID new","endorsed"]
["WID revised","replied to"]
["SID new","merged"]
["SID revised","not pursued"]
["WI status report","postponed"]
["WI exception request","noted"]
["TS or TR cover","not concluded"]
["draft TS","withdrawn"]
["draft TR","reissued"]
["report"]
["discussion"]
["response"]
["other"]