TSG-T2
Yokohama, JP, 19-21 April 1999	TSGT2#3(99) 442

Agenda Item:	

Source:	SWG6

Title:	Report of SWG6#2 (Terminal Features and Performance)

Document for:	Approval

___________________________________________________________________________

1.	Meeting Information

1.1	This meeting

-	Schedule : Yokohama, JAPAN, 11:00 – 18:00 on 20th and 9:00 – 10:30 on 21st April 1999
-	Chairman : Mr Kiyohito NAGATA (NTT DoCoMo).
-	The number of participants : 25 approximately
-	Participants list : Annex 1
-	Approved agenda : Annex 2
-	Documents list : Annex 3

1.2	Next meeting

- Next meeting scheduled : 14 – 16 June 1999 in US

2.  Presentations and Discussions

2.1	SAR requirements

2.1.1	Inputs from individual member

•	Tdoc T2-99383  “ Report on SAR requirements and regulations in different regions ”  [ERICSSON]
The present document provides information on radio frequency (RF) exposure limits and assessment methods for IMT-2000 terminals. It summarises international, regional and national recommendations, standards and regulations relevant to current and future mobile communication devices. It refers to recommendations, standards and regulations that already exist. 
IEC will most probably also start developing an international product standard for mobile communication terminals in 1999.
Comments
-	Concerning RF exposures, it is enough to describe in this report. 
-	The situation in Korea should be described in this report, if possible.
-	RF exposure and so on has been to be studied in Korea. 
-	After the completion of this report, the comments from the appropriate person of each company should be asked. 
-	In general more time may be required to get the approval by upper groups. 
Conclusions
-	This report is approved to be sent to T2 for approval. But the approval of TSG-T will be postponed if it will be required.

2.2	Electrical safety requirements

2.2.1	Inputs from individual member

•	Tdoc T2-99330  “ European Union Declaration for telecommunications products ” [Siemens]
•	Tdoc T2-99331  “ Product Safety ”  [Siemens]

•	Tdoc T2-99333  “ Suggested Approach for handling EMC/Safety Requirements ”  [TSG-RAN-WG4]
-	EMC issues should be discussed within TSG-T1.

•	Tdoc T2-99336  “ Report on electrical safety requirements ”  [TOSHIBA]
•	Tdoc T2-99337  “ First complete draft on electrical safety report ”  [TOSHIBA]
This report is mainly focused on national standards of each country corresponding to IEC60950.
To grasp the current deviations in each country, IEC has already collected the information among the countries taking part in the IEC activity and issues the results. This publication is called CB Bulletin and it is updated once a year.
Comments
-	If we will treat the safety requirements for only mobile terminals, the deviations will be so close. 
-	Mobile phone would be tested by IEC60950 if necessary in the future. That is the reason the differences from each region are included in this report. But it has been done by IEC. 
-	In the report of the safety requirements, the current situation on this issue should be described. 
-	The intention of this report is to inform the electrical safety world-wide situation to 3GPP members. 
-	The difference of the declaration should be described. 
Conclusions
-	The report should be created on electrical safety.
-	Tdoc T2-99337 will be used as a base document incorporating with the information in Tdoc330,331.

2.3	 General features (Terminal capabilities)

2.3.1	LS from other WGs

•	Tdoc T2-99398  “ Answer from S1 chairman on Terminal Capabilities ”  [TSG-S1 chairman]
S1 has received this LS from T2 after their last meeting (10-12 March), so have not had an opportunity to study its implications or to prepare a response. S1 does not now specify terminal requirements separately. Nevertheless, S1 does have interest in this matter and would be most interested to receive information on the latest position of T2 and other groups for consideration at their meeting in May.

•	Tdoc T2-99360  “ LS from TSG RAN WG1 on UE physical layer capabilities ”  [TSG-RAN-WG1]
From the next R1 meeting, the LS will be sent to T2. RG1 considers it necessary to define “fundamental physical layer features” which may not be part of the physical layer baseline implementation capabilities. 

