001 -r2 available template open 002 -r4 available template open 003 -r2 available no template issue 004 -r2 available no template issue 005 -r2 available no template issue 006 -r2 available no template issue Huawei: move everything to R20 Nokia: need to make decision 007 -r2 available no template issue 008 -r4 no template issue BSI: formatting issue in first change. bullet point in wrong format -> format B1 010 - no changes 011 -r2 available 012 -r3 ZTE: can be noted 013 -r2 available Huawei: comments on black box can be removed 014 discussion on template BSI: no strong opinion, heading procedure and execution steps redundant Nokia: align with what scases have, so pre-condition / execution steps QC: keep procedure and execuation steps, say it is optional heading, keep new E//: prefer to stay without Procedure and execution steps DCM: say this heading is deprecated, then update SCAS as they go along E//: prefer to keep the original submission, and update as we update the SCASes QC: ok with deprecated, keeps the procedure the same, doesn't force updates of the specs TMo: ok with deprecated, 515 leaves out the word steps Nokia: ok to fix this ->revision r19 vs r20 Huawei: r20, rapporteur would include the agreed content into the draft CRs Nokia: why not close the documents in this meeting? what is the benefit of waiting Huawei: if r19 is implemented, the baseline for r20 needs to be implementation Nokia: then pCR would have been better TMo: not all of these CRs are against living documents Huawei: almost all TMo: 515 doesn't have a living document E//: agree as CR those that don't have a living document. Oppo: what is target date for conversion to CRs Huawei: any time this year, closing time Q3 Oppo: then no need to convert to CR by Goa meeting Rajvel: way forward to create R19 CR or pCR from this meeting Oppo: the CRs were against R20 TMo: specs with no further changes in R19 VC: question to GSMA/BSI: do the changes need to be in R19 Nokia: as early as possible from GSMA perspective BSI: similar opinion, suggest proposal from TMo VC: CRs against documents without living doc, pCRs against living docs, endorse and then block approve Rajvel: endorse, no need for living document, rapporteur can do it