•	Tdoc T2-99361  “ LS from TSG RAN WG4 on Baseline Terminal Capabilities ”  [TSG-RAN-WG4]
Chiprate, frequency bands, and UE maximum output power are described in this LS.

•	Tdoc T2-99363  “ LS from TSG RAN WG3 on Terminal Capabilities ”  [TSG-RAN-WG3]
No terminal capabilities were identified that were within the scope of TSG RAN WG3. R3 asked to clarify the definition of the term “terminal” and “UE”.
Comments
-	The definition of “terminal” should be defined to avoid ambiguity.
-	In GSM specifications, the terminologies are included.
Conclusions
-	SWG6 asks T2 to send a LS to SA endorsed by TSG-T for requesting one common specification containing all needed definition of terminology.

•	Tdoc T2-99397  “ LS from RAN2 on  Baseline Implementation Capabilities ”  [TSG-RAN2]
Comments
-  There is no identification as mandatory or optional.

•	Tdoc T2-99332  “ LS to TSG-T on Terminal Capabilities ”  [TSG-S4]
•	Tdoc T2-99389  “TSG-S4 Multimedia Discussions Summary”  [TSG-S4 chairman]
The table first lists any capability to be mandatory supported by any 3G Terminal supporting the related Service Capability, i.e. speech and circuit switched multimedia service H.324 based service.

•	Tdoc T2-99388  “ Reply from TSG-N2 on terminal capabilities ”  [TSG-N2]
N2 does not foresee any specific requirements for terminal capabilities for the work of TSG-N2.
Comments
-  The issue of USSD should be treated within TSG-N2.
Conclusion
-  The issue of USSD should be included the common LS answer from T2.

•	Tdoc T2-99399  “ LS from CN3 on Terminal Capabilities ”  [TSG-CN3]
Regarding the facsimile service N3 is already able to provide input. In the domain of service capabilities two mechanisms have been identified (as documented in 22.45):
•	a store & forward mechanism (according to T.37)
•	a real-time service
Comments
-	The answer only for non transparent data service should be come from CN3.

•	Tdoc T2-99435  “Terminal Capabilities within T2 – suggested starting point”  [BT]

Conclusion
-	SWG6 asks other SWGs to identify the terminal capabilities in each SWG’s technical domain.

2.3.2	Report from other WGs

•	Tdoc T2-99385  “WI for Terminal Capabilities”  [TSG-T#2]
It was skipped.

2.3.3	Inputs from individual member

•	Tdoc T2-99334  “Proposed update to report on Terminal Capabilities Requirements”  [Samsung]
The definitions are added. 
Comments
-	In section 4, the path after “ready for service” in the diagram shall be re-considered.
-	In section 5, the reason why only Dual mode with GSM is described in this document is that there is no clear requirements for dual mode terminal with 2G except GSM in SA documents.
Conclusion
-  Table of contents of this report should be created as soon as possible for showing the total final image of this report, so service capabilities and how to handle with received LSs from other WGs should be included. More discussion will be continued by the e-mail reflector.

•	Tdoc T2-99335  “Proposed revision of the work item on terminal capabilities”  [Samsung]
This is a revised WI accounting current SWG6 situation under Forth-Florida adhoc meeting conclusion.
Comments
-	Concerning work items, S1 has discussed proposed WI. They continue to make sure the service capabilities for being suitable for T2.
-	The revised schedule should be described.
Conclusion
-	Mr.Bishop was selected as a rapporteur of the report of terminal capabilities.
-	Time schedule should be changed as below.
    T2      : Review of lists of service and baseline capabilities --- May 99  June 99
    Each WG : List implementation capability for each service capability --- June 99  Sep 99
    T2       : Review of lists --- July 99  Sep 99
    Each WG : Definition of minimum sets --- Sep 99  Oct 99
    T1       : Definition of  terminal conformance test --- Dec 99 (No change)

•	Tdoc T2-99338  “Proposed LSs on terminal capabilities”  [NTT DoCoMo]
The need for common understanding of the approach to its completion has been found because more detailed identifications in accordance with the classification of services are required.
Comments
-	In the LS to SA or S1, the y-axis of the table in ANNEX B shall be kept blanc.
-	But S1 does have interest in this matter and would be most interested to receive information on the latest position of T2 and other groups for consideration at their meeting in May. T2 should show them our concrete work image.
-	To accelerate the work in SA and S1, each member needs to co-operate with their delegates in SA and S1.
-	Also, T2 can ask SA and S1 to accelerate their work.
-	It should be given in the top-down way in the basis, but both top-down and bottom-up processes should work well to discuss and promote the work.
Conclusion
-	Create LS to reply to other WGs of the progress of the SWG6 work, and LS to SA or S1 to encourage their further works.
-	New adhoc for writing LSs above will be created. It will start at 8:00 on 21st April.

3.	Outputs

1. Tdoc T2-99383  “ Report on SAR requirements and regulations in different regions ”
2. Tdoc T2-99440  “ Proposed LS on terminal capabilities (Report of the current situation) “
3. Tdoc T2-99441  “ Proposed LS on service capabilities “

Annex 1 : Participants list

NAME	COMPANY	E-MAIL	
ABE Seiji	NTT DOCOMO	abe@cet.yrp.nttdocomo.co.jp	
AFCHAR Ramin		ramin.afchar@d2privat.de	
GRONGQIST Annete	Sonera Ltd	annette.grongvist@sonera.fi	
ARIMITSU Kazuhiro	NEC	arimistu@ccmail.mcd.yh.nec.co.jp	
BISHOP Craig	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS RESERCH INSTITUTE	ckbishop@aol.com	
BRATT Gunilla	ERICSSON	gunilla.bratt@ecs.ericsson.se	
DESCHERES Eric	Philips	eric.descheres@Pme.pcc.philips.com	
FERNANDES Edgar	MOTOROLA	edgar.fernandes@europe27.mot.com	
GRASSOT Francors	Bouygues Telecom	frg@rigeltelecom.com	
HARMA Esa	NOKIA MOBILE PHONES	esa.harma@nmp.nokia.com	
HASHIMOTO Kazuya	NEC TECHNOLOGIES UK	kazuya.hashimoto@nectech.co.uk	
HOLLEY Kevin	BT	Kevin.holley@bt.com	
IIMORI Eiji	TOSHIBA	iimori@msrd.hino.toshiba.co.jp	
IWANE Yasushi	MITSUBISHI	iwane@cew.melco.co.jp	
IWASA Masaki	MOTOROLA JAPAN	RTY868@email.mot.com	
KANNO Hiroshi	FUJITSU LIMITED	kanno@mcws.ts.fujitsu.co.jp	
KOHATA Tomizo	PANASONIC	tommy@qm.mci.mei.co.jp	
NAGAREDA Shunichiro	Panasonic	shun-Ichiro.nagareda@yrp.mci.mei.co.jp	
NAGATA Kiyohito	NTT DOCOMO	nagata@cet.yrp.nttdocomo.co.jp	
NEIRA Elena	ERICSSON	Elena.neira@nrj.ericsson.se	
NISHIDA Masaki	SHARP	nishi@trl.mkhar.sharp.co.jp	
NODA Chie	DOCOMO EUROPE	noda@docomo.fr	
RYLANDER Dan	ERICSSON	dan.rylander@ecs.ericsson.se	
SAEKI Hidekazu	NTT DOCOMO	saeki@cet.yrp.nttdocomo.co.jp	
SHIMIZU Toshihiro	Matsushita Communication Ind.	toshi.shimizu@mci.co.uk	
SOOD Prem	SHARP	pls.@sharpplabs.com	
Van De Berg Peter	ERICSSON	Peter.undeberg@ecs.ericsson.se	
URIYA Susumu	NEC	uriya@ccmail.mcd.yh.nec.co.jp	
VOSKAR Paul	NOKIA	paul.voskar@nmp.nokia.com	
MINAMI Yoichiro	NEC	minami@ccmail.mcd.yh.nec.co.jp	

Annex 2 : Approved agenda

Tuesday 20th April (11:00~12:30)
1.	Opening of the meeting
2.	Approval of the agenda  --------------------------------------------- 339
3.	Registration and allocation of input documents 
4.	Last meeting report   -------------------------------------------------- 283
6.	Electrical safety requirements
6.1.	    Presentation of inputs ---------------------------------------- 330, 331,333, 336, 337
6.2.	    Completion of first complete draft 
6.3.	    Discussion for future work 

Tuesday 20th April (14:00~15:30)
5.	SAR requirements
5.1.	    Presentation of inputs --------------------------------------- 383
5.2.	    Completion of the report on SAR requirements 
5.3.	    Discussion for future work 

Tuesday 20th April (16:00~18:00)
7.	General features (Terminal capabilities)
7.1.	    Liaison statements from other WGs ---------------- 332, 360, 361, 363, 388, 397, 398, 399
7.2.	    Review of reports from other WGs ------------------ 389
7.3.	    Presentation inputs ------------------------------------- 334, 335, 338, 385
7.4.	    Discussion for future work 

Wednesday 21st April (09:00~10:30)
8.	Approval of outputs
8.1.	Documents delivery
Report on SAR requirements for approval of TSG-T2 
First complete draft on electrical safety requirements 
8.2.	 Liaison statements  
8.3.	 Meeting report for TSG-T2 
9.	Any other business ----------------------------------------------- 329
10.	Future meetings
11.	Closing the meeting

Annex 3 : Documents list

STC_DOC	Subject	Source	Agenda Item	Status	
T2-99283	Report of SWG6#1 (Terminal features and performance)	SWG6	4		
T2-99329	TSG-T work program	T2 secretary	9		
T2-99330	European Union Declaration for telecommunications products	Siemens	6.1		
T2-99331	Product Safety	Siemens	6.1		
T2-99332	LS to TSG-T on Terminal Capabilities	TSG-S4	7.1		
T2-99333	Suggested Approach for handling EMC/Safety Requirements In 3GPP standards	NTTDoCoMo a.o.	6.1		
T2-99334	Proposed update to report on Terminal Capabilities Requirements	Samsung	7.3		
T2-99335	Proposed revision of the work item on terminal capabilities	Samsung	7.3		
T2-99336	Report on electrical safety requirements	TOSHIBA	6.1		
T2-99337	First complete draft on electrical safety report	TOSHIBA	6.1		
T2-99338	Proposed LSs on terminal capabilities	NTT DoCoMo	7.3		
T2-99339	Draft agenda of SWG6	SWG6 Chairman	2		
T2-99360	LS from TSG RAN WG1 on UE physical layer capabilities	TSG RAN WG1	7.1		
T2-99361	LS from TSG RAN WG4 on Baseline Terminal Capabilities	TSG RAN WG4	7.1		
T2-99363	LS from TSG RAN WG3 on Terminal Capabilities	TSG RAN WG3	7.1		
T2-99383	Report on SAR requirements and regulations in different regions	ERICSSON	5.1		
T2-99385	WI for Terminal Capabilites (= T2-99142)	TSG T#2	7.3		
T2-99388	Reply from TSG-N2 on terminal capabilities	TSG-N2 chairman	7.1		
T2-99389	TSG-S4 Multimedia Discussions Summary	TSG-S4 Chairman	7.2		
T2-99397	LS from RAN2 on  Baseline Implementation Capabilities	RAN2	7.1		
T2-99398	Answer from S1 chairman on Terminal Capabilities	S1 chairman	7.1		
T2-99399	LS from CN3 on Terminal Capabilities	CN3	7.1		
T2-99435	Terminal Capabilities within T2 – suggested starting point	BT	7.1		
T2-99436					
T2-99437	Proposed LS on terminal capabilities (Report of the current situation)	NTT DoCoMo			
T2-99438	Proposed LS on service capabilities	NTT DoCoMo,Sharp			
T2-99439	Report of SWG6	SWG6			
T2-99440	Proposed LS on terminal capabilities (Report of the current situation)	SWG6			
T2-99441	Proposed LS on service capabilities	SWG6			
T2-99442	Report of SWG6 (revised)	SWG6